SHAKESPEARE

A Parallel.

Shakespeare and Rembrandt have in common the faculty of quickening

speculation and compelling the minds of men to combat and discussion.

About the English poet a literature of contention has been in process of

accretion ever since he was discovered to be Shakespeare; and about the

Dutch painter and etcher there has gradually accumulated a literature

precisely analogous in character and for the most part of equal quality.

In such an age as this, when the creative faculty of the world is mainly

occupied with commentary and criticism, the reason should not be far to

seek. Both were giants; both were original and individual in the highest

sense of the words; both were leagues ahead of their contemporaries, not

merely as regards the matter of their message but also in respect of the

terms of its delivery; each, moreover--and here one comes upon a capital

point of contact and resemblance--each was at times prodigiously inferior

to himself. Shakespeare often writes so ill that you hesitate to believe

he could ever write supremely well; or, if this way of putting it seem

indecorous and abominable, he very often writes so well that you are loth

to believe he could ever have written thus extremely ill. There are

passages in his work in which he reaches such heights of literary art as

since his time no mortal has found accessible; and there are passages

which few or none of us can read without a touch of that 'burning sense

of shame' experienced in the presence of Mr. Poynter's _Diadumene_ by the

British Matron of _The Times_ newspaper. Now, we have got to be so

curious in ideals that we cannot away with the thought of imperfection.

Our worship must have for its object something flawless, something

utterly without spot or blemish. We can be satisfied with nothing less

than an entire and perfect chrysolite; and we cannot taste our

Shakespeare at his worst without experiencing not merely the burning

sense of shame aforesaid but also a frenzy of longing to father his

faults upon somebody else--Marlowe for instance, or Green, or

Fletcher--and a fury of proving that our divinity was absolutely

incapable of them. That Shakespeare varied--that the matchless prose and

the not particularly lordly verse of _As You Like It_ are by the same

hand; that the master to whom we owe our Hamlet is also responsible for

Gertrude and King Claudius; that he who gave us the agony of Lear and the

ruin of Othello did likewise perpetrate the scene of Hector's murder, in

manner so poor and in spirit so cynical and vile--is beyond all belief

and patience; and we have argued the point to such an extent that we are

all of us in Gotham, and a mooncalf like the ascription of whatever is

good in Shakespeare to Lord Bacon is no prodigy but a natural birth.

Views and Reviews: Essays in appreciation: Literature · 第 23 / 52 题