DER SELEN INFRID WART;

in modern German "_der Seelen Infried wort_." To the German scholar the

two latter words only require explanation. _Infrid_ for Unfried,

discord, disturbance, any thing in opposition to Frieden or peace. The

Frid-stools at Beverley, Ripon, and Hexham, still bear the old theotise

stamp. _Wart_, or _ward_, may be either the past tense of _werden_, to

be (our was), or an old form of _währen_, to endure, to last: our

English _wear_ is the same word. The sense is pretty much the same in

both readings alluding to Eve. In the first:

(By her) the soul's disturbance came (was).

By the second:

(Through her) the soul's disturbance continues.

I may here observe that the words ICH WART are particularly distinct on

a helmet, pictured in the Journal of the British Archæological

Association, which the Secretary, Mr. Planche, in such matters the

highest authority, regards as a tilting helmet. It may there have been

in the original ICH WARTE, meaning I bide (my time).

But the centres and this inscription are the least difficulty. A second,

frequently met with, is by far more puzzling. I could not give your

readers any idea of it without a drawing: however it is found

imperfectly depicted on the plates I have before mentioned in Nash's

_Worcestershire_, and the _Gentleman's Magazine_, and I think I

recollect also a very rude copy in a volume of Hearne's _Miscellaneous

Works_, which I examined in the Gottingen Library, but whether belonging

to the work or a MS. addition I cannot now call to mind. The fanciful

and flowery form of its letters gives great scope to the imagination in

assigning them their particular position in the alphabet, and the

difficulty of reading them is enhanced by the doubts of German

archæologists whether they are initials or component parts of a

sentence. Herr Joseph v. Hammer Purgstall, however, in his version

RECORD DE SCI GNSI, or in full _Recordamini de sancta Gnosi_, deduces

thence his principal proof of Gnostic heresy amongst the calumniated

Templars, in which I am sorry to say he has been too servilely followed

in England: e.g. by Mr. Godfrey Higgins, in his posthumous _Anaclypsis_

(p. 830 note), as well as by E.G. Addison, _The Temple Church_ (p. 57),

and by Mr. R.W. Billings more especially, who tacks to his account of

this building an "Essay on the symbolical Evidences of the Temple

Church, where the Templars are proved Gnostic Idolators, as alleged by

Edward Clarkson, Esq." Had the learnedly hypothetic Austrian seen the

engravings of the Crypt at Canterbury Cathedral (_Archæologia_, viii. p.

74.), and Ledwick's remarks on it in conjunction with the carvings at

Glendalloch (_History of Ireland_, p. 174.), or those of Grymbald's

Crypt at Oxford, he might have been expected to have attributed their

monstrosities to his order, with as little hesitation and as thorough a

contempt of chronology, or proved connection, as he has the curious and

innocent sculptures of the church at Schöngrabern in Bohemia (vide

_Curiositäten_, vol. viii. p. 501.).

WILLIAM BELL, Phil. Dr.

* * * * *

Notes and Queries, Number 09, December 29, 1849 · 第 25 / 62 题