THE THEORY OF THE EARTH.

BOOK III.

Concerning the CONFLAGRATION.

CHAP. I.

The INTRODUCTION:

_With the Contents and Order of this Work._

Seeing Providence hath planted in all Men a natural Desire and Curiosity

of knowing Things to come; and such Things especially, as concern our

particular Happiness, or the general Fate of Mankind; This Treatise may,

in both respects, hope for a favourable Reception amongst inquisitive

Persons; seeing the Design of it is, to give an Account of the greatest

Revolutions of Nature that are expected in future Ages: and in the first

Place, of the _Conflagration of the World_. In which universal Calamity,

when all Nature suffers, every Man’s particular Concern must needs be

involved.

We see with what Eagerness Men pry into the Stars, to see if they can

read there the Death of a King, or the Fall of an Empire: ’Tis not the

fate of any single Prince or Potentate, that we calculate, but of all

Mankind: Nor of this or that particular Kingdom or Empire, but of the

whole Earth. Our Enquiries must reach to that great Period of Nature,

when all Things are to be dissolv’d; both Human Affairs, and the Stage

whereon they are acted; when the Heavens and the Earth will pass away,

and the Elements melt with fervent Heat. We desire, if possible, to know

what will be the Face of that Day, that great and terrible Day! when the

Regions of the Air will be nothing but mingled Flame and Smoke, and the

habitable Earth turn’d into a Sea of molten Fire.

But we must not leave the World in this Disorder and Confusion, without

examining what will be the Issue and Consequences of it. Whether this

will be the End of all Things, and Nature, by a sad Fate, lie eternally

dissolv’d and desolate in this manner? or, Whether we may hope for a

Restoration: _New Heavens_ and a _New Earth_, which the Holy Writings

make mention of, more pure and perfect than the former? As if this was

but as a _Refiner’s Fire_, to purge out the Dross and coarser Parts, and

then cast the Mass again into a new and better Mould. These Things, with

God’s Assistance, shall be matter of our present Enquiry: These make the

general Subject of this Treatise, and of the remaining Parts of this

_Theory_ of the Earth. Which now, you see, begins to be a kind of

Prophecy or Prognostication of Things to come, as it hath been hitherto

an History of Things past; of such States and Changes as Nature hath

already undergone. And if that Account which we have given of the Origin

of the Earth, its first and Paradisaical Form, and the Dissolution of it

at the universal Deluge, appear fair and reasonable; the second

Dissolution by Fire, and the Renovation of it out of a second Chaos, I

hope, will be deduc’d from as clear Grounds and Suppositions. And

Scripture it self will be a more visible Guide to us in these following

Parts of the Theory, than it was in the former. In the mean Time, I take

occasion to declare here again, as I have done heretofore, That neither

this, nor any other great Revolutions of Nature, are brought to pass, by

Causes purely natural, without the Conduct of a particular Providence.

And ’tis the sacred Books of Scripture that are the Records of this

Providence, both as to Times past, and Times to come; as to all the

signal Changes, either of the natural World, or of Mankind, and the

different Oeconomies of Religion. In which respects, these Books, tho’

they did not contain a moral Law, would, notwithstanding, be, as the

most mystical, so also the most valuable Books in the World.

This Treatise, you see, will consist of Two Parts: The former whereof is

to give an Account of the _Conflagration_; and the latter, of the _New

Heavens_, and _New Earth_ following upon it; together with the State of

Mankind in those new Habitations. As to the Conflagration, we _first_

enquire, What the Antients thought concerning the present Frame of this

World: Whether it was to perish or no: Whether to be destroyed, or to

stand eternally in this Posture. Then, in what Manner they thought it

would be destroy’d: By what Force or Violence: Whether by Fire or other

ways. And with these Opinions of the Antients we will compare the

Doctrine of the Prophets and Apostles, to discover and confirm the Truth

of them. In the _second Place_, We will examine, What Calculations or

Conjectures have been made concerning the Time of this great

Catastrophe, or of the End of this World: Whether that Period be

definable or no; and whether by natural Arguments, or by Prophecies.

_Thirdly_, We will consider the Signs of the approaching Conflagration:

Whether such as will be in Nature, or in the State of human Affairs; but

especially such as are taken notice of, and recorded, in Scripture.

_Fourthly_, Which is the principal Point, and yet that wherein the

Antients have been most silent, _What Causes_ there are in Nature, what

Preparations, for this Conflagration: Where are the Seeds of this

universal Fire, or Fuel sufficient for the Nourishing of it? _Lastly_,

In what Order, and by what Degrees, the Conflagration will proceed: In

what Manner the Frame of the Earth will be dissolv’d; and what will be

the dreadful Countenance of a _burning World_.

These Heads are set down more fully in the Arguments of each Chapter;

and seem to be sufficient for the Explication of this whole Matter:

Taking in some additional Discourses, which, in pursuing these Heads,

enter of their own accord, and make the Work more even and intire. In

the Second Part, we restore the World that we had destroy’d: Build New

Heavens and a New Earth, _wherein Righteousness shall dwell_. Establish

that new Order of Things, which is so often celebrated by the Prophets:

A Kingdom of Peace and of Justice, where the Enemy of Mankind shall be

bound, and the Prince of Peace shall rule. A Paradise without a Serpent,

and a Tree of Knowledge, not to wound, but to heal the Nations: Where

will be neither _Curse_, nor _Pain_, nor _Death_, nor _Disease_: Where

all Things are new, all Things are more perfect, both the World it self,

and its Inhabitants: Where the First-born from the Dead, have the

First-fruits of Glory.

We dote upon this present World, and the Enjoyments of it: And ’tis not

without Pain, and Fear, and Reluctancy, that we are torn from them; as

if our Hopes lay all within the Compass of this Life. Yet, I know not by

what good Fate, my Thoughts have been always fix’d upon Things to come,

more than upon Things present. These I know, by certain Experience, to

be but Trifles; and if there be nothing more considerable to come, the

whole Being of Man is no better than a Trifle. But there is Room enough

before us in that we call _Eternity_, for great and noble Scenes; and

the Mind of Man feels itself lessen’d and straiten’d in this low and

narrow State; wishes and waits to see something greater. And if it could

discern another World a coming, on this side Eternal Life: a beginning

Glory, the best that Earth can bear, it would be a kind of Immortality

to enjoy that Prospect before-hand. To see, when this Theatre is

dissolv’d, where we shall act next, and what Parts; what Saints and

Heroes, if I may so say, will appear upon that Stage; and with what

Lustre and Excellency: How easy would it be, under a View of these

Futurities, to despise the little Pomps and Honours, and the Momentary

Pleasures of a mortal Life? But I proceed to our Subject.

CHAP. II

_The true State of the Question is propos’d._

_’Tis the general Doctrine of the Antients, that the present World,

or the present Frame of Nature, is mutable and perishable: To which

the Sacred Books agree; and natural Reason can alledge nothing

against it._

When we speak of the End or Destruction of the World, whether by Fire or

otherwise, ’tis not to be imagin’d that we understand this of the _Great

Universe_; Sun, Moon, and Stars, and the highest Heavens; as if these

were to perish or be destroy’d some few Years hence, whether by Fire or

any other Way. This Question is only to be understood of the _sublunary

World_, of this Earth and its Furniture; which had its Original about

Six thousand Years ago, according to the History of _Moses_; and hath

once already been destroyed, when the Exterior Region of it broke, and

the Abyss, issuing forth, as out of a Womb, overflow’d all the habitable

Earth, _Gen. vii. 17._ _Job xxxviii. 8._ The next Deluge is that of

Fire; which will have the same Bounds, and overflow the Surface of the

Earth, much what in the same Manner. But the Cœlestial Regions, where

the Stars and Angels inhabit, are not concerned in this Fate: Those are

not made of combustible Matter; nor, if they were, could our Flames

reach them. Possibly those Bodies may have Changes and Revolutions

peculiar to themselves, but in Ways unknown to us, and after long and

unknown Periods of Time. Therefore, when we speak of the Conflagration

of the World, these have no Concern in the Question; nor any other Part

of the Universe, than the Earth and its Dependances. As will evidently

appear when we come to explain the Manner and Causes of the

Conflagration.

And as this Conflagration can extend no farther than to the Earth and

its Elements, so neither can it destroy the Matter of the Earth; but

only the Form and Fashion of it, as it is an habitable World. Neither

Fire, nor any natural Agent, can destroy Matter, that is, reduce it to

nothing: It may alter the Modes and Qualities of it, but the Substance

will always remain. And accordingly the Apostle, when he speaks of the

Mutability of this World, says only, _The Figure_ or Fashion of _this

World passes away_, _1 Cor. vii. 31._ This Structure of the Earth and

Disposition of the Elements; and all the _Works_ of the Earth, as St.

_Peter_ says, _2 Epist. iii._ all its natural Productions, and all the

Works of Art or human Industry; these will perish, be melted or torn in

Pieces by the Fire; but without an Annihilation of the Matter, any more

than in the former Deluge. And this will be farther prov’d and

illustrated in the Beginning of the following Books.

The Question being thus stated, we are next to consider the Sense of

Antiquity upon these two Points: First, Whether this sublunary World is

mutable and perishable: Secondly, By the Force and Action of what

Causes, and in what Manner, it will perish; whether by Fire, or

otherwise. _Aristotle_ is very irregular in his Sentiments about the

State of the World; he allows it neither Beginning nor Ending, Rise nor

Fall; but wou’d have it eternal and immutable. And this he understands,

not only of the great Universe, but of this sublunary World, this Earth

which we inhabit; wherein he will not admit there ever have been, or

ever will be, either general Deluges or Conflagrations. And, as if he

was ambitious to be thought singular in his Opinion about the Eternity

of the World, he says, _All_ the _Antients_ before him, gave some

Beginning or Origin to the World; but were not, indeed, so unanimous as

to its future Fate: Some believing it immutable, or, as the Philosophers

call it, incorruptible; others, That it had its fatal Times and Periods,

as lesser Bodies have; and a Term of Age prefix’d to it by Providence.

But before we examine this Point any farther, it will be necessary to

reflect upon that which we noted before, an Ambiguity in the Use of the

Word _World_, which gives frequent Occasion of Mistakes in reading the

Ancients: When that which they speak of the _great Universe_, we apply

to the _sublunary World_: Or, on the contrary, what they speak of this

Earth, we extend to the whole Universe. And if some of them, besides

_Aristotle_, made the World incorruptible, they might mean that of the

_great Universe_, which they thought would never be dissolv’d or perish

as to its Mass and Bulk: But single Parts and Points of it (and our

Earth is no more) may be variously transform’d, and made habitable and

unhabitable, according to certain Periods of Time, without any Prejudice

to their Philosophy. So _Plato_, for Instance, thinks this World will

have no Dissolution: For, being a Work so beautiful and noble, the

Goodness of God, he says, will always preserve it. It is most reasonable

to understand this of the great Universe; For, in our Earth, _Plato_

himself admits such Dissolutions as are made by general Deluges and

Conflagrations; and we contend for no other. So likewise in other

Authors, if they speak of the Immortality of the World, you must observe

what World they apply it to; and whether to the Matter or the Form of

it: And if you remember that our Discourse proceeds only upon the

sublunary World, and the Dissolution of its Form, you will find little

in Antiquity contrary to this Doctrine. I always except _Aristotle_ (who

allow’d of no Providence in this inferior World) and some _Pythagoreans_

falsly so call’d, being either fictitious Authors, or Apostates from the

Doctrine of their Master. These being excepted, upon a View of the rest,

you will find very few Dissenters from this general Doctrine.

_Plato_’s Argument against the Dissolution of the World, from the

Goodness and Wisdom of God, would not be altogether unreasonable, tho’

apply’d to this Earth, if it was so to be dissolv’d, as never to be

restor’d again. But we expect _New Heavens_ and a _New Earth_, upon the

Dissolution of these; better in all Respects, more commodious, and more

beautiful. And the several Perfections of the Divine Nature, Wisdom,

Power, Goodness, Justice, Sanctity, cannot be so well display’d and

exemplify’d in any one single State of Nature, as in a Succession of

States, fitted to receive one another according to the Dispositions of

the moral World, and the Order of Divine Providence. Wherefore,

_Plato_’s Argument from the Divine Attributes, all Things consider’d,

doth rather prove a Succession of Worlds, than that one single World

should remain the same throughout all Ages, without Change or Variation.

Next to the _Platonists_, the _Stoicks_ were most considerable in

Matters relating to Morality and Providence: And their Opinion, in this

Case, is well known; they being look’d upon by the Moderns, as the

principal Authors of the Doctrine of the _Conflagration_. Nor is it less

known that the School of _Democritus_ and _Epicurus_, made all their

Worlds subject to Dissolution; and by a new Concourse of Atoms restor’d

them again. Lastly, The _Ionick_ philosophers, who had _Thales_ for

their Master, and were the first Naturalists amongst the _Greeks_,

taught the same Doctrine. We have, indeed, but an imperfect Account left

us of this Sect, and ’tis great Pity; for as it was one of the most

antient, so it seems to have been one of the most considerable amongst

the _Greeks_ for Natural Philosophy. In those Remains which _Diogenes

Laertius_ hath preserv’d, of _Anaxagoras_, _Anaximenes_, _Archelaus_,

&c. all great Men in their Time; we find that they treated much of the

Origin of the World, and had many extraordinary Notions about it, which

come lame and defective to us. The Doctrine of their Founder, _Thales_,

which made all Things to consist of Water, seems to have a great

Resemblance to the Doctrine of _Moses_ and St. _Peter_ about the

Constitution of the first Heavens and Earth, _Gen. i._ _2 Pet. ii. 5._

But there is little in _Laertius_, what their Opinion was about the

Dissolution of the World; other Authors inform us more of that.

_Stobæus_, _Ecl. Phys. l. 1. c. 24_, joins them with _Leucippus_ and the

_Epicureans_: _Simplicius_ with _Heraclitus_, and the _Stoicks_, in this

Doctrine about the Corruptibility of the World. So that all the Schools

of the _Greek_ Philosophers, as we noted before, were unanimous in this

Point, excepting the _Peripateticks_; whose Master, _Aristotle_, had

neither Modesty enough to follow the Doctrine of his Predecessors, nor

Wit enough to invent any Thing better.

Besides these Sects of Philosophers, there were Theologers amongst the

_Greeks_, more Antient than these Sects, and more Mystical. _Aristotle_

often distinguisheth the _Naturalists_, and the _Theologues_, Οἱ

φυσικοὶ, οἱ θεόλογοι. Such were _Orpheus_ and his Followers, who had

more of the antient Oriental Learning, than the succeeding Philosophers.

But they writ their Philosophy, or Theology rather, Mythologically and

Poetically, in Parables and Allegories, that needed an Interpretation.

All these Theologers supposed the Earth to rise from a Chaos; and as

they said that _Love_ was the Principle at first, that united the loose

and severed Elements, and formed them into an habitable World; so they

supposed that if _Strife_ or _Contention_ prevail’d, that would again

dissolve and disunite them, and reduce Things into a Chaos; such as the

Earth will be in, upon the Conflagration. And it farther appears, that

both these Orders of the Learned in _Greece_, suppos’d this present

Frame of Nature might perish, by their Doctrine of _Periodical

Revolutions_, or of the Renovation of the World after certain Periods of

Time; which was a Doctrine common amongst the Learned _Greeks_, and

received by them from the ancient Barbarick Nations: As will appear more

at large in the following Book, _Ch. 3._ In the mean Time we may

observe, that _Origen_ in answering _Celsus_, _Lib. 9._ about the Point

of the Resurrection, tells him, That Doctrine ought not to appear so

strange or ridiculous to him, seeing their own Authors did believe and

teach the _Renovation of the World_, after certain Ages or Periods. And

the Truth is, this Renovation of the World, rightly stated, is the same

Thing with the _First Resurrection_ of the Christians. And as to the

second and general Resurrection, when the Righteous shall have Cœlestial

Bodies; ’tis well known, that the _Platonists_ and _Pythagoreans_

cloathed the Soul with a Cœlestial Body, or, in their Language, an

Æthereal Vehicle, as her last Beatitude or Glorification. So that

_Origen_ might very justly tell his Adversary, he had no Reason to

ridicule the Christian Doctrine of the Resurrection, seeing their own

Authors had the main Strokes of it in their Traditionary Learning.

I will only add one Remark more, before we leave this Subject, to

prevent a Mistake in the Word _Immortal_ or _Immortality_, when applied

to the World. As I told you before, the Equivocation that was in that

Term _World_, it being us’d sometimes for the whole Universe, sometimes

for this inferior Part of it where we live; so likewise we must observe,

that when this inferior World is said to be _Immortal_, by the

Philosophers, as sometimes it is, that commonly is not meant of any

single State of Nature, or any single World, but of a Succession of

Worlds, consequent one upon another. As a Family may be said Immortal,

not in any single Person, but in a Succession of Heirs. So as, many

Times, when the Ancients mention the Immortality of the World, they do

not thereby exclude the Dissolution or Renovation of it; but suppose a

Vicissitude, or Series of Worlds succeeding one another. This

Observation is not mine, but was long since made by _Simplicius_,

_Stobæus_, and others, who tell us in what Sense some of those

Philosophers who allowed the World to be perishable, did yet affirm it

to be immortal: Namely, by successive Renovations.

Thus much is sufficient to shew the Sense and Judgment of Antiquity, as

to the Changeableness or Perpetuity of the World. But ancient Learning

is like ancient Medals, more esteem’d for their Rarity, than their real

Use; unless the Authority of a Prince make them currant: So neither will

these Testimonies be of any great Effect, unless they be made good and

valuable by the Authority of Scripture. We must therefore add the

Testimonies of the Prophets and Apostles, to these of the _Greeks_ and

_Barbarians_, that the Evidence may be full and undeniable. That the

Heavens and the Earth will perish, or be chang’d into another Form, is,

sometimes, plainly express’d, sometimes suppos’d and alluded to in

Scripture. The Prophet _David_’s Testimony is express, both for the

Beginning and Ending of the World: In _Psal. cii. ver. 25, 26, 27_. _Of

old hast thou laid the Foundation of the Earth, and the Heavens are the

Work of thy Hands. They shall perish, but thou shalt endure: Yea, all of

them shall wax old like a Garment; as a Vesture shalt thou change them,

and they shall be changed. But thou art the same, and thy Years shall

have no End._ The Prophet _Isaiah_’s Testimony is no less express, to

the same Purpose, _ch. li. 6._ _Lift up your Eyes to the Heavens, and

look upon the Earth beneath: For the Heavens shall vanish away like

Smoke, and the Earth shall wax old like a Garment, and they that dwell

therein shall die in like Manner._ These Texts are plain and explicit;

and in Allusion to this Day of the Lord, and this Destruction of the

World, the same Prophet often useth Phrases that relate to it: As the

_Concussion of the Heavens and the Earth, Isa. xiii. 13._ The _shaking

of the Foundations of the World, ch. xxiv. 18, 19._ The _Dissolution of

the Host of Heaven, ch. xxxiv. 4._ And our Sacred Writers have

Expressions of the like Force, and relating to the same Effect: As the

_Hills melting like Wax, at the Presence of the Lord, Psal. xcvii. 5._

Shattering _once more_ all the Parts of the Creation, _Hagg. ii. 6._

_Overturning the Mountains, and making the Pillars of the Earth to

tremble, Job ix. 5, 6._ If you reflect upon the Explication given of the

Deluge, in the first Part of this Theory, and attend to the Manner of

the Conflagration, as it will be explain’d in the Sequel of this

Discourse, you will see the Justness and Fitness of these Expressions:

That they are not Poetical Hyperboles, or random Expressions of great

and terrible Things in general, but a true Account of what hath been, or

will be, at that great Day of the Lord. ’Tis true, the Prophets

sometimes use such like Expressions figuratively, for Commotion in

States and Kingdoms, but that is only by way of Metaphor and

Accommodation; the true Basis they stand upon, is, That Ruin, Overthrow,

and Dissolution of the Natural World, which was once at the Deluge, and

will be again, after another Manner, at the general Conflagration.

As to the New Testament, our Saviour says, _Heaven and Earth shall pass

away, but his Words shall not pass away, Mat. xxiv. 35._ St. _Paul_

says, the _Scheme of this World_; the Fashion, Form, and Composition of

it, _passeth away, 1 Cor. vii. 31._ And when mention is made of _New

Heavens_ and a _New Earth_, which both the Prophet _Isaiah_, _Isa. lxv.

17. & lxvi. 22._ and the Apostles St. _Peter_ and St. _John_, _Rev. xxi.

1._ _2 Pet._ _iii. 13._ mention, ’tis plainly imply’d, that the Old ones

will be dissolv’d. The same Thing is also imply’d, when our Saviour

speaks of a _Renascency_, or _Regeneration_, _Mat. xix. 28._ and St.

_Peter_, of a _Restitution_ of all Things, _Acts iii. 21._ For what is

now, must be abolish’d, before any former Order of Things can be

restor’d or reduced. In a Word, If there was nothing in Scripture

concerning this Subject, but that Discourse of St. _Peter_’s, in his

Second Epistle, and Third Chapter, concerning the triple Order and

Successions of the Heavens and the Earth, past, present, and to come;

that alone would be a Conviction, and Demonstration to me, that this

present World will be dissolv’d.

You will say, it may be, in the last Place, we want still the Testimony

of Natural Reason and Philosophy, to make the Evidence complete. I

answer, ’tis enough if they be silent, and have nothing to say to the

contrary. Here are Witnesses, Human and Divine, and if none appear

against them, we have no reason to refuse their Testimony, or to

distrust it. Philosophy will very readily yield to this Doctrine, that

all material Compositions are dissolvable; and she will not wonder to

see that die, which she had seen born: I mean this terrestrial World.

She stood upon the Chaos, and saw it roll itself, with Difficulty, and

after many Strugglings, into the form of an habitable Earth: And that

Form she saw broken down again at the Deluge; and can as little hope or

expect, now, as then, that it should be everlasting and immutable. There

would be nothing great or considerable in this inferior World, if there

were not such Revolutions of Nature. The Seasons of the Year, and the

fresh Productions of the Spring, are pretty in their Way; but when the

(_Annus Magnus_) _Great Year_ comes about, with a new Order of all

Things, in the Heavens, and on the Earth; and a new Dress of Nature

throughout all her Regions, far more goodly and beautiful than the

fairest Spring; this gives a new Life to the Creation, and shews the

Greatness of its Author. Besides, these fatal Catastrophes are always a

Punishment to degenerate Mankind, that are overwhelm’d in the Ruins of

these perishing Worlds. And to make Nature herself execute the Divine

Vengeance against rebellious Creatures, argues both the Power and Wisdom

of that Providence that governs all Things here below. These Things

Reason and Philosophy approve of; but if you further require, that they

should shew a _Necessity_ of this future Destruction of the World, from

_natural Causes_, with the Time, and all other Circumstances of this

Effect; your Demands are unreasonable, seeing these Things do not depend

solely upon Nature. But if you will content yourself to know what

Dispositions there are in Nature towards such a Change; how it may

begin, proceed, and be consummate, under the Conduct of Providence, be

pleased to read the following Discourse, for your further Satisfaction.

The sacred theory of the Earth, Volume 2 (of 2) · 第 31 / 90 题