VARIETIES AND CHANGES IN THE MATERIALS OF BOOKS

The materials upon which literature has been embodied, and the changes

and improvements which these materials have undergone from age to

age, opens up one of the most interesting chapters of bibliographical

science and of the world's history. A knowledge of the materials

successively used in the book-making industry, and of the improvements

through which these have continually passed, together with the

various kinds of the completed products, the style of writing (there

is a "gait" of hand as well as of foot), and certain distinguishable

characteristics of the literature of the different periods, all assist

in fixing with approximate certainty the date at which a manuscript was

produced.

In considering the materials of books it needs to be held in mind

that the time of a manuscript's production was seldom affixed to it

until a late date; that must be determined or inferred from collateral

data. We would instance the "water marks" of manufactured paper as an

example of these collateral data helping to determine the age of a

manuscript. It is a well known fact that every paper manufactory has

its own individual mark of identification for its output. This is its

protective "water mark" and is impressed in the texture or fiber of

every sheet made, and at regular intervals in the sheet. This is by no

means an exclusively modern device of authentication, for these were

known as early as the thirteenth century. In the fifteenth century,

when the quality of the paper was improved, the "water marks" became

more elaborate and, as early as the sixteenth century, the name of the

maker of the paper was inserted. These marks of identification greatly

aid the antiquarian student in fixing the date of any writing. They

are often, too, of legal significance, inasmuch as important cases in

courts of law in our times--and earlier times--have been known to turn

upon such facts of evidence as the "water marks" of the paper used in

documents, as other cases have turned upon the kind or quality of the

ink or the "hand" in which the documents at issue were written. An

incident narrated in a book by Dr. N. D. Hillis may not be historical

though it does illustrate what has often actually occurred: "In looking

at the thick white paper, upon a sheet of which the guide said that the

deed had been written, John noticed that it was the usual parchment

paper of the time--a paper strong, and made of linen, so that it might

survive the rough usage of the settler's cabin. Holding it up between

his eyes and the sun he noticed this water-mark and stamp--'C. Saur,

Philadelphia, 1787.' The purported deed was dated 1740."[23] The press

dispatches some time ago reported a case before the Senate in one of

our states in which the conviction or the acquittal of the defendant

turned, largely, upon the quality of the ink which had been used in

signing a certain check, given in payment of a claim. It was admitted

by experts on both sides that the ink employed in signing the check was

of a different quality than that upon which the stub of the check had

been filled out, and that the writing on stub and check, respectively,

had not been made at the same time.

It is evident then that the materials themselves and the changes

through which they passed in the process of their improvement, the

ink and its constituents, the "hand" of the writer and, as well, the

peculiarities of the author's style of thought and expression as

evidenced by his other and well-known composition (there is a "gait"

of mind as well as of walk)--all become, so to speak, the "water

marks" which determine or help to determine, approximately, the time

at which a book or writing was made or produced. To illustrate: If the

antiquarian should "unearth" a manuscript having evidences of great

antiquity and should ascertain that it was written upon "cotton paper"

that fact would assure him, without any additional evidence whatever,

that the document could not be much, if any, earlier than the ninth

century, for it was then that cotton paper began to displace the

Egyptian papyrus. Or, if the writing was upon "linen paper" then he

would be assured by the same kind of evidence that, probably, it was

not made before the fourteenth century when paper made from linen rags

first came into more common use.

The Reign of the Manuscript · 第 18 / 47 题