CHAPTER XXIX

NEW LAWS NEEDED IN THE STATES

(Continued)

CONNECTICUT:

The sale of all native wild game, regardless of its source, should

be prohibited at all times. Enact at once a five-year close season

law on the remnant of ruffed grouse, quail, woodcock, snipe, and all

shore birds.

Even in the home of the newest and deadliest "autoloading" shotgun,

those guns and pump guns should be prohibited in hunting.

The enormous bag limits of 35 rail and 50 each per day of plover,

snipe and shore birds is a crime! They should be replaced by a

ten-year close season law for all of those species.

The terms of the game commissioners should be not less than four

years.

Like so many other states, Connecticut has recklessly wasted her

wild-life inheritance. During the fifteen years preceding the year 1898,

the bird life of that state had decreased 75 per cent. On March 6, 1912,

Senator Geo. P. McLean, of Connecticut stated at the hearing held by his

Committee on Forest Reservations and the Protection of Game this fact:

"We have more cover than there was thirty or forty years ago, more brush

probably, but there is not one partridge [ruffed grouse] today where

there were twenty ten years ago!"

First of all, Connecticut needs a ten-year close season law to save her

remnant of shore birds before it is completely annihilated. Then she

needs a Bayne law, and needs it badly. Under such a law, and the tagging

system that it provides, the state game wardens would have so strong a

grip on the situation that the present unlawful sale of game would be

completely stopped. Half-way measures in preventing the sale of game

will not answer. Already Connecticut has wasted thousands of dollars in

fruitless efforts to restock her desolated woodlands and farms with

quail, and to introduce the Hungarian partridge; but even yet she _will

not_ protect her own native species!

Men of Connecticut, save the last remnants of your native game birds

before they are all utterly exterminated within your borders! Don't ask

the killers of game what _they_ will agree to, but make the laws what

_you know_ they should be! If you want a gameless state, let the

destruction go on as it now is going, with _16,000 licensed gunners_ in

the field each year, and you will surely have it, right soon.

DELAWARE:

Stop all spring shooting, at once; stop killing shore birds for ten

years, and protect swans indefinitely.

Enact bag-limit laws, in very small figures.

Stop the sale of all native wild game, regardless of its use, by

enacting a Bayne law.

Enact a resident license law, and provide for a force of paid game

wardens.

Stop the use of machine shot-guns in killing your birds.

The state of Delaware is nearly twenty years behind the times. Can it be

possible that her Governor and her people are really satisfied with that

position? We think not. I dare say they are afflicted with apathy, and

game-hogs. The latter can easily back up General Apathy to an extent

that spells "no game laws." In one act, and at one bold stroke, Delaware

can step out of her position at the rear of the procession of states,

and take a place in the front rank. Will she do it? We hope so, for her

present status is unworthy of any right-minded, red-blooded state this

side of the Philippines.

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA:

The sale of all native wild game, regardless of its source, should

be stopped immediately, by the enactment of a complete Bayne law.

If game-shooting within the District is continued, on the marshes of

the Eastern Branch and on the Potomac River, common decency demands

the enactment of bag-limit laws and long close-season laws of the

most modern pattern.

Just why it is that gross abuses against wild life have so long been

tolerated in the territorial center of the American nation, remains to

be ascertained. But, whatever the reason the situation is absurd and

intolerable, and Congress should terminate it immediately. As late as

1897, and I think for two or three years thereafter, thousands of

_robins_ were sold every year in the public markets of Washington as

food! As a spectacle for gods and men, behold to-day the sale of quail,

ruffed grouse, wild turkeys and other American game, half way between

the Capitol and the White House! Look at Center Market as a national

"fence" for the sale of game stolen by market gunners from Maryland,

Virginia, the Carolinas and Pennsylvania.

It is time for Congress to bring the District of Columbia sharply into

line; for Washington must be made to toe the mark beside New York. The

reputation of the national capital demands it, whether the gods of the

cafes will consent or not.

FLORIDA:

Shooting shore birds and waterfowl in late winter and spring should

be stopped.

The sale of all native wild game should be prohibited.

A State Game Commissioner whose term of office should be not less

than four years, and a force of salaried game wardens, should be

appointed.

A general resident license should be required for hunting.

The killing of does and fawns should be stopped, and no deer should

be killed save bucks with horns at least three inches long.

The bag limit of five deer per year should be two deer; of twenty

quail, and two turkeys per day should be ten quail and one turkey.

The open season on all game birds should end on February 1, for

domestic reasons.

Protection should be accorded doves, and robins should be removed

from the game list.

In the destruction of wild life, I think the backwoods population of

Florida is the most lawless and defiant that can be found anywhere in

the United States. The "plume-hunters" have practically exterminated the

plume-bearing egrets, wholly annihilated the roseate spoonbill, the

flamingo, and also the Carolina parrakeet. On July 8, 1905, one of them

killed an Audubon Association Warden, Guy M. Bradley, whose business it

was to enforce the state laws protecting the egret rookeries. The people

really to blame for the shooting of Guy Bradley, and the extermination

of the egrets by lawless and dangerous men, are the vain and merciless

women who wear the "white badges of cruelty" as long as they can be

purchased! They have much to answer for!

Originally, Florida was alive with bird life. For number of species,

abundance of individuals, and general dispersal throughout the whole

state, I think no other state in America except possibly California ever

possessed a bird fauna quite comparable with it. Once its bird life was

one of the wonders of America. But the gunners began early to shoot, and

shoot, and shoot. During the fifteen years preceding 1898, the general

bird life of Florida decreased in volume 77 per cent. In 1900 it was at

a very low point, and it has steadily continued to decrease. The

rapidly-growing settlement and cultivation of the state has of course

had much to do with the disappearance of wild life generally, and the

draining and exploitation of the Everglades will about finish the birds

of southern Florida.

The brown pelicans' breeding-place on Pelican Island, in Indian River,

has been taken in hand by the national government as a bird refuge, and

its marvelous spectacle of pelican life is now protected. Nine other

islands on the coast of Florida have been taken as national bird

refuges, and will render posterity good service.

The great private game and bird preserve of Dr. Ray V. Pierce, at

Apalachicola, known as St. Vincent Island, containing twenty square

miles of wonderful woods and waters, is performing an important function

for the state and the nation.

The Florida bag limit on quail is entirely too liberal. I know one man

who never once exceeded the limit of twenty birds per day, but in the

season of 1908-9 he killed _865 quail_! Can the quail of any state long

endure such drains as that?

From a zoological point of view, Florida is in bad shape. A great many

of her people who shoot are desperately lawless and uncontrollable, and

the state is not financially able to support a force of wardens

sufficiently strong to enforce the laws, even as they are. It looks as

if the slaughter would go on until nothing of bird life remains. At

present I can see no hope whatever for saving even a good remnant of the

wild life of the state.

The present status of wild-life protective laws in Florida was made the

subject of an article in _Forest and Stream_ of August 10, 1912, by John

H. Wallace, Jr., Game Commissioner of the State of Alabama, in an

article entitled "The Florida Situation." In view of his record, no one

will question either the value or the honest sincerity of Mr. Wallace's

opinions. The following paragraphs are from that article:

The enactment of a model and modern game law for the State of

Florida is absolutely imperative in order to save many of the most

valuable species of birds and game of that State from certain

depletion and threatened extinction. The question of the protection

of the birds and game in Florida is not a local one, but is national

in its scope. Birds know no state lines, and while practically all

the States lying to the north of Florida protect migratory birds and

waterfowl, yet these are recklessly slaughtered in that state to

such an extent as to be appalling to all sportsmen and bird lovers.

So alarming has become the decrease of the birds and game of Florida

that unless a halt is called on the campaign of reckless

annihilation that has been ceaselessly waged in that state, the

sport and recreation enjoyed by primeval nimrods will linger only in

history and tradition.

It is the sincerest hope of all lovers of wild life of the American

continent that a strong and invincible sentiment, relative to the

imperative necessity of real conservation legislation, be

crystallized in the minds of the members elect of the Florida

Legislature, to the end that the next Legislature will spread upon

the statute books of the State of Florida a model and modern law for

the preservation and protection of the birds and game of that State,

which when put into practical operation will elicit the thanks of

all good citizens, and likewise the gratitude of future generations.

GEORGIA:

Prohibit late winter and spring shooting, and provide rational

seasons for wild fowl.

Reduce the limit on deer to two bucks a season, with horns not less

than three inches long.

Protect the meadow lark and stop forever the killing of doves and

wood-ducks.

Prohibit the use of automatic and pump shot-guns in hunting.

Extend the term of the game commissioner to four years.

We are glad to report that Georgia has already begun to take up the

white man's burden. The protection of wild life is now a gentleman's

proposition, and in it every real man with red blood in his veins has a

duty to perform. The state of Georgia has recently awakened, and under

the comprehensive law of 1911 has resolutely undertaken to do her whole

duty in this matter.

IDAHO:

The imperative duties of Idaho are as follows:

Stop all hunting of mountain sheep, mountain goat and elk.

Give the sage grouse and sharp-tail ten-year close seasons, at once,

to forestall their extermination.

Stop the killing of doves as "game."

Stop the killing of female deer, and of bucks with horns less than

three inches long.

Enact the model law to protect non-game birds.

Prohibit the use of machine shot-guns in hunting.

Extend the State Warden's term to four years.

Like Montana, Wyoming and Colorado, the state of Idaho has wasted her

stock of game, and it is to be feared that several species are now about

to disappear from that state. I am told that the sage grouse is almost

"gone"; and I think that the antelope, caribou, and mountain sheep are

in the same condition of scarcity.

If the people of Idaho wish to save their wild fauna, they must be up

and doing. The time to temporize, theorize, be conservative and

easy-going has gone by. It is that fatal policy that causes men to

slumber until it is too late to act; and we will watch with keen

interest to see whether the real men of Idaho are big enough to do their

whole duty in time to benefit their state.

In 1910, Dr. T.S. Palmer credited Idaho with the possession of about

five hundred moose and two hundred antelope.

There is one feature of the Idaho game law that may well stand

unchanged. The open season on "ibex," of which one per year may be

killed, may as well be continued. One myth per year is not an

extravagant bag for any intelligent hunter; and it seems that the "ibex"

will not down. Being officially recognized by Idaho, its place in our

fauna now seems assured.

ILLINOIS:

Enact a Bayne law, and stop the sale of all native wild game,

regardless of source, and regardless of the gay revelers of Chicago.

In Illinois the bag limits on birds are nearly all at least 50 per

cent too high. They should be as follows: No squirrels, doves or

shore birds; six quail, five woodcock, ten coots, ten rail, ten

ducks, three geese and three brant, with a total limit of ten

waterfowl per day.

Doves should be removed from the game list.

All tree squirrels and chipmunks should be perpetually protected, as

companions to man, unfit for food.

The sale of aigrettes should be stopped, and Chicago placed in the

same class as Boston, New York, New Orleans and San Francisco.

The use of all machine shotguns in hunting should be prohibited.

The chief plague-spots for the grinding up of American game are Chicago,

Philadelphia, Baltimore, New Orleans and San Francisco. St. Louis

cleared her record in 1909. New York thoroughly cleaned her Augean

stable in 1911, and Massachusetts won her Bayne law by a desperate

battle in 1912. In 1913, Pennsylvania probably will enact a Bayne law.

Fancy a city in the center of the United States sending to Norway for

1,500 ptarmigan, to eat, as Chicago did in 1911; and that was only one

order.

For forty years the marshes, prairies, farms and streams of the whole

upper Mississippi Valley have been combed year after year by the guns of

the market shooters. Often the migratory game was located by telegraphic

reports. Game birds were slain by the wagon-load, boat-load, barrel, and

car-load, "for the Chicago market." And the fool farmers of the Middle

West stolidly plowed their fields and fed their hogs, and permitted the

slaughter to go on. To-day the sons of those farmers go to the museums

and zoological parks of the cities to see specimens of pinnated grouse,

crane, woodcock, ducks and other species that the market shooters have

"wiped out"; and their fathers wax eloquent in telling of the flocks of

pigeons that "darkened the sky," and the big droves of prairie chickens

that used to rise out of the corn-fields "with a roar like a coming

storm."

To-day, Chicago stands half-way reformed. Her markets are open to only

one-half the game killable in Illinois, but they are wide open to all

"_legally_ killed game imported from other states, from Oct. 1 to Feb.

1." Through that hole in her game laws any game-dealer can drive a

moving-van! Of course, any game offered in Chicago has been "legally

killed in some other state!" Who can prove otherwise?

In addition to the imported game illegally killed in other states, the

starving population of Chicago may also buy for cash, and consume with

their champagne in November and December, all the Illinois doves that

can be combed out by the market-gunners.

After the awful Iroquois Theatre fire in Chicago, in 1903, the game

dealers reported a heavy falling off in the consumption of game! The

tragedy caused the temporary closing of the theaters, and the falling

off in after-theater suppers may be said to have taken away the

appetites of thousands of erstwhile consumers of game. Incidentally it

showed who consumes purchased game.

The people of Illinois should now enact a full-fledged Bayne law,

without changing a single word, and bring Chicago up to the level of New

York, St. Louis and Boston.

The present bag limits on Illinois game birds are fatally high. As they

stand, with 190,000 licensed gunners in the field each year, what else

do they mean than extermination? The men of Illinois have just two

alternatives between which to choose: drastic and immediate

preservation, or a gameless state. Which shall it be?

INDIANA:

Indiana should hasten to stop spring shooting.

She should enact a law, prohibiting the sale for millinery purposes

of the plumage of all wild birds save ducks killed in their open

season.

A Bayne law, absolutely prohibiting the sale of all native wild

game, should be enacted at once.

The killing of squirrels should be prohibited; because they are not

white men's game.

Ruffed grouse and quail should have five year close seasons.

The use of pump and autoloading guns in hunting should be

prohibited.

In Indiana the white-tailed deer is extinct. This means very close

hunting, and a bad outlook for all other game larger than the sparrow.

On October 2, 1912, eleven heads of greater bird of paradise, with

plumes attached, were offered for sale within one hundred feet of the

headquarters of the Fourth National Conservation Congress. The prices

ranged from $35 to $47.50; and while we looked, two ladies came up, one

of whom pointed to a bird-of-paradise corpse and said: "There! I want

one o' them, an' I'm a-goin' to _have_ it, too!"

IOWA:

Spring shooting should be stopped, at once and forever.

The killing of all tree squirrels and chipmunks should cease.

All shore birds that visit Iowa deserve a five-year close season.

Especially is the shooting of plover, sandpiper, marsh and beach

birds, rail, duck, geese and brant from September 1, to April 15, an

outrage.

Iowa should prohibit the use of the machine guns, and it is to be

hoped that she will awaken sufficiently to do so.

It is said that the Indian word "Iowa" means "the drowsy, or sleepy

ones." Politically, and educationally, Iowa is all right, but in the

protection of wild life she is ten years behind the times, in almost

everything save the prohibition of the sale of game. _Iowa knows better

than to pursue the course that she does_! She boasts about her corn and

hogs, but she is deaf to the appeals of the states surrounding her on

the subject of spring shooting. For years Minnesota has set her a good

example; but nothing moves her to step up where she belongs in the

phalanx of intelligent game-protecting states.

The foregoing may sound harsh, but in view of what other states have

endured from Iowa's stubbornness regarding migratory game, the time for

silent treatment of her case has gone by. She is to-day in the same

class as North Carolina, South Carolina and Maryland,--at the tail end

of the procession of states. She cares everything for corn and hogs, but

little for wild life.

KANSAS:

Spring shooting should be stopped, at once: with apologies for not

having done so long ago.

The continued shooting of prairie chickens when the species is near

extermination is outrageous, and should be prohibited for ten years.

Doves should be removed permanently from the game list, partly as a

measure of self respect.

Kansas should treat herself to a force of salaried game wardens

rendering real service.

She should bar out the machine guns as unfit for use in a

well-regulated State.

Kansas has calmly witnessed the extermination of her bison, elk, deer,

antelope, wild turkeys, sage grouse, whooping cranes, and the beginning

of the end of her pinnated grouse, without a pang. What is wild game in

comparison with fat hogs, and seventy-bushels-to-the-acre!

Draw a line around the hog-and-corn area of the United States, and

within it you will find more spring shooting, more sale of game and more

extermination of species than in any other area in the United States. I

refer to Nebraska, Kansas, Iowa, Missouri, Illinois, Indiana, Ohio,

Kentucky and Tennessee. In not one of these states except Missouri is

there any big game hunting, and in the majority of them spring shooting

is lawful!

In the Island of Mauritius, it was swine that exterminated the dodo. In

the United States, hogs and game extermination still go hand in hand.

Since the days of the dodo, however, a new species of swine has been

developed. It is now widely known as the "game-hog," and it has been

officially recognized by both bench and bar.

KENTUCKY:

Nearly everything that a state should maintain in the line of wild life

protection _Kentucky lacks_! It is easier to tell what she has than to

recite what she should have. Kentucky _permits spring shooting_; she has

_no bag limits_, and she has _long open seasons_ on everything save

introduced pheasants; She protects from sale only quail, grouse and wild

turkey _killed within her own borders_. This means that her markets are

practically wide open.

Until recently the people of Kentucky have been very indifferent to the

value of her wild-life; but with the new law enacted this year providing

for a game commission and a game protection fund, surely every member of

the Army of the Defense will wish God-speed to her efforts in game

conservation, and stand ready to lend a helping hand whenever help can

be utilized.

Kentucky should at one grand coup _stop spring shooting and all sale of

wild game, accord long close seasons to all species that are verging on

extinction, protect doves, establish moderate bag limits and stop the

use of machine guns_. If she takes up these measures at the rate of only

one at each legislative session, by the time her laws are perfect _all

her game will be gone_!

LOUISIANA:

On more counts than one, Louisiana is in the list of Great Delinquents;

for behold the things that she needs to do:

Protect deer for five years.

Instantly take the robin, red-winged black-bird, dove, grosbeak,

wood-duck and gull off the list of birds that may be killed as

"game."

Stop all late winter and spring shooting.

Stop the sale of all native game, and the possession and

transportation of game sold or intended for sale. In short,

Enact a Bayne law.

Re-establish a game warden system.

In legally permitting the slaughter of the robin, red-winged blackbird,

dove, grosbeak, wood-duck and gull the state of Louisiana is very

culpable.

For good reasons, forty states of the American Union strictly prohibit

the killing of song and insectivorous birds. The duty of every state to

protect those birds is not a debatable proposition. I put this question

to the people of Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, Tennessee and

other states where the robin is treated as a game bird: Is it fair of

you to kill and eat robins when that species is carefully protected by

forty other states of our country for grave economic reasons? What would

you say of the people of the North if they slaughtered your mockingbird

_to eat_!

Remember this proportion:

The Robin : The North :: The Mockingbird : The South.

* * * * *

Our Vanishing Wild Life: Its Extermination and Preservation · 第 3 / 16 章