Heine's short stanza has, then, two advantages over Wilhelm

Müllers--more passion, and much greater condensation of style.

In his favourite short iambic metre, Heine is influenced by Wilhelm

Müller, in his trochees he resembles another Romantic, far more

Romantic poet, Clemens Brentano. In Heine's _Romancero_ there are some

curious correspondences with Brentano's _Romanzen vom Rosenkranze_

("Romances of the Rosary"). These latter were written before

_Romancero_, but as they were not published till 1853, Heine cannot

possibly have been influenced by them.

In the second of the _Rosary Romances_ we read of the hero, Cosmo,

that:

"Aus dem Wasserspiegel mahnt

Ihn des Alters ernste Bote:

Du wirst bald die Schuld bezahlen,

Spricht des Hauptes Silberlocke."[4]

[4] The solemn messengers of age, the white locks of the man who gazes

at him from the water-mirror, cry: Soon thou must pay thy debt.

In Heine's posthumous poem _Bimini_, one of the divisions begins:

"Einsam auf dem Strand von Cuba,

Vor dem stillen Wasserspiegel,

Steht ein Mensch und er betrachtet

In der Flut sein Konterfei.

Eben nicht mit sonderlichem

Wohlgefallen scheint der Greis

In dem Wasser zu betrachten

Sein bekümmert Spiegelbildniss."[5]

[5]

On the shore of Cuba's island

Stands an old man solitary,

Gazing at his own reflection

In the tranquil water-mirror.

Not with any special pleasure

Does the sad and aged man

See beneath him in the water

His own image, sorrowful.

Metre, situation, idea are identical in the two passages.

There is also a certain resemblance between the tale of a mystery-book

in the Ninth Romance of the Rosary and the story of the beautiful

casket in Heine's poem of _Jehuda ben Halevy_.[6] Only that Brentano's

story of the passing of the mystery-book from hand to hand, through

many ages, merely opens up to us a Romantic wonder-world, whereas

Heine's tale of the wanderings of the casket is at the same time a jest

at the vicissitudes of life: the pearls first belong to Smerdis, who

gives them to Atossa, then to the great Alexander, who gives them to

Thais, then in course of time to Cleopatra, to a Moorish sultan, to

the regalia of Castille, and to the Baroness Solomon Rothschild, in a

compliment to whom the life-history of the casket terminates.

[6] _Cf_. Eduard Grisebach; _Die deutsche Litteratur_, p. 254, &c.;

where, however, a definite influence is insisted on, regardless of

Heine's priority.

It is quite certain that Heine is indebted to Clemens Brentano for the

subject of what in Germany is the best known and most sung of all his

songs, the song of _Lorelei_, "Ich weiss nicht was soll es bedeuten."

As far back as 1802 Brentano had published, in his _Godwi,_ a ballad

entitled "Lorelei." It is not the story of a siren, but of a young girl

of Bacharach on the Rhine, who was so beautiful that all men fell in

love with her. She was accused of witchcraft. But the bishop, who ought

to have condemned her to be burned, fell in love with her himself. She

desires to die, for the one man she loves will have nothing to say

to her and has gone away; so, on her way to the convent to which the

bishop is sending her, she climbs a high cliff, Lurelei (Ley means

slate-rock), and in despairing longing for her beloved, throws herself

into the Rhine.

This ballad suggested to a writer called Nikolaus Vogt the fabrication

of a Rhine legend, which he published in 1811, passing it off as an

old one. In it Lorelei, on her way to the convent, sees the man of her

heart sail past her on the Rhine, and throws herself from the cliff in

grief at having failed to win him. Three of her adorers follow her to a

watery grave. Hence a rock in that neighbourhood is known by the name

of the Dreiritterstein (Rock of the Three Knights). The last incident

was perhaps suggested by the ending of Brentano's poem:

"Wer hat dies' Lied gesungen?

Ein Schiffer auf dem Rhein.

Und immer hat geklungen

Vom hohen Felsenstein:

Lore Lay!

Lore Lay!

Lore Lay!

Als wären es unser Drei."[7]

[7] Who was it sang this song? A boatman on the Rhine. And still we

heard the cry, from the high cliff overhead: "Lore Lay! Lore Lay! Lore

Lay!" Me-seemed that we were three.

From this fabricated legend a certain Count Loeben, in 1821, took the

theme for a poem, _Lorelei_,[8] in which the young girl who drowns

herself is transformed into a mermaid, whose singing lures into the

depths those who are sailing past:

"Da wo der Mondschein blitzet

Um's hohe Felsgestein,

Das Zauberfräulein sitzet

Und schauet auf den Rhein.

Es schauet herüber, hinüber,

Es schauet hinab, hinauf,

Die Schifflein ziehen vorüber,

Lieb' Knabe, sieh nicht auf!

Sie singt dir hold am Ohre,

Sie blickt dich thöricht an,

Sie ist die schöne Lore,

Sie hat dir's angethan," &c.[9]

[8] A. Strodtmann: H. Heine's _Leben und Werke_, 2nd edition, i. 696.

[9] Where the moonlight glitters on the lofty cliff, there the

magic-maiden sits, and gazes on the Rhine. She looks across the stream,

looks up the stream and down; softly the boats glide past-look not

on her, O youth! She sings so sweetly in your ear, she looks at you

bewitchingly; she is the lovely Lore, and in her spells you're caught.

Now take Heine's world-famed poem, first a students' song, then a

popular song, melting and thrilling with the tender harmony of melody

and words. The direct imitation is unmistakable. The theme is the

same, the metre is the same, even some of the rhymes are the same:

"blitzet--sitzet;" instead of "an--gethan, Kahn--gethan." But what a

difference! Feeling has been added. First the personal starting-point,

the inexplicable melancholy of the narrator and his inability to banish

the old legend from his thoughts, then the instantaneous, clear,

definite picture of the landscape:

"Die Luft ist kühl, und es dunkelt,

Und ruhig fliesst der Rhein,

Der Gipfel des Berges funkelt

Im Abendsonnenschein.

Die schönste Jungfrau sitzet

Dort oben wunderbar,

Ihr gold'nes Geschmeide blitzet,

Sie kämmt ihr goldenes Haar."[10]

[10]

The cool air darkens, and listen,

How softly flows the Rhine!

The mountain peaks still glisten

Where the evening sunbeams shine.

The fairest maid sits dreaming

In radiant beauty there.

Her gold and her jewels are gleaming,

She combeth her golden hair.

(E. LAZARUS.)

And something more has been added--that element of dæmonic passion

which the earlier manipulators of the theme were unable to communicate

to it. Heine here represents an elemental luring power, akin to that

delineated with simpler means and more powerful effect by Goethe in

_Der Fischer_. But Goethe, in conformity with his nature, describes a

tranquil, enchanting ensnarement; Heine, in conformity with his, an

instantaneous, irresistible, maddening bewitchment.

A still more profound insight into Heine's art, in the making, and into

the manner in which his fancy deals with a theme, is perhaps to be

gained by observing how he makes use of a subject which offers itself

to him in prose.

In Henri Beyle's book, _De l'amour_, he evidently found the three

following anecdotes, translated from the Arabic. 1. Sahid ben Agba one

day asked an Arab: "Of what tribe art thou?" "Of that tribe," answered

the Arabian, "in which men die when they love." "Then thou art of the

tribe of Asra?" "Yea, verily, by the Lord of Kaaba!" "Whence comes

it that ye love thus?" "Our women are beautiful, and our young men

chaste." 2. A man once asked Arua ben Hezam of the tribe of Asra: "Is

it true that ye love with a tenderness surpassing that of all other

men?" "It is true," answered Arua. "Thirty young men of my tribe have

I seen carried off by death, whose only sickness was that of love." 3.

An Arab of the tribe Beni-Fazarat said one day to an Arab of the tribe

Beni-Asra: "Ye think that to die of love is a sweet and noble death;

whereas it is nought but weakness and foolishness." "Thou would'st

not speak so," answered the other, "had'st thou seen the great dark,

long-lashed eyes of our veiled women, seen their teeth gleam between

their brown lips when they smile."

Here we have the origin of Heine's famous _Der Asra_: "Täglich ging die

wunderschöne." He first paints the place for us--the garden with the

fountain whose white waters flash; then he shows us the slave, standing

there every day when the sultan's daughter comes to walk, paler every

day; then he tells how the princess one evening closely questions the

slave: "I would know thy name, thy race, thy family...":

"Und der Sklave sprach: 'ich heisse

Mohamet, ich bin aus Yemen

Und mein Stamm sind jene Asra,

Welche sterben, wenn sie lieben.'"[11]

[11]

Spake the youthful slave, "My name is

Mahomet, I come from Yemen;

And by birth I am an Asra,

One who dieth when he loves."

(E. LAZARUS.)

Heine, as we see, has disdained all explanations. We enjoy the

marvellous conciseness of these monumental words, this power as it were

of hewing out the speech in stone. But what, on closer investigation,

is the spiritual substance of the poem? Not much more than a laconic

combination of the words love and death. It is the same combination

that is to be found in all Heine's youthful poems, in the shape of love

and suffering, love and poison, love and suicide--in Alfred de Musset,

too, there is the same stereotyped coupling of _l'amour_ and _la mort_.

Here, as in general with Heine, the expression is epigrammatic,

therefore quite simple.

We have now sufficient material before us to give us a certain insight

into the formation of Heine's poetic style. It will be interesting to

study it finished and fully developed.

We may start from the last-mentioned poem with its epigrammatic point.

It is characteristic of Heine that neither here nor elsewhere does he

deeply concern himself with the true inwardness of a feeling; he only,

as a rule, points and sharpens the expression of it. This is the case

even with the feeling of love, which he has treated more frequently

than any other. And it is characteristic of his want of the power to

put himself in another's place, that it has only been possible for him

to give expression to masculine love; he has never put a passionate

utterance of feeling into the mouth of a woman.

Nothing would have been more impossible for Heine than to write such a

poem as Goethe's famous:

"Freudvoll und leidvoll,

Gedankenvoll sein,

Langen und bangen

In schwebender Pein,

Himmelhoch jauchzend,

Zum Tode betrübt,

Glücklich allein

Ist die Seele die liebt."[12]

[12]

Gladness

And sadness

And pensiveness blending;

Yearning

And burning

In torment ne'er ending;

Sad unto death,

Proudly soaring above,

Happy alone

Is the soul that doth love.

(BOWRING)

For this is the living delineation of a woman's heart, this is the very

inner life of love, its pulsation, its oscillation between bliss and

woe. The epigrammatic quality of Heine's style alone would make such

an unfolding of the emotional life impossible. And there is the same

concentration when he narrates an event. It is a condensation without

parallel in poetry; he produces his effect by making the briefest

possible statement or suggestion. As an example of this take the lines:

"Es war ein alter König,

Sein Herz war schwer, sein Haupt war grau;

Der arme, alte König

Er nahm eine junge Frau.

Es war ein schöner Page,

Blond war sein Haupt, leicht war sein Sinn,

Er trug die seid'ne Schleppe

Der jungen Königin."[13]

[13]

There was an aged monarch,

His heart was sad, his head was grey;

This foolish, fond old monarch

A young wife took one day.

There was a handsome page, too,

Fair was his hair and light his mien;

The silken train he carried

Of the beautiful young queen.

Observe the telling effect of the inversion: "Blond war sein Haupt;" it

is as if the verse began to rejoice and dance. Then comes the end:

"Kennst du das alte Liedchen?

Es klingt so süss, es klingt so trüb;

Sie mussten beide sterben,

Sie hatten sich viel zu lieb."[14]

[14]

Dost know the ancient ballad?

It sounds so sweet, it sounds so sad:

Both of them had to perish

Too much love to each other they had.

This is admirable. But we are not told the story; we only suspect it as

we suspect the story of the slave and the sultan's daughter. And here

again love is coupled with death.

A certain emptiness in Heine's conception of love strikes us here

again. This love has no real substance, no spiritual significance. It

was not till shortly before he lay down upon his death-bed that Heine

began to describe a love that has real inward substance. The love of

the _Buch der Lieder_ is for the most part wrath excited by coldness or

faithlessness, an unfruitful thing, that awakens no sympathy. The later

of the love-poems are frequently sensual or frivolous, and the more

exaggerated the expression, the less are we affected by the value of

the feeling:

"Mein Herz ist wie die Sonne,

So flammend anzuseh'n.

Und in ein Meer von Liebe

Versinkt es gross und schön."[15]

15:

My heart is like the sun, dear,

Yon kindled flame above;

And sinks in large-orbed beauty

Within a sea of love.

(E. LAZARUS.)

There is too much self-observation and too much boastfulness in this

youthful rodomontade. And it is the same with:

"Ich hab' dich geliebet und liebe dich noch,

Und fiele die Welt zusammen,

Aus ihren Trummern stiegen doch

Hervor meiner Liebe Flammen."[16]

16:

I have loved thee long, and I love thee now,

And, though the world should perish,

O'er its dying embers still would glow

The flames of the love I cherish.

(LELAND)

Admitting that this is probably so expressed for the sake of artistic

effect, we must also admit that the style is a good, perfectly modern

style. We can see it all with the mind's eye. The heart sinks like the

sun into a sea. From the ruins of the world rise the flames of love.

And still more powerful and much more picturesque is the scene in which

the name of Agnes is written on the vault of heaven. What is wanting is

substance in the feeling. Think, for the sake of comparison, of those

profoundly human lines of Goethe's:

"Kanntest jeden Zug in meinem Wesen,

Spähtest, wo die reinste Nerve klingt,

Konntest mich mit einem Blicke lesen,

Den so schwer ein sterblich Aug' durchdringt."[17]

[17] Thou knewest every impulse of my nature, thine eye detected where

the nerve thrilled keenest, thou couldst read me at a glance, me, so

impenetrable to mortal eye.

--or of the following, which complete the impression:

"Tropftest Mässigung dem heissen Blute,

Richtetest den wilden, wirren Lauf,

Und in deinen Engelsarmen ruhte

Die zerstörte Brust sich wieder auf."[18]

[18] The hot blood by thee was tempered, the wild, aimless course by

thee directed; and in thine angel arms the torn breast found rest and

healing.

This is the expression of the healthiest, fullest, mutual sympathy,

of love's gratitude, of perfect understanding. For such feeling Heine

did not find expression until, with the shadow of death upon him, he

loved _la Mouche_, the guardian angel of his death-bed. Until then it

is never the healthy, tranquillising, happy element in love that he

concerns himself with. It is in another domain that he is master. The

modern poet, he reproduces passionate desire with a Correggio-like

blending of colours and tones that is more effective than Goethe's

antique limpidity. With Goethe desire is Greek or Italian. Think, for

instance, of the poem of the orange:

"Ich trete zu dem Baume

Und sage: Pomeranze!

Du reife Pomeranze;

Du süsse Pomeranze!

Ich schüttle, fühl', ich schüttle,

O fall in meinen Schoos!"[19]

[19]

I take my stand beneath the tree,

And cry: O orange!

O orange ripe!

O orange sweet!

Feel, feel how I shake thy tree!

O fall into my lap

Then compare the feeling, the glow, the fragrance, the exuberance of

such a poem of desire as Heine's wonderful: _Die Lotosblume ängstigt

sich vor der Sonne Pracht_ ("The lotus-flower is fearful of the sun's

resplendent beam").

It is very characteristic of the two poets that (as has already been

noted), whenever the representation of love-longing glides into a

delineation of foreign lands, Goethe prefers to paint Italy, Heine

Hindostan. In Mignon's song of longing, without a superlative or a

diminutive, with a power like that of a God, Goethe summons before our

eyes the picture of the classic land where the citrons bloom. There is

a power in it all, a force in each distinguishing trait, that Heine

does not attain to. But compare this with the bewitching sweetness of

Heine's _Auf Flügeln des Gesanges_ ("Oh, I would bear thee, my love, my

bride, afar on the wings of song"), the dreamy longing, the charm and

the mystery of the perspective that opens out to us:

"Es hüpfen herbei und lauschen

Die frommen, klugen Gazelln,

Und in der Ferne rauschen

Des heiligen Stromes Welln."[20]

[20]

Gazelles come bounding from the brake,

And pause, and look shyly round;

And the waves of the sacred river make

A far-off slumb'rous sound.

(Sir THEODORE MARTIN)

This is an immortal stanza. Goethe, even when he gives the reins to

longing, is always, like his own goldsmith of Ephesus, the great, wise

heathen, who makes images of the gods; in Heine's visionary brain there

was that particle of divine frenzy without which it had been impossible

for the Düsseldorf merchant's son to understand and reproduce the

fatalistic, self-effacing dreaminess of ancient India.

Heine's peculiarities of style stand out even more sharply against the

background of Goethe's, when we compare the way in which the two give

expression to what is not exactly desire, but the pure longing of love.

Think of the following lines, which Goethe puts into Mignon's mouth:

"Nur wer die Sehnsucht kennt, weiss was ich leide,

Allein und abgetrennt von aller Freude,

Seh' ich an's Firmament nach jener Seite.

Ach, der mich liebt und kennt, ist in der Weite.--

Es schwindelt mir, es brennt mein Eingeweide.

Nur wer die Sehnsucht kennt, weiss was ich leide."[21]

21:

My grief no mortals know, except the yearning!

Alone, a prey to woe, all pleasure spurning,

Up towards the sky I throw a gaze discerning.

He who my love doth know seems ne'er returning;

With strange and fiery glow _my heart is burning_[*]

My grief no mortals know, except the yearning.

(BOWRING)

[*]In the original, _my bowels are burning_.

This is the master in the fulness of his power. Much art has been

expended in the representation of the wearing monotony of longing--the

five doubly rhyming lines, the languishing metre--interrupted by

the audacious, realistic expression: "Es schwindelt mir, es brennt

mein Eingeweide." Now compare with this, one of Heine's most perfect

expressions of pure love-longing, and we shall see what the plastic

fancy and the perfected laconicism of style which we traced in course

of development have succeeded in producing for time and eternity:

"Ein Fichtenbaum steht einsam

Im Norden auf kahler Höh'.

Ihn schläfert: mit weisser Decke

Umhüllen ihn Eis und Schnee.

Er träumt von einer Palme,

Die fern im Morgenland

Einsam und schweigend trauert

Auf brennender Felsenwand."[22]

[22]

A pine-tree stands alone on

A bare bleak northern height;

The ice and snow they swathe it

As it sleeps there, all in white.

'Tis dreaming of a palm-tree,

In a far-off Eastern land,

That mourns, alone and silent,

On a ledge of burning sand.

(Sir THEODORE MARTIN.)

This is hardly rhymed. The only real rhyme is the very commonplace

_Land_ and _Wand_. The pine dreams in the snow, the palm grieves

dumbly in the burning heat--that is all. It is not seen, it is fancied

or invented, hence it cannot be painted (though I did once see a

painting of it in a German exhibition, an idiotically absurd, double

picture); but it is, nevertheless, an unforgettable, an immortal poem.

And the reason is that the symbol is so marvellously effective in its

simplicity--these two clear outlines instinct with feeling, which

express the impossibility of overcoming the obstacle which prevents

the union of two who really belong to each other.

If Goethe's strength lies in the expression of healthy feelings,

comparatively simple and uncomplicated, Heine's lies in the expression

of complex modern feeling, of feelings whose unsound state is the

result of painful experiences. Goethe could never have written the

following lines, with their jarring contrasts and enigmatical meaning:

"Wenn ich in deine Augen seh'

So schwindet all mein Leid und Weh:

. . . . . . . . . . .

Doch wenn du sprichst: ich liebe dich!

So muss ich weinen bitterlich."[23]

[23]

Whene'er I look into thine eyes,

Then every fear that haunts me flies:

. . . . . . . . . . .

But when thou sayest: "I love thee;"

Then must I weep, and bitterly.

(Sir THEODORE MARTIN)

Why must he weep? I have heard the naïve answer: Because she is lying.

Alas! it is not such a simple matter as that. He has heard these words

from other lips, lips which have now ceased to utter words of love; he

knows how long such a passion as a rule lasts, and the sound of her

voice startles him out of his forgetfulness--he doubts the durability

of her feeling or the durability of his own. It is very interesting to

note the way in which Heine had wrestled with these words. Originally

the last line was: "Dann wein' ich still und bitterlich." Then the

word "bitterlich" was altered to "freudiglich," which changed the

original tenor of the poem, and finally the line received its present

form.[24]

[24] H. Hüffer: _Aus dem Leben Heinrich Heines,_ p. 153.

Heine was not happy enough and not great enough to attain

to reconciliation with existence. It was not possible, apart from all

else, that the man who was so long an exile, so long sick to death,

should look upon life with the same eyes as the man who was thoroughly

sound and healthy, in affluent circumstances, honoured by the great

majority, the friend of his sovereign. Hence the expressions of revolt,

of bitterness, and of cynicism so frequently to be found in Heine are

exceedingly rare in Goethe. Goethe, as a rule, puts them into the

mouth of his Mephistopheles. Heine, who was destitute of the dramatic

faculty, is himself responsible for every outburst, because he always

speaks in his own name. Goethe's bitterest utterances, moreover, are

not contained in his works. It is only in the Paralipomena to _Faust_,

for instance, that we find this passage:

"Nach kurzem Lärm legt Fama sich zur Ruh,

Vergessen wird der Held so wie der Lotterbube,

Der grösste König schliesst die Augen zu,

Und jeder Hund bepisst gleich seine Grube."[25]

[25]

Fame's short-liv'd turmoil o'er, she sleeps,

Hero and waif, oblivion's their doom;

The greatest king, life o'er, his eyes doth close,

And straightway every dog defiles his tomb.

Heine dwells upon the ideas which Goethe only calls up to banish

again. Goethe, too, can be blasphemous. He wrote that poem which is so

frequently quoted, so seldom understood: _Wer nie sein Brod mit Thränen

ass_ ("He that with tears did never eat his bread"). It is a bitter,

passionate appeal against the ordering of the world. But its bitterness

is a bitterness that is choked with tears, not the wild and desperate

bitterness of Heine's splendid _Fragen_ ("Questions") or the poem _Lass

die heiligen Parabeln_ ("Holy parable discarding"), in which occur the

lines:

"Warum schleppt sich blutend, elend,

Unter Kreuzlast der Gerechte,

Während glücklich als ein Sieger

Trabt auf hohem Ross der Schlechte?

Also fragen wir beständig,

Bis man uns mit einer Handvoll

Erde endlich stopft die Mäuler,

Aber ist das eine Antwort?"[26]

[26]

Wherefore bends the Just One, bleeding

'Neath the cross's weight laborious,

While upon his steed the Wicked

Rides all-proudly and victorious?

Thus are we for ever asking,

Till at length our mouths securely

With a clod of earth are fastened--

That is not an answer, surely?

(BOWRING)

The expression is here, as usual with Heine, on a lower plane, more

terrestrial, more boldly outspoken, yet by no means unworthy of the

subject.

Main Currents in Nineteenth Century Literature - 6. Young Germany · 第 13 / 34 段