I.--KAY AND HARGREAVES.

On the 3d of May 1734, there was a hanging at Cork which made a good

deal more noise than such a very ordinary event generally did in those

days. There was nothing remarkable about the malefactor, or the crime he

had committed. He was a very commonplace ruffian, and had earned his

elevation to the gallows by a vulgar felony. What was remarkable about

the affair was, that the woollen weavers of Cork, being then in a state

of great distress from want of work, dressed up the convict in cotton

garments, and that the poor wretch, having once been a weaver himself,

"employed" the last occasion he was ever to have of addressing his

fellow creatures, by assuring them that all his misdeeds and misfortunes

were to be traced to the "pernicious practice of wearing cottons."

"Therefore, good Christians," he continued, "consider that if you go on

to suppress your own goods, by wearing such cottons as I am now clothed

in, you will bring your country into misery, which will consequently

swarm with such unhappy malefactors as your present Object is; and the

blood of every miserable felon that will hang after this warning from

the gallows will lie at your doors."

All which sayings were no doubt greatly applauded by the disheartened

weavers on the spot, and much taken to heart by the citizens and gentry

to whom they were addressed.

This is only one out of the many illustrations which might be drawn from

the chronicles of those days, of the prejudice and discouragement cotton

had to contend against on its first appearance in this country.

Prohibited over and over again, laid under penalties and high duties,

treated with every sort of contumely and oppression, it had long to

struggle desperately for the barest tolerance; yet it ended by

overcoming all obstacles, and distancing its favoured rival wool.

Returning good for evil, cotton now sustains one-sixth of our

fellow-countrymen, and is an important mainstay of our commerce and

manufactures.

First imported into Great Britain towards the middle of the seventeenth

century, cotton was but little used for purposes of manufacture till the

middle of the eighteenth. The settlement of some Flemish emigrants in

Lancashire led to that district becoming the principal seat of the

cotton manufacture; and probably the ungenerous nature of its soil

induced the people to resort to spinning and weaving to make up for the

unprofitableness of their agricultural labours.

A nobler monument of human skill, enterprise, and perseverance, than the

invention of cotton-spinning machinery is hardly to be met with; but it

must also be owned that its history, encouraging as it is in one aspect,

is in another sad and humiliating to the last degree. It is difficult at

first to credit the uniform ingratitude and treachery which the various

inventors met with from the very men whom their contrivances enriched.

"There is nothing," said James Watt in the crisis of his fortunes, worn

with care, and sick with hope deferred--"there is nothing so foolish as

inventing;" and with far more reason the inventors of cotton-spinning

machines could echo the mournful cry. It is sad to think that so proud a

chapter of our history should bear so dark a stain.

In 1733 the primitive method still prevailed of spinning between the

finger and thumb, only one thread at a time; and weaving up the yarn in

a loom, the shuttle of which had to be thrown from right to left and

left to right by both hands alternately. In that year, however, the

first step was made in advance, by the invention of the fly-shuttle,

which, by means of a handle and spring, could be jerked from side to

side with one hand. This contrivance was due to the ingenuity of John

Kay, a loom-maker at Colchester, and proved his ruin. The weavers did

their best to prevent the use of the shuttle,--the masters to get it

used, and to cheat the inventor out of his reward. Poor Kay was soon

brought low in the world by costly law-suits, and being not yet tired of

inventing, devised a rude power-loom. In revenge a mob of weavers broke

into his house, smashed all his machines, and would have smashed him

too, had they laid hands on him. He escaped from their clutches, to find

his way to Paris, and to die there in misery not long afterwards. Kay

was the first of the martyrs in this branch of invention. James

Hargreaves was the next.

The use of the fly-shuttle greatly expedited the process of weaving, and

the spinning of cotton soon fell behind. The weavers were often brought

to a stand-still for want of weft to go on with, and had to spend their

mornings going about in search of it, sometimes without getting as much

as kept them busy for the rest of the day. The scarcity of yarn was a

constant complaint; and many a busy brain was at work trying to devise

some improvement on the common hand-wheel. Amongst others, James

Hargreaves, an ingenious weaver at Standhill, near Blackburn, who had

already improved the mode of cleaning and unravelling the cotton before

spinning, took the subject into consideration. One day, when brooding

over it in his cottage, idle for want of weft, the accidental

overturning of his wife's wheel suggested to him the principle of the

spinning-jenny. Lying on its side, the wheel still continued in

motion--the spindle being thrown from a horizontal into an upright

position; and it occurred to him that all he had got to do was to place

a number of spindles side by side. This was in 1764, and three years

afterwards Hargreaves had worked out the idea, and constructed a

spinning frame, with eight spindles and a horizontal wheel, which he

christened after his wife Jenny, whose wheel had first put him in the

right track. Directly the spinners of the locality got knowledge of this

machine that was to do eight times as much as any one of them, they

broke into the inventor's cottage, destroyed the jenny, and compelled

him to fly for the safety of his life to Nottingham. He took out a

patent, but the manufacturers leagued themselves against them. Sole,

friendless, penniless, he could make no head against their numbers and

influence, relinquished his invention, and died in obscurity and

distress ten years after he had the misfortune to contrive the

spinning-jenny.

The history of the cotton manufacture now becomes identified with the

lives of Arkwright, Crompton, and Cartwright--the inventors of the

water-frame, the mule, and the power-loom.

Triumphs of Invention and Discovery in Art and Science · 第 8 / 63 题