CHAPTER VI.

WITH the dawn of liberty in the republican cities of Italy, we hail the

reappearance of the arts. Before the close of the thirteenth century,

Pisa, with the neighboring cities of Etruria, the ancient seats of

elegance, had already made progress in sculpture. The founder of this,

the primitive school of modern Europe, was Nicolo Pisano. The works of

this master, and those of his scholars, still remaining in his native

city, in Sienna, Arezzo, Pistoia, Orvieto, and Lucca, induce a very

high opinion indeed of the progress of the age. In the succeeding

century, the art was carried by his grandson, Andrea, to Florence,

the future head and fountain of art. Here, in 1350, was established

the first academy of design; and before the close of the century,

sculpture was firmly established, and far from unskilfully practised,

throughout a considerable portion of Italy. Nor was this the limit

of the influence, though, as upon its centre, the eye of history is

fixed chiefly here. Fraternities of itinerant sculptors carried their

art over Germany and France; and even in England the works of this

early school have been traced. In these countries the numerous Gothic

edifices, with their sculptured ornaments, furnished rich occasions for

the exercise of the art; but from this very circumstance it ceased, in

a certain degree, to be regarded as independent of architecture. In

Italy, private excellence was better preserved, and is easily traced.

But it was union with the grand moral and political principles of free

constitutions, that in Italy at once gave dignity to, and cherished the

progress of, the arts. In the ancient world we bade a common farewell

to freedom and to genius, nay, virtue at the same time would have

winged her flight, had she not found an asylum on earth in the bosom of

Christianity. Upon the ages now passing in review, when Freedom again

rises, we behold genius also revive, as if the sweeter sensibilities

and the manlier virtues had together slumbered through the long long

night of ignorance and of despotism. It is thus that spring, breathing

on bank and wild wood, unchains the bud and the blossom from the

tenderest floweret to the hardy oak.

In the progress of intelligence, the fifteenth century constitutes a

splendid era. Advances were then accomplished in moral, intellectual,

and political knowledge, which form the ground work of no

inconsiderable portion of modern science. In the arts of elegance,

especially in sculpture, the labours of this age will always hold

distinguished rank. In the first year of the century, we find six great

masters--competitors for the same public work--the bronze folding-doors

of the baptistry at Florence: Brunelleschi and Ghiberti, Florentines;

Jacomo della Quercia of Sienna; Nicolo Lamberti of Arezzo; Francisco

di Valdambrino, and Simon dei Colle, Tuscans. The competitors each

afterwards became the head of a flourishing school. Ghiberti, a youth

of twentythree, was the successful candidate; and the work thus

assigned to his superior merit, occupied forty years of his future

life, remaining still one of the proudest triumphs of modern talent.

The subjects are upon panels in relievo, representing historical

passages from the Old and New Testaments, and the same which were

afterwards declared worthy the gates of Paradise.

This era may be styled the commonwealth of sculpture; no single master

so far excelling his compeers as to impress upon the art the stamp and

bearing of one individual style. But among this crowd of illustrious

contemporaries, Donatello, born in 1383, and already an eminent artist

at the age of twenty, stands forth pre-eminently conspicuous by the

magnitude and excellence of his own labours, as also by the number and

merits of his pupils. His performances, in almost every variety of

material, are scattered over all Italy; the best are in Florence, but

the equestrian statue of Erasmus, Duke of Narni, in that city, merits

attention as the first attempt of such magnitude in the revival of art.

The numerous scholars of Donatello may be divided into two classes.

The first comprehends those who, without producing much of their own,

have attained reputation as fellow-labourers in the most considerable

undertakings of their master. The legitimate disciples of Donatello,

however, consists of those who, without servilely following in the

train of their instructer, preserved, or even in some respects

improved, the science derived from his precepts. These include most of

the leading masters of the latter part of the century, for in every

town of importance he had left works and planted a school. After the

demise of Ghiberti in 1455, and of Donatello in 1466, the art was far

from languishing in the hands of their successors, and especially under

Andrea du Verrochio, towards the close of the century. In the academy

founded by the Medici, many of the most eminent men of the next century

are to be found, as yet youthful though not undistinguished pupils.

In reviewing the ages which have been made to pass before us in their

leading characters, the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries, we

perceive, may be termed the infancy of sculpture; with the fifteenth

begins its manhood, while in some respects full vigour was attained

even at the close of this period. During the two preceding centuries,

we find views frequently derived from the antique, of which many

specimens were brought directly from the East to Pisa. A character

of truth and simplicity, faithful imitation of nature, and just

expression, visibly begin from the time of Nicolo, whose own style

indeed is remarkable for sweetness and absence of all pretension. The

effect is never daringly ventured, but is sought to be discovered by

patient reiteration of effort and persevering imitation. At first,

therefore, no acknowledged principles of taste or of composition can

be perceived; a degree of restraint and meagreness consequently long

pervade the early labours of sculpture. But if in these the creative

faculties have seldom been conspicuously exerted; if the fancy be

rarely excited by novelty or variety of invention, the heart, even in

the sculpture of the fourteenth century, is often awakened to deep

feeling by unexpected beauties of the sweetest power, arising from

a diligent imitation of nature. The art being chiefly dedicated to

devotion, and to the memory of departed virtue, an air of dignified

sincerity, a touching portraiture of the gentler affections, diffuse

over the mind of the spectator a melancholy yet pleasing serenity, to

be felt rather than described--which give back the images of our own

sensibilities in all their simple, unpretending reality. The succeeding

age assumes a style and character more elevated, without being less

true. The simplicity is refined--equally removed from affectation

as from poverty--the skill of hand great, the execution bold and

felicitous; yet still exercised as a means, never as an instrument to

astonish or surprise. Nature is imitated faithfully, under the least

remote appearances, and by the simplest expression--the manner never

allures from the subject. The great proportion of the sculpture of

this century being in bronze, may account for a style of execution

in some respects harsh, with a degree of restraint, and occasionally

defective in energy. As respects intellectual merits, the design is

always chaste, often extremely elegant; the composition judicious,

seldom contrasted or grouped artificially. The expression is sweet and

calmly dignified, for rarely is strongly marked passion attempted.

No decided aims at representation of abstract or ideal beauty can be

observed; the powers of fancy are never presumed upon--seldom roused

by remote associations. But the mind of the artist, now no longer

entirely engrossed in mechanical detail, or confined by difficulties of

mere representation, expatiates, selects, combines; if the forms and

conceptions are not invested with the sublimity of ideal elevation, the

beautiful models of real existence are imitated not unsuccessfully.

Were the extent and object of art confined to simple imitation, the aim

of the sculptor would now nearly be attained. Yet, judging even by the

principles of the most refined criticism, one department, during the

fifteenth century, acquired a perfection which has not been surpassed,

rarely equalled, in succeeding times. Donatello and Ghiberti, the

former in high, the latter in low relief, have left models which

it does not easily appear possible to excel. The best of these are

Donatello's, in the church of San Lorenzo, representing the most

memorable events in the life of the Saviour; and Ghiberti's, already

noticed, on the gates of the baptistry at Florence. The subjects seem

to have imparted to the genius of the sculptors a portion of their own

sacred dignity, and calm and holy feeling. Indeed, to the influence of

religious impressions, we attribute, to a great degree, the improvement

of sculpture during this age, the principal undertakings being from

Scripture.

History of Sculpture, Painting, and Architecture · 第 6 / 17 章