There are no distinguishing qualities among men to which there are

not false pretenders; but though none is more pretended to than that

of devotion, there are, perhaps, fewer successful impostors in this

kind than any other. There is something so natively great and good

in a person that is truly devout, that an awkward man may as well

pretend to be genteel, as a hypocrite to be pious. The constraint in

words and actions are equally visible in both cases, and anything set

up in their room does but remove the endeavourers the further off

their pretensions. But however the sense of true piety is abated,

there is no other motive of action that can carry us through all the

vicissitudes of life with alacrity and resolution. But piety, like

philosophy, when it is superficial, does but make men appear the worse

for it; and a principle that is but half received, does but distract,

instead of guiding our behaviour. When I reflect upon the unequal

conduct of Lotius, I see many things that run directly counter to his

interest; therefore I cannot attribute his labours for the public good

to ambition. When I consider his disregard to his fortune, I cannot

esteem him covetous. How then can I reconcile his neglect of himself,

and his zeal for others? I have long suspected him to be a little

pious: but no man ever hid his vice with greater caution than he does

his virtue. It was the praise of a great Roman, that he had rather be,

than appear good. But such is the weakness of Lotius, that I dare say,

he had rather be esteemed irreligious than devout. By I know not what

impatience of raillery he is wonderfully fearful of being thought too

great a believer. A hundred little devices are made use of to hide a

time of private devotion; and he will allow you any suspicion of his

being ill employed, so you do not tax him with being well. But alas!

how mean is such a behaviour? To boast of virtue is a most ridiculous

way of disappointing the merit of it, but not so pitiful as that of

being ashamed of it. How unhappy is the wretch who makes the most

absolute and independent motive of action the cause of perplexity and

inconstancy? How much another figure does Cælicola[44] make with all

who know him? His great and superior mind, frequently exalted by the

raptures of heavenly meditation, is to all his friends of the same use

as if an angel were to appear at the decision of their disputes. They

very well understand he is as much disinterested and unbiassed as such

a being. He considers all applications made to him, as those addresses

will effect his own application to heaven. All his determinations are

delivered with a beautiful humility; and he pronounces his decisions

with the air of one who is more frequently a supplicant than a judge.

Thus humble, and thus great, is the man who is moved by piety, and

exalted by devotion. But behold this recommended by the masterly hand

of a great divine[45] I have heretofore made bold with:

"It is such a pleasure as can never cloy or overwork the mind; a

delight that grows and improves under thought and reflection; and

while it exercises, does also endear itself to the mind. All pleasures

that affect the body must needs weary, because they transport; and

all transportation is a violence; and no violence can be lasting, but

determines upon the falling of the spirits, which are not able to keep

up that height of motion that the pleasure of the senses raises them

to. And therefore how inevitably does an immoderate laughter end in a

sigh, which is only nature's recovering itself after a force done to

it; but the religious pleasure of a well-disposed mind moves gently,

and therefore constantly. It does not effect by rapture and ecstasy,

but is like the pleasure of health, greater and stronger than those

that call up the senses with grosser and more affecting impressions.

No man's body is as strong as his appetites; but Heaven has corrected

the boundlessness of his voluptuous desires by stinting his strengths,

and contracting his capacities.... The pleasure of the religious man

is an easy and a portable pleasure, such a one as he carries about in

his bosom, without alarming either the eye or envy of the world. A man

putting all his pleasure into this one, is like a traveller putting all

his goods into one jewel; the value is the same, and the convenience

greater."

FOOTNOTES:

[44] Possibly John Hughes, author of the "Siege of Damascus," who

contributed to both _Tatler_ and _Spectator_. He died in 1720, aged

forty-seven. In the _Theatre_ (No. 15) Steele said that Hughes's "head,

hand, or heart was always employed in something worthy imitation."

[45] Dr. South (see Nos. 61 and 205).

=No. 212.= [STEELE.

From _Tuesday, Aug. 15_, to _Thursday, Aug. 17, 1710_.

_From my own Apartment, Aug. 16._

I have had much importunity to answer the following letter:

* * * * *

"Mr. BICKERSTAFF,

"Reading over a volume of yours, I find the words _simplex munditiis_

mentioned as a description of a very well-dressed woman.[46] I beg

of you, for the sake of the sex, to explain these terms. I cannot

comprehend what my brother means, when he tells me they signify my own

name, which is,

"Sir,

"Your humble Servant,

"PLAIN ENGLISH."

I think the lady's brother has given us a very good idea of that

elegant expression, it being the greatest beauty of speech to be

close and intelligible. To this end nothing is to be more carefully

consulted than plainness. In a lady's attire this is the single

excellence; for to be what some call fine, is the same vice in that

case as to be florid is in writing or speaking. I have studied and

written on this important subject till I almost despair of making a

reformation in the females of this island, where we have more beauty

than in any spot in the universe, if we did not disguise it by false

garniture, and detract from it by impertinent improvements. I have

by me a treatise concerning pinners, which I have some hopes will

contribute to the amendment of the present head-dresses, to which I

have solid and unanswerable objections. But most of the errors in that

and other particulars of adorning the head, are crept into the world

from the ignorance of modern tirewomen; for it is come to that pass,

that an awkward creature in the first year of her apprenticeship, that

can hardly stick a pin, shall take upon her to dress a woman of the

first quality. However, it is certain that there requires in a good

tirewoman a perfect skill in optics; for all the force of ornament is

to contribute to the intention of the eyes. Thus she who has a mind to

look killing, must arm her face accordingly, and not leave her eyes

and cheeks undressed. There is Araminta so sensible of this, that she

never will see even her own husband without a hood[47] on. Can any one

living bear to see Miss Gruel, lean as she is, with her hair tied back

after the modern way? But such is the folly of our ladies, that because

one who is a beauty, out of ostentation of her being such, takes care

to wear something that she knows cannot be of any consequence to her

complexion; I say, our women run on so heedlessly in the fashion,

that though it is the interest of some to hide as much of their faces

as possible, yet because a leading toast appeared with a backward

head-dress, the rest shall follow the mode, without observing that the

author of the fashion assumed it because it could become no one but

herself.

Flavia[48] is ever well dressed, and always the genteelest woman you

meet: but the make of her mind very much contributes to the ornament of

her body. She has the greatest simplicity of manners of any of her sex.

This makes everything look native about her, and her clothes are so

exactly fitted, that they appear as it were part of her person. Every

one that sees her, knows her to be of quality; but her distinction

is owing to her manner, and not to her habit. Her beauty is full of

attraction, but not of allurement. There is such a composure in her

looks, and propriety in her dress, that you would think it impossible

she should change the garb you one day see her in for anything so

becoming, till you next day see her in another. There is no other

mystery in this, but that however she is apparelled, she is herself the

same: for there is so immediate a relation between our thoughts and

gestures, that a woman must think well to look well.

But this weighty subject I must put off for some other matters in which

my correspondents are urgent for answers, which I shall do where I can,

and appeal to the judgment of others where I cannot.

* * * * *

_Aug. 15, 1710_.

"Mr. BICKERSTAFF,

"Taking the air the other day on horseback in the Green Lane that leads

to Southgate, I discovered coming towards me a person well mounted in

a mask; and I accordingly expected, as any one would, to have been

robbed. But when we came up with each other, the spark, to my greater

surprise, very peaceably gave me the way; which made me take courage

enough to ask him, if he masqueraded, or how? He made me no answer,

but still continued _incognito_. This was certainly an ass in a lion's

skin; a harmless bull-beggar,[49] who delights to fright innocent

people, and set them a-galloping. I bethought myself of putting as good

a jest upon him, and had turned my horse, with a design to pursue him

to London, and get him apprehended, on suspicion of being a highwayman:

but when I reflected, that it was the proper office of the magistrate

to punish only knaves, and that we had a censor of Great Britain for

people of another denomination, I immediately determined to prosecute

him in your court only. This unjustifiable frolic I take to be neither

wit nor humour: therefore hope you will do me, and as many others as

were that day frighted, justice. I am,

"Sir,

"Your Friend and Servant,

"J. L."

* * * * *

"SIR,

"The gentleman begs your pardon, and frighted you out of fear of

frightening you; for he is just come out of the smallpox."

* * * * *

"Mr. BICKERSTAFF,

"Your distinction concerning the time of commencing virgins[50] is

allowed to be just. I write you my thanks for it, in the twenty-eighth

year of my life, and twelfth of my virginity. But I am to ask you

another question, May a woman be said to live any more years a maid

than she continues to be courted?

"I am, &c."

* * * * *

_Aug. 15, 1710_.

"SIR,

"I observe that the _Post-Man_ of Saturday last, giving an account of

the action in Spain, has this elegant turn of expression: 'General

Stanhope,[51] who in the whole action expressed as much bravery as

conduct, received a contusion in his right shoulder.' I should be glad

to know, whether this cautious politician means to commend or to rally

him, by saying, 'He expressed as much bravery as conduct'? If you can

explain this dubious phrase, it will inform the public, and oblige,

"Sir,

"Your humble Servant, &c."

FOOTNOTES:

[46] See No. 151.

[47] The _Spectator_ contains accounts of the new-fashioned hoods,

which were made in various tints, especially cherry-colour. In the

reign of King William the ladies wore a high head-dress, as appears

from the following passage in a letter of Swift to Esther Johnson,

dated Nov. 22, 1711: "I dined to-day with Sir Thomas Hanmer, whose

lady, the Duchess of Grafton, wears a great high head-dress, such as

was in fashion fifteen years ago, and looks like a mad woman in it, yet

she has great remains of beauty." In the _Spectator_ (No. 98) Addison

refers to these high head-dresses as in fashion ten years earlier,

_i.e._ about 1701.

[48] This picture of Flavia has been thought to be a representation of

Mrs. Anne Oldfield (see No. 10), of whom Cibber wrote: "Had her birth

placed her in a higher rank of life, she had certainly appeared in

reality what in the character of Lady Betty Modish she only excellently

acted, an agreeable gay woman of quality, a little too conscious of

her natural attractions. I have often seen her in private societies,

where women of the first rank might have borrowed some part of their

behaviour, without the least diminution of their sense of dignity."

From this passage it will be seen that the account of a lady "of

quality," with "the greatest simplicity of manners," can hardly be a

description of Mrs. Oldfield. Moreover, the name "Flavia" occurs in No.

239, by Addison, and it appears that the lady there referred to was

Miss Osborne, who became Atterbury's wife.

[49] Something used to frighten children. _Cf._ Sir T. Smith's

"Appendix to his Life," p. 34: "As children be afraid of bear-bugs and

bull-beggars."

[50] See No. 210

[51] Ibid.

=No. 213.= [STEELE.

From _Thursday, Aug. 17_, to _Saturday, Aug. 19, 1710_.

_Sheer Lane, Aug. 16._

There has of late crept in among the downright English a mighty spirit

of dissimulation. But before we discourse of this vice, it will be

necessary to observe, that the learned make a difference between

simulation and dissimulation.[52] Simulation is a pretence of what

is not, and dissimulation a concealment of what is. The latter is

our present affair. When you look round you in public places in this

island, you see the generality of mankind carry in their countenance

an air of challenge or defiance: and there is no such man to be found

among us who naturally strives to do greater honours and civilities

than he receives. This innate sullenness or stubbornness of complexion

is hardly to be conquered by any of our islanders. For which reason,

however they may pretend to choose one another, they make but very

awkward rogues; and their dislike to each other is seldom so well

dissembled, but it is suspected. When once it is so, it had as good

be professed. A man who dissembles well must have none of what we call

stomach, otherwise he will be cold in his professions of good-will

where he hates; an imperfection of the last ill consequence in

business. This fierceness in our natures is apparent from the conduct

of our young fellows, who are not got into the schemes and arts of life

which the children of this world walk by. One would think that, of

course, when a man of any consequence for his figure, his mien, or his

gravity, passes by a youth, he should certainly have the first advances

of salutation; but he is, you may observe, treated in a quite different

manner, it being the very characteristic of an English temper to defy.

As I am an Englishman, I find it a very hard matter to bring myself

to pull off the hat first; but it is the only way to be upon any good

terms with those we meet with: therefore the first advance is of high

moment. Men judge of others by themselves; and he that will command

with us must condescend. It moves one's spleen very agreeably to see

fellows pretend to be dissemblers without this lesson. They are so

reservedly complaisant till they have learned to resign their natural

passions, that all the steps they make towards gaining those whom they

would be well with, are but so many marks of what they really are, and

not of what they would appear.

The rough Britons, when they pretend to be artful towards one another,

are ridiculous enough; but when they set up for vices they have

not, and dissemble their good with an affectation of ill, they are

insupportable. I know two men in this town who make as good figures

as any in it, that manage their credit so well as to be thought

atheists, and yet say their prayers morning and evening. Tom Springly

the other day pretended to go to an assignation with a married woman

at Rosamond's Pond,[53] and was seen soon after reading the responses

with great gravity at six-of-clock prayers.

_Sheer Lane, Aug. 17._

Though the following epistle bears a just accusation of myself, yet in

regard it is a more advantageous piece of justice to another, I insert

it at large:

* * * * *

_Garraway's Coffee-house,

Aug. 10._

"Mr. BICKERSTAFF,

"I have lately read your paper[54] wherein you represent a conversation

between a young lady, your three nephews, and yourself; and am not

a little offended at the figure you give your young merchant in the

presence of a beauty. The topic of love is a subject on which a man is

more beholden to nature for his eloquence, than to the instruction of

the schools, or my lady's woman. From the two latter, your scholar and

page must have reaped all their advantage above him. I know by this

time you have pronounced me a trader. I acknowledge it, but cannot bear

the exclusion from any pretence of speaking agreeably to a fine woman,

or from any degree of generosity that way. You have among us citizens

many well-wishers, but it is for the justice of your representations,

which we, perhaps, are better judges of than you (by the account you

give of your nephew) seem to allow.

"To give you an opportunity of making us some reparation, I desire

you would tell your own way the following instance of heroic love in

the city. You are to remember, that somewhere in your writings, for

enlarging the territories of virtue and honour, you have multiplied

the opportunities of attaining to heroic virtue, and have hinted, that

in whatever state of life a man is, if he does things above what is

ordinarily performed by men of his rank, he is in those instances a

hero.[55]

"Tom Trueman, a young gentleman of eighteen years of age, fell

passionately in love with the beauteous Almira, daughter to his master.

Her regard for him was no less tender. Trueman was better acquainted

with his master's affairs than his daughter, and secretly lamented

that each day brought him by many miscarriages nearer bankruptcy than

the former. This unhappy posture of their affairs the youth suspected

was owing to the ill management of a factor, in whom his master had

an entire confidence. Trueman took a proper occasion, when his master

was ruminating on his decaying fortune, to address him for leave

to spend the remainder of his time with his foreign correspondent.

During three years' stay in that employment he became acquainted

with all that concerned his master; and by his great address in the

management of that knowledge, saved him ten thousand pounds. Soon after

this accident, Trueman's uncle left him a considerable estate. Upon

receiving that advice, he returned to England, and demanded Almira of

her father. The father, overjoyed at the match, offered him the £10,000

he had saved him, with the further proposal of resigning to him all his

business. Trueman refused both, and retired into the country with his

bride, contented with his own fortune, though perfectly skilled in all

the methods of improving it.

"It is to be noted, that Trueman refused twenty thousand pounds with

another young lady; so that reckoning both his self-denials, he is to

have in your court the merit of having given £30,000 for the woman he

loved. This gentleman I claim your justice to; and hope you will be

convinced, that some of us have larger views than only cash debtor,

_per contra_ creditor.

"Yours,

"RICHARD TRAFFIC."

"_N.B._--Mr. Thomas Trueman of Lime Street is entered among the heroes

of domestic life.

"CHARLES LILLIE."

FOOTNOTES:

[52] Bacon has an essay "Of Simulation and Dissimulation"; and Sallust,

in his character of Catiline ("Bell. Cat." v.), says, "Animus,

subdolus, varius, cujus rei libet simulator ac dissimulator."

[53] See No. 60.

[54] See No. 207.

[55] See the story of Sergeant Hall in No. 87.

=No. 214.= [STEELE.[56]

From _Saturday, Aug. 19_, to _Tuesday, Aug. 22, 1710_.

----Soles et aperta serena

Prospicere, et certis poteris cognoscere signis.

VIRG., Georg. i. 393.

_From my own Apartment, Aug. 21._

In every party there are two sorts of men, the rigid and the supple.

The rigid are an intractable race of mortals, who act upon principle,

and will not, forsooth, fall into any measures that are not consistent

with their received notions of honour. These are persons of a stubborn,

unpliant morality, that sullenly adhere to their friends when they are

disgraced, and to their principles, though they are exploded. I shall

therefore give up this stiff-necked generation to their own obstinacy,

and turn my thoughts to the advantage of the supple, who pay their

homage to places, and not persons; and without enslaving themselves

to any particular scheme of opinions, are as ready to change their

conduct in point of sentiment as of fashion. The well-disciplined part

of a court are generally so perfect at their exercise, that you may see

a whole assembly, from front to rear, face about at once to a new man

of power, though at the same time they turn their backs upon him that

brought them thither. The great hardship these complaisant members of

society are under, seems to be the want of warning upon any approaching

change or revolution; so that they are obliged in a hurry to tack about

with every wind, and stop short in the midst of a full career, to the

great surprise and derision of their beholders.

When a man foresees a decaying ministry, he has leisure to grow a

malcontent, reflect upon the present conduct, and by gradual murmurs

fall off from his friends into a new party, by just steps and measures.

For want of such notices, I have formerly known a very well-bred person

refuse to return a bow of a man whom he thought in disgrace, that was

next day made Secretary of State; and another, who after a long neglect

of a minister, came to his levee, and made professions of zeal for his

service the very day before he was turned out.

This produces also unavoidable confusions and mistakes in the

descriptions of great men's parts and merits. That ancient lyric, Mr.

D'Urfey,[57] some years ago wrote a dedication to a certain lord,

in which he celebrated him for the greatest poet and critic of that

age, upon a misinformation in Dyer's Letter[58], that his noble patron

was made Lord Chamberlain. In short, innumerable votes, speeches, and

sermons have been thrown away, and turned to no account, merely for

want of due and timely intelligence. Nay, it has been known, that a

panegyric has been half printed off, when the poet, upon the removal of

the minister, has been forced to alter it into a satire.

For the conduct therefore of such useful persons as are ready to do

their country service upon all occasions, I have an engine in my

study, which is a sort of a Political Barometer, or, to speak more

intelligibly, a State Weather-Glass, that, by the rising and falling

of a certain magical liquor, presages all changes and revolutions

in government, as the common glass does those of the weather. This

weather-glass is said to have been invented by Cardan,[59] and given by

him as a present to his great countryman and contemporary Machiavel,

which (by the way) may serve to rectify a received error in chronology,

that places one of these some years after the other. How or when it

came into my hands, I shall desire to be excused if I keep to myself;

but so it is, that I have walked by it for the better part of a

century, to my safety at least, if not to my advantage; and have among

my papers, a register of all the changes that happened in it from the

middle of Queen Elizabeth's reign.

In the time of that princess, it stood long at Settled Fair. At the

latter end of King James the First, it fell to Cloudy. It held several

years after at Stormy; insomuch that at last despairing of seeing any

clear weather at home, I followed the royal exile, and some time after

finding my glass rise, returned to my native country with the rest of

the loyalists. I was then in hopes to pass the remainder of my days

in Settled Fair: but alas! during the greatest part of that reign,

the English nation lay in a Dead Calm, which, as it is usual, was

followed by high winds and tempests till of late years: in which, with

unspeakable joy and satisfaction, I have seen our political weather

returned to Settled Fair. I must only observe, that for all this last

summer my glass has pointed at Changeable. Upon the whole, I often

apply to Fortune Æneas's speech to the sybil:

_----Non ulla laborum,

O virgo, nova mi fades inopinave surgit:

Omnia præcepi, atque animo me cum ante peregi._[60]

The Tatler, Volume 4 · 第 6 / 35 段