The third mythic tradition used as material is the world-tree, which went

(down in the lower world) to Urd's fountain. According to Völuspa (19),

this fountain is situated beneath the ash Ygdrasil. The conclusion drawn

by Gylfaginning by the aid of its Trojan premises is that since Urd's

fountain is situated in the heavens, and still under one of Ygdrasil's

roots, this root must be located still further up in the heavens. The

placing of the root is also done with consistency, so that we get the

following series of wrong localisations:--Down on the earth, Asgard-Troy;

thence up to the heavens the bridge Bifrost; above Bifrost, Urd's

fountain; high above Urd's fountain, one of Ygdrasil's three roots (which

in the mythology are all in the lower world).

Since one of Ygdrasil's roots thus had received its place far up in the

heavens, it became necessary to place a second root on a level with the

earth, and the third one was allowed to retain its position in the lower

world. Thus was produced a just distribution of the roots among the

three regions which in the conception of the middle ages constituted the

universe, namely, the heavens, the earth, and hell.

In this manner two myths were made to do service in regard to one of

the remaining Ygdrasil roots. The one myth was taken from Völuspa,

where it was learned that Mimer's fountain is situated below the

sacred world-tree; the other was Grimnismal (31), where we are told

that frost-giants dwell under one of the three roots. At the time when

Gylfaginning was written, and still later, popular traditions told that

Gudmund-Mimer was of giant descent (see the middle-age sagas narrated

above). From this Gylfaginning draws the conclusion that Mimer was a

frost-giant, and it identifies the root which extends to the frost-giants

with the root that extends to Mimer's fountain. Thus this fountain of

creative power, of world-preservation, of wisdom, and of poetry receives

from Gylfaginning its place in the abode of the powers of frost, hostile

to gods and to men, in the land of the frost-giants, which Gylfaginning

regards as being Jotunheim, bordering on the earth.

In this way Gylfaginning, with the Trojan hypothesis as its

starting-point, has gotten so far that it has separated from the lower

world with its three realms and three fountains Urd's realm and fountain,

they being transferred to the heavens, and Mimer's realm and fountain,

they being transferred to Jotunheim. In the mythology these two realms

were the subterranean regions of bliss, and the third, Nifelhel, with

the regions subject to it, was the abode of the damned. After these

separations were made, Gylfaginning, to be logical, had to assume that

the lower world of the heathens was exclusively a realm of misery and

torture, a sort of counterpart of the hell of the Church. This conclusion

is also drawn with due consistency, and Ygdrasil's third root, which in

the mythology descended to the well Hvergelmer and to the lower world

of the frost-giants, Nifelhel, Nifelheim, extends over the whole lower

world, the latter being regarded as identical with Nifelheim and the

places of punishment therewith connected.

This result carries with it another. The goddess of the lower world, and

particularly of its domain of bliss, was in the mythology, as shall be

shown below, the goddess of fate and death, Urd, also called Hel, when

named after the country over which she ruled. In a local sense, the

name Hel could be applied partly to the whole lower world, which rarely

happened, partly to Urd's and Mimer's realms of bliss, which was more

common, and Hel was then the opposite of Nifelhel, which was solely the

home of misery and torture. Proofs of this shall be given below. But when

the lower world had been changed to a sort of hell, the name Hel, both

in its local and in its personal sense, must undergo a similar change,

and since Urd (the real Hel) was transferred to the heavens, there was

nothing to hinder Gylfaginning from substituting for the queen of the

lower world Loke's daughter cast down into Nifelhel and giving her the

name Hel and the sceptre over the whole lower world.

This method is also pursued by Gylfaginning's author without hesitation,

although he had the best of reasons for suspecting its correctness.

A certain hesitancy might here have been in order. According to the

mythology, the pure and pious Asa-god Balder comes to Hel, that is to

say, to the lower world, and to one of its realms of bliss. But after

the transformation to which the lower world had been subjected in

Gylfaginning's system, the descent of Balder to Hel must have meant a

descent to and a remaining in the world of misery and torture, and a

relation of subject to the daughter of Loke. This should have awakened

doubts in the mind of the author of Gylfaginning. But even here he had

the courage to be true to his premises, and without even thinking of the

absurdity in which he involves himself, he goes on and endows the sister

of the Midgard-serpent and of the Fenris-wolf with that perfect power

which before belonged to Destiny personified, so that the same gods who

before had cast the horrible child Loke down into the ninth region of

Nifelhel are now compelled to send a minister-plenipotentiary to her

majesty to treat with her and pray for Balder's liberation.

But finally, there comes a point where the courage of consistency

fails Gylfaginning. The manner in which it has placed the roots of the

world-tree makes us first of all conceive Ygdrasil as lying horizontal in

space. An attempt to make this matter intelligible can produce no other

picture of Ygdrasil, in accord with the statements of Gylfaginning, than

the following:

The root over heaven

and over Urd's fountain.

-------------------------+

|

The root over Jotunheim |

and over Mimer's +-----------------------------

well. |

-------------------------+

|

The root over the lower +-----------------------------

world and over | Ygdrasil's trunk.

Hvergelmer's fountain. |

-------------------------+

But Gylfaginning is not disposed to draw this conclusion. On the

contrary, it insists that Ygdrasil stands erect on its three roots. How

we, then, are to conceive its roots as united one with the other and with

the trunk of this it very prudently leaves us in ignorance, for this is

beyond the range of human imagination.

The contrast between the mythological doctrine in regard to the three

Ygdrasil roots, and Gylfaginning's view of the subject may easily be

demonstrated by the following parallels:

_The Mythology._ _Gylfaginning._

1. Ygdrasil has three roots. 1. Ygdrasil has three roots.

2. All three roots are subterranean. 2. One is in the lower world;

a second stands over Jotunheim

on a level with the earth; a

third stands over the heavens.

3. To each root corresponds 3. To each root corresponds

a fountain and a realm in the a fountain and a realm; the

lower world. The lower world realms are the heavens,

consists of three realms, each Jotunheim, and the lower world,

with its fountain and each which are located each under

with its root. its root.

4. Under one of the subterranean 4. Under one of the roots,

roots dwells the goddess that is the one which stands

of death and fate, Urd, over heaven, dwells Urd the

who is also called Hel, and in goddess of fate, and there is

her realm is Urd's fountain. Urd's fountain.

5. Under the other (subterranean)

root dwells Mimer. In his realm is

Mimer's fountain and Mimer's grove,

where a subterranean race of men

are preserved for the future world.

This root may, therefore, be said

to stand over mennskir menn

(Grimnersmal).

It is said that one of the

roots stands over mennskir menn

(Grimnersmal). By this is meant,

according to Gylfaginning, not

the root over Mimer's well, but

the root over Urd's fountain,

near which the Asas hold their

assemblies, for the Asas are

in reality men who dwelt on

earth in the city of Troy.

6. Under the third (subterranean) 6. Under the third (and

root dwell frost-giants. Under only subterranean) root dwell

this root is the well Hvergelmer, the souls of sinners and those

and the realm of the frost-giants who have died from sickness

is Nifelhel (Nifelheim). Under and age. Under this root is

Nifelhel are nine regions of torture. the well Hvergelmer and

the whole lower world. The

lower world is called Nifelhel

or Nifelheim, and contains

nine places of torture.

7. The sister of the Midgard-serpent 7. The sister of the

and of the Fenris-wolf was cast by Midgard-serpent and of the

the gods into the regions of torture Fenris-wolf was cast by the gods

under Nifelhel, and received the into the regions of torture

rule over the places where the under Nifelhel, and received

damned are punished. the rule over the whole lower

world, which consists of

Nifelhel with the nine regions

of torture.

8. The name Hel can be applied to 8. As Hel means the lower

the whole lower world, but means world, and as the sister of the

particularly that region of bliss Midgard-serpent governs the

where Urd's fountain is situated, whole lower world, she is

for Urd is the personal Hel. The meant by the personal Hel.

Loke-daughter in Nifelhel is

her slave and must obey her

commands.

Gylfaginning does not stop with the above results. It continues the chain

of its conclusions. After Hvergelmer has been selected by Gylfaginning

as the only fountain in the lower world, it should, since the lower

world has been made into a sort of hell, be a fountain of hell, and

in this respect easily recognised by the Christian conception of the

middle ages. In this new character Hvergelmer becomes the centre and

the worst place in Gylfaginning's description of the heathen Gehenna.

No doubt because the old dragon, which is hurled down into the abyss

(Revelation, chap. 20), is to be found in the hell-fountain of the

middle ages, Gylfaginning throws Nidhog down into Hvergelmer, which it

also fills with serpents and dead bodies found in Grimnismal (Str. 34,

35), where they have no connection with Hvergelmer. According to Völuspa

it is in Nastrands that Nidhog sucks and the wolf tears the dead bodies

(_náir_). Gylfaginning follows Völuspa in speaking of the other terrors

in Nastrands, but rejects Völuspa's statements about Nidhog and the wolf,

and casts both these beasts down into the Hvergelmer fountain. As shall

be shown below, the Hvergelmer of the mythology is the mother-fountain of

all waters, and is situated on a high plain in the lower world. Thence

its waters flow partly northward to Nifelheim, partly south to the

elysian fields of heathendom, and the waves sent in the latter direction

are shining, clear, and holy.

It was an old custom, at least in Iceland, that booths for the

accommodation of the visitors were built around a remote thing-stead,

or place for holding the parliament. Gylfaginning makes its Trojan Asas

follow the example of the Icelanders, and put up houses around the

thing-stead, which they selected near Urd's fountain, after they had

succeeded in securing by Bifrost a connection between Troy and heaven.

This done, Gylfaginning distributes as best it can the divine halls and

abodes of bliss mentioned in the mythology between Troy on the earth and

the thing-stead in heaven.

This may be sufficient to show that Gylfaginning's pretended account of

the old mythological cosmography is, on account of its making Troy the

starting-point, and doubtless also to some extent as a result of the

Christian methods of thought, with which the author interpreted the

heathen myths accessible to him, is simply a monstrous caricature of the

mythology, a caricature which is continued, not with complacency and

assurance, but in a confused and contradictory manner, in the eschatology

of Gylfaginning.

My chief task will now be to review and examine all the passages in the

Elder Edda's mythological songs, wherein the words Hel and Nifelhel

occur, in order to find out in this manner in which sense or senses

these words are there employed, and to note at the same time all the

passages which may come in my way and which are of importance to the myth

concerning the lower world.

57.

THE WORD HEL IN LINGUISTIC USAGE.

The Norse Hel is the same word as the Gothic _Halja_, the Old High German

_Hella_, the Anglo-Saxon _Hellia_, and the English Hell. On account of

its occurrence with similar signification in different Teutonic tongues

in their oldest linguistic monuments, scholars have been able to draw the

conclusion that the word points to a primitive Teutonic _Halja_, meaning

lower world, lower world divinity. It is believed to be related to the

Latin _oc-cul-ere_, _cel-are_, _clam_, and to mean the one who "hides,"

"conceals," "preserves."

When the books of the New Testament were for the first time translated

into a Teutonic tongue, into a Gothic dialect, the translator, Ulfilas,

had to find some way of distinguishing with suitable words between the

two realms of the lower world mentioned in the New Testament, Hades and

Gehenna (_geen a_).

Hades, the middle condition, and the locality corresponding to this

condition, which contains both fields of bliss and regions of torture,

he translated with Halja, doubtless because the signification of this

word corresponded most faithfully with the meaning of the word Hades. For

Gehenna, hell, he used the borrowed word _gaiainna_.

The Old High German translation also reproduces Hades with the word

_Hella_. For Gehenna it uses two expressions compounded with Hella. One

of these, Hellawisi, belongs to the form which afterwards predominated

in Scandinavia. Both the compounds bear testimony that the place of

punishment in the lower world could not be expressed with Hella, but

it was necessary to add a word, which showed that a subterranean place

_of punishment_ was meant. The same word for Gehenna is found among the

Christian Teutons in England, namely, Hellewite; that is to say, _the_

Hellia, that part of the lower world where it is necessary to do penance

(_vite_) for one's sins. From England the expression doubtless came to

Scandinavia, where we find in the Icelandic _Helvíti_, in the Swedish

_Hälvete_, and in the Danish _Helvede_. In the Icelandic literature it

is found for the first time in Hallfred, the same skald who with great

hesitation permitted himself to be persuaded by Olaf Trygveson to abandon

the faith of his fathers.

Many centuries before Scandinavia was converted to Christianity, the

Roman Church had very nearly obliterated the boundary line between the

subterranean Hades and Gehenna of the New Testament. The lower world had,

as a whole, become a realm of torture, though with various gradations.

Regions of bliss were no longer to be found there, and for Hel in the

sense in which Ulfilas used Halja, and the Old High German translation

Hella, there was no longer room in the Christian conception. In the

North, Hel was therefore permitted to remain a heathen word, and to

retain its heathen signification as long as the Christian generations

were able or cared to preserve it. It is natural that the memory of this

signification should gradually fade, and that the idea of the Christian

hell should gradually be transferred to the heathen _Hel_. This change

can be pretty accurately traced in the Old Norse literature. It came

slowly, for the doctrine in regard to the lower world in the Teutonic

religion addressed itself powerfully to the imagination, and, as appears

from a careful examination, far from being indefinite in its outlines, it

was, on the contrary, described with the clearest lines and most vivid

colours, even down to the minutest details. Not until the thirteenth

century could such a description of the heathen Hel as Gylfaginning's be

possible and find readers who would accept it. But not even then were the

memories (preserved in fragments from the heathen days) in regard to the

lower world doctrine so confused, but that it was possible to present a

far more faithful (or rather not so utterly false) description thereof.

Gylfaginning's representation of the heathen Hades is based less on the

then existing confusion of the traditions than on the conclusions drawn

from the author's own false premises.

In determining the question, how far Hel among the heathen Scandinavians

has had a meaning identical with or similar to that which Halja and

Hella had among their Gothic and German kinsmen--that is to say, the

signification of a death-kingdom of such a nature that it could not

with linguistic propriety be used in translating Gehenna--we must first

consult that which really is the oldest source, the usage of the spoken

language in expressions where Hel is found. Such expressions show by the

very presence of Hel that they have been handed down from heathendom, or

have been formed in analogy with old heathen phrases. One of these modes

of speech still exists: _i hjäl_ (slå ihjäl, svälta ihjäl, frysa ihjäl,

&c.), which is the Old Norse _i Hel_. We do not use this expression in

the sense that a person killed by a weapon, famine, or frost is relegated

to the abyss of torture. Still less could the heathens have used it in

that sense. The phrase would never have been created if the word Hel had

especially conveyed the notion of a place of punishment. Already in a

very remote age _í Hel_ had acquired the abstract meaning _to death_, but

in such a manner that the phrase easily suggested the concrete idea--the

realm of death (an example of this will be given below). What there is

to be said about _í Hel_ also applies to such phrases as _bida Heljar_,

to await Hel (_death_); _buask til Heljar_, to become equipped for the

journey to Hel (to be shrouded); _liggja milli heims ok Heljar_, to lie

between this world and Hel (between life and death); _liggja á Heljar

thremi_, to lie on Hel's threshold. A funeral could be called a _Helför_

(a Hel-journey); fatal illness _Helsótt_ (Hel-sickness); the deceased

could be called _Helgengnir_ (those gone to Hel). Of friends it is said

that Hel (death) alone could separate them (Fornm., vii. 233).

Thus it is evident that Hel, in the more general local sense of the word,

referred to a place common for all the dead, and that the word was used

without any additional suggestion of damnation and torture in the minds

of those employing it.

58.

THE WORD HEL IN VEGTAMSKVIDA AND IN VAFTHRUDNERSMAL.

When Odin, according to Vegtamskvida, resolved to get reliable

information in the lower world in regard to the fate which threatened

Balder, he saddled his Sleipner and rode thither. On the way he took he

came first to Nifelhel. While he was still in Nifelhel, he met on his way

a dog bloody about the breast, which came from the direction where that

division of the lower world is situated, which is called Hel. Thus the

rider and the dog came from opposite directions, and the former continued

his course in the direction whence the latter came. The dog turned, and

long pursued Odin with his barking. Then the rider reached a _foldvegr_,

that is to say, a road along grass-grown plains. The way resounded under

the hoofs of the steed. Then Odin finally came to a high dwelling which

is called _Heljarrann_ or _Heljar rann_. The name of the dwelling shows

that it was situated in Hel, not in Nifelhel. This latter realm of the

lower world Odin now had had behind him ever since he reached the green

fields, and since the dog, evidently a watch of the borders between

Nifelhel and Hel, had left him in peace. The high dwelling was decorated

as for a feast, and mead was served. It was, Odin learned, the abode

where the _ásmegir_ longingly waited for the arrival of Balder. Thus

Vegtamskvida:

2. Ræid hann (Odin) nidr thathan

Niflhæljar til,

mætti hann hvælpi

theim ær or hæliu kom.

3. Sa var blodugr

urn briost framan

ok galldrs födur

gol um læengi.

4. Framm ræid Odinn,

foldvægr dundi,

ban kom at hafu

Hæliar ranni.

7. Her standr Balldri

of brugginn miödr.

Ok ásmegir

i ofvæno.

Vegtamskvida distinguishes distinctly between Nifelhel and Hel. In Hel

is the dwelling which awaits the son of the gods, the noblest and most

pious of all the Asas. The dwelling, which reveals a lavish splendour, is

described as the very antithesis of that awful abode which, according to

Gylfaginning, belongs to the queen of the lower world. In Vafthrudnersmal

(43) the old giant says:

Fra iotna runom Of the runes of giants

oc allra goda and of all the gods

ec kann segia satt, I can speak truly;

thviat hvern hefi ec for I have been

heim um komit: in every world.

nio kom ec heima In nine worlds I came

fyr Niflhel nedan, below Nifelhel,

hinig deyja or Helio halir. thither die "halir" from Hel.

Like Vegtamskvida, so Vafthrudnersmal also distinguishes distinctly

between Hel and Nifelhel, particularly in those most remarkable words

that thither, _i.e._, to Nifelhel and the regions subject to it, _die_

"halir" from Hel. _Halir_ means men, human beings; applied to beings in

the lower world _halir_ means dead men, the spirits of deceased human

beings (cp. Allvism., 18, 6; 20, 6; 26, 6; 32, 6; 34, 6, with 28, 3).

Accordingly, nothing less is here said than that deceased persons who

have come to the realm called Hel, may there be subject to a second

death, and that through this second death they come to Nifelhel. Thus

the same sharp distinction is here made between life in Hel and in

Nifelhel as between life on earth and that in Hel. These two subterranean

realms must therefore represent very different conditions. What these

different conditions are, Vafthrudnersmal does not inform us, nor will I

anticipate the investigation on this point; still less will I appeal to

Gylfaginning's assurance that the realms of torture lie under Nifelhel,

and that it is wicked men (_vândir menn_) who are obliged to cross the

border from Hel to Nifelhel. So far it must be borne in mind that it was

in Nifelhel Odin met the bloody dog-demon, who barked at the Asa-majesty,

though he could not hinder the father of the mighty and protecting

sorceries from continuing his journey; while it was in Hel, on the other

hand, that Odin saw the splendid abode where the _ásmegir_ had already

served the precious subterranean mead for his son, the just Balder. This

argues that they who through a second death get over the border from

Hel to Nifelhel, do not by this transfer get a better fate than that to

which Hel invites those who have died the first death. Balder in the one

realm, the blood-stained kinsman of Cerberus in the other--this is, for

the present, the only, but not unimportant weight in the balance which is

to determine the question whether that border-line which a second death

draws between Hel and Nifelhel is the boundary between a realm of bliss

and a realm of suffering, and in this case, whether Hel or Nifelhel is

the realm of bliss.

This expression in Vafthrudnersmal, _hinig deyja or Helio halir_, also

forces to the front another question, which as long as it remains

unanswered, makes the former question more complicated. If Hel is a realm

of bliss, and if Nifelhel with the regions subject thereto is a realm of

unhappiness, then why do not the souls of the damned go at once to their

final destination, but are taken first to the realm of bliss, then to

the realm of anguish and pain, that is, after they have died the second

death on the boundary-line between the two? And if, on the contrary, Hel

were the realm of unhappiness and Nifelhel offered a better lot, then why

should they who are destined for a better fate, first be brought to it

through the world of torture, and then be separated from the latter by a

second death before they could gain the more happy goal? These questions

cannot be answered until later on.

59.

THE WORD HEL IN GRIMNERSMAL. HVERGELMER'S FOUNTAIN AND ITS

DEFENDERS. THE BORDER MOUNTAIN BETWEEN HEL AND NIFELHEL. THE

WORD HELBLOTINN IN THORSDRAPA.

In Grimnersmal the word Hel occurs twice (str. 28, 31), and this poem is

(together with Gylfaginning) the only ancient record which gives us any

information about the well Hvergelmer under this name (str. 26, ff.).

Teutonic Mythology: Gods and Goddesses of the Northland, Vol. 2 · 第 3 / 24 段