CHAPTER LIII.

TSEK AND ARTEL.

The obstacles which lie in the way of a peasant wishing to become a

townsman are very great. After he has freed himself from his

obligations to the commune and the crown, and arrived at the gates of

Moscow, with his papers in perfect order, how is a rustic to live in

that great city? By getting work. That would be the only trouble of a

French paysan or an English plough-boy. In Russia it is different. The

towns are not open and unwalled, so that men may come and go as they

list. They are strongholds; held, in each case, by an army, in the

ranks of which every man has his appointed place.

No man--not of noble birth--can live the burgher life in Moscow, save

by gaining a place in one of the recognized orders of society--in a

tsek, a guild, or a chin.

A tsek is an association of craftsmen and petty traders, such as the

tailoring tsek, the cooking tsek, and the peddling tsek; the members

of which pay a small sum of money, elect their own elders, and manage

their own affairs. The elder of a tsek gives to each member a printed

form, which must be countersigned by the police not less than once a

year. A guild is a higher kind of tsek, the members of which pay a tax

to the state for the privilege of buying and selling, and for immunity

from serving in the ranks. A chin is a grade in the public service,

parted somewhat sharply into fourteen stages--from that of a certified

collegian up to that of an acting privy-councillor. A peasant might

enter a guild if he could pay the tax; but the impost is heavy, even

for the lowest guild; and a man who comes into Moscow in search of

work must seek a place in some cheap and humble tsek. He need not

follow the calling of his tsek--a clerk may belong to a shoemaker's

tsek, and a gentleman's servant to a hawker's tsek. But in one or

other of these societies a peasant must get his name inscribed and his

papers signed, under penalty of being seized by the police and hustled

into the ranks.

Every year he must go in person to the Office of Addresses, a vast

establishment on the Tverskoi Boulevard, where the name, residence,

and occupation of every man and woman living in this great city is

entered on the public books. At this Office of Addresses he has to

leave his regular papers, taking a receipt which serves him as a

passport for a week; in the mean while the police examine his papers,

verify the elder's signature, and mark them afresh with an official

stamp. Every time he changes his lodging he must go in person to the

Office of Addresses and record the change. A tax of three or four

shillings a year is levied on his papers by the police, half of which

money goes to the crown and half to the provincial hospitals. In case

of poverty and sickness, his inscription in a tsek entitles a man to

be received into a government hospital should there be room for him in

any of the wards.

To lose his papers is a calamity for the rustic hardly less serious

than to lose his leg. Without his papers he is an outlaw at the mercy

of every one who hates him. He must go back at once to his village; if

he has been lucky enough to get his name on the books of a tsek, he

must find the elder, prove his loss, procure fresh evidence of his

identity, and get this evidence countersigned by the police. Yet when

a rustic comes to Moscow nothing is more likely than that his passport

will be stolen. In China-town there is a rag fair, called the Hustling

Market, where cheap-jacks sell every sort of ware--old sheep-skins,

rusty locks and keys, felt boots (third wear), and span-new saints in

brass and tin. This market is a hiring-place for servants; and lads

who have no friends in Moscow flock to this market in search of work.

A fellow walks up to the rustic with a town-bred air: "You want a

place? Very well; let me see your passport." Taking his papers from

his boot--a peasant always puts his purse and papers in his boot--he

offers them gladly to the man, who dodges through the crowd in a

moment, while the rustic is gaping at him with open mouth. A thief

knows where he can sell these papers, just as he could sell a stolen

watch.

Having got his name inscribed in a tsek, his passport signed by his

elder and countersigned by the police, the peasant, now become a

burgher, looks about him for an artel, which, if he have money enough,

he proceeds to join.

An artel is an association of workmen following the same craft, and

organized on certain lines, with the principles of which they are made

familiar in their village life. An artel is a commune carried from the

country into the town. The members of an artel join together for their

mutual benefit and insurance. They elect an elder, and confide to him

the management of their concerns. They agree to work in common at

their craft, to have no private interests, to throw their earnings

into a single fund, and, after paying the very light cost of their

association, to divide the sum total into equal shares. In practical

effect, the artel is a finer form of communism than the commune

itself. In the village commune they only divide the land; in the city

artel they divide the produce.

The origin of artels is involved in mist. Some writers of the

Panslavonic school profess to find traces of such an association in

the tenth century; but the only proof adduced is the existence of a

rule making towns and villages responsible, in cases of murder, for

the fines inflicted on the criminal--a rule which these writers would

find in the Frankish, Saxon, and other codes. The safer view appears

to be, that the artel came from Asia. No one knows the origin of this

term artel--it seems to be a Tartar word, and it is nowhere found in

use until the reign of those tartarized Grand Dukes of Moscow, Ivan

the Third and Ivan the Fourth. In fact, the artel seems to have been

planted in Russia with the commune and the serf.

The first artel of which we have any notice was a gang of thieves, who

roamed about the country taking what they liked with a rude

hand--inviting themselves to weddings and merry-makings, where they

not only ate and drank as they pleased, but carried away the wine, the

victuals, and the plate. These freebooters elected a chief, whom they

called their ataman. They were bound to stand by each other in weal

and woe. No rogue could go where he pleased--no thief could plunder on

his personal account. The spoil was thrown into a common heap, from

which every member of the artel got an equal share.

These bandit artels must have been strong and prosperous, since the

principle of their association passed with little or no change into

ordinary city life and trade. The burghers kept the word artel; they

translated ataman into elder (starost); and in every minor detail they

copied their original, rule by rule. These early artels had very few

articles of association; and the principal were: that the members

formed one body, bound to stand by each other; that they were to be

governed by a chief, elected by general suffrage; that every man was

appointed to his post by the artel; that a member could not refuse to

do the thing required of him; that no one should be suffered to drink,

swear, game, and quarrel; that every one should bear himself towards

his comrade like a brother; that no present should be received, unless

it were shared by each; that a member could not name a man to serve in

his stead, except with the consent of all. In after times these simple

rules were supplemented by provisions for restoring to the member's

heirs the value of his rights in the common fund. In case of death,

these additional rules provided that the subscriber's share should go

to his son, if he had a son; if not, to his next of kin, as any other

property would descend. So far the estate was held to be a joint

concern as regards the question of use, and a series of personal

properties as regards the actual ownership. All these city artels took

the motto of "Honesty and truth."

An artel, then, was, in its origin, no other than an association of

craftsmen for their mutual support against the miseries of city life,

just as the commune was an association of laborers for their mutual

support against the miseries of country life. Each sprang, in its

turn, from a sense of the weakness of individual men in struggling

with the hard necessities of time and place. One body sought

protection in numbers and mutual help against occasional lack of

employment; the other against occasional attacks from wolves and

bears, and against the annual floods of rain and drifts of snow. An

artel was a republic like a commune; with a right of meeting, a right

of election, a right of fine and punishment. No one interfered with

the members, save in a general way. They made their own rules, obeyed

their own chiefs, and were in every sense a state within the state.

Yet these societies lived and throve, because they proved, on trial,

to be as beneficial to the upper as they were to the lower class; an

artel offering advantages to employers of labor like those offered by

a commune to the ministers of finance and war.

If an English banker wants a clerk, he must go into the open market

and find a servant, whom he has to hire on the strength of his

character as certified from his latest place. He takes him on trial,

subject to the chance of his proving an honest man. If a Russian

banker wants a clerk, he sends for the elder of an artel, looks at his

list, and hires his servant from the society, in that society's name.

He seeks no character, takes no guaranty. The artel is responsible for

the clerk, and the banker trusts him in perfect confidence to the full

extent of the artel fund. If the clerk should prove to be a rogue--a

thing which sometimes happens--the banker calls in the elder,

certifies the fact, and gets his money paid back at once.

These things may happen, yet they are not common. Petty thieving is

the vice of every Eastern race, and Russians of the lower class are

not exceptions to the rule; yet, in the artels, it is certain that

this tendency to pick and steal is greatly curbed, if not wholly

suppressed. "Honesty and truth," from being a phrase on the tongue,

may come at length to be a habit of the mind. A decent life is

strenuously enjoined, and no member is allowed to drink and game; thus

many of the vices which lead to theft are held in check by the public

opinion of his circle; yet the temptation sometimes grows too strong,

and a confidential clerk decamps with his employer's box. Another

merit of these artels then comes out.

A robbery has taken place in the bank, a clerk is missing, and the

banker feels assured that the money and the man are gone together.

Notice is sent to the police; but Moscow is a very big city; and

Rebrof, clever as he may be in catching thieves, has no instant means

of following a man who has just committed in a bank parlor his virgin

crime. But the elder knows his man, and the members, who will have to

suffer for his fault, are well acquainted with his haunts. Setting

their eyes and tongues at work, they follow him with the energy of a

pack of wolves on a trail of blood, never slackening in their race

until they hunt him down and yield him up to trial, judgment, and the

mines.

Bankers like Baron Stieglitz, of St. Petersburg, merchants like

Mazourin and Alexief, in Moscow, have artels of their own, founded in

the first instance for their own work-people. On entering an artel, a

man pays a considerable sum of money--the average is a thousand

rubles, one hundred and fifty pounds--though he need not always pay

the whole sum down at once. That payment is the good-will; what is

called the buying in. He goes to work wherever the artel may appoint

him. He gets no separate wages; for the payment is made to the elder

for one and all. So far this is share and share alike. But then the

old rule about receiving presents has been much relaxed of late; and a

good servant often receives from his master more than he receives as

his share from the general fund. This innovation, it is true, destroys

the old character of the artel as a society for the mutual assurance

of strong and weak; but in the progress of free thought and action it

is a revolution not to be withstood, and hardly to be gainsaid.

One day, when dining with a Swede, a banker in St. Petersburg, I was

struck by the quick eyes and ready hands of my host's butler, and, on

my dropping a word in his praise, my host broke out, "Ha, that fellow

is a golden man; he is my butler, valet, clerk, cashier, and master of

the household--all in one."

"Is he a peasant?"

"Yes; a peasant from the South. I get him for nothing--for the price

of a common lout."

"He comes to you from an artel?"

"Yes, he and some dozen more; he is worth the other twelve."

"You pay the same wage for each and all?"

"To the artel, so; but, hist! We make up for extra care and service by

a thumping New-Year's gift."

"Then the artel is beginning to fail of its original purpose--that of

securing to the weak, the idle, and the stupid men as high a wage as

it gave to the strong, the enterprising, and the able men?"

"Can you suppose that clever and pushing fellows will work like

horses, all for nothing, now that they are free? A serf might do so;

he lived in terror of the stick; he had no notion of his rights; and

he had worked for others all his life. An artel is a useful thing, and

no one (least of all a foreign banker) wishes to see the institution

fail; but it must go with the times. If it can not find the means of

drawing the best men into it by paying them fairly for what they do,

it will pass away."

An artel is a vast convenience to the foreign masters, whatever it may

be to the native men.

Free Russia · 第 53 / 66 章