THE PUBLIC LIBRARY: ITS USES TO THE MUNICIPALITY

Written for the National Municipal League and printed in

_The Library Journal_ for June, 1903, eight years after the

author, Dr. John S. Billings, had begun his service as

director of the New York Public Library; largely a defence

of libraries against certain objections. The statement of

the part played by "sentiment" in popular institutions, and

its justification, are striking and true.

John Shaw Billings was born in Switzerland County, Ind., in

1839, graduated from Miami University in 1857, studied

medicine and after serving as a surgeon in the Civil War,

was assigned to the Surgeon General's Office in Washington,

of whose library he compiled the 16-volume Index Catalogue.

After service in Johns Hopkins and Pennsylvania Universities

he was chosen in 1895 director of the newly established New

York Public Library, where he served until his death in

1913, planning and supervising the construction of its

central building.

The great majority of cities of 25,000 inhabitants and upward in the

United States have public libraries of some sort, and the same is true

of many of the smaller cities. Many of these libraries have been founded

on gifts of individuals, some have developed from subscription

libraries, but the majority are now supported mainly or entirely by

funds appropriated by the city government. A considerable number are

still in the formative stage, this being true of those for which

buildings are being erected from funds provided by Mr. Carnegie and for

several hundred others for which he will probably provide buildings in

the near future.

There may be excessive and unjustifiable taxation for the support of a

public library--the amount which the city can afford for this purpose

should be carefully considered in connection with its needs for a pure

water supply and good sewage disposal, for means of communication, for

the care of the sick poor and for public schools. Each case must be

judged by itself; the only general rule I have to suggest is that in the

department of education the claims of the public library for support are

more important than those of municipal college or high school. The

people who have no taxable property, and who therefore often erroneously

suppose that they contribute nothing toward the payment of the taxes,

are usually quite willing to have a higher tax rate imposed for the

purpose of securing for themselves and their families free library

facilities--although in exceptional cases religious or sociological

opinions may lead them to oppose it.

A considerable number of taxpayers on the other hand, are more or less

reluctant to have their assessments increased for this purpose, and

their arguments should be considered and met. They are:

1. That they should not be taxed for things they do not want and never

use.

2. That furnishing free books tends to pauperize the community and to

discourage the purchase of books for home use.

3. That there is no evidence that free public libraries improve the

community materially or morally.

4. That the greater part of the books used are works of fiction and that

these are injurious to the readers.

5. That most of the arguments used in favor of free public libraries are

merely sentimental and emotional.

The first of these reasons would apply also to taxes for public schools,

street paving, sewerage, and many other items of municipal expenditure

and has no weight.

With regard to the second argument it is not a sufficient reply to say

that every one pays through the taxes, for this would apply equally well

to free lodging houses, free lunchrooms and soup kitchens, free fuel,

etc., all of which it generally believed tend to pauperize a city,

except in great and special emergencies. The proper answer is that the

free public library is an important and, indeed, necessary part of the

system of free education which is required to secure intelligent

citizens in our form of popular government, and that while in a few very

exceptional cases free schools and free libraries may tend to

improvidence or indolence or even to certain forms of crime, these rare

cases are of no importance in comparison with the benefits which

education confers upon the immense majority of the community and with

the fact that without free schools and libraries a large part of the

people will not be sufficiently educated to be useful citizens.

With the regard to the third count, the public library, again, may be

considered together with the public school. While it is difficult to

trace to either specific instances of material or moral improvement, it

is certain that the general diffusion of intelligence which both

certainly effect does result beneficially in these directions.

Communities with flourishing free schools and libraries are usually more

prosperous and better than those without such facilities, and, while

there is doubtless room here for a confusion of cause and effect, it is

probable that there is both action and reaction. Prosperity calls for

increased facilities for education and these in turn tend to make the

community more prosperous.

That the majority of books withdrawn from public libraries are works of

fiction cannot be denied. Many librarians are wont to deplore this fact,

and most libraries endeavor in one way or another to decrease the

percentage of fiction in their circulation.

The proportion of recreative reading in a public library is necessarily

large. In like manner, the greater proportion of those who visit a

zoological or botanical garden do so for amusement. Yet the information

that they secure in so doing is none the less valuable and both are

certainly educational institutions. So if in the public library a large

number of its users get their history, their travel and their biography

through the medium of recreative readings we should not complain. Were

it otherwise these readers would probably lack altogether the

information that they now certainly acquire.

Taking up the final count in the indictment, it is doubtless true that

sentimental and emotional considerations have had much to do with

library development. They have furnished the initial motive power, as

they have for free schools, for the origin and progress of democratic

government, and for most of the advances of civilization. They often

precede deliberate, conscious reasoning and judgment, yet they are often

themselves the result of an unconscious reasoning process producing

action of the will in advance of deliberate judgment. Sometimes they are

pure reflexes, like winking when the eye is threatened by a blow. The

free public library can neither be established nor maintained usefully

without their aid, but their methods--or want of method--must be

carefully guided to produce good results.

The sentiment that we ought to establish institutions for the diffusion

of knowledge is the expression of a real economic need and should be

directed and encouraged and not suppressed. Logic is a useful steering

apparatus, but a very poor motive power.

The Library and Society: Reprints of Papers and Addresses · 第 70 / 92 题