BP. BURNET.

I brought these general considerations only to shew the reverend

opinion which of course would be entertained of this mixt person, THE

SUPREME HEAD OF THE CHURCH, compounded of a king and a pope; and how

natural a foundation it was for the superstructure of despotic power in

all its branches. But I now hasten to the particulars which demonstrate

that this use was actually made of that title.

And, first, let me observe, that it gave birth to that great and

formidable court of the HIGH-COMMISSION; which brought so mighty an

accession of power to the crown, that, as experience afterwards shewed,

no security could be had for the people’s liberties, till it was

totally abolished. The necessity of the times was a good plea for the

first institution of so dangerous a tribunal. The restless endeavours

of papists and puritans against the ecclesiastical establishment gave

a colour for the continuance of it. But, as all matters that regarded

religion or conscience were subjected to its sole cognizance and

inspection, it was presently seen how wide an entrance it gave to the

most tyrannical usurpations.

It was, further, natural that the king’s power in civil causes should

keep pace with his authority in spiritual. And, fortunately for the

advancement of his prerogative, there was already erected within the

kingdom another court of the like dangerous nature, of ancient date,

and venerable estimation, under the name of the court of STAR-CHAMBER;

which brought every thing under the direction of the crown that could

not so properly be determined in the high-commission. These were the

two arms of absolute dominion; which, at different times, and under

different pretences, were stretched forth to the oppression of every

man that presumed to oppose himself to the royal will or pleasure. The

star-chamber had been kept, in former times, within some tolerable

bounds; but the high and arbitrary proceedings of the other court,

which were found convenient for the further purpose of reformation, and

were therefore constantly exercised, and as constantly connived at by

the parliament, gave an easy pretence for advancing the star-chamber’s

jurisdiction so far, that in the end its tyranny was equally

intolerable as that of the high-commission.

Thus the king’s authority in all cases, spiritual and temporal, was

fully established, and in the highest sense of which the words are

capable. Our kings themselves so understood it; and when afterwards

their parliaments shewed a disposition to interfere in any thing

relating either to church or state, they were presently reprimanded;

and sternly required not to meddle with what concerned their

prerogative royal and their high points of government. Instances of

this sort were very frequent in ELIZABETH’S reign, when the commons

were getting up, and the spirit of liberty began to exert itself in

that assembly. The meaning of all this mysterious language was, that

the royal pleasure was subject to no control, but was to be left to

take its free course under the sanction of these two supreme courts, to

which the cognizance of all great matters was committed.

This, one would think, were sufficient to satisfy the ambition of our

kings. But they went further, and still under the wing of their beloved

supremacy.

The parliament were not so tame, or the king’s grace did not require

it of them, to divest themselves entirely, though it was much checked

and restrained by these courts, of their legislative capacity. But

the crown found a way to ease itself of this curb, if at any time it

should prove troublesome to it. This was by means of the DISPENSING

POWER; which, in effect, vacated all laws at once, further than it

pleased the king to countenance and allow them. And for so enormous a

stretch of power (which, being rarely exercised, was the less minded)

there was a ready pretence from the papal privileges and pre-eminencies

to which the crown had succeeded. For this most invidious of all the

claims of prerogative had been indisputable in the church; and it

had been nibbled at by some of our kings, in former times, from the

contagious authority of the pope’s example, even without the pretence

which the supremacy in spirituals now gave for it.

The exercise of this power, in the popes themselves, was thought so

monstrous, that MATTHEW PARIS honestly complains of it in his time,

as _extinguishing all justice_—EXTINGUIT OMNEM JUSTICIAM[17]. And on

another occasion, I remember, he goes so far, in a spirit of prophecy,

almost, as to tell us the ill use that hereafter kings themselves might

be tempted to make of it[18]. His prediction was verified very soon:

for HENRY III. learned this lesson of tyranny, and put it in practice.

On which occasion one of his upright judges could not help exclaiming,

CIVILIS CURIA EXEMPLO ECCLESIASTICÆ CONQUINATUR[19]. And afterwards,

we know, HENRY VII. claimed and exercised this dispensing power in

the case of sheriffs, contrary to act of parliament[20]. It was early

indeed in his reign, and when the state of his affairs was thought to

give a colour to it.

I mention these things to shew, that since the pope’s example had

been so infectious in former times, it would now be followed very

resolutely, when the translation of the very supremacy, from which it

had sprung, seemed to justify it. And we have a remarkable instance

in ELIZABETH’S reign, by which it may appear that this prerogative

was publickly and solemnly avowed. For upon some scandal taken by the

popish party upon pretence that the book of consecration of bishops was

not established by law, the queen made no scruple to declare by her

letters-patent, that she had, by her supreme authority, dispensed with

all causes or doubts of any imperfection or disability in the persons

of the bishops. My learned friend, Dr. STILLINGFLEET, in commenting

this case, acknowledges the very truth. “It was customary,” says he,

“in the pope’s bulls, to put in such kind of clauses; and therefore she

would omit no power in that case to which the pope had pretended[21].”

And it is in this dispensing spirit that JAMES I, having delivered it

for a maxim of state, “that the king is above law,” goes on to affirm,

in one of his favourite works, that general laws, made publickly in

parliament, may, upon known respects to the king, by his authority be

mitigated and SUSPENDED upon causes only known to him[22].

We perceive the ground of that claim, which was carried so high by the

princes of the house of STUART, and, as we have just seen, brought

on the ruin of the last of them. And to how great a degree this

prerogative of the dispensing power had at length possessed the minds

even of the common lawyers, (partly from some scattered examples of

it in former times, and partly from reasons of expediency in certain

junctures, but principally from the inveteracy of this notion of the

papal supremacy) we had an alarming proof in HALE’S case, when eleven

out of the twelve judges declared for it.

The works of Richard Hurd, volume 4 (of 8) · 第 56 / 243 题