A.D. 1719.

Dr. Hudson died, on Nov. 27, of dropsy. And at one o'clock on the

afternoon of the very next day, Joseph Bowles, M.A., of Oriel College,

was elected in his room.

The bitter terms in which Hearne frequently, in the course of his

_Diary_, condemns Hudson's management, or rather mismanagement, of the

Library, may be supposed to be owing in a considerable degree to

personal pique and quarrel[194]. But they meet with very singular and

abundant confirmation in the letter of Z. C. Uffenbach, quoted above (p.

130), when the writer expresses, in the following strong language, his

opinion of Hudson's neglect and incapacity, and of the general condition

of the Library under his management:--

'Perpende, quæso, mecum, vir eruditissime, quantus thesaurus ex

solius Bodleianæ Bibliothecæ codicibus elici possit, nisi

Proto-Bibliothecarii Hudson negligentia ac pertinacia obstaret. Is

enim muneri abunde satisfecisse, imo eximie ornasse Spartam videri

vult, dum tot annis unico scriptori, Thucydidem ejus puto, omni

Bibliothecæ cura plane abjecta, insudavit, cum hoc, quod supra dixi,

potius agendum fuisset. Nefandam hujus insignis Bibliothecæ sortem

(ignosce justæ indignationi) satis deplorare nequeo. Inculta plane

jacet, nemo ferme tanto thesauro uti, frui, gestit. Singulis sane

diebus per trium mensium spatium illam frequentavi, sed, ita me dii

ament, nunquam tot una vice homines in illa vidi quot numero sunt

Musæ, vel saltem artes liberales. De librorum studiosis loquor; nam

puerorum, muliercularum, rusticorum, hinc inde cursitantium,

voluminumque multitudinem per transennas spectantium mirantiumque,

cœtum excipio.... De Proto-bibliothecarii incuria jam dixi,

ejusque stupendam in historia literaria librariaque, inprimis extra

Insulam ultraque maria, ignorantiam taceo.'

Of Hearne, however, Uffenbach writes in the following different

strain:--

'Hîc scholaris, ut hîc loqui amant, esse solet, atque etiamnum est,

nomine Hearne, qui, præ reliquis, diligentiam suam non modo

scriptis, sed in novo etiam Bibliothecæ catalogo confitiendo, typis

proxime exscribendo, probavit; ast, quod dolendum, ad exemplum

prioris, qui satis jejunus, inconcinnus, erroribusque innumeris

scatens est.'

Hudson's successor, Bowles, had previously been his Assistant for some

years, and as, while Hearne was Under-keeper, he had come into sharp

collision with that irascible antiquary (see under 1715), his election

now was a matter of sore annoyance to the latter. Hearne dwells upon it

in his _Diary_ with great bitterness and at great length: 'Competitors

were Mr. Hall, of Queen's, and that pert conceited coxcomb Mr. Bowles

(who is not yet Regent Master) of Oriel College. Bowles carried it by a

great majority, having about 160 votes, and Mr. Hall about 77. I think

it the most scandalous election that I have yet heard of in Oxford.' Of

his supporters he speaks thus:--'Charlett and such rogues, who contrived

to bring in that most compleat coxcomb Bowles to be Head-Librarian, to

the immortal scandal of all that were concern'd in it[195].' And even,

when ten years later he records Bowles' death, he indulges, in

forgetfulness of charity to the departed, in the following strain: 'Of

this gentleman (a most vile, wicked wretch) frequent mention hath been

made in these Memoirs. He took the degree of M.A. Oct. 12, 1719. 'Tis

incredible what damage he did to the Bodl. Library, by putting it into

disorder and confusion, which before, by the great pains I had taken in

it (&c.), was the best regulated library in the world[196].' Bowles'

name never occurs in the _Diary_ without some opprobrious epithet being

attached to it, which may be accounted for partly from his having taken

the oaths of allegiance after declaring he would never do it (a

defection which Hearne never forgave in any one), but chiefly also from

his having personally excluded Hearne from the Library, when the latter

refused to resign his keys in 1715, by procuring new locks and keys,

which he kept in his own custody.

Three or four days after Bowles' election, Mr. Fletcher, the

Sub-librarian (disliking, no doubt, the appointment of his junior over

his head), resigned his office, to which Bowles appointed the well-known

antiquary, Francis Wise. Upon this appointment Hearne comments thus:

'Bowles put in Mr. Wise, A.M., of Trin. Coll. (a pretender to

antiquities), tho' he had promised it to one of Oriel Coll., that came

in fellow of Oriel when he did, and was very serviceable to him in

getting the Head Librarian's place; for which Bowles is strangely

scouted and despis'd at Oriel, as a breaker of his word, and a

whiffling, silly, unfaithfull, coxcomb.' It must be allowed that the

portrait of Bowles in the Library bears out in some degree Hearne's last

epithet, by giving him the appearance rather of a fine clerical

gentleman than of a student.

Baskett, the printer, presented to the Library a magnificent copy on

vellum of the 'Vinegar' Bible, printed by him in 1717. Only three copies

were so struck off; the second was placed in the King's Library, and the

third was sold to the Duke of Chandos, for five hundred guineas, at

whose sale, in 1747, Lord Foley purchased it for £72 9_s._

[194] In one passage, Hearne says that such was Hudson's self-esteem

that he reckoned himself equal to Erasmus or Sir Thomas More, while all

that was curious in his books was gained from Hearne himself or others.

(_MS. Diary_, vol. lviii. p. 158.)

[195] Vol. lxxxiv. pp. 59, 60.

[196] Vol. cxxii. p. 158.

Annals of the Bodleian Library, Oxford, A.D. 1598-A.D. 1867 With a Preliminary Notice of the earlier Library founded in the Fourteenth Century · 第 100 / 564 题