which, if you don't know it, I will write out for you, ready as it offers

itself to my Memory. Mrs. Frere of Cambridge used to sing it as she

could sing the Classical Ballad--to a fairly expressive tune: but there

is a movement (Trio, I think) in one of dear old Haydn's Symphonies

almost made for it. Who else but Haydn for the Pastoral! Do you

remember his blessed Chorus of 'Come, gentle Spring,' that open the

Seasons? Oh, it is something to remember the old Ladies who sang that

Chorus at the old Ancient Concerts rising with Music in hand to sing that

lovely piece under old Greatorex's Direction. I have never heard Haydn

and Handel so well as in those old Rooms with those old Performers, who

still retained the Tradition of those old Masters. Now it is getting

Midnight; but so mild--this October 4--that I am going to smoke one Pipe

outdoors--with a little Brandy and water to keep the Dews off. I told

you I had not been well all the Summer; I say I begin to 'smell the

Ground,' {83} which you will think all Fancy. But I remain while above

Ground

Yours sincerely

E. F.G.

XXXIII.

[_October_, 1875.]

DEAR MRS. KEMBLE,

My last Letter asked you how and where I could get at your Papers; this

is to say, I have got them, thanks to the perseverance of our Woodbridge

Bookseller, who would not be put off by his London Agent, and has finally

procured me the three Numbers {84} which contain your 'Gossip.' Now

believe me; I am delighted with it; and only wish it might run on as long

as I live: which perhaps it may. Of course somewhat of my Interest

results from the Times, Persons, and Places you write of; almost all more

or less familiar to me; but I am quite sure that very few could have

brought all before me as you have done--with what the Painters call, so

free, full, and flowing a touch. I suppose this 'Gossip' is the Memoir

you told me you were about; three or four years ago, I think: or perhaps

Selections from it; though I hardly see how your Recollections could be

fuller. No doubt your Papers will all be collected into a Book; perhaps

it would have been financially better for you to have so published it

now. But, on the other hand, you will have the advantage of writing with

more freedom and ease in the Magazine, knowing that you can alter,

contract, or amplify, in any future Re-publication. It gives me such

pleasure to like, and honestly say I like, this work--and--I know I'm

right in such matters, though I can't always give the reason why I like,

or don't like, Dr. Fell: as much wiser People can--who reason themselves

quite wrong.

I suppose you were at School in the Rue d'Angouleme near about the time

(you don't give dates enough, I think--there's one fault for you!)--about

the time when we lived there: I suppose you were somewhat later, however:

for assuredly my Mother and yours would have been together often--Oh, but

your Mother was not there, only you--at School. We were there in 1817-

18--signalised by The Great Murder--that of Fualdes--one of the most

interesting events in all History to me, I am sorry to say. For in that

point I do not say I am right. But that Rue d'Angouleme--do you not

remember the house cornering on the Champs Elysees with some ornaments in

stone of Flowers and Garlands--belonging to a Lord Courtenay, I believe?

And do you remember a Pepiniere over the way; and, over that, seeing that

Temple in the Beaujon Gardens with the Parisians descending and ascending

in Cars? And (I think) at the end of the street, the Church of St.

Philippe du Roule? Perhaps I shall see in your next Number that you do

remember all these things.

Well: I was pleased with some other Papers in your Magazine: as those on

V. Hugo, {85a} and Tennyson's Queen Mary: {85b} I doubt not that

Criticism on English Writers is likely to be more impartial over the

Atlantic, and not biassed by Clubs, Coteries, etc. I always say that we

in the Country are safer Judges than those of even better Wits in London:

not being prejudiced so much, whether by personal acquaintance, or party,

or Fashion. I see that Professor Wilson said much the same thing to

Willis forty years ago.

I have written to Donne to tell him of your Papers, and that I will send

him my Copies if he cannot get them. Mowbray wrote me word that his

Father, who has bought the house in Weymouth Street, was now about

returning to it, after some Alterations made. Mowbray talks of paying me

a little Visit here--he and his Wife--at the End of this month:--when

what Good Looks we have will all be gone.

Farewell for the present; I count on your Gossip: and believe me (what it

serves to make me feel more vividly)

Your sincere old Friend

E. F.G.

XXXIV.

[Nov. 1875.]

DEAR MRS. KEMBLE,

The Mowbray Donnes have been staying some days {86} with me--very

pleasantly. Of course I got them to tell me of the fine things in

London: among the rest, the Artists whose Photos they sent me, and I here

enclose. The Lady, they tell me--(Spedding's present Idol)--is better

than her Portrait--which would not have so enamoured Bassanio. Irving's,

they say, is flattered. But 'tis a handsome face, surely; and one that

should do for Hamlet--if it were not for that large Ear--do you notice? I

was tempted to send it to you, because it reminds me of some of your

Family: your Father, most of all, as Harlowe has painted him in that

famous Picture of the Trial Scene. {87a} It is odd to me that the fine

Engraving from that Picture--once so frequent--is scarce seen now: it has

seemed strange to me to meet People who never even heard of it.

I don't know why you have a little Grudge against Mrs. Siddons--perhaps

you will say you have not--all my fancy. I think it was noticed at

Cambridge that your Brother John scarce went to visit her when she was

staying with that Mrs. Frere, whom you don't remember with pleasure. She

did talk much and loud: but she had a fine Woman's heart underneath, and

she could sing a classical Song: as also some of Handel, whom she had

studied with Bartleman. But she never could have sung the Ballad with

the fulness which you describe in Mrs. Arkwright. {87b}

Which, together with your mention of your American isolation, reminds me

of some Verses of Hood, with which I will break your Heart a little. They

are not so very good, neither: but I, in England as I am, and like to be,

cannot forget them.

'The Swallow with Summer

Shall wing o'er the Seas;

The Wind that I sigh to

Shall sing in your Trees;

The Ship that it hastens

Your Ports will contain--

But for me--I shall never

See England again.' {88a}

It always runs in my head to a little German Air, common enough in our

younger days--which I will make a note of, and you will, I dare say,

remember at once.

I doubt that what I have written is almost as illegible as that famous

one of yours: in which however only [paper] was in fault: {88b} and now I

shall scarce mend the matter by taking a steel pen instead of that old

quill, which certainly did fight upon its Stumps.

Well now--Professor Masson of Edinburgh has asked me to join him and

seventy-nine others in celebrating Carlyle's eightieth Birthday on

December 4--with the Presentation of a Gold Medal with Carlyle's own

Effigy upon it, and a congratulatory Address. I should have thought such

a Measure would be ridiculous to Carlyle; but I suppose Masson must have

ascertained his Pleasure from some intimate Friend of C.'s: otherwise he

would not have known of my Existence for one. However Spedding and

Pollock tell me that, after some hesitation like my own, they judged best

to consent. Our Names are even to be attached somehow to a--White Silk,

or Satin, Scroll! Surely Carlyle cannot be aware of that? I hope

devoutly that my Name come too late for its Satin Apotheosis; but, if it

do not, I shall apologise to Carlyle for joining such Mummery. I only

followed the Example of my Betters.

Now I must shut up, for Photos and a Line of Music is to come in. I was

so comforted to find that your Mother had some hand in Dr. Kitchener's

Cookery Book, {89} which has always been Guide, Philosopher, and Friend

in such matters. I can't help liking a Cookery Book.

Ever yours

E. F.G.

No: I never turned my tragic hand on Fualdes; but I remember well being

taken in 1818 to the Ambigu Comique to see the 'Chateau de Paluzzi,'

which was said to be founded on that great Murder. I still distinctly

remember a Closet, from which came some guilty Personage. It is not only

the Murder itself that impressed me, but the Scene it was enacted in; the

ancient half-Spanish City of Rodez, with its River Aveyron, its lonely

Boulevards, its great Cathedral, under which the Deed was done in the

'Rue des Hebdomadiers.' I suppose you don't see, or read, our present

Whitechapel Murder--a nasty thing, not at all to my liking. The Name of

the Murderer--as no one doubts he is, whatever the Lawyers may

disprove--is the same as that famous Man of Taste who wrote on the Fine

Arts in the London Magazine under the name of Janus Weathercock, {90a}

and poisoned Wife, Wife's Mother and Sister after insuring their Lives.

De Quincey (who was one of the Magazine) has one of his Essays about this

wretch.

Here is another half-sheet filled, after all: I am afraid rather

troublesome to read. In three or four days we shall have another

Atlantic, and I am ever yours

E. F.G.

XXXV.

WOODBRIDGE: _Decr._ 29/75.

DEAR MRS. KEMBLE,

You will say I am a very good Creature indeed, for beginning to answer

your Letter the very day it reaches me. But so it happens that this same

day also comes a Letter from Laurence the Painter, who tells me something

of poor Minnie's Death, {90b} which answers to the Query in your Letter.

Laurence sends me Mrs. Brookfield's Note to him: from which I quote to

you--no!--I will make bold to send you her Letter itself! Laurence says

he is generally averse to showing others a Letter meant for himself (the

little Gentleman that he is!), but he ventures in this case, knowing me

to be an old friend of the Family. And so I venture to post it over the

Atlantic to you who take a sincere Interest in them also. I wonder if I

am doing wrong?

In the midst of all this mourning comes out a new Volume of Thackeray's

Drawings--or Sketches--as I foresaw it would be, too much Caricature, not

so good as much [of] his old Punch; and with none of the better things I

wanted them to put in--for his sake, as well as the Community's. I do

not wonder at the Publisher's obstinacy, but I wonder that Annie T. did

not direct otherwise. I am convinced I can hear Thackeray saying, when

such a Book as this was proposed to him--'Oh, come--there has been enough

of all this'--and crumpling up the Proof in that little hand of his. For

a curiously little hand he had, uncharacteristic of the grasp of his

mind: I used to consider it half inherited from the Hindoo people among

whom he was born. {91}

I dare say I told you of the Proposal to congratulate Carlyle on his

eightieth Birthday; and probably some Newspaper has told you of the

Address, and the Medal, and the White Satin Roll to which our eighty

names were to be attached. I thought the whole Concern, Medal, Address,

and Satin Roll, a very Cockney thing; and devoutly hoped my own

illustrious name would arrive too late. I could not believe that Carlyle

would like the Thing: but it appears by his published Answer that he did.

He would not, ten years ago, I think. Now--talking of illustrious names,

etc., oh, my dear Mrs. Kemble, your sincere old Regard for my Family and

myself has made you say more--of one of us, at least--than the World will

care to be told: even if your old Regard had not magnified our lawful

Deserts. But indeed it has done so: in Quality, as well as in Quantity.

I know I am not either squeamishly, or hypocritically, saying all this: I

am sure I know myself better than you do, and take a juster view of my

pretensions. I think you Kembles are almost Donnes in your determined

regard, and (one may say) Devotion to old Friends, etc. A rare--a

noble--Failing! Oh, dear!--Well, I shall not say any more: you will know

that I do not the less thank you for publickly speaking of [me] as I

never was spoken of before--only _too_ well. Indeed, this is so; and

when you come to make a Book of your Papers, I shall make you cut out

something. Don't be angry with me now--no, I know you will not. {92}

The Day after To-morrow I shall have your new Number; which is a

Consolation (if needed) for the Month's going. And I am ever yours

E. F.G.

Oh, I must add--The Printing is no doubt the more legible; but I get on

very well with your MS. when not crossed. {94}

Donne, I hear, is fairly well. Mowbray has had a Lift in his Inland

Revenue Office, and now is secure, I believe, of Competence for Life.

Charles wrote me a kindly Letter at Christmas: he sent me his own Photo;

and then (at my Desire) one of his wife:--Both of which I would enclose,

but that my Packet is already bulky enough. It won't go off to-night

when it is written--for here (absolutely!) comes my Reader (8 p.m.) to

read me a Story (very clever) in All the Year Round, and no one to go to

Post just now.

Were they not pretty Verses by Hood? I thought to make you a little

miserable by them:--but you take no more notice than--what you will.

Good Night! Good Bye!--Now for Mrs. Trollope's Story, entitled 'A

Charming Fellow'--(very clever).

XXXVI.

WOODBRIDGE: _Febr_: 2/76.

Now, my dear Mrs. Kemble, I have done you a little good turn. Some days

ago I was talking to my Brother John (I dared not show him!) of what you

had said of my Family in your Gossip. He was extremely interested: and

wished much that I [would] convey you his old hereditary remembrances.

But, beside that, he wished you to have a Miniature of your Mother which

my Mother had till she died. It is a full length; in a white Dress, with

blue Scarf, looking and tending with extended Arms upward in a Blaze of

Light. My Brother had heard my Mother's History of the Picture, but

could not recall it. I fancy it was before your Mother's Marriage. The

Figure is very beautiful, and the Face also: like your Sister Adelaide,

and your Brother Henry both. I think you will be pleased with this: and

my Brother is very pleased that you should have it. Now, how to get it

over to you is the Question; I believe I must get my little Quaritch, the

Bookseller, who has a great American connection, to get it safely over to

you. But if you know of any surer means, let me know. It is framed: and

would look much better if some black edging were streaked into the Gold

Frame; a thing I sometimes do only with a strip of Black Paper. The old

Plan of Black and Gold Frames is much wanted where Yellow predominates in

the Picture. Do you know I have a sort of Genius for Picture-framing,

which is an Art People may despise, as they do the Milliner's: but you

know how the prettiest Face may be hurt, and the plainest improved, by

the Bonnet; and I find that (like the Bonnet, I suppose) you can only

judge of the Frame, by trying it on. I used to tell some Picture Dealers

they had better hire me for such Millinery: but I have not had much Scope

for my Art down here. So now you have a little Lecture along with the

Picture.

Now, as you are to thank me for this good turn done to you, so have I to

thank you for Ditto to me. The mention of my little Quaritch reminds me.

He asked me for copies of Agamemnon, to give to some of his American

Customers who asked for them; and I know from whom they must have somehow

heard of it. And now, what Copies I had being gone, he is going, at his

own risk, to publish a little Edition. The worst is, he _will_ print it

pretentiously, I fear, as if one thought it very precious: but the Truth

is, I suppose he calculates on a few Buyers who will give what will repay

him. One of my Patrons, Professor Norton, of Cambridge Mass., has sent

me a second Series of Lowell's 'Among my Books,' which I shall be able to

acknowledge with sincere praise. I had myself bought the first Series.

Lowell may do for English Writers something as Ste. Beuve has done for

French: and one cannot give higher Praise. {97a}

There has been an absurd Bout in the Athenaeum {97b} between Miss Glyn

and some Drury Lane Authorities. She wrote a Letter to say that she

would not have played Cleopatra in a revival of Antony and Cleopatra for

1000 pounds a line, I believe, so curtailed and mangled was it. Then

comes a Miss Wallis, who played the Part, to declare that 'the Veteran'

(Miss G.) had wished to play the Part as it was acted: and furthermore

comes Mr. Halliday, who somehow manages and adapts at D. L., to assert

that the Veteran not only wished to enact the Desecration, but did enact

it for many nights when Miss Wallis was indisposed. Then comes Isabel

forward again--but I really forget what she said. I never saw her but

once--in the Duchess of Malfi--very well: better, I dare say, than

anybody now; but one could not remember a Word, a Look, or an Action. She

speaks in her Letter of being brought up in the grand School and

Tradition of the Kembles.

I am glad, somehow, that you liked Macready's Reminiscences: so honest,

so gentlemanly in the main, so pathetic even in his struggles to be a

better Man and Actor. You, I think, feel with him in your Distaste for

the Profession.

I write you tremendous long Letters, which you can please yourself about

reading through. I shall write Laurence your message of Remembrance to

him. I had a longish Letter from Donne, who spoke of himself as well

enough, only living by strict Rule in Diet, Exercise, etc.

We have had some remarkable Alternations of Cold and Hot here too: but

nothing like the extremes you tell me of on the other side of the Page.

Lionel Tennyson (second Son), who answered my half-yearly Letter to his

father, tells me they had heard that Annie Thackeray was well in health,

but--as you may imagine in Spirits.

And I remain yours always

E. F.G.

How is it my Atlantic Monthly is not yet come?

XXXVII.

WOODBRIDGE: _Febr_: 17/76.

DEAR MRS. KEMBLE,

I ought to have written before to apprise you of your Mother's Miniature

being sent off--by Post. On consideration, we judged that to be the

safest and speediest way: the Post Office here telling us that it was not

too large or heavy so to travel: without the Frame. As, however, our

Woodbridge Post Office is not very well-informed, I shall be very glad to

hear it has reached you, in its double case: wood within, and tin without

(quite unordered and unnecessary), which must make you think you receive

a present of Sardines. You lose, you see, the Benefit of my exalted

Taste in respect of Framing, which I had settled to perfection. Pray get

a small Frame, concaving inwardly (Ogee pattern, I believe), which leads

the Eyes into the Picture: whereas a Frame convexing outwardly leads the

Eye away from the Picture; a very good thing in many cases, but not

needed in this. I dare say the Picture (faded as it is) will look poor

to you till enclosed and set off by a proper Frame. And the way is, as

with a Bonnet (on which you know much depends even with the fairest

face), to try one on before ordering it home. That is, if you choose to

indulge in some more ornamental Frame than the quite simple one I have

before named. Indeed, I am not sure if the Picture would not look best

in a plain gold Flat (as it is called) without Ogee, or any ornament

whatsoever. But try it on first: and then you can at least please

yourself, if not the Terrible Modiste who now writes to you. My Brother

is very anxious you should have the Picture, and wrote to me again to

send you his hereditary kind Regards. I ought to be sending you his

Note--which I have lost. Instead of that, I enclose one from poor

Laurence to whom I wrote your kind message; and am as ever

Yours

E. F.G.

You will let me know if the Picture has not arrived before this Note

reaches you?

XXXVIII.

LOWESTOFT: _March_ 16/76.

DEAR MRS. KEMBLE,

Directly that you mentioned 'Urania,' I began to fancy I remembered her

too. {100} And we are both right; I wrote to a London friend to look out

for the Engraving: and I post it to you along with this Letter. If it do

not reach you in some three weeks, let me know, and I will send another.

The Engraving stops short before the Feet: the Features are coarser than

the Painting: which makes me suppose that it (Engraving) is from the

Painting: or from some Painting of which yours is a Copy--(I am called

off here to see the Procession of Batty's Circus parade up the street)--

The Procession is past: the Clowns, the Fine Ladies (who should wear a

little Rouge even by Daylight), the 'performing' Elephants, the helmeted

Cavaliers, and last, the Owner (I suppose) as 'the modern Gentleman'

driving four-in-hand.

This intoxication over, I return to my Duties--to say that the Engraving

is from a Painting by 'P. Jean,' engraved by Vendramini: published by

John Thompson in 1802, and dedicated to the 'Hon. W. R. Spencer'--(who, I

suppose, was the 'Vers-de Societe' Man of the Day; and perhaps the owner

of the original: whether now yours, or not. All this I tell you in case

the Print should not arrive in fair time: and you have but to let me

know, and another shall post after it.

I have duly written my Brother your thanks for his Present, and your

sincere Gratification in possessing it. He is very glad it has so much

pleased you. But he can only surmise thus much more of its history--that

it belonged to my Grandfather before my Mother: he being a great lover of

the Theatre, and going every night I believe to old Covent Garden or old

Drury Lane--names really musical to me--old Melodies.

I think I wrote to you about the Framing. I always say of that, as of

other Millinery (on which so much depends), the best way is--to try on

the Bonnet before ordering it; which you can do by the materials which

all Carvers and Gilders in this Country keep by them. I have found even

my Judgment--the Great Twalmley's Judgment--sometimes thrown out by not

condescending to this; in this, as in so many other things, so very

little making all the Difference. I should not think that Black next the

Picture would do so well: but try, try: try on the Bonnet: and if you

please yourself--inferior Modiste as you are--why, so far so good.

Donne, who reports himself as very well (always living by Discipline and

Rule), tells me that he has begged you to return to England if you would

make sure of seeing him again. I told Pollock of your great Interest in

Macready: I too find that I am content to have bought the Book, and feel

more interest in the Man than in the Actor. My Mother used to know him

once: but I never saw him in private till once at Pollock's after his

retirement: when he sat quite quiet, and (as you say) I was sorry not to

have made a little Advance to him, as I heard he had a little wished to

see me because of that old Acquaintance with my Mother. I should like to

have told him how much I liked much of his Performance; asked him why he

would say 'Amen stu-u-u-u-ck in my Throat' (which was a bit of wrong, as

well as vulgar, Judgment, I think). But I looked on him as the great Man

of the Evening, unpresuming as he was: and so kept aloof, as I have ever

done from all Celebrities--yourself among them--who I thought must be

wearied enough of Followers and Devotees--unless those of Note.

I am now writing in the place--in the room--from which I wrote ten years

ago--it all recurs to me--with Montaigne for my Company, and my Lugger

about to be built. Now I have brought Madame de Sevigne (who loved

Montaigne too--the capital Woman!) and the Lugger--Ah, there is a long

sad Story about that!--which I won't go into--

Little Quaritch seems to have dropt Agamemnon, Lord of Hosts, for the

present: and I certainly am not sorry, for I think it would only have

been abused by English Critics: with some, but not all, Justice. You are

very good in naming your American Publisher, but I suppose it must be

left at present with Quaritch, to whom I wrote a 'Permit,' so long as I

had nothing to do with it.

Ever yours

E. F.G.

XXXIX.

[LOWESTOFT, _April_, 1876.]

MY DEAR MRS. KEMBLE,

Letters of Edward FitzGerald to Fanny Kemble (1871-1883) · 第 4 / 15 段