CHAPTER IV.

DECLINE AND FALL.

After so strange and so complete a victory over one party, had the

Tribune pushed his advantage, and gone against the other with all the

prestige of his triumph, he would in all probability have ended the

resistance of the nobles altogether. But he did not do this. He had no

desire for any more fighting. It is supposed, with insufficient reason

we think, that personally he was a coward. What is more likely is that

so sensitive and nervous a man (to use the jargon of our own times)

must have suffered, as any fine temperament would have done, from that

scene at the gate of San Lorenzo, and poor young Janni Colonna lying

in his blood; and that when he declared "he would draw his sword no

more," he did so with a sincere disgust for all such brutal methods.

His own ways of convincing people were by argument and elocution, and

pictures on the walls, which, if they did not convince, did nobody any

harm. The next scene, however, which he prepared for his audience does

not look much like the horror for which we have given him credit. He

had informed his followers before he first set out against the nobles

that he was taking his son with him--something in the tone with which

the presence of a Prince Imperial might be proclaimed to an army; and

we now find the young Lorenzo placed still more in the foreground. The

day after that dreadful victory Cola called together the militia of

the city by the most touching argument. "Come with me," he said, "and

afterwards you shall have your pay." They turned out accordingly to

accompany him, wondering, but not knowing what he had in his mind.

"The trumpets sounded at the place where the fight

(_sconfitto_) had taken place. No one knew what was to be

done there. He went with his son to the very spot where

Stefano Colonna had died. There was still there a little

pool of water. Cola made his son dismount and threw over

him the water which was still tinged with the blood of

Stefano, and said to him: 'Be thou a Knight of Victory.'

All around wondered and were stupefied. Then he gave orders

that all the commanders should strike his son on the

shoulder with their swords. This done he returned to the

Capitol, and said: 'Go your ways. We have done a common

work. All our sires were Romans, the country expects that

we should fight for her.' When this was said the minds of

the people were much exercised, and some would never bear

arms again. Then the Tribune began to be greatly hated, and

people began to talk among themselves of his arrogance

which was not small."

This grotesque and horrible ceremony seems to have done Cola more harm

than all that had gone before. The leader of a revolution should have

no sons. The excellent instinct of providing for his family after him,

and making himself a stepping stone for his children, though

proceeding from "what is best within the soul," has spoiled many a

history. Cola di Rienzi was a most conspicuous and might have been a

great man: but Rienzo di Cola, which would have been his son's natural

name, was nobody, and is never heard of after this terrible baptism of

blood, so abhorrent to every natural and generous impulse. Did the

gazers in the streets see the specks of red on young Lorenzo's dress

as he rode along through the city from the Tiburtine gate, and through

the Forum to the Capitol, where all the train was dismissed so

summarily? As the Cavallerotti, the better part of the gathering,

turned their horses and rode away offended, no doubt the news ran

through quarter after quarter with them. The blood of Stefanello, the

heir of great Colonna! And thoughts of the old man desolate, and of

young Janni so brave and gay, would come into many a mind. They might

be tyrants, but they were familiar Roman faces, known to all, and with

some reason to be proud, if proud they were; not like this upstart,

who called honest men away from their own concerns to do honour to his

low-born son, and sent them packing about their business afterwards

without so much as a dinner to celebrate the new knight!

This was all in November, the 20th and 21st: and it was on the 20th of

May that Cola had received his election upon the Capitol and been

proclaimed master of the destinies of the universe, by inference, as

master of Rome. Six months, no more, crammed full of gorgeous pageants

and exciting events. Then, notwithstanding the extraordinary character

of his revolution, he had been believed in, and encouraged by all

around. He had received the sanction of the Pope, the friendly

congratulations of the great Italian towns, and above all the

applause, enthusiastic and overflowing, of Petrarch the greatest of

living poets. By degrees all these sympathies and applauses had fallen

from him. Florence and the other great cities had withdrawn their

friendship, the Pope had cancelled his commission, the Pope's Vicar

had left the Tribune's side. The more his vanity and self-admiration

grew, the more his friends had fallen from him. That very day--the

day after the defeat of the Colonna, before the news could have

reached any one at a distance, Petrarch on his way to Italy, partly

brought back thither by anxiety about his friend, received from

another friend a copy of one of the arrogant and extraordinary letters

which Cola was sending about the world, and read and re-read it and

was stupefied. "What answer can be made to it? I know not," he cries.

"I see that fate pursues the country, and on whatever side I turn, I

find subjects of grief and trouble. If Rome is ruined what hope

remains for Italy? and if Italy is degraded what will become of me?

What can I offer but tears?" A few days later, arrived at Genoa, the

poet wrote to Rienzi himself in reproof and sorrow:

[Illustration: AQUA FELICE.

_To face page_ 462.]

"Often, I confess it, I have had occasion upon thy account

to repeat with immense joy what Cicero puts in the mouth of

Scipio Africanus:--'What is this great and delightful sound

that comes to my ears?' And certainly nothing could be

better applied to the splendour of thy name and to the

frequent and joyful account of thy doings: and it was

indeed good to my heart to speak to thee in that

exhortation, full of thy praise and of encouragements to

continue, which I sent thee. _Deh!_ do nothing, I conjure

thee, to make me now ask, whence is this great and fatal

rumour which strikes my ear so painfully? Take care, I

beseech thee, not thyself to soil thine own splendid fame.

No man in the world except thyself can shake the

foundations of the edifice thou hast constructed; but that

which thou hast founded thou canst ruin: for to destroy his

own proper work no man is so able as the architect. You

know the road by which you have risen to glory: if you turn

back you shall soon find yourself in the lowest place; and

going down is naturally the quicker.... I was hastening to

you and with all my heart: but I turn upon the way. Other

than what you were, I would not see you. Adieu, Rome, to

thee also adieu, if that is true which I have heard. Rather

than come to thee I would go to the Indies, to the end of

the world.... Oh, how ill the beginning agrees with the

end! Oh, miserable ears of mine that, accustomed to the

sound of glory, do not know how to bear such announcements

of shame! But may not these be lies and my words false? Oh

that it might be so! How glad should I be to confess my

error!... If thou art indeed so little careful of thy fame,

think at least of mine. You well know by what tremendous

tempest I am threatened, how many are the crowd of

faultfinders ready to ruin me. While there is still time

put your mind to it, be vigilant, look well to what you do,

guide yourself continually by good counsel, consider with

yourself, not deceiving yourself, what you are, what you

were, from whence you have come, and to what point, without

detriment to the public weal, you can attain: how to

attire yourself, what name to assume, what hopes to awaken,

and of what doctrine to make open confession; understanding

always that not Lord, but solely Minister, you are of the

Republic."

The share which Petrarch thus takes to himself in Cola's fortunes may

seem exaggerated; but it must be remembered that the Colonna were his

chief patrons and friends, that it was under their protecting shadow

that he had risen to fame, and that his warm friendship for Rienzi had

already deeply affected the terms of his relationship with them. That

relationship had come to a positive breach so far as his most powerful

protector, the Cardinal Giovanni, was concerned, a breach of feeling

on one side as well as of protection on the other. His letter to the

Cardinal after this catastrophe, condoling with him upon the death of

his brothers, is one of the coldest of compositions, very unlike the

warm and eager affection of old, and consisting chiefly of elaborate

apologies for not having written. The poet had completely committed

himself in respect to the Tribune; he had hailed his advent in the

most enthusiastic terms, he had proclaimed him the hope of Italy, he

had staked his own reputation upon his friend's disinterestedness and

patriotism; therefore this downfall with all its humiliating

circumstances, the vanities and self-intoxication which had brought it

about, were intolerable to Petrarch: his own credit as well as Cola's

was concerned. He had been so rash as to answer for the Tribune in all

quarters, to pledge his own judgment, his power of understanding men,

almost his honour, on Cola's behalf; and to be proved so wrong, so

little capable of estimating justly the man whom he believed himself

to know so well, was bitterness unspeakable to him.

The interest of his tragic disappointment and sorrow is at the same

time enhanced by the fact, that the other party to this dreadful

quarrel had been the constant objects of the poet's eulogies and

enthusiasm. It is to Petrarch that we owe most of our knowledge of

the Colonna family at this remarkable period of a long history which

is filled with the oft-repeated incidents of an endless struggle for

power, either with the rebellious Romans themselves, or with the other

little less great family of the Orsini who, unfortunately for

themselves, had no Petrarch to bring them fully into the light of day.

The many allusions in Petrarch's letters, his reminiscences of the

ample and gracious household, all so friendly, and caressing, all of

one mind as to his own poetical qualities, and anxious to heap honours

upon him, light up for us the face of the much complicated story, and

give interest to many an elaborate poetical or philosophical

disquisition. Especially the figure of the father, the old Stefano

with his seven sons and the innumerable tribe of nephews and cousins,

not to say grandsons, still more cherished, who surrounded him--rises

clear, magnanimous, out of the disturbed and stormy landscape. His

brief appearances in the chronicle which we have quoted, with a keen

brief speech here and there, imperative, in strong accents of common

sense as well as of power, add a touch of energetic life to the many

anecdotes and descriptions of a more elaborate kind. And the poet

would seem never to have failed in his admiration for the old

Magnanimo. At an earlier period he had described in several letters to

the son Giovanni, the Cardinal, the reception given to him at Rome,

and conversations, some of them very remarkable. One scene above all,

of which Petrarch reminds Stefano himself in his bereavement, gives us

a most touching picture of the noble old man.

"One day at sunset you and I alone were walking by that

spacious way which leads from your house to the Capitol,

when we paused at that point where it is crossed by the

other road by which on one hand you ascend to the Arch of

Camillus, and on the other go down to the Tiber: we paused

there without interruption from any and talked together of

the condition of your house and family, which, often

assailed by the enmity of strangers, was at that time moved

by grievous internal commotions:--when the discourse fell

upon one of your sons with whom, more by the work of

scandal-mongers than by paternal resentment, you were

angry, and by your goodness it was given to me, what many

others had not been able to obtain, to persuade you to

receive him again to your good grace. After you had

lamented his faults to me, changing your aspect all at once

you said (I remember not only the substance of your

discourse but the very words). 'This son of mine, thy

friend, whom, thanks to thee, I will now receive again with

paternal affection, has vomited forth words concerning my

old age, of which it is best to be silent; but since I

cannot refuse you, let us put a stone over the past and let

a full amnesty, as people say, be conceded. From my lips I

promise thee, not another word shall be heard.

"'One thing I will tell you, that you may make perpetual

remembrance of it. It is made a reproach to my old age that

I am mixed up with warlike factions more than is becoming,

and more than there is any occasion, and that thus I will

leave to my sons an inheritance of peril and hate. But as

God is true, I desire you to believe that for love of peace

alone I allow myself to be drawn into war. Whether it be

the effect of my extreme old age which chills and enfeebles

the spirit in this already stony bosom, or whether it

proceeds from my long observation of human affairs, it is

certain that more than others I am greedy of repose and

peace. But fixed and immovable as is my resolution never to

shrink from trouble though I may prefer a settled and

tranquil life, I find it better, since fate compels me, to

go down to the sepulchre fighting, than to submit, old as I

am, to servitude. And for what you say of my heirs I have

but one thing to reply. Listen well, and fix my words in

your mind. God grant that I may leave my inheritance to my

sons. But all in opposition to my desires are the decrees

of fate (the words were said with tears): contrary to the

order of nature it is I who shall be the heir of all my

sons.' And thus saying, your eyes swollen with tears, you

turned away."

At the corner where the Corso is crossed by the street which borders

the Forum of Trajan, let whoso will pause amid the bustle of modern

traffic and think for a moment of those two figures standing together

talking, "without interruption from any one," in the middle of that

open space, while the long level rays of the sunset streamed upon them

from beyond the Flaminian gate. Was there some great popular meeting

at the Capitol which had cleared the streets, the hum of voices rising

on the height, but all quiet here at this dangerous, glorious hour,

when fever is abroad and the women and children are all indoors? "I

made light of it, I confess," says Petrarch, though he acknowledges

that he told the story of this dreadful presentiment to the Cardinal,

who, sighing, exclaimed, "Would to God that my father's prediction may

not come true!" But old Stefano with his weight of years upon him, and

his front like Jove, turned away sighing, stroking his venerable

beard, unmoved by the poet's reassurances, with that terrible

conviction in his heart. They were all young and he old: daring,

careless young men, laughing at that same Cola of the little

_albergo_, the son of the wine-shop, who said he was to be an emperor.

But the shadow on the grandsire's heart was one of those which events

cast before them. Young Janni was to go among the first, the brave boy

who ought to have been heir of all. To him, too, his grandfather, the

great Stefano, the head of the full house, was to be heir.

The terrible event of the Porta di San Lorenzo shows in still darker

colours when we look at it closer. Stefano, the son of Stefano, and

Janni his son, are the two most conspicuous names: but there were

more. Camillo, _figlio naturale, morto il 20 November 1347,

all'assalto di Porta San Lorenzo_; Pietro, _figlio naturale, rimase

occiso a Porta San Lorenzo_. Giovanni of Agapito, Pietro of Agapito,

nephews of old Stefano, _morti nell'assalto di Porta San Lorenzo_.

Seven in all were the scions of Colonna who ended their life that

horrible November morning in the mud and rain; or more dreadful still

under the morning sun which broke out so suddenly, showing those white

dreadful forms all stripped and abandoned, upon the fatal way. It was

little wonder if between the house of Colonna and the upstart Cola no

peace should ever be possible after a lost battle so fatal and so

humiliating to the race.

Perhaps after the first moment of terrible joy and relief to find

himself uninjured, and his enemies so deeply punished, compunction

seized the sensitive mind of Cola: or perhaps he was alarmed by the

displeasure of the Pope, his abandonment by all his friends, and the

solemn adjuration of Petrarch. It is certain that after this he

dropped many of his pretensions, subdued the fantastic arrogance of

his titles and superscription, gave up his claim to elect emperors and

preside over the fortunes of the world, and began to devote himself

with humility to the government of the city which had fallen into

something of its old disorderliness within the walls; while outside

there was again, as of old, no security at all. The rebel barons had

resumed their turbulent sway, the robbers reappeared in all their old

coverts; and once again every road to Rome was as unsafe as that on

which the traveller of old fell among thieves. Cola, Knight and

Lieutenant of our Lord the Pope, now headed his proclamations, instead

of Nicolas, severe and clement. His crown of silver and sceptre of

steel, fantastic emblems, were hung up before the shrine of Our Lady

in the Ara Coeli, and everything about him was toned down into

gravity. By this means he kept up a semblance of peace, and replaced

the Buono Stato in its visionary shrine. But Cola had gone too far,

and lost the confidence of the people too completely to rise again.

His very humility would no doubt be against him, showing the weakness

which a man unsupported on any side should perhaps have been bold

enough to defy, hardihood being now his only chance in face of so many

assailants. Pope Clement thundered against him from Avignon; the

nobles lay in Palestrina and Marino, and many a smaller fortress

besides, irreconcilable, watching every opportunity of assailing him.

The country was once more devastated all round Rome, provisions short,

corn dear, and funds failing as well as authority and respect. And

Cola's heart had failed him along with his prosperity. He had bad

dreams; he himself tells the story of this moral downfall with a

forlorn attempt to show that it was not, after all, his visible

enemies, or the power of men, which had cast him down.

"After my triumph over the Colonna," he writes, "just when

my dominion seemed strongest, my stoutness of heart was

taken from me, and I was seized by visionary terrors. Night

after night awakened by visions and dreams I cried out,

'The Capitol is falling,' or 'The enemy comes!' For some

time an owl alighted every night on the summit of the

Capitol, and though chased away by my servants always came

back again. For twelve nights this took my sleep and all

quiet of mind from me. It was thus that dreams and

nightbirds tormented one who had not been afraid of the

fury of the Roman nobles, nor terrified by armies of armed

men."

The brag was a forlorn one, but it was all of which the fallen Tribune

was now capable. Cola received back the Vicar of the Pope, who

probably was not without some affection for his old triumphant

colleague, with gladness and humility, and seated that representative

of ecclesiastical authority beside himself in his chair of judgment,

before which he no longer summoned the princes and great ones of the

earth. The end came in an unexpected way, of which the writer of the

_Vita_ gives the popular account: it is a little different from that

of the graver history but only in details. A certain Pepino, Count

Palatine of Altamura, a fugitive from Naples, whose object in Rome was

to enlist soldiers for the service of Louis of Hungary, then eager to

avenge the murder of his brother Andrew, the husband of Queen Joan of

Naples--had taken up his abode in the city. He was in league with

several of the nobles, and ready to lend a hand in any available way

against the Tribune. Fearing to be brought before the tribunal of

Cola, and to be obliged to explain the object of his residence in

Rome, he shut himself up in his palace and made an effort to raise the

city against its head.

"Messer the Conte Paladino at this time threw a bar

(barricade) across the street, under the Arch of Salvator

(to defend his quarters apparently). A night and a day the

bells of St. Angelo in Pescheria rang a _stuormo_, but no

one attempted to break down the bar. The Tribune sent a

party of horsemen against the bar, and an officer named

Scarpetta, wounded by a lance, fell dead in the skirmish.

When the Tribune heard that Scarpetta was dead and that the

people were not affected by the sound of the tocsin,

although the bell of St. Angelo continued to ring, he

sighed deeply: chilled by alarm he wept: he knew not what

to do. His heart was beaten down and brought low. He had

not the courage of a child. Scarcely could he speak. He

believed that ambushes were laid for him in the city, which

was not true, for there was as yet no open rebellion: no

one, as yet, had risen against the Tribune. But their zeal

had become cold: and he believed that he would be killed.

What can be said more? He knew he had not the courage to

die in the service of the people as he had promised.

Weeping and sighing, he addressed as many as were there,

saying that he had done well, but that from envy the people

were not content with him. 'Now in the seventh month am I

driven from my dominion.' Having said these words weeping,

he mounted his horse and sounded the silver trumpets, and

bearing the imperial insignia, accompanied by armed men, he

came down as in a triumph, and went to the Castle of St.

Angelo, and there shut himself in. His wife, disguised in

the habit of a monk, came from the Palazzo de Lalli. When

the Tribune descended from his greatness the others also

wept who were with him, and the miserable people wept. His

chamber was found to be full of many beautiful things, and

so many letters were found there that you would not believe

it. The barons heard of this downfall, but three days

passed before they returned to Rome because of their fear.

Even when they had come back fear was in their hearts. They

made a picture of the Tribune on the wall of the Capitol,

as if he were riding, but with his head down and his feet

above. They also painted Cecco Manneo, who was his Notary

and Chancellor, and Conte, his nephew, who held the castle

of Civita Vecchia. Then the Cardinal Legate entered into

Rome, and proceeded against him and distributed the greater

part of his goods, and proclaimed him to be a heretic."

Thus suddenly Cola fell, as he had risen. His heart had failed him

without reason or necessity, for the city had not shown any open signs

of rebellion, and there seems to have been no reason why he should

have fled to St. Angelo. The people, though they did not respond to

his call to arms, took no more notice of the tocsin of his opponent or

of his cry of Death to the Tribune. Rome lay silent pondering many

things, caring little how the tide turned, perhaps, with the instinct

of Lo Popolo everywhere, thinking that a change might be a good thing:

but it was no overt act on the part of the populace which drove its

idol away. The act was entirely his own--his heart had failed him. In

these days we should say his nerves had broken down. The phraseology

is different, but the things were the same. His downfall, however, was

not perhaps quite so sudden in reality as it appears in the

chronicle. It would seem that he endeavoured to escape to Civita

Vecchia where his nephew was governor, but was not received there, and

had to come back to Rome, and hide his head once more for a short time

in St. Angelo. But it is certain that before the end of January, 1438,

he had finally disappeared, a shamed and nameless man, his titles

abolished, his property divided among his enemies. Never was a

downfall more sudden or more complete.

Stefano Colonna and his friends re-entered Rome with little appearance

of triumph. The remembrance of the Porta San Lorenzo was too recent

for rejoicings, and it must be put to the credit of the old chief,

bereaved and sorrowful, that no reprisals were made, that a general

amnesty was proclaimed, and the peace of the city preserved. Cola's

family, at least for the time, remained peaceably at Rome, and met

with no harm. We hear nothing of the unfortunate young Knight of

Victory who had been sprinkled with the blood of the Colonnas. The

Tribune went down like a stone, and for the moment, of him who had

filled men's mouths and minds with so many strange tidings, there was

no more to tell.

Cola's absence from Rome lasted for seven years; of which time there

is no mention whatever in the _Vita_, which concerns itself

exclusively with things that happened in Rome; but his steps can be

very clearly traced. We never again find our enthusiast, he who first

ascended the Capitol in a passion of disinterested zeal and

patriotism, approved by every honest visionary and every suffering

citizen, a man chosen of God to deliver the city. That his motives

were ever ill motives, or that he had begun to seek his own prosperity

alone, it would be hard to say: but he appears to us henceforward in a

changed aspect as the eager conspirator, the commonplace plotter and

schemer, hungry for glory and plunder, and using every means, by hook

or by crook, to recover what he has lost, which is a far more

familiar figure than the ideal Reformer, the disinterested

revolutionary. We meet with that vulgar hero a hundred times in the

stormy record of Italian politics, a man without scruples, sticking at

nothing. But Rienzi was of a different nature: he was at once a less

and a greater sinner. It would be unjustifiable to say that he ever

gave up the thought of the Buono Stato, or ceased to desire the

welfare of Rome. But in the long interval of his disappearance from

the scene, he not only plotted like the other, but used that higher

motive, and the mystic elements that were in the air, and the tendency

towards all that was occult, and much that was noble in the

aspirations of the visionaries of his time, to further the one object,

his return to power, to the Capitol, and to the dominion of Rome. A

conspirator is the commonplace of Italian story, at every period: and

the pretender, catching at every straw to get back to his unsteady

throne, besieging every potentate that can help him, pleading every

inducement from the highest to the lowest--self-interest,

philanthropy, the service of God, the most generous and the meanest

sentiments--is also a very well known figure; but it is rare to find a

man truly affected by the most mystic teachings of religion, yet

pressing them also into his service, and making use of what he

conceives to be the impulses of the Holy Spirit for the furtherance of

his private ends, without, nevertheless, so far as can be asserted,

becoming a hypocrite or insincere in the faith which he professes.

This was the strange development to which the Tribune came. After some

vain attempts to awaken in the Roman territory friends who could help

him, his heart broken by the fickleness and desertion of the Popolo in

which he had trusted, he took refuge in the wild mountain country of

the Apennines, where there existed a rude and strange religious party,

aiming in the midst of the most austere devotion at a total overturn

of society, and that return of a primeval age of innocence and bliss

which is so seductive to the mystical mind. In the caves and dens of

the earth and in the mountain villages and little convents, there

dwelt a severe sect of the Franciscans, men whose love of Poverty,

their founder's bride and choice, was almost stronger than their love

of that founder himself. The Fraticelli were only heretics by dint of

holding their Rule more strictly than the other religious of their

order, and by indulging in ecstatic visions of a renovated state and a

purified people--visions less personal though not less sincere or

pious, than those which inflicted upon Francis himself the semblance

of the wounds of the Redeemer, in that passion of pity and love which

possessed his heart. The exile among them, who had himself been

aroused out of the obscurity of ordinary life by a corresponding

dream, found himself stimulated and inspired over again by the

teaching of these visionaries. One of them, it is said, found him out

in the refuge where he thought himself absolutely unknown, and,

addressing him by name, told him that he had still a great career

before him, and that it should be his to restore to Rome the double

reign of universal dominion, to establish the Pope and the Empire in

the imperial city, and reconcile for ever those two joint rulers

appointed of God.

It is curious to find that what is to some extent the existing state

of affairs--the junction in one place of the two monarchs of the

earth--should have been the dream and hope of religious visionaries in

the middle of the fourteenth century. The Emperor to them was but a

glorified King of Italy, with a vague and unknown world behind him;

and they believed that the Millennium would come, when that supreme

sovereign on the Capitol and the Holy Father from the seat of St.

Peter should sway the world at their will. The same class, in the same

order now--so much as confiscation after confiscation permits that

order to exist--would fight to its last gasp against the forced

conjunction, which its fathers before it thus thought of as the thing

most to be prayed for, and schemed for, in the whole world.

When others beside the Fraticelli discovered Rienzi's hiding-place,

and he found himself, or imagined himself, in some danger, he went to

Prague to seek shelter with the Emperor Charles IV., and a remarkable

correspondence took place between that potentate on one side and the

Archbishop of Prague, his counsellor, and Rienzi on the other, in

which the exile promised many splendours to the monarch, and offered

himself as his guide to Rome, and to lend him the weight of his

influence there with the people over whom Rienzi believed that he

would yet himself preside with greater power than ever. That Charles

himself should reply to these letters, and reason the matter out with

this forlorn wanderer, shows of itself what a power was in his words

and in the fervour of his purpose. But it is ill talking between a

great monarch and a penniless exile, and Charles seems to have felt no

scruple in handing him over, after full exposition of his views, to

the archbishop as a heretic. That prelate transferred him to the Pope,

to be dealt with as a man already excommunicated under the ban of the

Church, and now once more promulgating strange doctrines, ought to be;

and thus his freedom, and his wandering, and the comparative safety of

his life came to an end, and a second stage of strange development

began.

The fortunes of Rienzi were at a very low ebb when he reached Avignon

and fell into the hands of his enemies, of those whom he had assailed

and those whom he had disappointed, at that court where there was no

one to say a good word for him, and where all that was best in him was

even more greatly against him than that which was worst. In the

dungeons of Avignon, in the stronghold of the Pope who had so much

cause to regret having once sanctioned and patronised the Tribune, his

cause had every appearance of being lost for ever. It was fortunate

for him that there was no longer a Cardinal Colonna at that court; but

there was, at the same time, no champion to take up his cause. Things

indeed went so badly with him, that he was actually condemned to death

as a heretic, himself allowing that he was guilty and worthy of death

in some moment of profound depression, or perhaps with the hope of

touching the hearts of his persecutors by humility as great as had

been the pretensions of his brief and exciting reign. For poor Cola

after all, if the affair at Porta San Lorenzo is left out--and that

was no fault of his--had done nothing worthy of death. He had been

carried away by the passion and madness of an almost impossible

success; but he had scarcely ever been rebellious to the Church, and

his vagaries of doctrine were rather due to the mingling together of

the classical with the religious, and the inflation of certain not

otherwise unorthodox ideas, than any real rebellion; but he carried

his prevailing sentiment and character into everything, being lower

than any in the depths of his downfall as he had been higher than any

on the heights of his visionary pride and short-lived triumph.

He was saved from this sentence in a manner as fantastical as himself.

It may be believed that it was never intended to be carried out, and

that, especially after his acknowledgment of the justice of his

sentence, means would have been found of preserving him from its

execution; very likely, indeed, the curious means which were found,

originated in some charitable whisper that a plausible pretence of a

reason for letting him off would not be disagreeable to the Pope. He

was saved by the suggestion that he was a poet! We have the story in

full detail from Petrarch himself, who is not without a perception of

its absurdity, and begins his letter by an indignant description of

the foolish and pretended zeal for poetry of which this was so strange

an example. "Poetry," he says, "divine gift and vouchsafed by heaven

to so few, I see it, friend, if not prostituted, at least made into a

vulgar thing.

"I feel my heart rise against this, and you, if I know you

well, will not tolerate such an abuse for any

consideration. Neither at Athens, nor at Rome, even in the

lifetime of Horace, was there so much talk of poets and

poetry as at the present day upon the banks of the

Rhone--although there never was either time or place in

which men understood it less. But now I will check your

rising bile by laughter and show how a jest can come in the

midst of melancholy.

"There has lately come to this court--or rather has not

come but has been brought--a prisoner, Niccola di Lorenzo,

once the formidable Tribune of Rome, now of all the men the

most unhappy--and what is more, not perhaps worthy of the

compassion which the misery of his present state calls

forth. He might have ended his days gloriously upon the

Capitol, but brought himself down instead, to the great

shame of the Republic and of the Roman name, into the

condition of a prisoner, first in Bohemia and now here.

Unfortunately, many more than I now like to think of are

the praises and encouragements which I myself have written

to him. Lover of virtue as I am, I could not do less than

exalt and admire the generous undertaking of the strong

man: and thankful on account of Italy, hoping to see the

Empire of Rome arise again and secure the peace of the

whole world, my heart was inundated by such joy, on account

of so many fine events, that to contain myself was

impossible; and it seemed to me that I almost took part in

his glory by giving encouragement and comfort to his

enterprise: by which as both his messengers and his letters

showed, he was himself set on fire--and always more and

more willingly I set myself to increase this stimulus with

every argument I could think of, and to feed the flame of

that ardent spirit, well knowing that every generous heart

kindles at the fire of praise and glory. For this reason

with an applause which to some seemed extravagant but to me

very just, I exalted his every act, encouraging him to

complete the magnanimous task which he had begun. The

letters which I then wrote went through many hands: and

since I am no prophet and still less was he ever a prophet

I am not ashamed of what I wrote: for certainly what he did

in those days and promised to do, not in my opinion alone

but to the praise and admiration of the whole world, were

very worthy, and I would not abolish the memory of these

letters of mine from my memory solely because he prefers an

ignoble life to a glorious death. But it is useless to

discuss a thing which is impossible; and however much I

might desire to destroy them I could not do it. As soon as

they come into the hands of the public, the writer has no

more power over them. Let us return to our story.

"This man then, who had filled the wicked with terror, the

good with expectation, and with joyful hope the universe,

has come before this Court humiliated and abject; and he

whom the people of Rome and all the cities of Italy

exalted, was seen passing through our streets between two

soldiers, affording a miserable spectacle to the rabble

eager to see face to face one whose name they had heard to

sound so high. He came from the King of Rome (a title of

the Emperor) to the Roman Pontiff, oh marvellous commerce!

As soon as he had arrived the Pope committed to three

princes of the Church the charge of examining into his

cause, and judging of what punishment he was guilty who had

attempted to free the State."

The letter is too long to quote entire, and Petrarch, though

maintaining the cause of his former friend, is perhaps too anxious to

make it clear that, had Rienzi given due attention to his own letters,

this great reverse would never have happened to him; yet it is on the

whole a noble plea for the Tribune. "In this man," the poet declares,

"I had placed the last hope of Italian liberty, and, having long known

and loved him from the moment when he put his hand to this great work,

he seemed to me worthy of all veneration and honour. Whatever might be

the end of the work I cannot cease to hold as magnificent its

beginning:" and he regrets with great indignation that it was this

beginning which was chiefly brought against him, and that his

description of himself as Nicolas, severe and clement, had more weight

with his judges than his good government or the happy change that took

place in Rome during his sway. We must hasten, however, to the irony

of the Tribune's deliverance.

"In this miserable state (after so much that is sorrowful,

here at last is something to laugh at), I learn from the

letters of my friends that there is still a hope of saving

him, and that because of a notion which has been spread

abroad among the vulgar, that he is a famous poet.... What

can we think of this? Truly I, more than I can say in

words, comfort myself and rejoice in the thought that the

Muses are so much honoured--and what is still more

marvellous, among those who never knew anything about

them--as to save from a fatal sentence a man who is

shielded by their name. What greater sign of reverence

could be given than that the name of Poetry should thus

save from death a man who rightly or wrongly is abhorred by

his judges, who has been convicted of the crime laid to his

charge and has confessed it, and by the unanimous sentence

of the tribunal has been found worthy of death? I rejoice,

I repeat, I congratulate him and the Muses with him: that

he should have such patrons, and they so unlooked-for an

honour--nor would I to a man so unhappy, reduced to such

an extreme of danger and of doubt, grudge the protecting

name of poet. But if you would know what I think, I will

say that Niccola di Lorenzo is a man of the greatest

eloquence, most persuasive and ready of speech, a writer

lucid and harmonious and of an elegant style. I do not

remember any poet whom he has not read; but this no more

makes him a poet than a man would be a weaver who clothed

himself with garments woven by another hand. To merit the

name of poet it is not enough to have made verses. But this

man has never that I know written a single line."

There is not a word of all this in the _Vita_. To the chronicler,

Rienzi, from the moment when he turned his face again towards Rome,

was never in any danger. As he came from Germany to Avignon all the

people in the villages came out to greet him, and would have rescued

him but for his continual explanation that he went to the Pope of his

own will; nor does his biographer seem to be aware that the Tribune

ran any risk of his life. He did escape, however, by a hair's breadth

only, and, as Petrarch had perfect knowledge of what was going on, no

doubt in the very way described by the poet. But he was not delivered

from prison until Cardinal Albornoz set out for Rome with the Pope's

orders to pacify and quiet the turbulent city. Many and great had been

its troubles in those seven years. It had fallen back into the old

hands--an Orsini and a Colonna, a Colonna and an Orsini. There had

been a temporary lull in the year of the Jubilee (1350), when all the

world flocked to Rome to obtain the Indulgence, and to have their sins

washed away in the full stream of Papal forgiveness. It is said that

Rienzi himself made his way stealthily back to share in that

Indulgence, but without making himself known: and the interest of the

citizens was so much involved in peace, and it was so essential to

keep a certain rule of order and self-restraint on account of the many

guests who brought money to the city, that there was a temporary lull

of its troubles. The town was no more than a great inn from Easter to

Christmas, and wealth, which has always a soothing and quieting

influence, poured into the pockets of the citizens, fully occupied

as they were by the care of their guests, and by the continual

ceremonials and sacred functions of those busy days. The Jubilee

brought not only masses of pious pilgrims from every part of the

world, but innumerable lawsuits--cases of conscience and of secular

disputes--to be settled by the busy Cardinal who sat instead of the

Pope, hearing daily what every applicant might have to say. There had

been a new temporary bridge built in order to provide for the pressure

of the crowd, and avoid that block of the old bridge of St. Angelo

which Dante describes in the _Inferno_, when the mass of pilgrims

coming and going broke down one of the arches. Other large if hasty

labours of preparation were also in hand. The Capitol had to be

repaired, and old churches furbished up, and every scrap of drapery

and tapestry which was to be had employed to make the city fine. So

that for one year at least there had been no thought but to put the

best possible face on things, to quench internal disorders for the

moment, and make all kinds of temporary arrangements for comfort and

accommodation, as is often done in a family when important visitors

force a salutary self-denial upon all; so that there were a hundred

inducements to preserve a front of good behaviour and fit decorum

before the world.

[Illustration: THE TARPEIAN ROCK.

_To face page_ 480.]

After the Jubilee however, things fell back once more into the old

confusion: once more there was robbery and violence on every road to

Rome; once more an Orsini and a Colonna balanced and struggled with

each other as Senators, with no time to attend to anything but their

personal interests, and no thought for the welfare of the people. In

1352, however, things had come to such a pass that a violent remedy

had to be tried again, and the Romans once more took matters in their

own hands and elected an official of their own, a certain Cerroni, in

the place of the unworthy Senators. He however held the position a

very short time, and being in his turn deserted by the people, gave

up the thankless task. That year there was a riot in which the Orsini

Senator was stoned to death at the foot of the stairs which lead to

the Capitol, while his colleague Colonna, another Stefano, escaped by

the other side. Then once more the expedient of a popular election was

attempted and a certain Francesco Baroncelli was elected who styled

himself the second Tribune of the people. The Pope had also attempted

to do what he could, once by a committee of four Cardinals, constantly

by Legates sent to guide and protect the ever-troubled city. The

hopelessness of these repeated efforts was proved over and over again.

Villani the historian writes with dismay that "the changes which took

place in the ancient mother and mistress of the universe did not

deserve to be recorded because of their frivolity and baseness."

Baroncelli too fell after a short time, and it seemed that no

government, and no reformation, could last.

In the meantime Pope Clement VI. died at Avignon, and Innocent VI.

reigned in his stead. At the beginning of this new reign a new attempt

to pacificate Rome, and to restore it to order and peace, was made. As

it was the general feeling that a stranger was the safest ruler in the

midst of the network of private and family interests in which the city

was bound, the new Pope with a sincere desire to ameliorate the

situation sent the Spanish Cardinal Albornoz to the rescue of Rome.

All this was in the year 1353 when Rienzi, his death sentence remitted

because of the illusion that he was a poet, lay in prison in Avignon.

His story was well known: and it was well known too, that the people

of Rome, after having deserted him, were eager to have him back, and

had to all appearance repented very bitterly their behaviour to him.

The Pope adopted the strong and daring expedient of taking the old

demagogue from his prison and giving him a place in the Legate's

council. There was no intention of replacing him in his former

position, but he was eager to accept the secondary place, and to give

the benefit of his advice and guidance to the Legate. All appearance

of his old ambition seemed indeed to have died out of him. He went

simply in the train of Albornoz to Montefiascone,[9] which had long

been the headquarters of the Papal representative, and from whence the

Legate conducted a campaign against the towns of the "Patrimony," each

of whom, like the mother city, occasionally secured a gleam of

uncertain independence, or else--which was oftener the case--fell into

the clutches of some one of the band of nobles who had so long held

Rome in fee. It is very likely that Rienzi had no ambitious motive,

nor thought of a new revolution when he set out. He took part like the

rest of the Cardinal's following in several of the expeditions,

especially against his old enemy Giovanni di Vico, still as masterful

and as dangerous as ever, but attempted nothing more.

FOOTNOTE:

[9] An amusing story used to be told in Rome concerning this place,

which no doubt sprang from the legend of that old ecclesiastical

inhabitation. It was that a bishop, travelling across the country (it

is always a bishop who is the _bon vivant_ of Italian story), sent a

messenger before him with instructions to write on the wall of every

town his opinion of the wine of the place, that his master might judge

whether he should alight there or not. If it was good _Est_ was to be

the word. When the courier came to Montefiascone he was so delighted

with the vintage there that he emblazoned the gate with a triple

legend of _Est_, _Est_, _Est_. The bishop arrived, alighted; and never

left Montefiascone more. The wine in its native flasks is still

distinguished by this inscription.

[Illustration: THE BORGHESE GARDENS.]

The Makers of Modern Rome, in Four Books · 第 4 / 7 章