THE MUSIC HALL AS OTHERS WOULD SEE IT.

(_With compliments to those it may concern_)

The _entrepreneur_ had conducted, the visitor here, there, and

everywhere. He had shown the stage, the auditorium, and the tea

and cake-room. Every feature of the reformed scheme had been duly

explained.

"No singing allowed in the entertainment?" queried the visitor.

"None at all," was the reply; "we consider that music is a mistake.

Of course same songs are good, but as others are bad it is better

to prohibit them altogether, and thus escape the risk of a mistaken

choice."

"And no dancing?"

"Of course not. That would be entirely contrary to our principles. If

people require exercise they can walk or run."

"But how about the poetry of motion? How about the grace of movement?"

"We desire to have nothing to do with either," returned the

_entrepreneur_. "You see our object is to have an entirely new

entertainment, and consequently we reject all items, that have figured

in other programmes."

"Well, well," murmured the visitor; "you may be right. But I should

like to see the result. I will wait until the performance is given,

and judge for myself."

"I am sorry I cannot assist you to carry out this scheme," declared

the Manager of the Progressive Music Hall, "because we are not going

to have an entertainment."

"No, of course not. Of course it won't be an entertainment in the

usual sense of the word. It can't naturally be an entertainment--I

should have said a performance."

"But we give neither entertainment nor performance."

"Why not?"

Then came the answer, which was more convincing than

surprising--"Because, my dear Sir, we can't get an audience!"

* * * * *

THE NEW HOTEL ON THE EMBANKMENT.-- Our Dear _Daily News_, in a recent

note, says that the "Hôtel Magnifique" (as it ought to be called,

reminding us as the D. _D. N._ justly observes of the _Hôtel

Splendide_ in Paris) has been already styled by its proprietors _The

Cecil_. "The Cecil!"--"There is only one in it," observes bluntly a

certain well-known comedian, quoting the song "_There's only one

in it, that's me!_" And pleased is ARTHUR CECIL with the gratuitous

advertisement. But _The Cecil!_ Good name for club, not for

hotel. _The Sarum_ sounds too ecclesiastical; so we return to _The

Magnificent_, which can be familiar in our mouths as "_The Mag._"

"_Omne ignotum pro magnifico._"

* * * * *

"Odd notice!" observed a short-sighted man, who had been cursorily

inspecting a card stuck up in a Restaurant's. "What is?" inquired his

friend. "Why this," was the short-sighted one's reply, pointing to the

notice; "'_No charge for changing plates._' Who ever heard of----"

But here his friend broke in, "Why, you noodle, you've been reading a

photographer's advertisement!"

* * * * *

[Illustration: A SIMPLE DEFINITION.

MASTER JOHNNY BULL. "MONROE DOCTRINE! WHAT _IS_ THE 'MONROE

DOCTRINE'?"

MASTER JONATHAN. "WA-AL--GUESS IT'S THAT EVERYTHING EVERYWHERE

BE-LONGS TO _US!_"]

* * * * *

[Illustration: A NICE DISTINCTION.

_Porter._ "TRAIN'S AWA, MAN. YE SHOULD HAE RAN FASTER."

_Passenger._ "RAN FASTER! DOD, 'A RAN FAST ENEUGH, BUT 'A SHOULD HA'E

STARTIT SOONER."]

* * * * *

Punch, or the London Charivari, Vol. 109, November 2nd, 1895 · 第 16 / 22 题