CHAPTER XXXVII

GAME PRESERVES AND GAME LAWS IN CANADA

As now set forth on the map of North America, Canada is a vast country.

We must no longer think of Ontario and Quebec as "Canada West" and

"Canada East," because the new assistant-nation owns and rules

everything from Labrador to British Columbia, and all the northern

mainland save Alaska.

Although the fauna of Canada is strictly boreal, it is sufficiently

dispersed and diversified to demand wise legislation, and plenty of it.

For a nation with an outfit of provinces so new, Canada already is well

advanced in the matter of game laws and game preserves, and in some

respects she has set the pace for her southern neighbors. For example,

in New Brunswick we see the lordly moose successfully hunted for sport,

not only without being exterminated but actually on a basis that permits

it to increase in number. In Nova Scotia we see a law in force _which

successfully prohibits the waste of moose meat_, a loss that

characterizes moose hunting everywhere else throughout the range of that

animal. All over southern Canada the use of automatic shotguns in

hunting is strictly prohibited.

On the other hand, the laws of the Canadians are weak in not preventing

the sale of all wild game and the killing of antelope. In the matter of

game-selling, there are far too many open doors, and a sweeping reform

is very necessary.

Speaking generally, and with application from Labrador to British

Columbia, the American process of game extermination according to law is

vigorously and successfully being pursued by the people of Canada. The

open seasons are too long, and the bag limits are too generous to the

gunners. As it is elsewhere, the bag-limit laws on birds are a farce,

because it is impossible to enforce them, save on every tenth man. For

example, in his admirable "Final Report of the Ontario Game and

Fisheries Commission" (1912), Commissioner Kelly Evans says:

"The prairie chicken, which formerly was comparatively plentiful

throughout the greater portion of the Rainy River District, has now

become practically extinct in that region. Various causes have been

assigned for this, but it would seem, as usual, to have been mainly the

fault of indiscriminate and excessive slaughter." (Page 226.)

Like the United States, the various portions of Canada have their

various local troubles in wild-life protection. I think the greatest

practical difficulties, and the most real opposition to adequate

measures, is found in the Provinces of Quebec and Ontario. Is it because

the French-descended population is impatient of real restraint, and

objects to measures that are drastic, even though they are necessary? In

Ontario, Commissioner Evans has been splendidly supported by the

Government, and by all the real sportsmen of that province; but the

gunners and guerrillas of destruction have successfully postponed

several of the reforms that he has advocated, and which should have been

carried into effect.

So far as _public_ moral support for game protection is concerned I

think that the prairie and mountain provinces have the best of it. In

Manitoba, Saskatchewan, Alberta, Athabasca and British Columbia, the

spirit of the people is mainly correct, and the chief thing that seems

to be lacking is a Kelly Evans in each of those provinces to urge public

sentiment into strong action. For example, why should Alberta still

permit the hunting and killing of prong-horned antelope, when it is so

well known that that species is vanishing like a mist before the morning

sun? I think it is because no one seems to have risen up as G.O. Shields

did in the United States, to make a big fuss about it, and demand a

reform. At any rate, all the provinces of Canada that still possess

antelope should _immediately pass laws giving that species absolute

close seasons for ten years_. Why neglect it longer, when such neglect

is now so very wrong? Whether this is done or not, I sincerely hope that

hereafter no true American sportsman, will be guilty of killing one of

the vanishing antelope of Canada, even though "the law doth give it."

* * * * *

THE GAME PRESERVES OF CANADA

In the creation of National parks and game preserves, some of the

provinces of the Canadian nation have displayed a degree of foresight

and enterprise that merits sincere admiration. While in different

provinces the exact status of these establishments may vary somewhat,

the main purpose of each is the same,--the preservation of the forests

and the wild life. In all of them a regulated amount of fishing is

permitted, and in some the taking of fur-bearing animals is permitted;

but I believe in all the birds and furless mammals are strictly

protected. In some parks the carrying of firearms still is permitted,

but that privilege is quite out of harmony with the spirit and purposes

of a game preserve, and should be abolished. If it is necessary to carry

firearms through a preserve, as often happens in the Yellowstone Park,

it can be done under seals that are affixed by duly appointed officers

and thus will temptation be kept out of the way of sinners.

Up to this date I never have seen a publication which set forth in one

place even so much as an annotated list of the game preserves of the

various provinces of Canada, and at present exact information regarding

them is rather difficult to obtain. It seems that an adequate

governmental publication on this subject is now due, and overdue.

ONTARIO.--"At the present time," says Commissioner Evans in his "Final

Report," "the Algonquin National Park is the only actual game preserve

in the Province, being in fact a game reserve and not a forest reserve;

but in the past at least a measure of protection would seem to have been

afforded the game in most of the [forest] reserves, owing to the fact

that the carrying of firearms therein has been discouraged, and it would

appear to require but the passing of an Order-in-Council to render the

carrying of firearms in all reserves illegal. It is sincerely to be

hoped that not only will such action be taken without delay, but also

that all the forest reserves will be declared game reserves in the

strictest sense."

To this sentiment all friends of wild life will join a fervent wish for

its realization. As conditions are to-day, it is _impossible to have too

many game reserves_! There is everything to gain and nothing to lose by

making every national forest and forest reserve on the whole continent

of North America a game preserve in the strictest sense, and we hope to

live to see that end accomplished, both in the United States and Canada.

_The Algonquin National Park_ is situated in the Parry Sound region,

just above the Muskoka Lakes, and it has an area of 1,930 square miles.

It is well stocked with moose, caribou, white-tailed deer, black bear

and beaver. During the period of protection the beaver have increased so

greatly that about 1,000 were trapped last year for the market, by

officers of the government; and about 25 were sold to zoological gardens

and parks, at $25 each.

_The Quetico Forest Reserve_, area 1,560 square miles, was created as

the Canadian complement of the Minnesota National Forest and Game

Preserve. The two join on the international boundary, and each helps to

protect the other. Both are well stocked with moose, and will render

valuable service in the preservation of a mid-continental contingent of

that species.

ALBERTA.--In the making of game preserves the province of Alberta has

been splendidly progressive and liberal. The total result is fairly

beyond the reach of ordinary words of praise. It sets a pace that should

result in wide-spread benefits to the wild life of North America. In it

there is nothing faint-hearted. It should make some of our States think

seriously regarding their own shortcomings in this particular field of

endeavor.

ALBERTA'S NATIONAL PARKS

Acres Sq. miles

Rocky Mountains Park 2,764,800 4,320

Yoho Park 1,799,680 2,812

Glacier Park 1,474,560 2,304

Buffalo Park 384,000 600

Elk Island Park 40,000 62

Jasper Park 3,488,000 5,450

Waterton Lakes Park 34,560 54

--------- ------

9,985,600 15,602

_The Rocky Mountains Park_ is near Banff. The _Yoho_ and _Glacier Parks_

are near Field. The _Buffalo Park_ is near Wainwright, on the plains,

and it was created and fenced especially as a home for the herd of

American bison that was purchased in Montana in 1909. It now contains

1,052 head of bison, 20 moose, 35 deer, 7 elk, and 6 antelope.

_The Elk Island Park_ is near Fort Saskatchewan and Lamont, and at this

date (1912) it contains 53 bison, 28 elk, 30 deer and 5 moose. The bison

subsist entirely by grazing, and upon hay cut within the Park.

_Jasper Park_, established in 1908, is on the Athabasca River and the

Grand Trunk Pacific Railway, near Strathcona. Sixty miles of the railway

line lie within the Park. Scenically, Jasper Park is a rival of Rocky

Mountains Park, and undoubtedly possesses great attractions for

travellers who appreciate the beauties and grandeur of Nature as

expressed in mountains, valleys, lakes and streams.

_Waterton Lakes Park_ is situated in the extreme southwestern corner of

Alberta, in the Rocky Mountains surrounding the Waterton Lakes. At

present it is nine miles long from north to south and six miles wide,

with its southern end resting on the international boundary, and

adjoining our Glacier Park. It is the home of a few bands of mountain

sheep that carry very large horns. Through the initiative of Frederick

K. Vreeland, the Camp-Fire Club of America two years ago represented to

the Government of Alberta the great desirability of enlarging this

preserve, toward the north and west, the better to protect the mountain

sheep and other big game of that region. The suggestion was received in

a friendly spirit, and there is good reason to hope that at an early

date the enlargement will be made.

BRITISH COLUMBIA.--This province has made an excellent beginning in the

creation of game preserves. The first agitation on that subject was

begun in 1906, by two sportsmen whose names in connection with it have

long since been forgotten. On November 15, 1908, the Legislative Council

of British Columbia issued a proclamation that created a very fine game

preserve in the East Kootenai District, between the Elk and Bull Rivers

and northwestward thereof to the White River country. By an unfortunate

oversight, the new preserve never has been officially named, but we may

designate it here as

_The Elk River Game Preserve_.--This preserve has a total area of about

450 square miles, and includes a fine tract of mountains, valleys, lakes

and streams. It contained in 1908 about 1,000 mountain goats, 200 sheep,

a few elk and deer, and about 50 grizzly bears. All these have notably

increased during the period of absolute protection that they have

enjoyed. It is probable that this preserve contains more white mountain

goats than any other preserve that thus far has been made. It was in

this region that Mr. John M. Phillips and Prof. Henry Fairfield Osborne

made the first mountain goat photographs ever made at close range. It is

to be hoped that the protection of this preserve, both as to its wild

life and its timber, will be made perpetual.

_Frazer River Preserve_.--Next after the above there was created in

British Columbia a game preserve covering a large portion of the

mountain territory that rises between the North and South Forks of the

Fraser River. It is about 75 miles long by 30 miles wide and contains

about 2,250 square miles. Concerning its character and wild-life

population we have no details.

_Yalakom Game Preserve_.--On the north side of Bridge River (a western

tributary of the Fraser), about twenty miles above Lilloet. there has

been established a game preserve having an area of about 215 square

miles.

MANITOBA.--In the making of game preserves, Manitoba has made an

excellent beginning. It is good to see from Duck Mountain in the north

to Turtle Mountain in the south a chain of four liberal preserves, each

one protected in unmistakable terms as follows: "Carrying firearms,

hunting or trapping strictly prohibited within this area."

The lake regions of Manitoba, Saskatchewan and Alberta form what is

probably the most important wild-fowl breeding-ground in North America.

To a great extent it rests with those provinces to say whether the

central United States shall have any ducks and geese, or not! _It is

high time that an international treaty should be made between the United

States, Canada and Mexico for the federal protection of all migratory

birds_.

These preserves are of course intended to conserve wild-fowl,

shore-birds, grouse and all other birds, as well as big game. Thanks to

the cooperation of Mr. J.M. Macoun, of the Canadian Geological Survey, I

am able to offer the following:

LIST OF MANITOBA'S GAME PRESERVES

DUCK MOUNTAIN PRESERVE 324 sq. miles, 207,360 acres.

RIDING MOUNTAIN PRESERVE 360 " " 230,000 "

SPRUCE WOODS PRESERVE 64 " " 40,960 "

TURTLE MOUNTAIN PRESERVE 100 " " 64,000 "

848 " " 542,320 "

Manitoba is to be congratulated on this record.

QUEBEC.--This province has created two huge game preserves, well worthy

of the fauna that they are intended to conserve when all hunting in them

is prohibited!

_The Laurentides National Park_ is second in area of all the national

parks of Canada, being surpassed only by the Rocky Mountains Park of

British Columbia. Its area is 3565 square miles, or 2,281,600 acres. It

occupies the entire central portion of the great area surrounded by Lake

St. John, the Saguenay River, the wide portion of the St. Lawrence, and

the St. Maurice River on the west. Its southern boundary is in several

places only 16 miles from the St. Lawrence, while its most northern

angle is within 13 miles of Lake St. John. Its greatest width from east

to west is 71 miles, and its greatest length from north to south is 79

miles. It covers a huge watershed in which over a dozen large rivers and

many small ones have their sources. It is indeed a forest primeval. The

rivers are well stocked with fish, and the big game includes moose,

woodland caribou, black bear, lynx, beaver, marten, fisher, mink, fox,

and--sad to say--the gray wolf. The caribou live in rather small bands,

from 10 up to 100.

Unfortunately, hunting under license is permitted in the Laurentian

National Park, and therefore it is by no means a _real_ game preserve!

It is a near-preserve.

_The Gaspesian Forest, Fish and Game Preserve_, created in 1906, is in

"the Gaspe country," and it has an area of 2500 square miles situated in

the eastern Quebec counties of Gaspe and Matane.

_The Connaught National Park_, to be named in honor of H.R.H. the Duke

of Connaught, has been proposed by Mr. J.M. Macoun, of the Canadian

Geological Survey. The general location chosen is the mountains and

forested territory north of Ottawa and the Ottawa River, within easy

access from the Canadian capitol. On the map the location recommended

lies between the Gatineau River on the east and Wolf Lake on the west.

The proposal is meeting with much popular favor, and it is extremely

probable that it will be carried into effect at an early date.

LABRADOR.--During the past two years Lieut.-Col. William Wood has

strongly advocated the making of game preserves in Labrador, that will

not only tend to preserve the scanty fauna of that region from

extinction but will also aid in bringing it back. While Col. Wood's very

energetic and praiseworthy campaign has not yet been crowned with

success, undoubtedly it will be successful in the near future, because

ultimately such causes always win their objects, provided they are

prosecuted with the firm and unflagging persistence which has

characterized this particular campaign. We congratulate Col. Wood on the

success that he _will achieve_ in the near future!

* * * * *

GAME LAWS OF THE CANADIAN PROVINCES

ALBERTA.--The worst feature of the Alberta laws is the annual open

season on antelope, two of which may be killed under each license. This

is _entirely wrong_, and a perpetual close season should at once be

enacted. Duck shooting in August is wrong, and the season should not

open until September. It is not right that duck-killing should be made

so easy and so fearfully prolonged that extermination is certain. _All

killing of cranes and shore birds should be absolutely stopped, for five

years_. No wheat-producing province can afford the expense to the wheat

crops of the slaughter of shore birds, _thirty species_ of which are

great crop-protectors.

The bag limit of two sheep is too high, by 50 per cent. It should

immediately be cut down to one sheep, before sheep hunting in Alberta

becomes a lost art. _Sheep hunting should not be encouraged_--quite the

reverse! There are already too many sheep-crazy sportsmen. The bag limit

on grouse and ptarmigan of 20 per day or 200 in a season is simply

legalized slaughter, no more and no less, and if it is continued, a

grouseless province will be the quick result. The birds are not

sufficiently numerous to withstand the guns on that basis. Alberta

should be wiser than the states below the international boundary that

are annihilating their remnants of birds as fast as they can be found.

BRITISH COLUMBIA.--We note with much satisfaction that the Provincial

Game Warden, Mr. A. Bryan Williams, has been allowed $37,000 for the pay

of game wardens, and $28,000 for the destruction of wolves, coyotes,

pumas and other game-destroying animals. During the past two years the

following game-destroyers were killed, and bounties were paid upon them:

1909-10 1910-11

Wolves 655 518

Coyotes 1,464 3,653

Cougars 382 277

Horned Owls 854 2,285

Golden Eagles 29 73

3,374 6,806

"Now," says Warden Williams in his excellent annual report for 1911, "in

these two years a total of 2,896 wolves and cougars and 5,141 coyotes

were destroyed, as well as a number of others poisoned and not recovered

for the bounty. Allowing fifty head for each wolf and cougar and ten for

each coyote, by their bounties alone 196,210 head of game and domestic

animals were saved. Is it any wonder that deer are increasing almost

everywhere?"

The great horned owl has been and still is a great scourge to the upland

game birds, partly because when game is abundant "they become

fastidious, and eat only the brains of their prey." The destruction of

3,139 of them on the Lower Mainland during the last two years has made

these owls sing very small, and says the warden, "Is it any wonder that

grouse are again increasing?"

I have discussed with the Provincial Game Warden the advisability of

putting a limit of one on the grizzly bear, but Mr. Williams advances

good reasons for the opinion that it would be impracticable to do so at

present. I am quite sure, however, that the time has already arrived

when a limit of one is necessary. During the present year three of my

friends who went hunting in British Columbia, _each killed 3 grizzly

bears!_ Hereafter I will "locate" no more bear hunters in that country

until the bag limit is reduced to one grizzly per year. Since 1905 the

trapping of bears south of the main line of the Canadian Pacific Railway

has been stopped; and an excellent move too. A Rocky Mountain without a

grizzly bear is like a tissue-paper rose.

The bag limit on the big game of British Columbia is at least twice too

liberal,--five deer, two elk, two moose (one in Kootenay County), three

caribou and three goats. There is no necessity for such wasteful

liberality. Few sportsmen go to British Columbia for the sake of a large

lot of animals. I know many men who have been there to hunt, and the

great majority cared more for the scenery and the wild romance of

camping out in ground mountains than for blood and trophies.

MANITOBA.--What are we to think of a "bag limit" of fifty ducks per day

in October and November? A "limit" indeed! Evidently, Manitoba is tired

of having ducks, ruffed grouse, pinnated and other grouse pestering her

farmers and laborers. While assuming to fix bag limits that will be of

some benefit to those species, the limit is distinctly off, and nothing

short of a quick and drastic reform will save a remnant that will remain

visible to the naked eye.

NEW BRUNSWICK.--This is the banner province in the protection of moose,

caribou and deer, even while permitting them to be shot for sport. Of

course, only males are killed, and I am assured by competent judges that

thus far the killing of the finest and largest male moose has had no bad

effect upon the stature or antlers of the species as a whole.

NOVA SCOTIA.--If there is anything wrong with the game laws of Nova

Scotia, it lies in the wide-open sale of moose meat and all kinds of

feathered game during the open season. If that province were more

heavily populated, it would mean a great destruction of game. Even with

conditions as they are, the sale permitted is entirely wrong, and

against the best interests of 97 per cent of the people.

As previously mentioned, the law against the waste of moose meat is both

novel and admirable. The saving of any considerable portion of the flesh

of a full-grown bull moose, along with its head, is a large order; but

it is right. The degree of accountability to which guides are held for

the doings of the men whom they pilot into the woods is entirely

commendable, and worthy of imitation. If a sportsman or gunner does the

wrong thing, the guide loses his license.

SASKATCHEWAN.--This is another of the too-liberal provinces having no

real surplus of big game with which to sustain for any length of time an

excess of generosity. I am told that in this province there is now a

great deal of open country around each wild animal. And yet, it

cheerfully offers two moose, two elk, two caribou and two _antelope_ per

season to each licensed gunner or sportsman. The limit is too generous

by half. Why throw away an extra $250 worth of game with each license?

That is precisely what the people of Saskatchewan are doing to-day.

And that antelope-killing! It should be stopped at once, and for ten

years.

YUKON.--This province permits the sale of all the finest and best wild

game within its borders,--moose, elk, caribou, _bison_, musk-ox, sheep

and goats! The flesh of all these may be sold during the open season,

and for sixty days thereafter. Of the species named above, the barren

ground caribou is the only one regarding which we need not worry;

because that species still exists in millions. The Osborn caribou

(_Rangifer osborni_), can be exterminated in our own times, because it is

nowhere really numerous, and it inhabits exposed situations.

* * * * *

Our Vanishing Wild Life: Its Extermination and Preservation · 第 11 / 16 章