BY EDWARD A. FREEMAN

The towers of Lincoln, simply as towers, are immeasurably finer than those

of York; but the front of York, as a front, far surpasses the front of

Lincoln.

As for the general outline, there can be no doubt as to the vast

superiority of Lincoln. Lincoln has sacrificed a great deal to the

enormous pitch of its roofs, but it has its reward in the distant view of

the outside. The outline of York is spoiled by the incongruity between the

low roofs of the nave and choir and the high roofs of the transepts. The

dumpiness of the central tower of York--which is, in truth, the original

Norman tower cased--can not be wholly made a matter of blame to the

original builders. For it is clear that some finish, whether a crown like

those at Newcastle and Edinburgh or any other, was intended. Still the

proportion which is solemn in Romanesque becomes squat in perpendicular,

and, if York has never received its last finish, Lincoln has lost the last

finish which it received. Surely no one who is not locally sworn to the

honor of York can doubt about preferring the noble central tower of

Lincoln, soaring still, even tho shorn of its spire. The eastern transept,

again, is far more skilfully managed at Lincoln than at York. It may well

be doubted whether such a transept is really an improvement; but if it is

to be there at all, it is certainly better to make it the bold and

important feature which it is at Lincoln, than to leave it, as it is at

York, half afraid, as it were, to proclaim its own existence.

Coming to the east end, we again find, as at the west, Lincoln throwing

away great advantages by a perverse piece of sham. The east window of

Lincoln is the very noblest specimen of the pure and bold tracery of its

own date. But it is crusht, as it were, by the huge gable window above

it--big enough to be the east window of a large church--and the aisles,

whose east windows are as good on their smaller scale as the great window,

are absurdly finished with sham gables, destroying the real and natural

outline of the whole composition. At York we have no gables at all; the

vast east window, with its many flimsy mullions, is wonderful rather than

beautiful; still the east end of York is real, and so far it surpasses

that of Lincoln.

On entering either of these noble churches, the great fault to be found is

the lack of apparent height. To some extent this is due to a cause common

to both. We are convinced that both churches are too long. The eastern

part of Lincoln--the angels' choir--is in itself one of the loveliest of

human works; the proportion of the side elevations and the beauty of the

details are both simply perfect. But its addition has spoiled the minster

as a whole. The vast length at one unbroken height gives to the eastern

view of the inside the effect of looking through a tube, and the

magnificent east window, when seen from the western part of the choir, is

utterly dwarfed. And the same arrangement is open to the further objection

that it does not fall in with the ecclestiastical arrangements of the

building....

In the nave of York, looking eastward or westward, it is hard indeed to

believe that we are in a church only a few feet lower than Westminster or

Saint Ouens. The height is utterly lost, partly through the enormous

width, partly through the low and crushing shape of the vaulting-arch. The

vault, it must be remembered, is an imitation of an imitation, a modern

copy of a wooden roof made to imitate stone. This imitation of stone

construction in wood runs through the greater part of the church; it comes

out specially in the transepts, where a not very successful attempt is

made to bring the gable windows within the vault--the very opposite to the

vast space lost in the roofs at Lincoln. Yet with all this, many noble

views may be got in York nave and transepts, provided only the beholder

takes care never to look due east or west. The western view is still

further injured by the treatment of the west window--in itself an

admirable piece of tracery--which fits into nothing, and seems cut through

the wall at an arbitrary point. But the nave elevation, taken bay by bay,

is admirable. Looking across out of the aisle--the true way to judge--the

real height at last comes out, and we are reminded of some of the most

stately minsters of France....

DURHAM [Footnote: From "English Note Books." By arrangement with, and by

permission of, the publishers of Hawthorne's works, Houghton, Mifflin Co.

Copyright, 1870 and 1898.]

Seeing Europe with Famous Authors, Volume 1 Great Britain and Ireland, part 1 · 第 45 / 85 题