CHAPTER III. SYMBOLS.

Probably it will elucidate the drift of these foregoing obscure

utterances, if we here insert somewhat of our Professor's speculations

on _Symbols_. To state his whole doctrine, indeed, were beyond our

compass: nowhere is he more mysterious, impalpable, than in this of

"Fantasy being the organ of the Godlike;" and how "Man thereby, though

based, to all seeming, on the small Visible, does nevertheless extend

down into the infinite deeps of the Invisible, of which Invisible,

indeed, his Life is properly the bodying forth." Let us, omitting these

high transcendental aspects of the matter, study to glean (whether from

the Paper-bags or the Printed Volume) what little seems logical and

practical, and cunningly arrange it into such degree of coherence as

it will assume. By way of proem, take the following not injudicious

remarks:--

"The benignant efficacies of Concealment," cries our Professor, "who

shall speak or sing? SILENCE and SECRECY! Altars might still be raised

to them (were this an altar-building time) for universal worship.

Silence is the element in which great things fashion themselves

together; that at length they may emerge, full-formed and majestic, into

the daylight of Life, which they are thenceforth to rule. Not William

the Silent only, but all the considerable men I have known, and the most

undiplomatic and unstrategic of these, forbore to babble of what they

were creating and projecting. Nay, in thy own mean perplexities, do

thou thyself but _hold thy tongue for one day_: on the morrow, how much

clearer are thy purposes and duties; what wreck and rubbish have those

mute workmen within thee swept away, when intrusive noises were shut

out! Speech is too often not, as the Frenchman defined it, the art of

concealing Thought; but of quite stifling and suspending Thought,

so that there is none to conceal. Speech too is great, but not the

greatest. As the Swiss Inscription says: _Sprechen ist silbern,

Schweigen ist golden_ (Speech is silvern, Silence is golden); or as I

might rather express it: Speech is of Time, Silence is of Eternity.

"Bees will not work except in darkness; Thought will not work except in

Silence: neither will Virtue work except in Secrecy. Let not thy left

hand know what thy right hand doeth! Neither shalt thou prate even to

thy own heart of 'those secrets known to all.' Is not Shame (_Schaam_)

the soil of all Virtue, of all good manners and good morals? Like other

plants, Virtue will not grow unless its root be hidden, buried from the

eye of the sun. Let the sun shine on it, nay do but look at it privily

thyself, the root withers, and no flower will glad thee. O my Friends,

when we view the fair clustering flowers that overwreathe, for example,

the Marriage-bower, and encircle man's life with the fragrance and hues

of Heaven, what hand will not smite the foul plunderer that grubs them

up by the roots, and, with grinning, grunting satisfaction, shows us

the dung they flourish in! Men speak much of the Printing Press with

its Newspapers: _du Himmel_! what are these to Clothes and the Tailor's

Goose?

"Of kin to the so incalculable influences of Concealment, and connected

with still greater things, is the wondrous agency of _Symbols_. In

a Symbol there is concealment and yet revelation; here therefore, by

Silence and by Speech acting together, comes a double significance. And

if both the Speech be itself high, and the Silence fit and noble, how

expressive will their union be! Thus in many a painted Device, or simple

Seal-emblem, the commonest Truth stands out to us proclaimed with quite

new emphasis.

"For it is here that Fantasy with her mystic wonderland plays into the

small prose domain of Sense, and becomes incorporated therewith. In the

Symbol proper, what we can call a Symbol, there is ever, more or less

distinctly and directly, some embodiment and revelation of the Infinite;

the Infinite is made to blend itself with the Finite, to stand visible,

and as it were, attainable there. By Symbols, accordingly, is man guided

and commanded, made happy, made wretched: He everywhere finds himself

encompassed with Symbols, recognized as such or not recognized: the

Universe is but one vast Symbol of God; nay if thou wilt have it, what

is man himself but a Symbol of God; is not all that he does symbolical;

a revelation to Sense of the mystic god-given force that is in him; a

'Gospel of Freedom,' which he, the 'Messias of Nature,' preaches, as he

can, by act and word? Not a Hut he builds but is the visible embodiment

of a Thought; but bears visible record of invisible things; but is, in

the transcendental sense, symbolical as well as real."

"Man," says the Professor elsewhere, in quite antipodal contrast with

these high-soaring delineations, which we have here cut short on the

verge of the inane, "Man is by birth somewhat of an owl. Perhaps, too,

of all the owleries that ever possessed him, the most owlish, if we

consider it, is that of your actually existing Motive-Millwrights.

Fantastic tricks enough man has played, in his time; has fancied himself

to be most things, down even to an animated heap of Glass: but to fancy

himself a dead Iron-Balance for weighing Pains and Pleasures on, was

reserved for this his latter era. There stands he, his Universe one huge

Manger, filled with hay and thistles to be weighed against each other;

and looks long-eared enough. Alas, poor devil! spectres are appointed to

haunt him: one age he is hag-ridden, bewitched; the next, priest-ridden,

befooled; in all ages, bedevilled. And now the Genius of Mechanism

smothers him worse than any Nightmare did; till the Soul is nigh choked

out of him, and only a kind of Digestive, Mechanic life remains. In

Earth and in Heaven he can see nothing but Mechanism; has fear for

nothing else, hope in nothing else: the world would indeed grind him

to pieces; but cannot he fathom the Doctrine of Motives, and cunningly

compute these, and mechanize them to grind the other way?

"Were he not, as has been said, purblinded by enchantment, you had but

to bid him open his eyes and look. In which country, in which time, was

it hitherto that man's history, or the history of any man, went on by

calculated or calculable 'Motives'? What make ye of your Christianities,

and Chivalries, and Reformations, and Marseillaise Hymns, and Reigns of

Terror? Nay, has not perhaps the Motive-grinder himself been in _Love_?

Did he never stand so much as a contested Election? Leave him to Time,

and the medicating virtue of Nature."

"Yes, Friends," elsewhere observes the Professor, "not our Logical,

Mensurative faculty, but our Imaginative one is King over us; I might

say, Priest and Prophet to lead us heavenward; or Magician and Wizard to

lead us hellward. Nay, even for the basest Sensualist, what is Sense

but the implement of Fantasy; the vessel it drinks out of? Ever in the

dullest existence there is a sheen either of Inspiration or of Madness

(thou partly hast it in thy choice, which of the two), that gleams in

from the circumambient Eternity, and colors with its own hues our little

islet of Time. The Understanding is indeed thy window, too clear thou

canst not make it; but Fantasy is thy eye, with its color-giving

retina, healthy or diseased. Have not I myself known five hundred living

soldiers sabred into crows'-meat for a piece of glazed cotton, which

they called their Flag; which, had you sold it at any market-cross,

would not have brought above three groschen? Did not the whole Hungarian

Nation rise, like some tumultuous moon-stirred Atlantic, when Kaiser

Joseph pocketed their Iron Crown; an implement, as was sagaciously

observed, in size and commercial value little differing from a

horse-shoe? It is in and through _Symbols_ that man, consciously or

unconsciously, lives, works, and has his being: those ages, moreover,

are accounted the noblest which can the best recognize symbolical worth,

and prize it the highest. For is not a Symbol ever, to him who has eyes

for it, some dimmer or clearer revelation of the Godlike?

"Of Symbols, however, I remark farther, that they have both an extrinsic

and intrinsic value; oftenest the former only. What, for instance, was

in that clouted Shoe, which the Peasants bore aloft with them as ensign

in their _Bauernkrieg_ (Peasants' War)? Or in the Wallet-and-staff round

which the Netherland _Gueux_, glorying in that nickname of Beggars,

heroically rallied and prevailed, though against King Philip himself?

Intrinsic significance these had none: only extrinsic; as the accidental

Standards of multitudes more or less sacredly uniting together; in

which union itself, as above noted, there is ever something mystical and

borrowing of the Godlike. Under a like category, too, stand, or stood,

the stupidest heraldic Coats-of-arms; military Banners everywhere; and

generally all national or other sectarian Costumes and Customs: they

have no intrinsic, necessary divineness, or even worth; but have

acquired an extrinsic one. Nevertheless through all these there glimmers

something of a Divine Idea; as through military Banners themselves, the

Divine Idea of Duty, of heroic Daring; in some instances of Freedom, of

Right. Nay the highest ensign that men ever met and embraced under, the

Cross itself, had no meaning save an accidental extrinsic one.

"Another matter it is, however, when your Symbol has intrinsic meaning,

and is of itself _fit_ that men should unite round it. Let but the

Godlike manifest itself to Sense, let but Eternity look, more or less

visibly, through the Time-Figure (_Zeitbild_)! Then is it fit that men

unite there; and worship together before such Symbol; and so from day to

day, and from age to age, superadd to it new divineness.

"Of this latter sort are all true Works of Art: in them (if thou know a

Work of Art from a Daub of Artifice) wilt thou discern Eternity looking

through Time; the Godlike rendered visible. Here too may an extrinsic

value gradually superadd itself: thus certain _Iliads_, and the like,

have, in three thousand years, attained quite new significance. But

nobler than all in this kind are the Lives of heroic god-inspired Men;

for what other Work of Art is so divine? In Death too, in the Death of

the Just, as the last perfection of a Work of Art, may we not discern

symbolic meaning? In that divinely transfigured Sleep, as of Victory,

resting over the beloved face which now knows thee no more, read (if

thou canst for tears) the confluence of Time with Eternity, and some

gleam of the latter peering through.

"Highest of all Symbols are those wherein the Artist or Poet has risen

into Prophet, and all men can recognize a present God, and worship the

Same: I mean religious Symbols. Various enough have been such religious

Symbols, what we call _Religions_; as men stood in this stage of culture

or the other, and could worse or better body forth the Godlike: some

Symbols with a transient intrinsic worth; many with only an extrinsic.

If thou ask to what height man has carried it in this manner, look

on our divinest Symbol: on Jesus of Nazareth, and his Life, and his

Biography, and what followed therefrom. Higher has the human Thought

not yet reached: this is Christianity and Christendom; a Symbol of quite

perennial, infinite character; whose significance will ever demand to be

anew inquired into, and anew made manifest.

"But, on the whole, as Time adds much to the sacredness of Symbols, so

likewise in his progress he at length defaces, or even desecrates them;

and Symbols, like all terrestrial Garments, wax old. Homer's Epos has

not ceased to be true; yet it is no longer our Epos, but shines in the

distance, if clearer and clearer, yet also smaller and smaller, like

a receding Star. It needs a scientific telescope, it needs to be

reinterpreted and artificially brought near us, before we can so much as

know that it _was_ a Sun. So likewise a day comes when the Runic

Thor, with his Eddas, must withdraw into dimness; and many an African

Mumbo-Jumbo and Indian Pawaw be utterly abolished. For all things, even

Celestial Luminaries, much more atmospheric meteors, have their rise,

their culmination, their decline.

"Small is this which thou tellest me, that the Royal Sceptre is but

a piece of gilt wood; that the Pyx has become a most foolish box, and

truly, as Ancient Pistol thought, 'of little price.' A right Conjurer

might I name thee, couldst thou conjure back into these wooden tools the

divine virtue they once held.

"Of this thing, however, be certain: wouldst thou plant for Eternity,

then plant into the deep infinite faculties of man, his Fantasy and

Heart; wouldst thou plant for Year and Day, then plant into his shallow

superficial faculties, his Self-love and Arithmetical Understanding,

what will grow there. A Hierarch, therefore, and Pontiff of the World

will we call him, the Poet and inspired Maker; who, Prometheus-like, can

shape new Symbols, and bring new Fire from Heaven to fix it there. Such

too will not always be wanting; neither perhaps now are. Meanwhile, as

the average of matters goes, we account him Legislator and wise who can

so much as tell when a Symbol has grown old, and gently remove it.

"When, as the last English Coronation [*] I was preparing," concludes this

wonderful Professor, "I read in their Newspapers that the 'Champion of

England,' he who has to offer battle to the Universe for his new King,

had brought it so far that he could now 'mount his horse with little

assistance,' I said to myself: Here also we have a Symbol well-nigh

superannuated. Alas, move whithersoever you may, are not the tatters

and rags of superannuated worn-out Symbols (in this Ragfair of a World)

dropping off everywhere, to hoodwink, to halter, to tether you; nay, if

you shake them not aside, threatening to accumulate, and perhaps produce

suffocation?"

* That of George IV.--ED.

Sartor Resartus: The Life and Opinions of Herr Teufelsdröckh · 第 3 / 12 章