Then there was Carrollton Garden (I think it is dead and buried now).

There was a short railroad leading to Carrollton; one could see open

fields and grazing cattle from the car windows as one crept along.

Except a still shorter railroad to the Lake, connecting with the Lake

boats, I think the rural road to Carrollton was the only one leading out

of the city. The Carrollton hotel, like the Lake one, was all verandas.

I never knew of any guest staying there, even one night, but there was

a dear little garden and lots of summer houses and pagodas, covered

with jasmines and honeysuckle vines. One could get lemonade or orgeat

or orange flower syrup, and return to the city with a great bouquet of

monthly roses, to show one had been on an excursion. A great monthly rose

hedge, true to its name, always in bloom, surrounded the premises. To see

a monthly rose now is to see old Carrollton gardens in the forties.

IX

THE OLD FRENCH OPERA HOUSE

It was on Orleans Street, near Royal—I don’t have to “shut my eyes and

think very hard,” as the Marchioness said to Dick Swiveller, to see the

old Opera House and all the dear people in it, and hear its entrancing

music. We had “Norma” and “Lucia di Lammermoor” and “Robert le Diable”

and “La Dame Blanche,” “Huguenots,” “Le Prophète,” just those dear old

melodious operas, the music so thrillingly catchy that half the young men

hummed or whistled snatches of it on their way home.

There were no single seats for ladies, only four-seated boxes. The pit,

to all appearances, was for elderly, bald gentlemen only, for the beaux,

the fashionable eligibles, wandered around in the intermissions or

“stood at attention” in the narrow lobbies behind the boxes during the

performances. Except the two stage boxes, which were more ample, and also

afforded sly glimpses towards the wings and flies, all were planned for

four occupants. Also, all were subscribed for by the season. There was

also a row of latticed boxes in the rear of the dress circle, usually

occupied by persons in mourning, or the dear old _messieurs et mesdames_,

who were not chaperoning a _mademoiselle_. One stage box belonged, by

right of long-continued possession, to Mr. and Mrs. Cuthbert Bullitt.

The opposite box was _la loge des lions_, and no less than a dozen lions

wandered in and out of it during an evening. Some were blasé and looked

dreadfully bored, a few were young and frisky, but every mortal one of

them possessed a pompous and self-important mien.

[Illustration: THE OLD FRENCH OPERA HOUSE.]

If weather permitted (we had to consider the weather, as everybody

walked) and the opera a favorite, every seat would be occupied at 8

o’clock, and everybody quiet to enjoy the very first notes of the

overture. All the fashionable young folks, even if they could not play or

whistle “Yankee Doodle,” felt the opera was absolutely necessary to their

social success and happiness. The box was only five dollars a night, and

pater-familias certainly could afford that!

Think of five dollars for four seats at the most fashionable Opera House

in the land then, and compare it with five dollars for one seat in the

topmost gallery of the most fashionable house in the land to-day. Can one

wonder we old people who sit by our fire and pay the bills wag our heads

and talk of the degenerate times?

Toilets in our day were simple, too. French muslins trimmed with real

lace, pink and blue _barèges_ with ribbons. Who sees a _barège_ now? No

need of jeweled stomachers, ropes of priceless pearls or diamond tiaras

to embellish those Creole ladies, many of whom were direct descendants of

French nobles; not a few could claim a drop of even royal blood.

Who were the beaux? And where are they now? If any are living they are

too old to hobble into the pit and sit beside the old, bald men.

It was quite the vogue to saunter into Vincent’s, at the corner, on the

way home. Vincent’s was a great place and he treated his customers with

so much “confidence.” One could browse about the glass cases of pâtés,

_brioches_, éclairs, meringues, and all such toothsome delicacies, peck

at this and peck at that, lay a dime on the counter and walk out. A

large Broadway firm in New York attempted that way of conducting a lunch

counter and had such a tremendous patronage that it promptly failed. Men

went for breakfast and shopping parties for lunch, instead of dropping in

_en passant_ for an éclair.

As I said, we walked. There were no street cars, no ’buses and precious

few people had carriages to ride in. So we gaily walked from Vincent’s to

our respective homes, where a cup of hot coffee put us in condition for

bed and slumber.

Monday morning Mme. Casimir or Mam’zelle Victorine comes to sew all

day like wild for seventy-five cents, and tells how splendidly Rosa de

Vries (the prima donna) sang “_Robert, toi que j’aime_” last night. She

always goes, “_Oui, madame, toujours_,” to the opera Sunday. Later,

dusky Henriette Blondeau comes, with her _tignon_ stuck full of pins and

the deep pockets of her apron bulging with sticks of bandoline, pots of

pomade, hairpins and a bandeau comb, to dress the hair of mademoiselle.

She also had to tell how fine was “Robert,” but she prefers De Vries in

“Norma,” “_moi_.” The Casimirs lived in a kind of cubby-hole way down

Ste. Anne Street. M. Casimir was assistant in a barber shop near the

French Market, but such were the gallery gods Sunday nights, and no mean

critics were they. Our nights were Tuesday and Saturday.

Society loves a bit of gossip, and we had a delightful dish of it

about this time, furnished us by a denizen of Canal Street. He was

“horribly English, you know.” As French was the fashion then, it was an

impertinence to swagger with English airs. The John Bull in question,

with his wife all decked out in her Sunday war paint and feathers, found

a woman calmly seated in his pew at Christ Church, a plainly dressed,

common appearing woman, who didn’t even have a flower in her bonnet.

The pew door was opened wide and a gesture accompanied it, which the

common-looking somebody did not fail to comprehend. She promptly rose

and retired into the aisle; a seat was offered her nearer the door of

the church, which she graciously accepted. Lady Mary Wortley Montagu had

asked for a seat in that pew, as she bore a letter of introduction to its

occupant. This incident gave us great merriment, for the inhospitable

Englishman had been boasting of the coming of Lady Mary. I introduce it

here, for it has a moral which gives a Sunday school flavor to my opera

reminiscences. Now they have all gone where they are happily singing, I

hope, even better than Rosa de Vries, and where there are no doors to the

pews.

X

MURAL DECORATIONS AND PORTRAITS OF THE PAST

The pendulum is swinging. Landscape wall papers, after a seventy years’

truce, are on the warpath, to vanquish damask hangings and other fabrics

that are traps for moths and dust and microbes, we old-time people aver.

Now, in view of the return to favor of landscape wall papers, some

elegant, expensive and striking specimens rise in my memory, and clamor

to be once more displayed to the public.

I vividly remember a decorated wall at a school under the charge of a

superannuated Episcopal clergyman. His aged wife must have possessed

considerable artistic ability, for she painted, on the parlor walls,

mythological subjects, as befits a school teacher’s, if not a preacher’s,

residence. There were Diana and her nymphs (quite modestly wrapped in

floating draperies) on one side the room, and opposite, was Aurora in her

chariot, driving her team of doves. They were up in the dawning sky, and

below was such greenery as I presume old Mrs. Ward thought belonged to

the period of gods and goddesses, but it was strangely like the bushes

and trees in her own back yard. Various other figures were floating or

languishing about. The colors, on the whole, were not brilliant; in

fact, artistically subdued. That bit of mural adornment was a curiosity

to all. I, a little child, thought it most wonderful, and it was. All

these landscape walls had a three or four-foot base of a solid color,

surmounted by a band of wood, called in those days “chair boarding.” So

the figures came near the level of the eye.

Years after the two old people had joined the immortals, I had occasion

to call at the house. It was a great disappointment to find the parlor

wall covered with stiff paper, representing slabs of white marble

(marble, of all things, in that dingy red-brick house!). Aurora and

Diana, and perhaps Calypso, for I imagine the scope was sufficiently

extensive to comprise such a picturesque immortal, were buried under

simulated marble. A weather-beaten portrait of Major Morgan in full

uniform hung right over the spot where Aurora drove her fluttering birds.

I looked at the desecration in dismay, when the voice of old black mammy

was heard. “Dat is Mars Major in his rag-gi-ments; you never know’d him?”

No, I didn’t. “And dat odder portrait over dar” (pointing to a simpering

girl with curly hair) “is Miss Merriky ’fore she married de major.” Where

are those old portraits now? The whirligig of time has doubtless whirled

them away to some obscure closet or garret, where, with faces turned to

the wall, they await a time when there will be a general cleaning up or

tearing down—then where? _Sic transit!_

[Illustration: TYPICAL OLD NEW ORLEANS DWELLING.]

I recall, in later life, a wonderful wall paper on the broad hall

of Judge Chinn’s house in West Baton Rouge. That was very gay and

brilliant, somewhat after the Watteau style, swains playing on impossible

instruments to beauties in various listening attitudes; lambs gamboling

in the distance, birds flying about amid lovely foliage, horsemen on

galloping steeds with extraordinary trappings. How I did love that wall!

It was never permitted the family to cover all that glory with “pillars

and panels,” for the house, shortly after my visit, was destroyed by

fire, and the debonair ladies, prancing steeds and all went up in one

great holocaust.

The new house that rose over the ashes was aptly called Whitehall. It

was all white, inside and out, broad, dead white walls, grand balconies

all around the mansion dead white; white steps led to the lawn, and

the trees surrounding had their trunks whitewashed as high as could be

reached by a long pole and a brush. All the old portraits and some awful

prints (it was long before the chromo era) were fished out of closets

and other hiding places and hung about on the white walls. One old man

with a tremendously long neck and a stiff black stock to help hold up his

head, and a fierce look, had a pair of eyes that looked like great daubs

of ink. His portrait decorated the parlor. I was warned not to handle

the gilt-edged books and little trinkets on the marble-top center-table,

“for your Cousin Christopher will see you; notice, whichever way you turn

his eyes will follow you.” I was mortally afraid of that old spook till

little black Comfort told me, “Laws! if dem eyes could hurt we’d all be’n

daid in dis house.”

At “The Oaks,” Dr. Patrick’s plantation, the wall paper illustrated

scenes from China, in colors not gorgeous, like the last mentioned,

neither was the house so pretentious. There was no broad, high ceilinged

hall to ornament with startling figures that seemed to jump at you. The

orderly processions of pigtailed Chinamen in sepia tints could not by

any possibility get on one’s nerves. Whole processions wended their way

to impossible temples, wedding processions, palanquins, and all that;

funeral processions dwindled away to a mere point in the distance, all

becomingly solemn, until some of the irrepressible Patrick children,

with black pencil, or charcoal, or ink, put pipes into all the mouths

and clouds of smoke therefrom spotted the landscape. Moral suasion was

the discipline of the Patrick children, so that freak was not probably

followed by after-claps, but the Chinese were promptly marched off, and

the inevitable white walls were the result.

Family portraits came forth to brighten the room. One notable one that

superseded the Chinese wall paper was a full-length portrait of Gov.

Poindexter’s (everybody knows “Old Poins” was the first Governor of the

State of Mississippi) first wife, who was a sister of Mrs. Patrick. She

was a vision of beauty, in full evening dress. Facing her was the glum,

“sandy complected” Governor, not one bit fascinated by the sight of his

wife’s smiling face.

The fashionable portrait painter of the time was Moïse; it was he who

painted the author’s portrait shortly after her marriage. He was a

dashing, improvident genius, and many of his portraits were executed to

cancel debts. At one time he designed and had made for my husband, in

settlement for a loan, a handsome silver lidded bowl with alcohol lamp

beneath. It was known as a _pousse café_ and was used to serve hot punch

to after-dinner parties. I am glad to say it has survived all the family

vicissitudes, and is an honored heirloom, in company with a _repoussé_

silver pitcher, which we won as a prize for cattle at the Louisiana State

Fair, described in a later chapter.

At John C. Miller’s place the house was only one story, but it spread

over what seemed to be a half acre of land. A square hall, which was a

favorite lounging place for everybody, had wall paper delineating scenes

from India. Women walked toward the Ganges river, smilingly tripping

along with huge water jars on their shoulders, in full view of another

woman descending the steps of a temple, with a naked baby, poised aloft,

to be thrown into the sacred Ganges. A crocodile ruffled the blue (very

blue) waters, with jaws distended, ready to complete the sacrifice. That

sacred river seemed to course all around the hall, for on another side

were a number of bathers, who appeared to be utterly oblivious of their

vicinity to the mother and babe, not to mention the awful crocodile.

The culmination of landscape wall paper must have been reached in the

Minor plantation dwelling in Ascension parish. Mrs. Minor had received

this plantation as a legacy, and she was so loyal to the donor that the

entreaties of her children to “cover that wall” did not prevail. It was

after that style of mural decoration was of the past, that I visited the

Minors. The hall was broad and long, adorned with real jungle scenes from

India. A great tiger jumped out of dense thickets toward savages, who

were fleeing in terror. Tall trees reached to the ceiling, with gaudily

striped boa constrictors wound around their trunks; hissing snakes peered

out of jungles; birds of gay plumage, paroquets, parrots, peacocks

everywhere, some way up, almost out of sight in the greenery; monkeys

swung from limb to limb; ourang-outangs, and lots of almost naked,

dark-skinned natives wandered about. To cap the climax, right close to

the steps one had to mount to the story above was a lair of ferocious

lions!

I spent hours studying that astonishing wall paper, and I applauded Mrs.

Minor’s decision, “The old man put it there; it shall stay; he liked

it, so do I.” It was in 1849 I made that never-to-be-forgotten trip to

jungle land. The house may still be there; I don’t know; but I warrant

that decorated hall has been “done over,” especially if little children

ever came to invade the premises. Upon the departure of landscape wall

paper, the pendulum swung to depressing simplicity of dead white walls or

else “pillared and paneled,” which is scarcely one degree better.

Old portraits and any kind of inartistic picture or print were brought

forth to gratify the eye unaccustomed to such monotony. Only a few

years ago I asked: “What became of that military epauletted portrait of

old Major Messiah that always hung in your mother’s hall when we were

children?” “Oh, it was hanging twenty or more years ago in the office of

a hardware concern down town. Don’t know where it is now.”

After the war, inquiring for a lot of portraits of various degrees of

merit and demerit that disappeared when the Yankees left, we heard

that some were in negro cabins in West Feliciana. So they come and are

appreciated, those images of loved ones. So they often go, and are

despised by those who follow us, and who, perchance, never knew the

original. Now the questions arise, will landscape wall papers really

return? And in their pristine splendor? Surely the scope in brilliancy

and variety could not be excelled. The limit was reached almost seventy

years ago, and naturally (I was a child then) comes as vividly to my

mind as the counterfeit face of my ancestor with eyes following me all

around the room. The tigers and ourang-outangs, even the den of lions and

the crocodile of the Ganges, never made my little soul quake like the

searching eyes of “my Cousin Christopher.”

XI

THOUGHTS OF OLD

I shall begin to think I am in my second childhood by and by. I have just

been reading of a fashionable wedding where the bride and her attendants

carried flat bouquets with lace paper frills. I don’t doubt the revival

of the _porte bouquet_ will come next, the slender bouquet holders made

of filigree silver with a dagger like a short hatpin to stick clear

through and secure the bouquet—a chain and ring attached to the holder

and all could be hung from the finger. I used to think, a childish

looker-on, that it was pretty to see the ladies in a quadrille “balancing

to your partners,” “ladies changing,” etc., each with a tight little

bouquet in a trim little holder swinging and banging about from the chain.

Later the _porte bouquets_ were abandoned, but the stiff little posies,

in their lacy frills, remained. They were symmetrical, a camellia

japonica, surrounded by a tiny row of heliotrope, then a row of Grand

Duke jasmine, one of violets, finally a _soupçon_ of greenery, and the

paper bed. James Pollock had a fund of such rare flowers to draw from,

for though the Pollock home down on Royal street was the simplest of old

Creole houses, flush on the street, only two steps from the _banquette_

leading into a modest parlor, there was a tiny _parterre_ in the rear, a

vision of the most choice collection of plants. How it was managed and

cultivated I don’t know, for it was hemmed in on all sides by buildings

that intercepted much of the air and almost all of the sun’s rays.

Still those camellias, Grand Dukes and violets thrived and bloomed,

and delighted the heart of any girl to whom James, the best dancer in

society, sent them in one of those tight little bouquets on the eve of a

dance.

[Illustration: A CREOLE PARTERRE.]

I have to-day a much larger _parterre_ in my backyard, open to sun and

rain and wind, but no amount of coddling brings anything better than

dock-weed and tie-grass. I leave it to the climate of my own sunny

Southland to explain the problem. The _porte bouquet_ will no doubt come

in time. I for one will hail an old friend, if I am “on deck” when it

arrives.

Last Christmas what should my granddaughter receive but a mob cap of

gold lace! almost exactly like one my mother wore before I can remember.

Caps! Every woman when she arrived at middle age, and some who found them

becoming at an earlier age, wore caps. My mother was considered very

tasty and expert at cap-trimming. She had a papier mâché, or soft wood

dummy head—I know she stuck pins into it—on which she fashioned her caps.

Mechlin lace (one rarely sees it now) was considered the fashionable cap

lace. Remember cotton laces and Italian laces and machine-made laces were

not in existence in those days, neither were Hamburg embroideries and

Nottingham curtains, two awful products of to-day; and a thousand other

make-believes, cheap and tawdry now. When mother’s fine Mechlin edgings

became soiled she “did them up” herself, clapping the damp lace in her

hands, pulling out and straightening the delicate edges—drying them

without heat; and she had a deft way, too, of what she called “pinching”

with her dainty fingers; she knife pleated it. The net foundation was

fitted to the wooden head, the lace was attached in folds and frills, and

little pink rosebuds or some other tiny flower scattered tastefully here

and there. Behold a dress cap! One can imagine the care and taste and

time and thought consumed in its manufacture. And how the old lady must

have appeared when in full dress!

Many of those dames wore little bunches of black curls to enhance the

effect, those tight, stiff little curls that looked like they had been

wound on a slate-pencil. Dear Mrs. Leonard Matthews always wore the black

curls. Even a few years after the war I met the sweet old lady, curls and

all, jet black, tight little curls, and she looked scarcely older than in

my earliest recollection of her.

Well, I must return to cap trimmings to tell of a bride. She must have

been in the neighborhood of seventy, for she made what her friends called

a suitable match with a widower long past that age. They came to the St.

Charles Hotel on a kind of honeymoon trip. She decorated her head, oh, ye

cherubim and seraphim! with a fussy cap sprinkled with sprays of orange

flowers!

I, who revel in a towering white pompadour, have just had the present of

a soft silk cap, with frills and bows. I presume it will be useful on the

breezy piazzas of the mountains a week hence; but it looks to me now that

the caps of our mothers and grandmothers are on the march hitherward.

I possess a few “Moniteurs des Dames,” dated in the late forties, that

contain pictures and patterns for “bonnets,” as they were called. Who

knows but they may be useful yet?

Now, “in regard to” (as a lady we all know prefaces every remark)—“in

regard to” frills, in my young days we had to make our own frills. Nobody

had dreamed even of machine-made ruchings any more than of vehicles that

run all over the streets without the aid of horses. We made our frills

of lawn, neatly gathered on to a band, and what is more, they had to be

fluted with hot irons. The making was not beyond everybody’s skill, but

the “doing up” and fluting was way beyond me, as beyond many others. How

queer it is, when we recall to mind the images of people so long absent

that they are almost forgotten, the image presents itself, emphasized by

some peculiarity of dress or speech. When I think of Dr. Bein’s daughter

Susanna, whom I knew and loved so well, it is with the beautifully fluted

frill she always wore and so excited my envy. Now, every Biddy in the

kitchen and every little darky one sees wandering around wears handsomer

frills than Susanna and I ever dreamed of.

Parasols had heavy fringes; so, to show to advantage, they were carried

upside down, the ferule end fitted with a ring to be, like the bouquet

holders, hung from the finger. My sister had a blue parasol, with pink

fringe, that I thought too beautiful for words. How I should laugh at it

now!

Best frocks, such as could be utilized for dinners and parties, were

made with short sleeves, “caps,” they were called, and tapes sewed in

the armholes; long sleeves similarly equipped were tied in under the

“caps.” I used to see even party guests take off their sleeves as they

put on their gloves to descend to the dancing room. Black, heelless

slippers, with narrow black ribbons, wound over the instep, and crossed

and recrossed from ankle, way up, over white stockings, were the style;

it was a pretty fashion.

I recall the autumn of 1849, when I, a young girl, was at the Astor

House, in New York. Coming downstairs one morning to breakfast, how

surprised I was at glaring notices posted on walls and doors, “Hop

to-night.” You may well believe I was at the hop, though I had no

suitable dress. I was only a looker-on.

When I mentioned slippers I recalled that hotel hop, for Mme. Le Vert

wore a pink silk dress and pink satin slippers, all laced up and tied

up with broad pink ribbons. Nobody had ever seen the like before. Mme.

Walton, her mother, was on hand, and hopped, too, just as spry a hop as

any young girl. I contrived to sidle along and keep near to Mme. Le Vert,

for I was as fascinated as any one of her numerous beaux. Dr. Le Vert, by

the way, had just started on a trip to Europe for his health. Going to

Europe then was like taking a trip to Mars now.

I heard Mme. Le Vert talking to four different swains in four different

languages. I believe she considered her linguistic versatility her strong

point. She surely was a most remarkable woman. She was as tender and

sweet to me, a very plain, simple, unattractive girl, as to her swellest

friends. One does not easily forget such an episode of early life. I

never met Mme. Le Vert after that autumn. We all returned South together

on the Crescent City, the pioneer steamer between New York and New

Orleans.

I will not moralize or sermonize over these reminiscences. They are all

of the dead past. Both fashions and people are gone.

XII

WEDDING CUSTOMS THEN AND NOW

Social life in old New Orleans · 第 3 / 15 段