CHAPTER VIII.

SOME LESSER STARS IN THE OPERATIC FIRMAMENT.

(_b_) THE GERMAN SCHOOL (KEISER TO NICOLAI).

Keiser and his successors—Hiller—Real German

opera—Spohr—Marschner—Operatic interest

not centred in Germany at this time.

[Sidenote: =Keiser and his Successors=]

A good start was given to German opera, as we have already shown, by

Keiser, who wrote over one hundred operas for the Hamburg house. The

fact that after his decease the centre of interest shifts partly to

England (where Handel was at work), and still more to Italy, does not

mean that German composers were idle. True, many of them were writing

operas on the Italian plan, and therefore must be classed with the

Italian school, and even the greatest sons of German soil were content

to produce their masterpieces in foreign capitals rather than at home.

Thus it is that we find Gluck bringing out all his important works in

Vienna or Paris; Mozart his at Prague, Munich, or Vienna; Beethoven his

only specimen in Vienna.

The work done on German soil must not, however, be passed over lightly.

Stars of the second magnitude, such as Hasse (1699-1783), who wrote

over one hundred operas, and Graun (1701-1759) have their place among

the constellations. They are not important either in their influence

upon opera generally nor upon German opera in particular, since their

work was almost exclusively done to Italian libretti on the prevailing

Italian model; but they both had great influence upon Adam Hiller, who

has a distinct place in the history of opera.

[Sidenote: =Hiller, 1728-1804=]

For it is very largely to Hiller that the credit of the foundation of

the “Singspiel” may be allotted. This form of opera, to which we must,

of necessity, allude frequently, seeing that it was the form very

largely in vogue at the time of Mozart, Beethoven, and Weber, although

possibly derived in the first instance from the French operetta, soon

justified its existence as a distinctly German form of art.

Hiller raised it from a mere collection of songs, and adopted an able

and dramatic method in setting the words to forms of larger outline and

of more complex development. His chief works are _Der Dorfbarbier_ and

_Die Jagel_, both of which sometimes gain a hearing to-day. Without

doubt he had something to do with the success attained by Weber and

Mozart, for although their settings of similar “song-plays” are

infinitely superior, their work is certainly more sure by reason of the

leadership he gave them. The pioneer in a new land seldom reaches its

utmost limits.

[Sidenote: =Real German Opera=]

Hiller’s operettas were German and not Italian, and that also must

have affected Mozart and Weber, for they were able to notice the

deeper appeal made on a German audience by a performance in the

vernacular, and both eventually followed suit. Until the production of

_Der Freischütz_ at the Berlin Opera House in 1821 there was little

to justify such a course, but after that date we find many composers

writing German operas, and founding a school of composition which

includes such names as Spohr, Marschner, Lortzing, Lindpaintner, and

Nicolai.

[Sidenote: =Spohr, 1784-1859=]

Spohr’s greatest operatic work, _Faust_, was actually staged at

Frankfort two years before _Der Freischütz_ first saw the light of day.

Although very popular both in Germany and England for many years, this

opera rarely gets a performance now, it having been entirely eclipsed

by Gounod’s work of the same title.

[Illustration: J. A. HILLER.]

Besides _Faust_, Spohr wrote many other operas, following Weber to

a large extent in romanticism of method, although the peculiarly

chromatic genius of his music never leaves one in doubt as to its

authorship. The most successful of these are _Zemir and Azor_,

_Jessonda_, _Der Berggeist_, and _Der Alchymist_, all almost entirely

forgotten now. The popular song with sopranos, “Rose Softly Blooming,”

comes from the first-named of these.

[Sidenote: =Marschner, 1796-1861=]

A still more faithful follower in the footsteps of Weber was Heinrich

Marschner, who loved the demoniacal and the weird, and gloated over

them in his music. His operas, the most famous of which are _Der

Vampyr_, _Hans Heiling_, and _The Templar and the Jewess_ (founded on

Scott’s _Ivanhoe_), still have a hold on German affections. The study

of _Hans Heiling_ is held to have had a great influence over Wagner at

the time he was composing _The Flying Dutchman_.

Many composers of this school and this date remain in our memories

through the more or less frequent performances of their most successful

work. Among such may be named Lortzing (1803-1852), composer of

_Peter the Shipwright_ (a story dealing with Peter the Great’s life

in the shipbuilder’s yard at Zaandam); Flotow (1812-83), composer of

the tuneful and popular _Martha_; Kreutzer (1782-1849), Lindpaintner

(1791-1856), and Nicolai (1810-49). The overture to the last-named

composer’s _Merry Wives of Windsor_ is world famous. Peter Cornelius

(1824-74) and Goetz (1840-76) each composed a well-known opera, _The

Barber of Bagdad_ and _The Taming of the Shrew_ respectively.

[Sidenote: =Operatic interest not centred in Germany at this time=]

The fact that the Germans at this time did not produce composers of

greater operatic eminence is due largely to the fact that the grandeur

and charm of French grand opera was drawing many devotees and many

composers to Paris. While Italy had its brilliant Rossini and Verdi

to uphold the traditions of national opera in their own land, there

was no composer of German opera on a like eminence, or one that could

successfully vie with the ever-increasing magnificence and interest of

the grand opera of Paris. To that brilliant episode in the story of the

opera we will now turn our attention.

The story of opera · 第 8 / 19 章