SECTION II.

OF THE PHENOMENA PECULIAR TO UNSTRATIFIED BODIES.

1. _Metallic Veins._

49. THE unstratified minerals exist either in veins, intersecting the

stratified, or in masses surrounded by them. Veins are of various

kinds, and may in general be defined, separations in the continuity of

a rock, of a determinate width, but extending indefinitely in length

and depth, and filled with mineral substances, different from the rock

itself. The mineral veins, strictly so called, are those filled with

crystallized substances, and containing the metallic ores.

That these veins are of a formation subsequent to the hardening and

consolidation of the strata which they traverse, is too obvious to

require any proof; and it is no less clear, from the crystallized

and sparry structure of the substances contained in them, that these

substances must have concreted from a fluid state. Now, that this

fluidity was simple, like that of fusion by heat, and not compound,

like that of solution in a menstruum, is inferred from many phenomena.

It is inferred from the acknowledged insolubility of the substances

that fill the veins, in any one menstruum whatsoever; from the total

disappearance of the solvent, if there was any; from the complete

filling up of the vein by the substances which that solvent had

deposited; from the entire absence of all the appearances of horizontal

or gradual deposition; and, lastly, from the existence of close

cavities, lined with crystals, and admitting no egress to any thing but

heat.

50. To the same effect may be mentioned those groups of crystals

composed of substances the most different, that are united in the same

specimen, all intersecting and mutually impressing one another. These

admit of being explained, on the supposition that they were originally

in fusion, and became solid by the loss of heat; a cause that acted

on them all alike, and alike impelled them to crystallize: But the

appearances of simultaneous crystallization seem incompatible with the

nature of deposition from a solvent, where, with respect 16 different

substances, the effects must take place slowly, and in succession.

51. The metals contained in the veins which we are now treating of,

appear very commonly in the form of an ore, mineralized by sulphur.

Their union with this latter substance can be produced, as we know, by

heat, but hardly by the way of solution in a menstruum, and certainly

not at all, if that menstruum is nothing else than water. The metals,

therefore, when mineralized by sulphur, give no countenance to the

hypothesis of aqueous solution; and still less do they give any when

they are found native, as it is called, that is, malleable, pure

and uncombined with any other substance. The great masses of native

iron found in Siberia and South America are well known; and nothing

certainly can less resemble the products of a chemical precipitation.

Gold, however, the most perfect of the metals, is found native most

frequently; the others more rarely, in proportion nearly to the

facility of their combination with sulphur. Of all such specimens it

may be safely affirmed, that if they have ever been fluid, or even

soft, they must have been so by the action of heat; for, to suppose

that a metal has been precipitated, pure and uncombined from any

menstruum, is to trespass against all analogy, and to maintain a

physical impossibility. But it is certain, that many of the native

metals have once been in a state of softness, because they bear on them

impressions which they could not have received but when they were soft.

Thus, gold is often impressed by quartz and other stones, which still

adhere to it, or are involved in it. Specimens of quartz, containing

gold and silver shooting through them, with the most beautiful and

varied ramifications, are every where to be met with in the cabinets of

the curious; and contain, in their structure, the clearest proof, that

the metal and the quartz have been both soft, and have crystallized

together. By the compactness, also, of the body which they form, they

show, that when they acquired solidity, it was by the concretion of the

whole mass, and not by such partial concretion as takes place when a

solvent is separated from substances which it held in solution.

52. Native copper is very abundant; and some specimens of it have been

found crystallized. Here the crystallization of the metal is a proof

that it has passed from a fluid to a solid state; and its purity is a

proof that it did not make that transition by being precipitated from a

menstruum.

53. Again, pieces of native manganese have been found possessing so

exactly the characters peculiar to that metal when reduced in our

furnaces, that it is impossible to consider them as deriving their

figure and solidity from any cause but fusion. The ingenious author

who describes these specimens, La Peyrouse, was so forcibly struck

with this resemblance, that he immediately drew the same conclusion

from it which is drawn here, attributing the only difference, which

he remarked between the native and the artificial _regulus_, to the

different energy with which the same agent works when employed by

nature and by art.[17]

[Footnote 17: Theory of the Earth, vol. i. p. 68. Journal de Phys.

Janvier, 1786.]

54. All these appearances conspire to prove, that the materials which

fill the mineral veins were melted by heat, and forcibly injected, in

that state, into the clefts and fissures of the strata. These fissures

we must conceive to have arisen, not merely from the shrinking of the

strata while they acquired hardness and solidity, but from the violence

done to them, when they were heaved up and elevated in the manner which

has already been explained.[18]

[Footnote 18: NOTE XIII.]

55. When these suppositions are once admitted, the other leading facts

in the history of metallic veins will be readily accounted for. Thus,

for instance, it is evident to what we must ascribe the fragments of

the surrounding rock that are often found immersed in the veins, and

encompassed on all sides by crystallized substances. These fragments

being no doubt detached by the concussion, which at once tore asunder

and elevated the strata, were sustained by the melted matter that

flowed at the same time upward through the vein. Large masses of rock

are often found in this manner completely insulated; one of these,

which M. De Luc has described with great accuracy, is no less than a

vast segment of a mountain.[19]

[Footnote 19: Lettres Physiques, &c. tom. iii. P. 361.]

56. The immense violence which has accompanied the formation of mineral

veins, is particularly marked by the slips and shifts of the strata on

each side of them all tending to show what mighty changes have taken

place in those regions, which our imagination erroneously paints as

the abode of everlasting silence and rest. This shifting of the strata

is best observed, where the veins make a transverse section of beds of

rock, considerably inclined to the horizon. There it is common to see

the beds on one side of the vein slipped along from the corresponding

beds on the other side, and removed sometimes in a horizontal,

sometimes in an oblique direction. In this way, not only the strata

are shifted, but veins, which intersect one another, are also shifted

themselves. They are _heaved_, as it is called in the significant

language of the miners, and forced out of their direction. It is

impossible, in such a case, but to connect in the mind the formation

of the vein, and the production of the slips which accompany it, and to

regard them as parts of the same phenomenon.

57. Where these slips are horizontal, and exhibit great bodies of

strata carried from their place, while the parts of the transferred

mass remain undisturbed relatively to one another, they furnish a dear

proof, that this change of plaice has not arisen from the falling in

of the roofs of caverns, as some geologists suppose. The horizontal

direction, and the regularity of the movement, are incompatible with

the action of such a cause as this; and indeed it is highly interesting

to remark, in the midst of the signs of disturbance which prevail in

the bowels of the earth, that there reigns a certain symmetry and

order, which indicate the action of a force of incredible magnitude,

but slow and gradual in its effects. The parts of the mass moved are

undisturbed relatively to one another; what has been broken has been

cemented; the breaches of continuity have been filled up and healed;

and every where we see the operation of a cause that could unite as

well as separate. The twofold action of heat to expand and to melt,

could scarce be pointed out more clearly by any system of appearances.

58. As a long period was no doubt required for the elevation of the

strata, the rents made in them are not all of the same date, nor the

veins all of the same formation. This is clear in the case of one vein

producing a shift or slip in another; for the vein which forces the

other out of its place, and preserves its own direction, is evidently

the more recent of the two, and must have had its materials in a

state of activity, when those of the other were inert. Sometimes,

also, at the intersection of two veins, we may trace the current of

the materials of the one, across those of the other; and here, of

consequence, the relative antiquity is determined just as in the former

instance.

59. The want of any appearance of stratification in mineral veins has

already been taken notice of. There is, however, to be observed, in

many instances, a tendency to a regular arrangement of the substances

contained in them; those of the same kind forming coats parallel to the

sides of the vein, and nearly of an equal thickness. This phenomenon

is considered as one of the strongest arguments in favour of the

Neptunian system, but has nothing in it, in the least incompatible

with that theory which ascribes the formation of veins to the action

of subterraneous heat. When melted matter from the mineral regions was

thrown up into the veins, that which was nearest to the sides would

soonest lose its heat. The similar substances, also, would unite while

this process was going forward, and would crystallize, as in other

cases of congelation, from the sides toward the interior. There is the

more reason for supposing this to have been the case, that the same

sort of coating is often observed on the inside of close cavities,

which are, nevertheless, so constructed, as to afford a demonstration

that no chemical solvent was ever included in them, (§ 74.) Some

veins, it must also be considered, may have been filled by successive

injections of melted matter, and this would naturally give rise to a

variety of separate incrustations.[20]

[Footnote 20: See some farther remarks on this subject at NOTE XIII.]

60. In the view now given of metallic veins, they have been considered

as traversing only the stratified parts of the globe. They do,

however, occasionally intersect the unstratified parts, particularly

the granite, the same vein often continuing its course across rocks

of both kinds, without suffering any material change; and, if we have

hitherto paid no attention to this circumstance, it is because the

order pursued in this essay required, that the relation of the veins

to stratified bodies should be first treated of. Besides, the facts

in the natural history of veins, whether contained in stratified or

unstratified rocks, are so nearly alike, that in a general view of

geology, they do not require to be distinguished. It is material to

remark, that, though metallic veins are found indiscriminately in all

the different kinds of rock, whether stratified or otherwise, they are

most abundant in the class of primary schisti. All the countries most

remarkable for their mines, and the mountains distinguished by the

name of metalliferous, are primary, and the instance of Derbyshire is

perhaps the most considerable exception to this rule that is known.

This preference, which the metals appear to give to the primary strata,

is very consistent with Dr Hutton's theory, which represents the rocks

of that order as being most changed from their original position, and

those on which the disturbing forces of the subterraneous regions have

acted most frequently, and with greatest energy. The primary strata are

the lowest, also, and have the most direct communication with those

regions from which the mineral veins derive all their riches.

2. _Of Whinstone._

61. Beside the veins filled with spar, and containing the metallic

ores, the strata are intersected by veins of whinstone, porphyry, and

granite, the characters of which are next to be examined.

The term _whin_, or _whinstone_, with Dr. Hutton, like the word _trap_,

with the German mineralogists, denotes a class of stones, comprehending

several distinct species, or at least varieties. The common _basalt_,

the _wacken_, _mullen_, and _crag_ of Kirwan, the _grûnstein_ of

Werner, and the _amygdaloid_, are comprehended under the name of whin.

All these stones have a tendency to a spathose structure, and discover

at least the rudiments of crystallization. They are, at the same time,

without any mark of stratification in their internal texture, as they

are also, for the most part, in their outward configuration; and, as

the different species here enumerated compose, not unfrequently, parts

of the same continuous rock, the change from one to another being made

through a series of insensible gradations, they may safely be regarded

by the geologist as belonging to the same _genus_.

62. Whin, though not stratified, exists in two different ways, that is,

either in veins, (called in Scotland _dykes_,) traversing the strata

like the veins already described, or in irregular masses, incumbent

on the strata, and sometimes interposed between them. In both these

forms, whinstone has nearly the same characters, and bears, in all its

varieties, a most striking resemblance to the lavas which have actually

flowed from volcanoes on the surface of the earth. This resemblance

is so great, that the two substances have been often mistaken for one

another; and many rocks, which have been pronounced to be the remains

of extinguished volcanoes, by mineralogists of no inconsiderable

name, have been found, on closer examination, to be nothing else than

masses or veins of whinstone. This latter stone is indeed only to be

distinguished from the former, by a careful examination of the internal

characters of both; and chiefly from this circumstance, that whinstone

often contains calcareous spar and zeolite, whereas neither of these

substances is found in such lavas, as are certainly known to have been

thrown out by volcanic explosions.

Now, from these circumstances of affinity between lava and whinstone,

on the one hand, and of diversity on the other, as the formation of

the one is known, it should seem that some probable conclusion may be

drawn concerning the formation of the other. The affinity in question

is constant and essential; the difference variable and accidental;

and this naturally leads to suspect, that the two stones have the

same origin; and that, as lava is certainly a production of fire, so

probably is whinstone.

63. But, in order to see whether this hypothesis will explain the

diversity of the two substances, without which it will not be entitled

to much attention, we must remark, that the presence of carbonate of

lime in a body that has been fused, argues, agreeably to the principles

formerly explained, that the fusion was brought about under a great

compressing force, that is to say, deep in the bowels of the earth, or

in the great laboratory of the mineral regions. We are, therefore, to

suppose that the fusion of the whin was performed in those regions,

where the compression was sufficient to preserve the carbonic gas in

union with the calcareous earth, so that these two substances melted

together, and, on cooling, crystallized into spar. In the lavas, again,

thrown out by volcanic eruption, the fusion, as we know, wherever it

may begin, continues in the open air, where the pressure is only that

of the atmosphere: the calcareous earth, which, therefore, may have

been, in the form of a carbonate, among the materials of this lava,

must be converted into quicklime, and become infusible; hence the want

of calcareous spar in lavas that have flowed at the surface.

Thus, whinstone is to be accounted a subterraneous, or _unerupted_

lava; and our theory has the advantage of explaining both the affinity

and the difference between these stony bodies, without the introduction

of any new hypothesis. In the Neptunian system, the affinity of

whinstone and lava is a paradox which admits of no solution.

64. The columnar structure sometimes found in that species of whinstone

called basaltes, is a fact which has given rise to much discussion;

and it must be confessed, that though one of the most striking and

peculiar characters of this fossil, it is not that which gives the

clearest and most direct information concerning its origin. One

circumstance, however, very much in favour of the opinion that basaltic

rocks owe their formation to fire, is, that the columnar form is

sometimes assumed by the lava actually erupted from volcanoes. Now, it

is certainly of no small importance, to have the synthetic argument

on our side, and to know, that basaltic columns can be produced by

fire; though, no doubt, to give absolute certainty to our conclusion,

it would be necessary to show, that there are in nature no other

means but this by which these columns can be formed. This sort of

evidence is hardly to be looked for; but since the power of fusion,

to produce the phenomena in question, is perfectly established, and

since the production of the same phenomena in the humid way is a mere

hypothesis, if there be the least reason to suspect the action of

subterraneous heat as one of the causes of mineralization, every maxim

of sound philosophy requires that the basaltic structure, in all cases,

should be ascribed to it.

65. The Neptunists will no doubt allege, with BERGMAN, that, in the

drying of starch, clay, and a few other substances, something analogous

to basaltic columns is produced. Here, however, a most important

difference is to be remarked, corresponding very exactly to one of the

characters which we have all along observed to distinguish the products

of aqueous, from those of igneous consolidation. The columns formed

by the substances just mentioned, are distant from one another: they

are separated by fissures which widen from the bottom to the top, and

which arise from the shrinking and drying of the mass. In the basaltic

columns, no such openings, nor vacuity of any kind is found; the

pillars are in contact, and, though perfectly distinct, are so close,

that the sharp edge of a wedge can hardly be introduced between them.

This is a great peculiarity in the basaltic structure, and is strongly

expressive of this fact, that the mass was all fluid together, and

that its parts took their new arrangement, not in consequence of the

separation of a fluid from a solid part, by which great shrinking and

much empty space might be produced; but in consequence of a cause

which, like refrigeration, acted equally on all the parts of the mass,

and preserved their absolute contact after their fluidity had ceased.

66. A mark of fusion, or at least of the operation of heat, which

whinstone possesses in common with many other minerals, is its being

penetrated by pyrites, a substance, as has been already remarked, that

is of all others most exclusively the production of fire. Another

mark of fusion, more distinctive of whin, is, that both in veins and

in masses it sometimes includes pieces of sandstone, or of the other

contiguous strata, completely insulated, and having the appearance

of fragments of rock, floating in a fluid sufficiently dense and

ponderous to sustain their weight. Though these fragments have been

too refractory to be reduced into fusion themselves, they have not

remained entirely unchanged, but are, in general, extremely indurated,

in comparison of the rock from which they appear to have been detached.

67. Similar instances of extraordinary induration are observed in the

parts of the strata in contact with whinstone, whether they form the

sides of the veins, or the floors, and roofs of the masses into which

the whinstone is distributed. The strata whether sandy or argillaceous,

in such situations, are usually extremely hard and consolidated; the

former in particular lose their granulated texture, and are sometimes

converted into perfect jasper. This interesting remark was first made

by Dr Hutton, and the truth of it has been verified by a great number

of subsequent observations.

68. To the same excellent geologist we are indebted for the knowledge

of an analogous fact, attendant on the passage of whinstone veins

through coal strata. As the beds of stone where they are in contact

with veins of whin, seem to acquire additional induration, so those

of coal, in like circumstances, are frequently found to have lost

their fusibility, and to be reduced nearly to the condition of coke,

or of charcoal. The existence of coal of this kind has been already

mentioned, and considered as a proof of the operation of subterraneous

heat. In the instances here referred to, that is, where the charring

of the coal is limited to those parts of the strata which are in

contact with the whin, or in its immediate vicinity, the heat is

pointed out as residing in the vein; and this is to be accounted for

only on the supposition of the melted whin, at a period subsequent to

the consolidation of the coal, having flowed through the openings of

the strata. The heat has been powerful enough, in many cases, to drive

off the bituminous matter of the coal, and to force it into colder and

more distant parts. Few facts, in the history of fossils, are more

remarkable than this, and none more directly assimilates the operations

of the mineral regions, with those that take place at the surface of

the earth.

69. Again, the disturbance of the strata, wherever veins of whinstone

abound, if not a direct proof of the original fluidity of the

whinstone, is a clear indication of the violence with which it was

introduced into its place. This disturbance of the position of the

strata, by shifting, unusual elevation, and other irregularities, where

they are intersected by whinstone veins, is a fact so well known to

miners, that when they meet with any sudden change in the lying of the

_metals_, they are wont to foretell their approach to masses, or veins

of unstratified matter; and, in their figurative language, point them

out as the causes of the confusion with which they are so generally

accompanied.[21] The mineral veins likewise, as well as the strata, are

often heaved and shifted by the veins of whinstone.

[Footnote 21: A _Trouble_ is the name which the colliers in this

country give to a vein of whinstone.]

70. Whinstone of every species is found frequently interposed in

tabular masses, between beds of stratified rocks; and it then adds to

the indications of its igneous origin, already enumerated, some others

that are peculiar to it when in this situation. In such instances, it

is not uncommon to find the strata in some places, contiguous to the

whin, elevated, and bent with their concavity upward, so that they

appear clearly to have been acted on by a force that proceeded from

below, at the same time that they were softened, and rendered in some

degree flexible: it is needless to remark, that these effects can be

explained by nothing but the fusion of the whin; and that the great

force with which it was impelled against the strata, could be produced

by no cause but heat, acting in the manner that is here supposed.

71. Again, if it be true that the masses of whin, thus interposed

among the strata, were introduced there, after the formation of the

latter, we might expect to find, at least in many instances, that the

beds on which the whinstone rests, and those by which it is covered,

are exactly alike. If these beds were once contiguous, and have been

only heaved up and separated by the irruption of a fluid mass of

subterraneous lava, their identity should still be recognised. Now,

this is precisely what is observed; it is known to hold in a vast

number of instances, and is strikingly exemplified in the rock of

_Salisbury Crag_, near Edinburgh.

This similarity of the strata that cover the masses of whinstone,

to those that serve as the base on which they rest, and again the

dissimilitude of both to the interposed mass, are facts which I think

can hardly receive any explanation, on the principles of the Neptunian

theory. If these rocks, both stratified and unstratified, are to be

regarded as productions of the sea, the circumstances would require to

be pointed out, which have determined the whinstone, and the beds that

are all round it, to be so extremely unlike in their structure, though

formed at the same time, and in the immediate vicinity of one another;

as also those circumstances, on the other hand, which determined the

stratified deposits above and below the whinstone, to be precisely

the same, though the times of their formation must have been very

different. The homogeneous substances, thus, placed at a distance, and

the heterogeneous brought so closely together, are phenomena equally

unaccountable, in a theory that ascribes their origin to the operation

of the same element, and that necessarily dates their formation

according to the order in which they lie, one above another.

72. If, indeed, in these instances, the gradation were insensible, as

some have asserted it to be, between the strata and the interposed

mass, so that it was impossible to point out the line where the one

ended and the other began, whatever difficulties we might perceive in

the Neptunian theory, we should find it hard to substitute a better

in its room. But the truth seems to be, that, in the cases we are now

treating of, no such gradation exists; and that, though where the two

kinds of rock come into contact a change is often observed, by the

strata having acquired an additional degree of induration, yet the line

of separation is well defined, and can be precisely ascertained. This

at least is certain, that innumerable specimens, exhibiting such lines

of separation, are to be met with; and wherever care has been taken

to obtain a fresh fracture of the stone, and to remove the effects of

accidental causes, even where the two rocks are most firmly united,

and most closely assimilated, I am persuaded that no uncertainty has

ever remained as to the line of their separation. For these reasons,

it seems probable that the gradual transition of basaltes into the

adjoining strata, is in all cases imaginary, and is, in truth, a mere

illusion, proceeding from hasty and inaccurate observation.

73. Another remarkable fact in the natural history of the whinstone

rocks, remains yet to be mentioned, and with it I shall conclude the

argument, as far as these rocks are concerned.

Some of the species of whinstone are the common matrices of agates and

chalcedonies, which lie inclosed in them in the form of round nodules.

The original fluidity of these nodules is evinced by their figured, and

sometimes crystallized structure, and indeed is so generally admitted,

that the only question concerning them is, whether this fluidity

was the effect of heat or of solution. To answer this question, Dr

Hutton observes, that the formation of the concentric coats, of which

the agate is usually composed, has evidently proceeded from the

circumference toward the centre, the exterior coats always impressing

the interior, but never the reverse. The same thing also follows from

this other fact, that when there is any vacuity within the agate, it is

usually at the centre, and there too are found the regular crystals,

when any such have been formed. It therefore appears certain, that the

progress of consolidation has been from the circumference inwards, and

that the outward coats of the agate were the first to acquire solidity

and hardness.

74. Now, it must be considered that these coats are highly

consolidated; that they are of very pure siliceous matter, and are

utterly impervious to every substance which we know of, except light

and heat. It is plain, therefore, that whatever at any time, during

the progress of consolidation, was contained within the coats already

formed, must have remained there as long as the agate was entire,

without the least possibility of escape. But nothing is found within

the coats of the agate save its own substance; therefore, no extraneous

substance, that is to say no solvent, was ever included within them.

The fluidity of the agate was therefore simple, and unassisted by any

menstruum.

In this argument, nothing appears to me wanting, that is necessary to

the perfection of a physical, I had almost said of a mathematical,

demonstration. It seems, indeed, to be impossible that the igneous

origin of fossils could be recorded in plainer language, than by the

phenomenon which has just been described.

75. The examination of particular specimens of agates and chalcedonies,

affords many more arguments of the same kind, which Dr Hutton used to

deduce with an acuteness and vivacity, which his friends have often

listened to with great admiration and delight.[22] These, however,

must be passed over at present; and I have only further to remark,

that a series of the most interesting experiments, instituted by Sir

JAMES HALL, and published in the Transactions of the Royal Society of

Edinburgh,[23] has removed the only remaining objection that could

be urged against the igneous origin of whinstone. This objection is

founded on the common observation, that when a piece of whinstone or

basaltes is actually melted in a crucible, on cooling, it becomes

glass, and loses its original character entirely; and from thence it

was concluded, that this character had not been originally produced

by fusion. The experiments above mentioned, however, have shown, in

the most satisfactory manner, that melted whin, by _regulated_ or by

slow cooling, is prevented from assuming the appearance of glass, and

becomes a stony substance, hardly to be distinguished from whinstone or

lava.

[Footnote 22: NOTE XVI.]

[Footnote 23: vol. v. p. 43.]

The experiments of another ingenious chemist, Dr KENNEDY, have shown,

that whinstone contains mineral alkali, by which, of course, its fusion

must have been assisted.[24] Dr Hutton used to ascribe its fusibility,

in a great measure at least, to the quantity of iron contained in it:

both these causes have no doubt united to render it more easily melted

than the ordinary materials of the strata.

[Footnote 24: Trans. R. S. Edin. vol. v. p. 85.]

76. In a word, therefore, to conceive aright the origin of that class

of unstratified rocks, distinguished by the name of whinstone, we must

suppose, that long after the consolidation of the strata, and during

the time of their elevation, the materials of the former were melted

by the force of subterraneous heat, and injected among the rents and

fissures of the rocks already formed. In this manner were produced

the veins or dikes of whinstone; and, where circumstances allowed

the stream of melted matter to diffuse itself more widely, tabular

masses were formed, which were afterwards raised up, together with the

surrounding strata, above the level of the sea, and have been since

laid open by the operation of those causes that continually change and

waste the surface of the land.

These unstratified rocks are not, however, all the work of the same

period; they differ evidently in the date of their formation, and it is

not unusual, to find tabular masses of one species of whin, intersected

by veins of another species. Indeed, of all the fossil bodies which

compose the present land, the veins of whin appear to be the most

recently consolidated.[25]

[Footnote 25: NOTE XIV.]

Porphyry may so properly be regarded as a variety of whin,

distinguished only by involving crystallized feldspar, that, in a

geological sketch like the present, it is hardly entitled to a separate

article. Like the other kinds of whin, it exists both in veins and

in tabular masses, having, no doubt, an origin similar to that which

has just been described. Porphyry, however, has the peculiarity of

being rarely found in any but the primary strata; it seems to be the

whinstone of the old world, or at least that which is of the highest

antiquity in the present. It no where, I believe, assumes a columnar,

or basaltic appearance, of any regularity; but this is also true of

many other varieties of whin, of all, indeed, except the most compact

and homogeneous. These differences are not so considerable as to

require our entering into any particular detail concerning the natural

history of this fossil.

3. _Granite_.

77. The term Granite is used by Dr Hutton to signify an aggregate

stone, in which quartz, feldspar, and mica are found distinct from

one another, and not disposed in layers. The addition of hornblende,

schorl, or garnet, to the three ingredients just mentioned, is not

understood to alter the _genus_ of the stone, but only to constitute a

specific difference, which it is the business of lithology to mark by

some appropriate character, annexed to the generic name of granite.

The fossil now defined exists, like whinstone and porphyry, both in

masses and in veins, though most frequently in the former. It is like

them unstratified in its texture, and is regarded here, as being also

unstratified in its outward structure.[26] One ingredient which is

essential to granite, namely, quartz, is not contained in whinstone;

and this circumstance serves to distinguish these _genera_ from one

another, though, in other respects, they seem to be united by a chain

of insensible gradations, from the most homogeneous basaltes, to

granite the most highly crystallized.

[Footnote 26: Those rocks that consist of the ingredients here

enumerated, if they have at the same time a schistose texture, or a

disposition into layers, are properly distinguished from granite, and

called Gneiss, or Granitic Schistus. But it has been questioned whether

a stone does not exist composed of these ingredients, and destitute

of a schistose texture, but yet divided into large beds, visible in

its external form. Dr Hutton supposes such a stone not to exist, or at

least not to constitute any such proportion of the mineral kingdom, as

to entitle it to particular consideration, in the general speculations

of geology.

Whether this supposition is perfectly correct, may require to be

farther considered: this, however, is certain, that a rock, in all

respects conformable to it, composes a great proportion of what are

usually called the granite mountains. See NOTE XV.]

78. Granite, it has been just said, exists most commonly in masses; and

these masses are rarely, if ever, incumbent on any other rock: they are

the basis on which others rest, and seem, for the most part, to rise

up from under the ancient, or primary strata. The granite, therefore,

wherever it is found, is inferior to every other rock; and as it also

composes many of the greatest mountains, it has the peculiarity of

being elevated the highest into the atmosphere, and sunk the deepest

under the surface, of all the mineral substances with which we are

acquainted.

Notwithstanding the circumstance of not being alternated with

stratified bodies, which constitutes a remarkable difference between

granite and whinstone, the affinity of these fossils is such as to make

the similarity of their origin by no means improbable. Accordingly,

in Dr Hutton's theory, granite is regarded as a stone of more recent

formation than the strata incumbent on it; as a substance which has

been melted by heat, and which, when forced up from the mineral

regions, has elevated the strata at the same time.

79. That granite has undergone a change from a fluid to a solid

state, is evinced from the crystallized structure in which some of

its component parts are usually found. This crystallization is

particularly to be remarked of the feldspar, and also of the schorl,

where there is any admixture of that substance, whether in slender

spiculæ, or in larger masses. The quartz itself is in some cases

crystallized, and is so, perhaps, more frequently than is generally

supposed. The fluidity of granite, in some former period of its

existence, is so evident from this, as to make it appear singular that

it should ever have been considered as a fossil that had remained

always the same, and one, into the origin of which it was needless to

inquire. If the regular forms of crystallization are not to be received

as proofs of the substance to which they belong having passed from

a fluid to a solid state, neither are the figures of shells and of

other supposed petrifactions, to be taken as indications of a passage

from the animal to the mineral kingdom; so that there is an end of

all geological theories, and of all reasonings concerning the ancient

condition of the globe. To an argument which strikes equally at the

root of all theories, it belongs not to this, in particular, to make

any reply.

80. We shall, therefore, consider it as admitted, that the materials

of the granite were originally fluid; and, in addition to this, we

think it can easily be proved, that this fluidity was not that of the

elements taken separately, but of the entire mass. This last conclusion

follows, from the structure of those specimens, where one of the

substances is impressed by the forms which are peculiar to another.

Thus, in the Portsoy granite,[27] which Dr Hutton has so minutely

described, the quartz is impressed by the rhomboidal crystals of the

feldspar, and the stone thus formed is compact and highly consolidated.

Hence, this granite is not a congeries of parts, which, after being

separately formed, were somehow brought together and agglutinated; but

it is certain that the quartz, at least, was fluid when it was moulded

on the feldspar. In other granites, the impressions of the substances

on one another are observed in a different order, and the quartz gives

its form to the feldspar. This, however, is more unusual; the quartz

is commonly the substance which has received the impressions of all

the rest; and the spiculæ of schorl often shoot both across it and the

feldspar.

[Footnote 27: Theory of the Earth, vol. i. p. 104.]

The ingredients of granite were therefore fluid when mixed, or at least

when in contact with one another. Now, this fluidity was not the effect

of solution in a menstruum; for, in that case, one kind of crystal

ought not to impress another, but each of them should have its own

peculiar shape.

81. The perfect consolidation of many granites, furnishes an argument

to the same effect. For, agreeably to what was already observed, in

treating of the strata, a substance, when crystallizing, or passing

from a fluid to a solid state, cannot be free from porosity, much

less fill up completely a space of a given form, if, at the same

time, any solvent is separated from it; because the solvent so

separated would still occupy a certain space, and, when removed by

evaporation or otherwise, would leave that space empty. The perfect

adjustment, therefore, of the shape of one set of crystallizing bodies,

to the shape of another set, as in the Portsoy granite, and their

consolidation into one mass, is as strong a proof as could be desired,

that they crystallized from a state of simple fluidity, such as, of all

known causes, heat alone is able to produce.

82. This conclusion, however, does not rest on a single class of

facts. It has been observed in many instances, that where granite and

stratified rocks, such as primary schistus, are in contact, the latter

are penetrated by veins of the former, which traverse them in various

directions. These veins are of different dimensions, some being of the

breadth of several yards, others of a few inches, or even tenths of an

inch; they diminish as they recede from the main body of the granite,

to which they are always firmly united, constituting, indeed, a part of

the same continued rock.

These phenomena, which were first distinctly observed by Dr Hutton, are

of great importance in geology, and afford a clear solution of the two

chief questions concerning the relation between granite and schistus.

As every vein must be of a date posterior to the body in which it is

contained, it follows, that the schistus was not super-imposed on

the granite, after the formation of this last. If it be argued, that

these veins, though posterior to the schisti, are also posterior to

the granite, and were formed by the infiltration of water in which the

granite was dissolved or suspended; it may be replied, _1mo_, That the

power of water to dissolve granite, is a postulatum of the same kind

that we have so often, and for such good reason, refused to concede;

and, _2do_, That in many instances the veins proceed from the main

body of the granite _upwards_ into the schistus; so that they are in

planes much elevated in respect of the horizon, and have a direction

quite opposite to that which the hypothesis of infiltration requires.

It remains certain, therefore, that the whole mass of granite, and the

veins proceeding from it, are coeval, and both of later formation than

the strata.

Now, this being established, and the fluidity of the veins, when they

penetrated into the schistus, being obvious, it necessarily follows,

that the whole granite mass was also fluid at the same time. But this

can have been brought about only by subterraneous heat, which also

impelled the melted matter against the superincumbent strata, with such

force as to raise them from their place, and to give them that highly

inclined position in which they are still supported by the granite,

after its fluidity has ceased. Thus a conclusion, rendered probable by

the crystallization of granite, is established beyond all contradiction

by the phenomena of granitic veins.[28]

[Footnote 28: NOTE XV.]

83. With the granite, we shall consider the proof of the igneous origin

of all mineral substances as completed. These substances, therefore,

whether stratified or unstratified, owe their consolidation to the same

cause, though acting with different degrees of energy. The stratified

have been in general only softened or penetrated by melted matter,

whereas the unstratified have been reduced into perfect fusion.

84. In this general conclusion we may distinguish two parts, which, in

their degree of certainty, differ perhaps somewhat from one another.

The first of these, and that which stands highest in point of evidence,

consists of two propositions; namely, that the fluidity which preceded

the consolidation of mineral substances was SIMPLE, that is, it did not

arise from the combination of these substances with any solvent; and,

next, that after consolidation, these bodies have been raised up by an

expansive force acting from below, and have by that means been brought

into their present situation. These two propositions seem to me to be

supported by all the evidence that is necessary to constitute the most

perfect demonstration.

85. The other part of the general conclusion, that fire, or more

properly heat, was the cause of the fluidity of these mineral bodies,

and also of their subsequent elevation, is not perhaps to be considered

as a truth so fully demonstrated as the two preceding propositions;

it is, no doubt, a matter of THEORY; or a portion of one of those

invisible chains by which men seek to connect in the mind the state

of nature that is present, with the states of it that are past; and

participates of that uncertainty from which our reasonings concerning

such causes as are not direct objects of perception, are hardly ever

exempted. That it participates of this uncertainty in a very slight

degree, will, however, be admitted, when it is considered that the

cause assigned has been proved sufficient for the effect; that the same

is not true of any other known cause; and that this theory accounts,

with singular simplicity and precision, for a system of facts so

various and complex, as that which is presented by the natural history

of the globe.

86. Neither can it be said that the existence of subterraneous heat is

a principle assumed without any evidence, but that of the geological

facts which it is intended to explain: on the contrary, it is proved by

phenomena within the circle of ordinary experience, namely, those of

hot springs, volcanoes, and earthquakes. These leave no doubt of the

existence of heat, and of a moving and expansive power, in the bowels

of the earth; so that the only questions are, at what depth is this

power lodged? to what extent, and with what intensity, does it act?

That it is lodged at a very considerable depth, is rendered probable by

the permanency of some of the preceding phenomena: from the earliest

times many fountains have retained their heat to the present day; and

volcanoes, though they become extinguished at length, have a very

long period allotted for their duration. The cause of earthquakes is

certainly a force that resides very deep under the surface, otherwise

the extent of the concussion could not be such as has been observed in

many instances.

87. The intensity of volcanic fire, is another circumstance that

favours the opinion of its being seated deep under the surface. That

this intensity is considerable, is certain from the experiments made

by Sir James Hall on the fusibility of whinstone and lava; from which

it appears, that the lowest temperature in which either of these

stones melt, is about 80° of Wedgewood's pyrometer. Some mineralogists

have indeed affirmed, that lava is melted, not by the intensity of

the heat applied to it, but in consequence of a certain combination

formed between it and bituminous substances, in a manner which they do

not attempt to explain, and which has indeed no analogy to any thing

that is known. That a hypothesis, formed in such direct opposition to

the most obvious principles of inductive reasoning, should have been

imagined by a philosopher who had examined the phenomena of Etna and

Vesuvius with much attention, and described them with great accuracy

and truth, is more wonderful than that it should have been adopted by

mineralogists, whose views of nature may have been confined within a

cabinet or a laboratory. It is, however, a hypothesis, which, having

never had any support but from other hypotheses, hardly merited the

direct refutation that it has received from the experiments just

mentioned.

88. But, if the intensity of volcanic heat be such as is here

stated, it will be found very difficult to account for a fire of

such activity, and of such long continuance in the same spot, by any

decomposition of mineral substances near the surface. In the place

where this combustion is supposed to exist, it must be remembered,

that there is no fresh supply of materials to replace those that have

been consumed, and that, therefore, the original accumulation of these

materials in one spot, must have been very unlike any thing that has

ever been observed concerning the disposition of minerals in the bowels

of the earth.

89. If, on the other hand, we ascribe the phenomena of volcanoes to

the central heat, the account that may be given of them is simple, and

consistent with itself. According to all the appearances from which the

existence of such heat has been inferred above, it is of a nature so

far different from ordinary fire, that it may require no circulation

of air, and no supply of combustible materials to support it. It is

not accompanied with inflammation or combustion, the great pressure

preventing any separation of parts in the substances on which it acts,

and the absence of that elastic fluid without which heat seems to have

no power to decompose bodies, even the most combustible, contributing

to the unalterable nature of all the substances in the mineral regions.

There, of consequence, the only effects of heat are fusion and

expansion; and that which forms the nucleus of the globe may therefore

be a fluid mass, melted, but unchanged by the action of heat.

90. If, from the confines of this nucleus, we conceive certain fissures

and openings to traverse the solid crust, and to issue at the surface

of the earth, the vapours ascending through these may in time heat the

sides of the tubes through which they pass to a vast distance from the

lower extremities. It is, indeed, difficult to fix the limit to which

this distance may extend, on account of the great difference between

the rate at which heat moves when it has a fluid for its vehicle, and

when it is left to make its way alone through a solid body. In the

present case, the supply of heat is rapid, as being made by a vapour

ascending through a tube of solid rock; and the dissipation of it slow,

as arising from its transmission through the rock. The waste of heat is

therefore small, compared with the supply, and grows smaller at every

given point, the longer the stream of heated vapour has continued to

flow. Such a stream, therefore, though it may at first be condensed

within a small distance of its source, will in time reach higher

and higher, and may at last be able to carry its heat to an immense

distance from the place of its original derivation. Thus, it is easy

to conceive, that vapours from the mineral regions may convey their

heat to reservoirs of water near the surface of the earth, and may in

that manner produce hot springs, and even boiling fountains, like those

of Rycum and Geyser.

91. When, instead of a heated vapour, melted matter is thrown up

through the _shafts_ or _tubes_, which thus communicate with the

mineral regions, veins of whinstone and basaltes are formed in the

interior of the earth. When the melted matter reaches to the surface,

it is thrown out in the form of lava, and all the other phenomena of

volcanoes are produced.

Lastly, where melted matter of this kind, or vapours without being

condensed, have their progress obstructed, those dreadful concussions

are produced, which seem to threaten the existence even of the earth

itself. Though terrible, therefore, to the present inhabitants of the

globe, the earthquake has its place in the great system of geological

operations, and is part of a series of events, essential, as will more

clearly appear hereafter, to the general order, and to the preservation

of the whole.

Such, according to this theory, are the changes which have befallen

mineral substances in the bowels of the earth; and though different

for the stratified and unstratified parts of those substances, they

are connected together by the same _principle_, or explained by the

same _cause_. It remains to consider that part of the history of both

which describes their changes after their elevation to the surface;

and here we shall find new causes introduced, which are more directly

the subjects of observation, than those hitherto treated of; causes,

also, which act on all fossils alike, and alike prepare them for their

ultimate destination.

Illustrations of the Huttonian Theory of the Earth · 第 2 / 7 章