CHAPTER VIII

1857

General Anson--The news reaches Simla--Anson loses no time

--A long list of troubles--John Lawrence--The Phulkian family

--Death of General Anson

While the events I have recounted were taking place, the

Commander-in-Chief and the Head-Quarters staff were on their way up

country inspecting the troops at the various stations _en route_ to

Simla, at which place it had been arranged that the summer of 1857 was

to be spent. The Commander-in-Chief in India at that time was General

the Hon. George Anson, an officer of forty-three years' service, but

without much Indian experience, having been only four years in the

country. He was an able, intelligent man, an excellent judge of

character, a great authority on whist and on horses, and he was well

known in London society, which was somewhat surprised when he accepted

an appointment in India--the command of the Meerut division. He did

not, however, remain long in that position, for he was soon given

the command of the Madras Army, and a year and a half later became

Commander-in-Chief in India. General Anson was present at Waterloo as

an Ensign, but had seen no service afterwards, and until he arrived in

India had held no high appointment.

When the Commander-in-Chief left Calcutta the previous autumn, all was

apparently quiet in the Native army. He visited the principal military

stations, amongst others Meerut and Delhi, and although reports of an

uneasy feeling amongst the Native troops in the Presidency division

had reached him from time to time, it was not until he arrived at

Umballa, about the middle of March, that these reports were confirmed

by personal communication with the sepoys attending the School of

Musketry which had been formed at that station.

On the occasion of the Commander-in-Chief's inspection of the School,

he learnt from the men of the various regiments under instruction how

strongly opposed they were to using a cartridge which they believed

to be injurious to their caste. Anson listened attentively to all the

sepoys had to say, and then explained to them in a manly, sensible

speech, that the old cartridge was not suited to the rifle about to be

introduced. A new cartridge had, therefore, to be made; but they must

not listen to any foolish rumour as to its being designed to destroy

their caste. He assured them, 'on the honour of a soldier like

themselves,' that it had never been, and never could be, the policy of

the British Government to coerce the religious feeling of either the

military or the civil population of India, or to interfere in any way

with their caste or customs. He told the Native officers to do all in

their power to allay the men's unfounded fears, and called upon them

to prove themselves worthy of the high character they had hitherto

maintained; he concluded by warning all ranks that the Government were

determined not to yield to insubordination, which would be visited

with the severest punishment.

The demeanour of the sepoys was most respectful, and when the parade

was over they expressed their high sense of the Commander-in-Chief's

goodness. They declared that he had removed their own objections,

but that the story was universally believed by their countrymen and

relations, and if they were to use the cartridge they must become

social outcasts.

General Anson, feeling that the doubts and anxieties of the men with

regard to the use of the new cartridges were by no means imaginary,

suspended their issue until a special report had been prepared as to

the composition of the paper in which they were wrapped.[1]

Having thus done all that he could at the time to allay any feeling of

uneasiness, and hoping that the news of the disbandment of the 19th

Native Infantry would check the spirit of insubordination, General

Anson continued his journey to Simla, that beautiful place in the

Himalayas, 7,000 feet above the sea, which has since become the seat

of the Government of India and Army Head-Quarters during the hot

weather months.

The Commander-in-Chief had been at Simla rather more than a month,

when, on the afternoon of Tuesday, the 12th May, an Aide-de-camp

galloped in from Umballa (the Head-Quarters station of the Sirhind

division), distant eighty miles, bringing with him a copy of the

telegraphic message which had been despatched from Delhi the previous

day to 'all stations in the Punjab,' and which had caused such

consternation at Peshawar on the evening of the 11th May.

Sir Henry Barnard, commanding the Sirhind division, desired the

Aide-de-camp (his own son) to inform the Commander-in-Chief that

the temper of the three Native regiments at Umballa was more than

doubtful, and that it seemed advisable that the three regiments of

British Infantry stationed in the hills near Simla should be ordered

at once to Umballa. So urgent did this seem to Barnard, that, in

anticipation of sanction from the Commander-in-Chief, he told his son

to warn the 75th Foot as he passed through Kasauli to be prepared for

an immediate move.

General Anson at once saw the necessity for taking prompt action. That

same afternoon he despatched an Aide-de-camp to Kasauli to order the

75th to proceed without delay to Umballa, and the 1st Bengal Fusiliers

at Dagshai to follow the 75th as soon as carriage could be collected;

also to warn the 2nd Bengal Fusiliers at Subathu to be ready to move.

Expresses were sent at the same [time] to Ferozepore and Jullundur

directing that a European guard should be placed in charge of the

magazine at the former place, and a detachment of European Infantry

thrown into the fort of Philour from the latter. The confidence

reposed in the Native army before the Mutiny was so great that these

two important magazines, like almost all the arsenals and magazines in

India, were guarded by Native soldiers, and subsequent events proved

that, but for General Anson's timely precautions, the mutineers

must have obtained possession of the magazines at Ferozepore and

Philour.[2]

Anson had not long to wait before he received confirmation of the

alarming news brought by General Barnard's son. The very next

afternoon a letter arrived from Meerut giving an account of the

outbreak on the 10th, and a few particulars of what had occurred at

Delhi. The Commander-in-Chief immediately decided on proceeding to

Umballa, to superintend personally the organization of the force

which, as he rightly judged, would have to be sent to Delhi. There

was no hesitation on General Anson's part, or delay in issuing the

necessary orders.[3] The 2nd Bengal Fusiliers were directed to march

to Umballa, and an Artillery officer was sent express to Philour with

instructions for a third-class siege-train to be got ready, and for

reserve Artillery and Infantry ammunition to be despatched to Umballa.

Orders were also issued for the Nasiri battalion, stationed at Jutog,

near Simla, and for the company of Native Artillery at Kangra and

Nurpur[4] to march with all expedition to Philour, for the purpose of

accompanying the siege-train; and for the Sirmur battalion of Gurkhas

at Dehra Dun, and the Sappers and Miners at Rurki, to proceed to

Meerut.

Having thus pressed forward the measures for the suppression of the

revolt which to him seemed most urgent, General Anson left Simla early

on the 14th May, within forty-eight hours of the receipt of the first

news of the outbreak, and reached Umballa the following morning. His

last act at Simla was to draft a circular which he hoped would have

the effect of allaying excitement in the Native army.

The report which Sir Henry Barnard had to make to the Chief on his

arrival at Umballa was not reassuring. The troops at that station

consisted of Her Majesty's 9th Lancers, two troops of Horse Artillery,

the 4th Bengal Light Cavalry, and two regiments of Native Infantry.

The 75th Foot and 1st Bengal Fusiliers had just marched in with only

thirty and seventy rounds of ammunition per man, respectively, and

(from want of carriage) without tents or baggage. The Commissariat and

Medical Departments were totally unprepared to meet the requirements

of a force suddenly ordered to take the field; there were no doolies

for the sick; supplies were difficult to collect, for the bazaars

were partially deserted; there was a scarcity of contractors, and no

ammunition was available nearer than Philour, eighty miles off.

At Delhi all the Europeans who had not escaped had been massacred, and

the city had been taken possession of by the Native garrison and the

mutinous troops from Meerut in the name of the old King.

At Meerut the European troops were entrenching themselves; the

surrounding district was in the most complete disorder, and the civil

courts powerless.

At Umballa and Jullundur, although the presence of European troops had

hitherto kept the Native regiments from open mutiny, it was evident

that they were not in the least to be depended upon.

At Ferozepore an aggravated revolt had occurred, and at Lahore it had

been found necessary to disarm all the Native troops.

From below Meerut there was no intelligence whatever, but it seemed

more than probable that the spirit of rebellion had broken out in many

stations, and later this was known to be the case.

To add to the Commander-in-Chief's anxieties, it was reported that the

Nasiri battalion at Jutog had got out of hand for a time and refused

to march to Philour, while a detachment of the same corps at Kasauli

plundered the treasury, rendering it necessary to send back 100 men

of the 75th Foot to reinforce the depot at that place, where a large

number of European soldiers' families were collected.

The behaviour of the Gurkhas gave rise to a panic at Simla,

which, however, did not last long. Lord William Hay,[5] who was

Deputy-Commissioner at the time, induced most of the ladies,

with their children, to seek a temporary asylum with the Raja of

Kiunthal.[6] Hay himself managed to keep Simla quiet, and the men

of the Nasiri battalion coming to their senses, order was restored

throughout the hills. The money taken from the Kasauli treasury was

nearly all voluntarily given up, and before the year was out the

battalion did us good service.

It was a long list of troubles that was placed before the

Commander-in-Chief. Disturbing as they all were, each requiring prompt

and special action, there was one amongst them which stood out in bold

relief--the situation at Delhi; and to wrest that stronghold from the

hands of the mutineers was, General Anson conceived, his most pressing

obligation. But could it be done with the means at his disposal?

He thought not; and in this opinion he was supported by the senior

officers at Umballa, with whom the question was anxiously discussed at

a conference held at Sir Henry Barnard's house on the 16th May.[7] It

was nevertheless determined to push on to Delhi, and General Hewitt

was asked what force he could spare from Meerut to co-operate with the

Umballa column. He was warned that time was an object, and that the

23rd May was the date on which his troops would probably be required

to start. All details were carefully considered. The first difficulty

to be overcome was the want of carriage. No organized system of

transport--one of the most essential requirements of an efficient

army--existed, and, owing to the restlessness and uncertainty which

prevailed throughout the country, the civil authorities were unable to

collect carts and camels with the usual rapidity.[8]

That afternoon General Anson received a letter from Sir John Lawrence

urging the importance of an immediate advance on Delhi, and giving an

outline of the measures he proposed to adopt in the Punjab. He asked

the Commander-in-Chief to give a general sanction to the arrangements,

and concluded with these words: "I consider this to be the greatest

crisis which has ever occurred in India. Our European force is so

small that, unless effectively handled in the outset, and brought to

bear, it will prove unequal to the emergency. But with vigour and

promptitude, under the blessing of God, it will prove irresistible."

Anson naturally hesitated to advance with an inefficient and only

partially equipped force against a strongly-fortified city with

an immense armed population, defended by many thousand desperate

mutineers, and in his reply (dated the 17th May) he put the case

plainly before Sir John Lawrence. He pointed out that the Europeans

were without tents; that there were no guns at Umballa or Meerut

heavier than six or nine pounders with which to batter down the walls

of Delhi; that the required amount of carriage could not be provided

in less than sixteen or twenty days; and that the three Native corps

at Umballa could not be depended upon. He asked Sir John whether he

considered 'it would be prudent to risk the small European force we

have here in an enterprise against Delhi,' and he wrote: 'My own view

of the state of things now is, by carefully collecting our resources,

having got rid of the bad materials which we cannot trust, and having

supplied their places with others of a better sort, it would not be

very long before we could proceed, without a chance of failure, in

whatever direction we might please.' Adding, 'this is now the opinion

of all here whom I have consulted--the Major-General and Brigadier,

the Adjutant-General, Quartermaster-General and Commissary-General.'

Anson concluded his letter with the following words: 'It would give me

great satisfaction to have your views upon the present crisis, for I

would trust to them more than to my experience.'

John Lawrence, who was straining every nerve to check the Mutiny and

prevent a general rising of the population, was impatient at the idea

of delay, and lost no time in giving Anson his opinion. He telegraphed

it briefly on the 20th, and the following day he wrote to the effect

that he knew Delhi well, having been stationed there for nearly

thirteen years, and it seemed incredible to him that mutineers could

hold and defend it; his belief was 'that, with good management on the

part of the civil officers, it would open its gates on the approach of

our troops.' He admitted that 'on military principles, in the present

state of affairs, it may not be expedient to advance on Delhi until

the Meerut force is prepared to act.' But he protested against

European soldiers being 'cooped up in their cantonments, tamely

awaiting the progress of events.' He went on to say: 'Pray only

reflect on the whole history of India. Where have we failed when

we acted vigorously? Where have we succeeded when guided by timid

counsels? Clive with 1,200 men fought at Plassy, in opposition to

the advice of his leading officers, beat 40,000 men, and conquered

Bengal.'

That Sir John Lawrence greatly under-estimated the difficulties which

Anson had to overcome we now know. Delhi did not open its gates on our

approach, but for more than three months defied all our efforts to

capture it. And in his eagerness to get the Commander-in-Chief

to think as he did, the resolute Chief Commissioner forgot that

Clive--not with 1,200 men, but with 3,000 disciplined troops--had to

deal in the open field with an enemy little better than a rabble;

whereas Anson had to attack a strong fortress, amply supplied with

stores and ammunition, possessing a powerful armament, and held

by soldiers who were not only well trained and equipped, but were

fighting for their lives, and animated by religious fanaticism.

Still, there can be no doubt that John Lawrence's views as to the

necessity for Delhi being taken at all hazards were correct. The

Governor-General held the same opinion, and strongly urged it upon

Anson, who loyally responded, and during the short time he remained at

Umballa strenuously exerted himself to equip the troops destined for

the arduous task.

While preparing for his advance on the Moghul capital, Anson did not

neglect to provide, as far as lay in his power, for the safety of

Umballa. The soldiers' wives and children were sent to Kasauli; a

place of refuge was made for the non-combatants at the church, round

which an entrenchment was thrown; a garrison, about 500 strong, was

formed of the sick and weakly men of the several European regiments,

assisted by some of the Patiala troops; and as an additional security

half the Native corps were sent into the district, and the other half

with the column to Delhi.

John Lawrence had strongly advocated the policy of trusting the

Maharaja of Patiala and the Rajas of Jhind and Nabha. The attitude of

these Chiefs was of extreme importance, for if they had not been well

disposed towards us, our communication with the Punjab would have been

imperilled. There was therefore much anxiety at Umballa as to the

course Patiala, Jhind, and Nabha (the three principal members of

the great Phulkian family) would elect to take. Douglas Forsyth,[9]

Deputy-Commissioner of Umballa, who was a personal friend of the

Maharaja of Patiala, at once sought an interview with him. He

was beginning to explain to the Maharaja the difficulties of the

situation, when he was interrupted by His Highness, who said he was

aware of all that had happened; on which Forsyth asked if it was

true that emissaries from the King of Delhi had come to Patiala. The

Maharaja pointed to some men seated at a little distance, saying,

'There they are.' Forsyth then asked for a word in private. As soon as

they were alone, he addressed the Maharaja thus: 'Maharaja _sahib_,

answer me one question: Are you for us, or against us?' The Maharaja's

reply was very hearty: 'As long as I live I am yours, but you know

I have enemies in my own country; some of my relations are against

me--my brother for one. What do you want done?' Forsyth then asked the

Maharaja to send some of his troops towards Kurnal to keep open the

Grand Trunk Road. The Maharaja agreed on the understanding that

Europeans should soon be sent to support them--a very necessary

condition, for he knew that his men could only be trusted so long as

there was no doubt of our ultimate success.

Patiala was true to his word, and throughout the Mutiny the Phulkian

Chiefs remained perfectly loyal, and performed the important service

of keeping open communication between Delhi and the Punjab.[10]

On the 19th May General Anson was cheered by hearing from John

Lawrence that the Corps of Guides and four trusty Punjab regiments

were proceeding by forced marches to join him. On the 21st he received

a message from the Governor-General informing him that European troops

were coming from Madras, Bombay, and Ceylon. He also heard of the

arrival of the siege-train at Umballa, and he had the satisfaction of

telegraphing to the Chief Commissioner that the first detachment of

the column destined for Delhi had started.

On the 23rd the Commander-in-Chief communicated his plan of operations

to General Hewitt. It was as follows: Two brigades were to advance

from Umballa, commanded by Brigadier Hallifax of the 75th Foot, and

Colonel Jones of the 60th Rifles; and one brigade from Meerut, under

the command of Brigadier Archdale Wilson. The two former were to be

concentrated at Kurnal by the 30th May, and were then to advance,

under General Anson, so as to arrive opposite Baghput on the 5th June,

at which place they were to be joined by the Meerut brigade, and the

united force was then to proceed to Delhi.

All his arrangements being now completed, Anson left Umballa on the

24th May, and reached Kurnal the following morning. On the 26th he was

struck down by cholera, and in a few hours succumbed to that fatal

disease. His last words expressed a hope that his country would do him

justice, and it is grievous to feel that, in estimating his work and

the difficulties he had to encounter, full justice has not been done

him. Anson has been undeservedly blamed for vacillation and want of

promptitude. He was told to 'make short work of Delhi,' but before

Delhi could be taken more men had perished than his whole force at

that time amounted to. The advice to march upon Delhi was sound, but

had it been rashly followed disaster would have been the inevitable

result. Had the Commander-in-Chief been goaded into advancing without

spare ammunition and siege Artillery, or with an insufficient force,

he must have been annihilated by the overwhelming masses of the

mutineers--those mutineers, who, we shall see later, stoutly opposed

Barnard's greatly augmented force at Badli-ki-Serai, would almost

certainly have repulsed, if not destroyed, a smaller body of troops.

On the death of General Anson the command of the Field Force devolved

on Major-General Sir Henry Barnard.

[Footnote 1: 'I am not so much surprised,' wrote General Anson to Lord

Canning on the 23rd March, 'at their objections to the cartridges,

having seen them. I had no idea they contained, or, rather, are

smeared with, such a quantity of grease, which looks exactly like fat.

After ramming down the ball, the muzzle of the musket is covered

with it. This, however, will, I imagine, not be the case with those

prepared according to the late instructions. But there are now

misgivings about the paper, and I think it so desirable that they

should be assured that no animal grease is used in its manufacture,

that I have ordered a special report to be made to me on that head

from Meerut, and until I receive an answer, and am satisfied that no

objectionable material is used, no firing at the depots by the sepoys

will take place. It would be easy to dismiss the detachments to their

regiments without any practice, on the ground that the hot weather is

so advanced, and that very little progress could be made, but I do not

think that would be admissible. The question, having been raised, must

be settled. It would only be deferred till another year, and I trust

that the measures taken by the Government when the objection was first

made, and the example of the punishment of the 19th Native Infantry

and of the other delinquents of the 70th, now being tried by a General

Court-Martial, will have the effect we desire.'--KAYE, vol. i., p.

558.]

[Footnote 2: Surely those whom God has a mind to destroy, He first

deprives of their senses; for not only were the magazines at Delhi and

Cawnpore allowed to fall into the enemy's hands, but the great arsenal

at Allahabad narrowly escaped the same fate. Up till May, 1857, this

fort was garrisoned only by Native soldiers. Early in that month sixty

worn-out European pensioners were brought to Allahabad from Chunar,

with whose assistance, and that of a few hastily raised Volunteers,

Lieutenants Russell and Tod Brown, of the Bengal Artillery, were able

to overawe and disarm the Native guard on the very night on which the

regiments to which they belonged mutinied in the adjoining cantonment.

These two gallant officers had taken the precaution to fill the

cellars below the armoury (which contained some 50,000 or 60,000

stands of arms) with barrels of powder, their intention being to blow

up the whole place in the event of the sepoys getting the upper hand.

This determination was known to all in the fort, and no doubt had

something to say to the guard submitting to be disarmed.]

[Footnote 3: He has been accused of dilatoriness and want of decision

after hearing the news.]

[Footnote 4: Places at the foot of the Himalayas.]

[Footnote 5: Now the Marquis of Tweeddale.]

[Footnote 6: A small hill state near Simla.]

[Footnote 7: It is a remarkable fact that the five senior officers at

this conference were all dead in less than seven weeks. General Anson,

Brigadier Hallifax, commanding the Umballa station, and Colonel

Mowatt, commanding the Artillery, died within ten days; Colonel

Chester, Adjutant-General of the Army, was killed at Badli-ki-Serai on

the 8th June, and Sir Henry Barnard died at Delhi on the 5th July.]

[Footnote 8: See Kaye's 'History of the Indian Mutiny,' vol. ii., p.

120.]

[Footnote 9: The late Sir Douglas Forsyth, K.C.S.I.]

[Footnote 10: See 'The Life of Sir Douglas Forsyth.']

* * * * *

Forty-one years in India: from subaltern to commander-in-chief · 第 8 / 69 章