A.D. 1787.

On May 31, the Reader in Chemistry, Thomas Beddoes, M.D., of Pembroke

College, issued a printed Memorial to the Curators 'concerning the state

of the Bodleian Library, and the conduct of the Principal Librarian.'

The utmost laxity appears from this statement to have prevailed with

regard to attendance, and to the hours of opening the Library; the

Librarian was always absent on Saturdays and Mondays, as on those days

he was occupied in journeys to and from a curacy eleven miles distant,

which he held together with a living more remote; and the Library which

should then in summer have been opened at eight was found unopened

between nine and ten, and unopened also after University sermons. The

Librarian is charged besides with having discouraged readers by neglect

and incivility, with being very careless in regard to the value and

condition of books purchased by the Library[264], and with having but

little knowledge of foreign publications. An anecdote is related

(amongst others) of his lending _Cook's Voyages_, which had been

presented by King Geo. III, to the Rector of Lincoln College, and

telling him that the longer he kept it the better, 'for if it was known

to be in the Library, he (Mr. Price) should be perpetually plagued with

enquiries after it[265].' In consequence of these complaints, the

Curators, in 1788, prepared on their part a new form of Statute, while

the Heads of Houses prepared another. This separate action led to a

paper war between the two bodies, in which the Regius Professors of

Divinity, Law, Medicine, Hebrew and Greek, (Randolph, Vansittart,

Vivian, Blayney and Jackson) appeared on the Curators' side of the

question, and, as the Hebdomadal Board persisted in pressing their own

scheme, they at length (with the exception of Blayney) adopted the

strong step, on the day when the rival plan was proposed in Convocation

(June 23, 1788), of formally protesting before a notary public against

this violation of their privileges. The consequence was that the Statute

was withdrawn, and the proposal for a new code abandoned by both

parties. The chief points of difference were, that the Curators objected

to the proposal being put forward as 'cum consensu Curatorum' instead of

'ex relatione Curatorum,' to the increase of the Librarian's stipend to

£150, to the appointment of two Sub-librarians instead of one, and to

the leaving the appointment of these in the hands of the Librarian (in

accordance with Bodley's own Statute) instead of assigning it to the

Curators.

Eleven Arabic and Persian MSS. were given by Turner Camac, Esq., co.

Down.

A first part of a Catalogue of the Oriental MSS., comprehending those in

Hebrew, Chaldee, Syriac, Æthiopic, Arabic, Persian, Turkish and Coptic,

was issued in this year, in folio. It was compiled by John Uri, a

Hungarian, who had studied Oriental literature under Schultens, at

Leyden, and who was recommended for this purpose to Archbp. Secker, by

Sir Joseph Yorke, then Ambassador in the Netherlands. Many years were

occupied in the preparation of this volume, as Uri appears to have

commenced his work in 1766, his signature occurring in the 'Registrum

admissorum' under Feb. 17, in that year[266]. Sixty closely-printed

folio pages of corrections and additions are, however, supplied by Dr.

Pusey, in the second part of the Catalogue, which he completed after Dr.

Nicoll's death and published in 1835. In his preface to this part, Dr.

Pusey remarks that Uri frequently copied with carelessness; and that the

whole series of Arabic MSS. was found to need re-examination from the

discovery that all kinds of cheats and impositions had been played upon

all the purchasers of Eastern MSS., Pococke alone excepted, by the

cunning sellers with whom they dealt, particularly in the passing off of

supposititious works for genuine[267]. And upon carrying out this

re-examination, the following was found to be the result:--

'Varias errorum formas deprehendi, titulis nunc charta coopertis,

nunc atramento oblitis, nunc cultro pæne abrasis; auctorum porro

nominibus paullulum immutatis quo notiora quædam referrent; numeris

etiam, quibus singula volumina signata sunt, permutatis, quo quis

opus imperfectum pro integro habeat, paginis denique pauculis operi

alieno a fronte assutis.'

[264] Among other instances the purchase (in 1784) of Sir John Hill's

_Vegetable System_, at the cost of £140, is mentioned.

[265] It appears incidentally, from this pamphlet, that three o'clock

was the dinner-hour at almost every College at that time.

[266] He died suddenly at his lodgings in Oxford, Oct. 18, 1796, aged

upwards of seventy (_Gent. Magaz._, vol. lxvi. p. 884.)

[267] The late Dr. Simonides was evidently by no means the first in his

art, although probably _facile princeps_.

Annals of the Bodleian Library, Oxford, A.D. 1598-A.D. 1867 With a Preliminary Notice of the earlier Library founded in the Fourteenth Century · 第 139 / 564 题