CHAPTER XXXV

INTRODUCED SPECIES THAT HAVE BECOME PESTS

The man who successfully transplants or "introduces" into a new habitat

any persistent species of living thing, assumes a very grave

responsibility. Every introduced species is doubtful gravel until panned

out. The enormous losses that have been inflicted upon the world through

the perpetuation of follies with wild vertebrates and insects would, if

added together, be enough to purchase a principality. The most

aggravating feature of these follies in transplantation is that never

yet have they been made severely punishable. We are just as careless and

easy-going on this point as we were about the government of the

Yellowstone Park in the days when Howell and other poachers destroyed

our first national bison herd, and when caught red-handed--as Howell

was, skinning seven Park bison cows,--_could not be punished for it,

because there was no penalty prescribed by any law_.

To-day, there is a way in which any revengeful person could inflict

enormous damage on the entire South, at no cost to himself, involve

those states in enormous losses and the expenditure of vast sums of

money, yet go absolutely unpunished!

THE GYPSY MOTH is a case in point. This winged calamity was imported at

Maiden, Massachusetts, near Boston, by a French entomologist, Mr.

Leopold Trouvelot, in 1868 or '69. History records the fact that the man

of science did not purposely set free the pest. He was endeavoring with

live specimens to find a moth that would produce a cocoon of commercial

value to America; and a sudden gust of wind blew out of his study,

through an open window, his living and breeding specimens of the gypsy

moth. The moth itself is not bad to look at, but its larvae is a great,

overgrown brute, with an appetite like a hog. Immediately Mr. Trouvelot

sought to recover his specimens, and when he failed to find them all.

like a man of real honor, he notified the State authorities of the

accident. Every effort was made to recover all the specimens, but enough

escaped to produce progeny that soon became a scourge to the trees of

Massachusetts. The method of the big, nasty-looking mottled-brown

caterpillar was very simple. It devoured the entire foliage of every

tree that grew in its sphere of influence.

The gypsy moth spread with alarming rapidity and persistence. In course

of time the state authorities of Massachuestts were forced to begin a

relentless war upon it, by poisonous sprays and by fire. It was awful!

Up to this date (1912) the New England states and the United States

Government service have expended in fighting this pest about $7,680,000!

The spread of this pest has been retarded, but the gypsy moth never

will be wholly stamped out. To-day it exists in Rhode Island,

Connecticut and New Hampshire, and it is due to reach New York at an

early date. It is steadily spreading in three directions from Boston,

its original point of departure, and when it strikes the State of New

York, we, too, will begin to pay dearly for the Trouvclot experiment. It

is said that General S.C. Lawrence, of Medford, Massachusetts, has spent

$75,000 in trying to protect his trees from the ravages of this scourge.

THE RABBIT PLAGUE IN AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND.--The rabbit curse upon

Australia and New Zealand is so well known as to require little comment.

In this case the introduction was deliberate. In the days when the sheep

industry was most prosperous, a patriotic gentleman conceived the idea

that the introduction of the rabbit, and its establishment as a wild

animal, would be a good thing. He reasoned that it would furnish a good

food supply, that it would furnish sport, and being unable to harm any

other creature of flesh and blood it was therefore harmless.

Accordingly, three pairs of rabbits were imported and set free.

In a short time, the immense number of rabbits that began to overrun the

country furnished food for reflection, as well as for the table. A very

simple calculation brought out the startling information that, under

perfectly favorable conditions, a single pair of rabbits could in three

years' time produce progeny amounting to 13,718,000 individuals. Ever

since that time, in discussing the rabbits of Australia it has been

necessary to speak in millions.

"The inhabitants of the colony," says Dr. Richard Lydekker, "soon found

that the rabbits were a plague, for they devoured the grass, which was

needed for the sheep, the bark of trees, and every kind of fruit and

vegetable, until the prospects of the colony became a very serious

matter, and ruin seemed inevitable. In New South Wales upwards of

15,000,000 rabbits skins have been exported in a single year; while in

thirteen years ending with 1889 no less than 39,000,000 were accounted

for in Victoria alone.

"To prevent the increase of these rodents, the introduction of weasels,

stoats, mongooses, etc., has been tried; but it has been found that

those carnivores neglected the rabbits and took to feeding on poultry,

and thus became as great a nuisance as the animals they were intended to

destroy. The attempt to kill them off by the introduction of an epidemic

disease has also failed. In order to protect such portions of the

country as are still free from rabbits, fences of wire netting have been

erected; one of these fences erected by the Government of Victoria

extending for a distance of upwards of one hundred and fifty

geographical miles. In New Zealand, where the rabbit has been introduced

little more than twenty years, its increase has been so enormous, and

the destruction it inflicts so great, that in some districts it has

actually been a question whether the colonists should not vacate the

country rather than attempt to fight against the plague. The average

number of rabbit skins exported from New Zealand is now twelve

millions."--(Royal Natural History.)

THE FOX PEST IN AUSTRALIA.--And now unfortunate Australia has a new

pest, also acquired by importation of an alien species. It is the

European fox (_Vulpes vulpes_). The only redeeming feature about this

fresh calamity is found in the fact that the species was not

deliberately introduced into Australia for the benefit of the local

fauna. Mr. O.W. Rosenhain, of Melbourne, informs me (1912) that about

thirty years ago the Hunt Club brought to Australia about twenty foxes,

for the promotion of the noble sport of fox hunting. In some untoward

manner, the most of those animals escaped. They survived, multiplied,

and have provided New South Wales, Victoria and South Australia with a

fox pest of the first rank.

The destruction of wild bird life and poultry has become so serious that

Australia now is making vigorous efforts to exterminate the pest. The

government pays ten shillings bounty on fox scalps, besides which each

prime fox skin is worth from four to five dollars. It is hoped that

these combined values will eliminate the fox pest.

Regarding foxes in Australia, Mr. W.H.D. Le Souef has this to say in his

extremely interesting and valuable book, "Wild Life in Australia," page

146:

"We found that foxes were unfortunately plentiful in this district, and

in a hollow log that served to shelter some cubs were noticed the

remains of ducks, fowls, rabbits, lambs, bandicoots and snakes; so they

evidently vary their fare, snakes even not coming amiss. They also sneak

on wild ducks that are nesting by the edge of the water among the rushes

and tussocky grass, and catch quail also, especially sitting birds.

_These animals are, and always will be, a great source of trouble in the

thickly timbered country and stony ranges, and will gradually, like the

rabbit, extend all over Australia_. They are evidently not contented

with ground game only, as Mr. A.F. Kelly, of Barwonleigh, in Victoria,

states: "When riding past a bull-oak tree about twenty-five feet high,

with either a magpie's or crow's nest on top. I noticed the nest looked

very bulky, and had something red in it. On going nearer I saw a large

fox coiled up in it!"

THE MONGOOSE.--Circumstances alter cases, and a change of environment

sometimes works marvelous changes in the character of an animal species.

Now, _why_ should not the gray Indian mongoose (formerly called the

ichneumon, _(Herpestes griscus_)) destroy poultry in India, as it does

elsewhere? There is poultry in plenty to be destroyed, but

"Rikki-Tikki-Tavi" elects to specialize on the killing of rats, and

cobras, and other snakes.

In his own sphere of influence,--India and the orient,--the mongoose is

a fairly decent citizen, and he fits into the time-worn economy of that

region. As a destroyer of the thrice-anathema domestic rat, he has no

equal in the domain of flesh and blood. His temper is so fierce that one

"pet" mongoose has been known to kill a full grown male giant bustard,

and put a greyhound to flight.

In an evil moment (1872) Mr. W.B. Espeut conceived the idea that it

would be a good thing to introduce mongooses to the rats of Barbadoes

and Jamaica that were pestering the cane-fields to an annoying extent.

It was done. The mongooses attacked the rats, cleaned them out,

multiplied, and then looked about for more worlds to conquer. Snakes and

lizards were few; but they cheerfully killed and devoured all there

were. Then, being continuously hungry, they attacked the wild birds and

poultry, indiscriminately, and with their usual vigor. I have been told

that in Barbadoes "they cleaned out every living thing that they could

catch and kill, and then they attacked the sugar-cane." The last count

in the indictment may seem hard to believe; but it is a fact that the

Indian mongoose often resorts to fruit and vegetable food.

In Jamaica, at the end of the rat-killing period, the planters joyfully

estimated that the labors of Herpestes had saved between 500,000 pounds

and 750,000 pounds to the industries of that island. That was before the

slaughter of wild birds and poultry began. I am told that up to date the

damage done by the mongoose far exceeds the value of the benefit it once

conferred, but the total has not been computed.

Up to this date, the mongoose has invaded and become a destructive pest

in Barbadoes, Jamaica, Cuba, St. Vincent, St. Lucia, Trinidad, Nevis,

Fiji and all the larger islands of the Hawaiian group. It would require

many pages to contain a full account of each introduction, awakening,

reckoning of damages and payment of bounties for destruction that the

fiendish mongoose has wrought out wherever it has been introduced. The

progress of the pest is everywhere the same,--sweeping destruction of

rats, snakes, wild birds, small mammals, and finally poultry and

vegetables.

Every country that now is without the mongoose will do well to shut and

guard diligently all the doors by which it might be introduced.

Throughout its range in the western hemisphere, the mongoose is a pest;

and the Biological Survey of the Department of Agriculture has done well

in securing the enactment of a law peremptorily prohibiting the

importation of any animals of that species into the United States or any

of its colonies. The fierce temper, indomitable courage and vaulting

appetite of the mongoose would make its actual introduction in any of

the warm portions of the United States a horrible calamity. In the

southern states, and all along the Pacific slope clear up to Seattle, it

could live, thrive and multiply; and the slaughter that it could and

would inflict upon our wild birds generally, especially all those that

nest and live on the ground, saying nothing of the slaughter of poultry,

would drive the American people crazy.

Fancy an animal with the murderous ferocity of a mink, the agility of a

squirrel, the penetration of a ferret and the cunning of a rat,

infesting the thickets and barnyards of this country. The mongoose can

live wherever a rat can live, provided it can get a fair amount of

animal food. Not for $1,000,000 could any one of the southern or Pacific

states afford to have a pair of these little gray fiends imported and

set free. If such a calamity ever occurs, all wheels should stop, and

every habitant should turn out and hunt for the animals until they are

found and pulverized. No matter if it should require a thousand men and

$100,000, _find them!_ If not found, the cost to the state will soon be

a million a year, with no ending.

In spite of the vigilance of our custom house officers, every now and

then a Hindoo from some foreign vessel sneaks into the country with a

pet mongoose (and they do make great pets!) inside his shirt, or in the

bottom of a bag of clothing. Of course, whenever the Department of

Agriculture discovers any of these surreptitious animals, they are at

once confiscated, and either killed or sent to a public zoological park

for safe-keeping. In New York, the director of the Zoological Park is so

genuinely concerned about the possibility of the escape of a female

mongoose that he has issued two standing orders: All live mongooses

offered to us shall at once be purchased, and every female animal shall

immediately be chloroformed.

If _Herpestes griseus_ ever breaks loose in the United States, the crime

shall not justly be chargeable to us.

THE ENGLISH SPARROW.--In the United States, the English sparrow is a

national sorrow, almost too great to be endured. It is a bird of plain

plumage, low tastes, impudent disposition and persistent fertility.

Continually does it crowd out its betters, or pugnaciously drive them

away, and except on very rare occasions it eats neither insects nor weed

seeds. It has no song, and in habits it is a bird of the street and the

gutter. There is not one good reason why it should exist in this

country. If it were out of the way, our native insect-eaters of song and

beauty could return to our lawns and orchards. The English sparrow is a

nuisance and a pest, and if it could be returned to the land of its

nativity we would gain much.

* * * * *

Our Vanishing Wild Life: Its Extermination and Preservation · 第 9 / 16 章