HIGH CHURCH AND LOW CHURCH.

_A Universal History of Party; with the Origin of Party Names_[1] would

form an acceptable addition to literary history: "N. & Q." has contributed

towards such a work some disquisitions on our party names _Whig_ and

_Tory_, and _The Good Old Cause_. Such names as _Puritan_, _Malignant_,

_Evangelical_[2], can be traced up to their first commencement, but some

obscurity hangs on the mintage-date of the names we are about to consider.

As a matter of fact, the distinction of _High Church_ and _Low Church_

always existed in the Reformed English Church, and the history of these

parties would be her history. But the _names_ were not coined till the

close of the seventeenth century, and were not stamped in full relief as

party-names till the first year of Queen Anne's reign.

In October, 1702, Anne's first Parliament and Convocation assembled:

"From the deputies in Convocation at this period, the appellations

_High Church_ and _Low Church_ originated, and they were afterwards

used to distinguish the clergy. It is singular that the bishops[3] were

ranked among {118} the Low Churchmen (see Burnet, v. 138.; Calamy, i.

643.; Tindal's _Cont._, iv. 591.)"--Lathbury's _Hist. of the

Convocation_, Lond. 1842, p. 319.

Mr. Lathbury is a very respectable authority in matters of this kind, but

if he use "originated" in its strict sense, I am inclined to think he is

mistaken; as I am tolerably certain that I have met with the words several

years before 1702. At the moment, however, I cannot lay my hands on a

passage to support this assertion.

The disputes in Convocation gave rise to a number of pamphlets, such as _A

Caveat against High Church_, Lond. 1702, and _The Low Churchmen vindicated

from the unjust Imputation of being No Churchmen, in Answer to a Pamphlet

called "The Distinction of High and Low Church considered:_" Lond. 1706,

8vo. Dr. Sacheverell's trial gave additional zest to the _dudgeon

ecclesiastick_, and produced a shower of pamphlets. I give the title of one

of them: _Pulpit War, or Dr. S----l, the High Church Trumpet, and Mr.

H----ly, the Low Church Drum, engaged by way of Dialogue_, Lond. 1710, 8vo.

To understand the cause of the exceeding bitterness and virulence which

animated the parties denominated _High Church_ and _Low Church_, we must

remember that until the time of William of Orange, the Church of England,

_as a body_--her sovereigns and bishops, her clergy and laity--comes under

the _former_ designation; while those who sympathised with the Dissenters

were comparatively few and weak. As soon as William was head of the Church,

he opened the floodgates of Puritanism, and admitted into the church what

previously had been more or less external to it. This element, thus made

part and parcel of the Anglican Church, was denominated _Low Church_.

William supplanted the bishops and clergy who refused to take oaths of

allegiance to him as king _de jure_; and by putting Puritans in their

place, made the latter the dominant party. Add to this the feelings of

exasperation produced by the murder of Charles I., and the expulsion of the

Stuarts, and we have sufficient grounds, political and religious, for an

irreconcilable feud. Add, again, the reaction resulting from the overthrow

of the tyrannous hot-bed and forcing-system, where a sham conformity was

maintained by coercion; and the _Church-Papist_, as well as the

_Church-Puritans_, with ill-concealed hankering after the mass and the

preaching-house, by penal statutes were forced to do what their souls

abhorred, and play the painful farce of attending the services of "The

Establishment."

A writer in a _High Church_ periodical of 1717 (prefacing his article with

the passage from Proverbs vi. 27.) proceeds:

"The old way of attacking the Church of England was by mobs and

bullies, and hard sounds; by calling _Whore_, and _Babylon_, upon our

worship and liturgy, and kicking out our clergy as _dumb dogs_: but now

they have other irons in the fire; a new engine is set up under the

cloak and disguise of _temper, unity, comprehension, and the Protestant

religion_. Their business now is not to storm the Church, but to _lull

it to sleep_: to make us relax our care, quit our defences, and neglect

our safety.... These are the politics of their Popish fathers: when

_they_ had tried all other artifices, they at last resolved to sow

schism and division in the Church: and from thence sprang up this very

generation, who by a fine stratagem endeavoured to set us one against

the other, and they gather up the stakes. _Hence the distinction of

High and Low Church._"--_The Scourge_, p. 251.

In another periodical of the same date, in the Dedication "To the most

famous University of Oxford," the writer says:

"These enemies of our religious and civil establishment have

represented you as instillers of _slavish doctrines and principles_ ...

if to give to God and Cæsar his due be such tow'ring, and _High Church_

principles, I am sure St. Peter and St. Paul will scarce escape being

censured for _Tories_ and _Highflyers_."--_The Entertainer_, Lond.

1717.

"If those who have kept their first love, and whose robes have not been

defiled, endeavour to stop these innovations and corruptions that their

enemies would introduce, they are blackened for _High Church Papists_,

favourers of I know not who, and fall under the public

resentment."--_Ib._ p. 301.

I shall now give a few extracts from _Low Church_ writers (quoted in _The

Scourge_), who thus designate their opponents:

"A pack or party of scandalous, wicked, and profane men, who

appropriate to themselves the name of _High Church_ (but may more

properly be said to be Jesuits or Papists in masquerade), do take

liberty to teach, preach, and print, publickly and privately, sedition,

contentions, and divisions among the Protestants of this

kingdom."--_Motives to Union_, p. 1.

"These men glory in their being members of the _High Church_ (Popish

appellation, and therefore they are the more fond of that); but these

pretended sons are become her persecutors, and they exercise their

spite and lies both on the living and the dead."--_The Snake in the

Grass brought to Light_, p. 8.

{119}

"Our common people of the _High Church_ are as ignorant in matters of

religion as the bigotted Papists, which gives great advantage to our

Jacobite and Tory priests to lead them where they please, or to mould

them into what shapes they please."--_Reasons for an Union_, p. 39.

"The minds of the populace are too much debauched already from their

loyalty by seditious arts of the _High Church faction_."--_Convocation

Craft_, p. 34.

"We may see how closely our present _Highflyers_ pursue the steps of

their Popish predecessors, in reckoning those who dispute the usurped

power of the Church to be hereticks, schismaticks, or what else they

please."--_Ib._ p. 30.

"All the blood that has been spilt in the late unnatural rebellion, may

be very justly laid at the doors of the _High Church

clergy_."--_Christianity no Creature of the State_, p. 16.

"We see what the _Tory Priesthood_ were made of in Queen Elizabeth's

time, that they were ignorant, lewd, and seditious: and it must be said

of 'em that they are true to the stuff still."--_Toryism the Worst of

the Two_, p. 21.

"_The Tories_ and _High Church_, notwithstanding their pretences to

loyalty, will be found by their actions to be the greatest rebels in

nature."--_Reasons for an Union_, p. 20.

Notes and Queries, Number 197, August 6, 1853 A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc. · 第 3 / 128 题