HOBBES'S "LEVIATHAN."

(Vol. iv., pp. 314. 487.)

I am surprised that your correspondent H. A. B., who appears by his

expressions to be an admirer of the _Leviathan_, should think the

frontispiece an absurd conceit, very unworthy of its author. The design

may be regarded, I think, as a very remarkable embodiment of the thought

expressed in the passage where the term _Leviathan_ is first used. The

civil body or commonwealth, derived from the union of individuals, is

represented by Hobbes as the origin of all rights and duties. And this

combination of men is (_Leviathan_, p. 87.) something more than consent

and concord. It is the real unity of them all in one and the same

person. The multitude, so united in one person, is called a

_Commonwealth_. "This is the generation," he says, "of that great

_Leviathan_, or, to speak more reverently" (that is, with the reverence

due to it), "of that _mortal God_ to which we owe (under the _Immortal

God_) our peace and defence." This "mortal God," thus constituted, may

very fitly be represented by the giant image, made up of thousands of

individual forms, wielding the mighty sword and the magnificent crosier,

and spreading its arms, with an air of sovereignty, over castles and

churches, rivers and ports, fields and villages. The emblems then

represent, as H. A. B. observes, the manifestations of civil and of

ecclesiastical power; and the parallelisms there exhibited appear to me

to be curious: the castle, with a piece of ordnance discharged from the

walls; the church, with a figure of Faith on its roof; the coronet and

the mitre; the cannon, the thunderbolt of war; and the spiritual

fulmination, represented by the mythological thunderbolts; the arms of

Logic, Syllogism, and Dilemma, and the like; and the arms of war, pikes,

and swords, and muskets; and finally, the judiciary tribunal, and the

tribunal of the battle field, the _ultima ratio regum_.

The frontispiece in the edition of 1651 is a much better print than that

of 1750; and in the former, I think, the resemblance to Cromwell is

undeniable. In this edition, the tablet at the bottom has the words,

"London: _Printed for Andrew Crooke_, 1651." In the edition of 1750

there are on the tablet the words, "_Written by Thos. Hobbs_, 1651," as

C. J. W. states.

Notes and Queries, Vol. V, Number 115, January 10, 1852 A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc. · 第 57 / 150 题