Let us take Mr. Frazer's examples.[35]

1. A Congo people believe that the world would perish if their chitome,

or pontiff, died a natural death. So he was clubbed or strangled by

his successor. But what god is incarnate in the chitome? None is

mentioned.[36] The king himself 'is regarded as a god in earth, and all

powerful in heaven.'

2. The Ethiopian kings of Meroe were worshipped as gods, but were

ordered to die by the priests, on the authority of an alleged oracle

of the gods, 'whenever the priests chose.' That they first showed any

signs of decay 'we may conjecture.'[37] We have no evidence except that

the priests put an end to the king 'whenever they chose.' And, far

from alleging the king's decay or bad crops as the regular recognised

reason, they alleged a special oracle of the gods.

3. When the King of Unyoro, in Central Africa, is old, or very ill, his

_wives_ kill him (an obvious reason readily occurs: it is the wives,

not a god, who need a more spirited person), alleging an old prophecy

that the throne will pass from the dynasty if the king dies a natural

death. But it is not here shown that this king is a man-god of either

species; and the prophecy does not concern injury to a god, or to

magical _rapport_.[38]

4. The King of Kibanga, on the upper Congo, is killed by sorcerers

when he 'seems near his end.' So are old dogs and cats and horses in

this country, and peasants are even thought to provide euthanasia for

kinsfolk 'near their end.' If the King of Kibanga is a man-god, Mr.

Frazer does not say so.

5. If wounded in war the King of Gingero is killed by his comrades or

kinsfolk, even if he be reluctant. The reason alleged is 'that he may

not die by the hands of his enemies.' Did Saul, Brutus, and many other

warriors who refuse to survive wounds and defeat die as man-gods? Is

the King of Gingero a man-god?

6. Chaka, King of the Zulus, used hair-dye, having a great aversion to

grey hairs. The Zulus, a warlike people, would not elect, or accept, a

greyhaired king, and, though I know no instance of slaying a Zulu king

because he was old, Mr. Isaacs (1836) says that grey hair is 'always

followed by the death of the monarch.' Even if an historical example

were given, a warlike race merely superannuates a disabled war-leader

in the only safe way.

7. At last we reach a king-man-god in Sofala, who, according to Dos

Santos, was the only god of the Caffres, and was implored to give good

weather.[39] A modern Zulu told Dr. Callaway that 'when people say

the heaven is the chief's they do not believe what they say.'[40] The

Sofalese, or rather their neighbours, were perhaps more credulous; and

it appears to have been a custom or law among them that a blemished

king should kill himself, though a reforming prince denounced this as

insanity, and altered the law. We are told that the king-god of the

Sofalese was under this law, and a neighbouring king (who is nowhere

said to have been a man-god) was. But what god, if any, was incarnate

in this man-god, if he _was_ a man-god, like his neighbour?[41]

8. The Spartans were warned by an oracle against a lame king, as the

Mackenzies were warned by the Brahan seer against a set of physically

blemished lairds. The seer's prophecy was fulfilled.[42] We do not hear

that the Spartans Killed any lame king.

9. The King of the Eyeos is warned to kill himself, warned by a gift

of parrot's eggs, 'when the people have conceived an opinion of his

ill-government.' His wives strangle him, and his son succeeds, or did

so before 1774, when the King refused to die at the request of his

ministers. To make a case, it must be shown that the king was a man-god

of one or other variety. He is, in fact, merely king while popular,

'holding the reins of government no longer than whilst he merits the

approval of his people.'

10. The old Prussians were governed by a king called God's Mouth. 'If

he wanted to leave a good name behind,' when weak and ill he burned

himself to death, in front of a holy oak.

11. In Quilacare, in Southern India, the king cut himself to pieces,

before an idol, after a twelve years' reign. We are not told that he

was an incarnation of the god, if any, incorporated in, or represented

by, the idol.

12. The King of Calicut, on the Malabar coast, used to cut his

throat in public after a twelve years' reign. About 1680-1700 this

was commuted. If any man could cut his way through 30,000 or 40,000

guardsmen, to kill the king, he succeeded. Three men tried, but numbers

over-powered them. Other examples are given in which every regicide

might become king, if he could, like Macbeth. It was held, at Passier,

that God would not allow the king to be killed if he did not richly

deserve it. These kings are not said to incarnate gods.

13. Ibn Batuta once saw a man throw a rope into the air, and climb up

it. Another man followed and cut the first to pieces, which fell on

the ground, were reunited, and no harm done. This veracious traveller

also saw a man, at Java, kill himself for love of the Sultan, thereby

securing liberal pensions for his family, as his father and grandfather

had done before him. 'We may conjecture that formerly the Sultans of

Java, like the Kings of Quilacare and Calicut, were bound to cut their

own throats at the end of a fixed term of years,'[43] but that they

deputed the duty to one certain family. We _may_ conjecture, but,

considering the lack of evidence, and the stories that Ibn Batuta

freely tells, I doubt! Ibn, at the Court of Delhi, saw cups and dishes

I at a wish appear, and at a wish retire.' Did the Sultan of Java

incarnate a god?

14. This case is so extremely involved and hypothetical (it concerns

Sparta, where I never heard that the king was a man-god) that the

reader must be referred to the original.[44]

Meanwhile the list of instances is numerically respectable. But are

the instances to the point? Do they prove a practice of killing a

royal man-god, for the purpose of helping a god incarnate in him, or

even of preventing his magical power (or _mana_, in New Zealand) from

waning? They rather prove regicide as a form of superannuation, or as

the result of the machinations of priests, or of public discontent.

Above all, they do not demonstrate that the king is ever killed as an

incarnation of a deity who needs a sturdier person to be incarnate in.

So recalcitrant is the evidence, that of all Mr. Frazer's kings who are

here said to be gods, or to incarnate gods, not one is here said to be

put to death by his worshippers.[45] And of all his kings who are here

said to be put to death, not one is here said to incarnate a god.[46]

Such are the initial difficulties of the theory: to which we may add

that elderly men are notoriously killed by many savages just because

they are elderly, whether they are kings or commoners.

Mr. Frazer's point is that Christ died in 'a halo of divinity,'

visible 'wherever men had heard the old, old story of the dying and

rising god.'[47] But, apart from other objections already urged, Mr.

Frazer's present instances do not contain one example of a 'dying and

rising god,' stated to be represented by a living man who is therefore

killed; even if there are one or two cases of a slain king who is a

medicine-man, sorcerer, or cosmic sensitive. Thus the argument fails

from the first. Christ is to be reckoned divine as representing a king

who was killed as an incarnation of a god. But of regicide for this

reason no proof is afforded, as far as I can see.

Magic and Religion · 第 18 / 74 题