CHAPTER II.

ALL THAT IS BORN OF THE FLESH MUST

BE BORN OF THE SPIRIT.

In the former chapter we have shown, from Scripture and from

reason, that our Church teaches only the plain truth, when she

confesses that: "After Adam's fall, all men, begotten after the common

course of nature, are born with sin."

As a sinful being the new-born infant is not in the Way of

Salvation. By its natural birth, from sinful parents, it is not in the

kingdom of God, but in the realm and under the dominion of sin, death

and the devil. If left to itself--to the undisturbed development of

its own nature, it must miserably and hopelessly perish. True, there

is a _relative_ innocence. The Apostle exhorts: "_Be ye

followers of God, as dear children._" "_In malice be ye children._"

Our blessed Saviour, on several occasions, rebuked the vain, ambitious

spirit of the disciples by contrasting it with the spirit of a little

child. He said: "_Of such is the kingdom of heaven_," and

"_Except ye be converted, and become as little children, ye cannot

enter the kingdom of heaven_."

These passages are generally quoted by those who refuse to

believe the doctrine of Original Sin, as though they taught

sinlessness and entire fitness for the kingdom. But if we accept this

interpretation, then the Scriptures contradict themselves; for we have

seen that, in many places, they clearly teach the opposite. These

passages can only mean that children are _relatively_ innocent.

Compared with the forbidding, haughty, loveless disciples, little

children are much _better subjects_ for the kingdom. While the

roots of sin are there, that sin has not yet done its hardening work.

They do not wilfully resist the good. They are much more tender,

docile, trustful and loving. The Grace of God has less to overcome in

them. They are more easily reached, and thus are fit subjects to be

brought into the kingdom of God. In this sense only can it be said,

"_Suffer the little children to come unto me_," that I may touch

them, bless them, impart my Grace to them, and thus make them

partakers of my kingdom. "_Of such is the kingdom_" because I

desire and purpose to bring them into the kingdom.

Thus far we can safely go. This much in favor of the child, over

against the adult, we freely admit. But this does not say that the

child is innocent, pure and holy by nature. The undeveloped roots and

germs of sin are still there. Its nature is evil. It must be saved

from that moral nature. How?

Here again we meet those who have a very easy solution of the

difficulty. They say: "Admitting that the child has sin, this will in

no way endanger its salvation, because Christ died to take away sin.

They have no _conscious_ sin. Therefore, the atonement of Christ

covers their case, and, without anything further, they pass into

heaven, if they die in their infancy."

This view seems to satisfy a great many well-meaning people.

Without giving the matter any further thought, they dismiss it with

this easy solution. Surely, did they stop to consider and examine this

theory, they would see it has no foundation.

Christ's atonement alone, and in itself, never saved a soul. It

removed the obstacles that were in the way of our salvation, opened

the way back to our Father's house, purchased forgiveness and

salvation for us. But all this profits the sinner nothing, so long as

he is not brought into that way; so long as the salvation is not

applied to him personally. Neither can we speak of salvation being

applied to an unrenewed, sinful nature. We cannot even conceive of

forgiveness for an unregenerate being. This would, indeed, be to take

away the guilt of sin, while its power remained. It would be to save

the sinner in and with his sin.

The position is utterly groundless. It is even contrary to

reason. It assumes that a being who has in his heart, as a very part

of his nature, the roots and germs of sin, can, with that heart

unchanged, enter into the kingdom of God. It makes God look upon sin

with allowance. It does violence to the holiness of His nature. It

makes heaven the abode of the unclean.

No, no. It will not do. When men try to avoid what seem to them

difficult and unwelcome doctrines of God's Word, they run into far

greater difficulties and contradictions. That child is conceived and

born in sin. It is a child of wrath, _dead in trespasses and in

sins_. Its nature must be cleansed and renewed. Otherwise, if it

can be saved as it is, there are unregenerate souls in heaven!

Better abide by what is written, and believe that every one,

infant or adult, who has been born of the flesh, must be born of the

Spirit. Listen to the earnest words of Jesus as he emphasizes them

with that solemn double affirmation, "_Verily, verily, I say unto you,

except a man be born again he cannot see the kingdom of God_." He

repeats this sweeping declaration a second time. In the Greek it

reads, Except _any one_ be born again. The assertion is intended to

embrace every human being. Lest this should be disputed, Jesus further

says, "_That which is born of the flesh_"--i.e., naturally born--"_is

flesh, and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit._" Wherever

there is a birth of the flesh, there must be a birth of the Spirit.

The flesh-born cannot even _see_ the kingdom of God, much less enjoy

it, still less possess it. There must be new life, divine life,

spiritual life breathed into that fleshly, carnal nature. Thus will

there be a new heart; a new spirit, a new creature. Then, and not till

then, can there be comprehension, apprehension and appreciation of the

things of the kingdom of God. This is the teaching of the whole Word

of God. Gal. vi. 15: "_For in Christ Jesus neither circumcision

availeth anything, nor uncircumcision, but a new creature_"--i.e.,

neither Jewish birth nor Gentile birth, without the new birth.

Here also then our Church confesses the pure truth of God's Word,

when, in the second Article of the Augsburg Confession, as quoted

above, she goes on to say: "And this disease, or original fault, is

truly sin, condemning and bringing eternal death upon all that are not

born again."

Here then we take our stand. No child can be saved unless it be

first reached by renewing Grace. If ever an infant did die, or should

die, in that state in which it was born, _unchanged_ by divine Grace,

that infant is lost. There are, there can be, no unregenerate souls in

heaven. Where there is no infant regeneration, there can be no infant

salvation.

Here also we remark, in passing, that this doctrine, of the

absolute necessity of infant regeneration, is not held by the Lutheran

Church alone. Even the Romish and Greek Churches teach that it is

impossible for any human creature, without a change from that

condition in which he was born, to enter heaven. All the great

historic confessions of the Protestant churches confess the same

truth. Even the Calvinistic Baptists confess the necessity of infant

regeneration.

In short all churches that have paid much attention to theology,

and have been careful to have consistent systems of doctrine, agree on

this point. However much those who call themselves by their names may

deny it, in their preaching and in their conversation, their own

confessions of faith and their greatest and best theologians clearly

teach it.

Yes, there must be infant regeneration. But is it possible? Can

the Grace of God reach the helpless infant? Will He reach down and

make it a new creature in Christ Jesus? Has He made provision for this

end? Yes, thanks be to his abounding Grace, we believe He can and will

save the child, and has committed to His spouse, the Church, a means

of Grace for this purpose. He, of whom it was prophesied long before

He came, that He would "_gather the lambs in His arms and carry them

in His bosom_;" who made it the first duty of the reinstated apostle

to _feed His lambs_, must have a special care for them. It is not His

or His Father's will "_that one of them should perish_." He has made

provision for these sin-stricken ones, whereby His Grace can reach

down to renew and heal them. There is Balm in Gilead. The Great

Physician is there. The Church need only apply His divine, life-giving

remedy. Of this we will speak in the next chapter.

The Way of Salvation in the Lutheran Church · 第 2 / 28 章