BOILING TO DEATH AS A PUNISHMENT.

(Vol. ii., p. 519.)

L. H. K. gives an extract from Howe's _Chronicle_, detailing the

punishment of one _Richard Rose_ (as also of another person) in the

above manner for the crime of poisoning, and inquires if this was a

peculiar mode of punishing of _cooks_. No reply to this having yet

appeared, and the subject being only incidentally mentioned at Vol.

iii., p. 153., I venture to submit to you the following Notes I have

made upon it.

The crime of poisoning was always considered as most detestable,

"because it can, of all others, be the least prevented either by manhood

or forethought." Nevertheless, prior to the statute of 22 Hen. VIII. c.

9. there was no peculiarity in the mode of punishment. The occurrence to

which Howe refers, appears to have excited considerable attention,

probably on account of the supposition that the life of the bishop was

aimed at; so much so, that the extraordinary step was taken of passing

an Act of Parliament, _retrospective_ in its enactments as against the

culprit (who is variously described as _Rose_, _Roose_, otherwise

_Cooke_, and _Rouse_), prescribing the mode of punishment as above, and

declaring the crime of poisoning to be treason for the future. The

occurrence is thus related in a foot-note to Rapin, 2nd edit. vol. i. p.

792.:--

"During this Session of Parliament [1531] one _Richard Rouse_, a

_cook_, on the 16th February poisoned some soop in the Bishop of

Rochester's kitchen, with which seventeen persons were mortally

infected; and one of the gentlemen died of it, and some poor

people that were charitably fed with the remainder were also

infected, one woman dying. The person was apprehended; and by Act

of Parliament poisoning was declared treason, and _Rouse_ was

attainted and _sentenced to be boiled to death_, which was to be

the punishment of poisoning for all times to come. The sentence

was executed in Smithfield soon after."

This horrible punishment did not remain on the Statute Books for any

very lengthened period, the above statute of Henry being repealed by

statutes 1 Edw. VI. c. 12., and 1 Mary, stat. I. c. 1., by which all

_new_ treasons were abolished, since which the punishment has been the

same as in other cases of murder. If within the reach of any

correspondent, an extract from the statute of Henry would be

interesting.

Notes and Queries, Vol. V, Number 115, January 10, 1852 A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc. · 第 53 / 150 题