WALMER, OCTOBER, 1895.]

* * * * *

"THE 'PINERIAN' SPRING" AT THE COMEDY.

Mr. PINERO is temporarily Ibsenised. "_What will become of them?_"

should have been the sub-title, if not the single title, of his new

play at the "C. C. C.," or COMYNS CARR'S Comedy Theatre. Instead of

"_What will become of them?_" Mr. PINERO calls it _The Benefit of the

Doubt_, which is supposed to be a quotation from the Judge's summing

up in the Divorce Court in the case of _Allingham_ v. _Allingham_.

_Mrs. Allingham_ has sued for a divorce in consequence of her

husband's misconduct with _Mrs. Fraser_; the misconduct was not

proved, but the Judge was so severe on the conduct of _Mrs. Fraser_

that there is for her, as far as her husband, friends, family, and

Society generally are concerned, no benefit whatever to be obtained

from the existence of the doubt in question. Such is the cheerful

subject Mr. PINERO, in Ibsenitish vein, has chosen, and he has written

a series of dramatic scenes artistically developing his characters

by the most natural dialogue possible, but not, as it seems to me, by

means either most natural, or most probable. The great situation of

the piece is brought about by a gentleman (in the best sense of

the word, as far as we can judge up to this point) permitting his

infernally jealous wife--there is no other epithet for her except

"infernally"--to conceal herself on purpose to overhear a conversation

between himself and her supposed rival! Analogous situations in broad

farce and farcical comedy are frequent and permissible: but surely

not in a drama of real life. But then, I remind me, that this drama is

Ibsenitish; which does make a difference.

[Illustration: _Mr. P-n-ro_ (_making up after the portrait of Ibsen_).

"Ah! I think I'm getting uncommonly like him."]

The play is far too long, but it is admirably written and admirably

acted. The dramatist intends most of his leading characters to be

repulsively sordid, vulgar, and selfish, and those who are not so

are amiable, but weak. The first heroine, perfectly played by Miss

WINIFRID EMERY, is a fast member of a fast family as badly brought

up as _La famille Benoîton_, the vain, frivolous mother being

well portrayed by Miss LINDLEY; and the second heroine, admirably

represented by Miss LILY HANBURY, is simply an odious, jealous shrew,

and the prospect of happiness in a "place unmentionable to ears

polite" would be more probable than any happiness for a husband with

a wife like this. With neither heroine is sympathy possible. Another

splendid comedy performance is that of Miss ROSE LECLERCQ, as the

Bishop's wife, a character whose original is to be found in ANTHONY

TROLLOPE'S _Barchester Towers_, from which I will quote a specimen

passage, and ask those who have seen _The Benefit of the Doubt_

whether it does not sum up in brief Mr. PINERO'S characters of _Mrs.

Cloys_ and her husband the Bishop:--

"What did you say about it, Bishop?" asks _Mrs. Proudie_ of

her husband.

"Why," replies "her little man," "I said that I thought that

if, that is, should I--should the dean die--that is, I said I

thought----" As he went on stammering and floundering, he saw

that his wife's eye was fixed sternly on him.

And these, with the stage directions, are the _Right Rev. Dr. Cloys_

and _Mrs. Cloys_ of "St. Olpherts," and not of "Barchester"--that's

all. And this _Mrs. Proudie-Cloys_ serves as a _Dea ex machinâ_ coming

forward to offer temporary relief to the hard, austere husband _Mr.

Fraser_ (also a good performance by Mr. J. G. GRAHAME), from his very

trying wife. The Bishop is, oddly enough, a mere "lay" figure; and is

"left till called for" at the last moment.

Having already said that the acting all round is of first-class

quality, it will be superfluous to single out Mr. LEONARD BOYNE

for special praise. Yet he deserves it. Had the author given this

character an Irish title, the combination would have been perfect. Mr.

CYRIL MAUDE, as the fussy, empty-headed M.P., adds another finished

picture to his eccentric portraitures; but Mr. PINERO might have

refrained from adding to this personage's eccentricities one which

originated with Mr. CHARLES WYNDHAM'S _Headless Man_, whose system

of _memoria technica_, and recalling things by initial letters, Mr.

PINERO seems to have borrowed, in order to complete _Sir Fletcher

Portwood's_ equipment for the stage. It is as well to note this, lest

by unconscious cerebration Mr. PINERO should, in some future piece,

develope _Sir Fletcher_ into another _Mr. Hedley_, and refer to _Sir

Fletcher_ in this piece as his original.

[Illustration: "Bedad then, 'tis Misther Shawn Allingham!"]

The only pleasant scene is where, in the Second Act, two club "pals,"

_Denzil Shafto_ (Mr. J. W. PIGOTT) and _Peter Elphick_ (Mr. STUART

CHAMPION) appear, the latter with a banjo; both coming to cheer up

their unhappy friend _Misther Allingham_. These two lighten up the

gloom of the Second Act for a brief space, and then are heard no more;

yet the scene in which they strut their short ten minutes on the

stage is one of the best imagined, and best stage-managed as regards

"business," in a piece where every detail has been considered and not

a point lost. For acting, for dialogue, for character (granting these

to be what the author of their being has made them), this unpleasant

play ranks with the best of the dramas from, what _Mrs. Malaprop_

might term, "The Pinerian spring." And the end? Nothing; a blank. The

audience look at one another and say, "Well--and then?... What next?"

It is a highly-finished play without a finish. It belongs to the

new order of dramas classified under the heading of the "The Problem

Play." Whether these will pay, or not, is another problem of which the

author and manager may find a satisfactory solution.

* * * * *

A Toiler to a Twitterer.

BARD MORRIS sings:--"For this of old is sure,

That change of toil is toil's sufficient cure."

Ah me! You ought to add, oh bard omniscient,

"Provided always that the pay's sufficient."

* * * * *

COPYRIGHT, AND ENTERED AT STATIONERS' HALL.--Mr. HALL CAINE, author,

addressing a deputation from the Dominion, is said to have remarked

that "he felt assured of help from them, as they were _Hall

Caine-aidians_."

* * * * *

QUITE NATURAL.--A composer who had taken rooms in certain mansions

in Victoria Street has given them up, as he found himself writing

everything in A Flat. Most monotonous.

* * * * *

The "Hook of Holland" ought to catch some large fish. What is it

baited with?

* * * * *

Punch, or the London Charivari, Vol. 109, November 2nd, 1895 · 第 19 / 22 题