Letter of a missionary father of the Order of St. Francis to a Spanish
father of the Society of Jesus, written from the city of Manila in
the Philippine Islands, December 13, 1771, and communicated not long
ago to Father Aloysius Knapp. [156]
The provincial Council which was held this year by the archbishop of
this place with his three suffragans has given rise to the greatest
discord. [157] For therein the archbishop and the governor of the
islands sought to have abolished the solemn votive Mass (of the Blessed
[Virgin]) and the Salve Regina--which from the first christianizing
of these islands it has been the custom to chant every Saturday in
honor of the Blessed Virgin as well as other devotions to the Blessed
Virgin, for the preservation and spread of the Catholic religion--under
the pretext that the Indians might not [thereby] be led into idolatry
and the worship of Mary as a goddess. [158] This purpose and decision
of the two they gave in writing to the three suffragans. Two of the
suffragans--one of whom was a secular, the other belonging to the
Order of St. Dominic--yielded assent, or at least showed no displeasure
thereat. But the third, by name De Luna, of the Order of St. Francis,
bishop of Camarines, a man worthy of honor for his advanced age and
uprightness, rose in indignation at the dastardliness of the motion,
and with apostolic zeal declaimed against the written decision. On
recognizing, however, that his endeavor was wholly fruitless, with
the declaration that the council was a scandal he left the assembly,
subsequently sending [a copy of] this scandalous mandate to the royal
Audiencia--a body consisting of three magistrates, to whom an appeal
may lie against the governor--from whom he requested an official
statement in writing to that effect, in order that he might send this
scandalous decree to Madrid. On being apprised of his action, the
governor and archbishop in a rage sent soldiers to force from Bishop
de Luna the statement of the royal Audiencia and the written decree,
even under threat of death, should he refuse to surrender them. But as
the whole city was deeply indignant at this insolent proceeding, the
soldiers, dreading greater evils, desisted from their violent purpose,
whereupon Bishop de Luna received orders to leave the city. Soon after
his return to his episcopal see he issued a pastoral letter to his
clergy, religious and secular, wherein he declared the council [159]
null and scandalous. This declaration of the bishop was accepted by
all except the Dominican fathers, who sided with the archbishop and
the governor, who, quite unmoved by tumults, scandals, and bloodshed,
continued this council of theirs. In the meantime Bishop de Luna put
himself in hiding, and, it is said, took passage for Spain on a ship
sailing for China, in order to present the case to his Majesty. In
this council it furthermore was decreed, that Bishop de Luna should
be wrested from his see, and all the Augustinian fathers driven from
their parishes. Accordingly, on October 22 and 28 of the year 1771,
a large body of soldiery, sent therefor from the city of Manila by
the governor, gave to thirty-one Indian clerics [160] the parishes of
the Augustinian fathers, whom they led away as prisoners after having
pillaged their homes in the name of the king, and substituted the
said Indian clerics in their place. The same fate that befell the
Augustinian fathers was destined for us Franciscans; but, rather
than be taken away as prisoners, we all abandoned our homes and
our parishioners, and went up to our convent on a mountain, where
we purposed to struggle with hunger and hardships until God should
otherwise dispose of us. The father provincials of both orders sent
word in writing to their religious who were not yet in captivity,
to return to Spain, in any way and, in fine, by whatever road they
could. It is said that before long soldiers are to be sent to pillage
all our convents, both inside and outside the walls of Manila. The
governor is intercepting all letters addressed to Spain; he forbids
any to be sent thither. Accordingly, since he recently got hold of
four letters which were intended for Spain, which had been written by
the commander-in-chief of the troops, he had him thrown into jail and
deprived of his command; another Spaniard, who sided with the Spanish
religious and clerics, he fined three thousand dollars [talerorum]. For
the governor and the archbishop declare that Spanish religious
or clerics will no longer be tolerated, since with their masses,
sodalities [institutis], and prayers in common [comprecationibus],
[161] they are tricking the people, and with their devotions bleeding
them of their money. During this persecution the Moros, the enemies
of the Christians, are fishing in muddy waters; from the neighboring
islands of Xolo and Mindanao they are making raids in every quarter,
pillaging and setting afire churches and houses; they have slain many;
many more they have carried away into slavery, as happened three days
ago when they captured five hundred Christians a short distance from
the city of Manila. All these miseries and the immense slaughter
of Christians the governor and the archbishop view with unconcern,
pleased with this conceit alone that thereby they are harassing the
religious and are strong enough to persecute them--whose sorrowful
fate, moreover, they rejoice at, when, in the midst of banquets and
revelry [jocando], they intone the [invitatory] of the [divine] office:
Regem, cui omnia vivunt, venite adoremus, venite exultemus, [162] etc.
They rejoice since they have driven very many religious away from their
ministries; but it is greatly to be feared that their joy will soon be
turned into mourning. For all the Pampangos, the people who occupy the
most fertile and extensive region about the city of Manila--who are
the bravest of all the Indians, and excel all the rest in religious
fervor--are stirring up a revolt against the governor, the archbishop,
the Indian clerics, and all their partisans, all of whom they threaten
with death. They seem already to have leagued themselves with the
Moros, to whom they have already given as captives five of the Indian
clerics thrust upon them, in exchange for five Spanish soldiers,
besides asking for the Augustinian fathers who were taken away from
them by force.
Before opening the said council [conciliabulum], the archbishop made
the charge that all religious were unfit and unworthy to attend
the council--a statement that he insisted each one of them should
subscribe to in his own handwriting. Such as refused were [punished],
some by being thrown into prison, others by being very grievously
distressed. Two fathers of the Pious Schools, however, as being
members of his own order, [163] he chose as secretaries of the council.