METHODS

_Electrical Fishing Gear_

The principal collecting-device used was a portable (600-watt, 110-volt,

A. C.) electric shocker carried in a 12-foot aluminum boat. Two 2 x

2-inch wooden booms, each ten feet long, were attached to the front of

the boat in a "V" position so they normally were two feet above the

surface of the water. A nylon rope attached to the tips of the booms

held them ten feet apart. Electrodes, six feet long, were suspended from

the tip and center of each boom, and two electrodes were suspended from

the nylon rope. The electrodes extended approximately four feet into the

water. Of various materials used for electrodes, the most satisfactory

was a neoprene-core, shielded hydraulic hose in sections two feet long.

These lengths could be screwed together, permitting adjustment of the

length of the electrodes with minimum effort. At night, a sealed-beam

automobile headlight was plugged into a six-volt D. C. outlet in the

generating unit and a Coleman lantern was mounted on each gunwale to

illuminate the area around the bow and along the sides of the boat (Pl.

3a). In late summer, 1959, a 230-volt, 1500-watt generating unit,

composed of a 115-volt, 1500-watt Homelite generator was used. It was

attached to a step-up transformer that converted the current to 230

volts. The same booms described above were used with the 230-volt unit,

with single electrodes at the tip of each boom.

A 5.5-horsepower motor propelled the boat, and the stunned fish were

collected by means of scap nets. Fishes seen and identified but not

captured also were recorded. On several occasions fishes were collected

by placing a 25-foot seine in the current and shocking toward the seine

from upstream.

The shocker was used in daylight at all six stations in the three years,

1957-'59. Collections were made at night in 1958 and 1959 at the middle

Neosho station and in 1959 at the lower Neosho station.

_Seines_

Seines of various lengths (4, 6, 12, 15, 25 and 60 feet), with

mesh-sizes varying from bobbinet to one-half inch, were used. The

4-, 12-, and 25-foot seines were used in the estimation of relative

abundance by taking ten hauls with each seine, recording all species

captured in each haul, and making a total count of all fish captured in

two of the ten hauls. The two hauls to be counted were chosen prior to

each collection from a table of random numbers. Additional selective

seining was done to ascertain the habitats occupied by different

species.

_Trap, Hoop, and Fyke Nets._--Limited use was made of unbaited trapping

devices: wire traps 2.5 feet in diameter, six feet long, covered with

one-inch-mesh chicken wire; hoop nets 1.5 feet to three feet in

diameter at the first hoop with a pot-mesh of one inch; and a fyke net

three feet in diameter at the first hoop, pot-mesh of one inch with

wings three feet in length. All of these were set parallel to the

current with the mouths downstream. The use of trapping devices was

abated because data obtained were not sufficient to justify the effort

expended.

_Gill Nets_

Gill-netting was done mostly in 1959 at the lower Neosho station. Use of

gill nets was limited because frequent slight rises in the river caused

nets to collect excessive debris, with damage to the nets.

Gill nets used were 125 feet long, six feet deep, with mesh sizes of

3/4 inch to 2-1/2 inches. Nets, weighted to sink, were placed at right

angles to the current and attached at the banks with rope.

_Sodium Cyanide_

Pellets of sodium cyanide were used infrequently to collect fish from a

moderately fast riffle over gravel bottom that was overgrown with

willows, making seining impossible. The pellets were dissolved in a

small amount of water, a seine was held in place, and the cyanide

solution was introduced into the water a short distance upstream from

the seine, causing incapacitated fish to drift into the seine. Most of

these fish that were placed in uncontaminated water revived.

_Rotenone_

Rotenone was used in a few small pools in efforts to capture complete

populations. This method was used to check the validity of other

methods, and to reduce the possibility that rare species would go

undetected. Rotenone was applied by hand, and applications were

occasionally supplemented by placing rotenone in a container that was

punctured with a small hole and suspended over the water at the head of

a riffle draining into the area being poisoned. This maintained a toxic

concentration in the pool for sufficient time to obtain the desired

kill. Rotenone acts more slowly than cyanide, allowing more of the

distressed fish to rise to the surface.

_Dyes_

Bismark Brown Y was used primarily at the upper Neosho station to stain

large numbers of small fish. The dye was used at a dilution of 1:20,000.

Fishes were placed in the dye-solution for three hours, then

transferred to a live-box in midstream for variable periods (ten minutes

to twelve hours) before release.

_Determination of Abundance_

In the accounts of species that follow, the relative terms "abundant,"

"common," and "rare" are used. Assignment of one of these terms to each

species was based on analysis of data that are presented in Tables 9-16,

(pages 402, 403, 404, 405, 408, 410, 411, 414-415, and 416). The number

of fish caught per unit of effort with the shocker (Table 10) and with

seines (Table 11) constitute the main basis for statements about the

abundance of each species at all stations except the upper Neosho

station. Species listed in each Table (10 and 11) are those that were

taken consistently by the method specified in the caption of the table;

erratically, but in large numbers at least once, by that method; and

those taken by the method specified but not the other method.

For the species listed in Table 10, the following usually applies:

abundant=more than three fish caught per hour; common=one to three fish

caught per hour; rare=less than one fish caught per hour.

Tables 12-16 list all fish obtained at the upper Neosho station by means

of the shocker, seines, and rotenone.

_Names of Fishes_

Technical names of fishes are those that seem to qualify under the

International Rules of Zoological Nomenclature. Vernacular names are

those in Special Publication No. 2 (1960) of the American Fisheries

Society, with grammatical modifications required for use in the

University of Kansas Publications, Museum of Natural History.

Fish Populations, Following a Drought, in the Neosho and Marais des Cygnes Rivers of Kansas · 第 28 / 119 题