XXIII.

During the summer he spent at York Harbor I was only forty minutes away

at Kittery Point, and we saw each other often; but this was before the

last time at Riverdale. He had a wide, low cottage in a pine grove

overlooking York River, and we used to sit at a corner of the veranda

farthest away from Mrs. Clemens’s window, where we could read our

manuscripts to each other, and tell our stories, and laugh our hearts out

without disturbing her. At first she had been about the house, and there

was one gentle afternoon when she made tea for us in the parlor, but that

was the last time I spoke with her. After that it was really a question

of how soonest and easiest she could be got back to Riverdale; but, of

course, there were specious delays in which she seemed no worse and

seemed a little better, and Clemens could work at a novel he had begun.

He had taken a room in the house of a friend and neighbor, a fisherman

and boatman; there was a table where he could write, and a bed where he

could lie down and read; and there, unless my memory has played me one of

those constructive tricks that people’s memories indulge in, he read me

the first chapters of an admirable story. The scene was laid in a

Missouri town, and the characters such as he had known in boyhood; but as

often as I tried to make him own it, he denied having written any such

story; it is possible that I dreamed it, but I hope the MS. will yet be

found. Upon reflection I cannot believe that I dreamed it, and I cannot

believe that it was an effect of that sort of pseudomnemonics which I

have mentioned. The characters in the novel are too clearly outlined in

my recollection, together with some critical reservations of my own

concerning them. Not only does he seem to have read me those first

chapters, but to have talked them over with me and outlined the whole

story.

I cannot say whether or not he believed that his wife would recover; he

fought the fear of her death to the end; for her life was far more

largely his than the lives of most men’s wives are theirs. For his own

life I believe he would never have much cared, if I may trust a saying of

one who was so absolutely without pose as he was. He said that he never

saw a dead man whom he did not envy for having had it over and being done

with it. Life had always amused him, and in the resurgence of its

interests after his sorrow had ebbed away he was again deeply interested

in the world and in the human race, which, though damned, abounded in

subjects of curious inquiry. When the time came for his wife’s removal

from York Harbor I went with him to Boston, where he wished to look up

the best means of her conveyance to New York. The inquiry absorbed him:

the sort of invalid car he could get; how she could be carried to the

village station; how the car could be detached from the eastern train at

Boston and carried round to the southern train on the other side of the

city, and then how it could be attached to the Hudson River train at New

York and left at Riverdale. There was no particular of the business

which he did not scrutinize and master, not only with his poignant

concern for her welfare, but with his strong curiosity as to how these

unusual things were done with the usual means. With the inertness that

grows upon an aging man he had been used to delegating more and more

things, but of that thing I perceived that he would not delegate the

least detail.

He had meant never to go abroad again, but when it came time to go he did

not look forward to returning; he expected to live in Florence always

after that; they were used to the life and they had been happy there some

years earlier before he went with his wife for the cure of Nauheim. But

when he came home again it was for good and all. It was natural that he

should wish to live in New York, where they had already had a pleasant

year in Tenth Street. I used to see him there in an upper room, looking

south over a quiet open space of back yards where we fought our battles

in behalf of the Filipinos and the Boers, and he carried on his campaign

against the missionaries in China. He had not yet formed his habit of

lying for whole days in bed and reading and writing there, yet he was a

good deal in bed, from weakness, I suppose, and for the mere comfort of

it.

My perspectives are not very clear, and in the foreshortening of events

which always takes place in our review of the past I may not always time

things aright. But I believe it was not until he had taken his house at

21 Fifth Avenue that he began to talk to me of writing his autobiography.

He meant that it should be a perfectly veracious record of his life and

period; for the first time in literature there should be a true history

of a man and a true presentation of the men the man had known. As we

talked it over the scheme enlarged itself in our riotous fancy. We said

it should be not only a book, it should be a library, not only a library,

but a literature. It should make good the world’s loss through Omar’s

barbarity at Alexandria; there was no image so grotesque, so extravagant

that we did not play with it; and the work so far as he carried it was

really done on a colossal scale. But one day he said that as to veracity

it was a failure; he had begun to lie, and that if no man ever yet told

the truth about himself it was because no man ever could. How far he had

carried his autobiography I cannot say; he dictated the matter several

hours each day; and the public has already seen long passages from it,

and can judge, probably, of the make and matter of the whole from these.

It is immensely inclusive, and it observes no order or sequence. Whether

now, after his death, it will be published soon or late I have no means

of knowing. Once or twice he said in a vague way that it was not to be

published for twenty years, so that the discomfort of publicity might be

minimized for all the survivors. Suddenly he told me he was not working

at it; but I did not understand whether he had finished it or merely

dropped it; I never asked.

We lived in the same city, but for old men rather far apart, he at Tenth

Street and I at Seventieth, and with our colds and other disabilities we

did not see each other often. He expected me to come to him, and I would

not without some return of my visits, but we never ceased to be friends,

and good friends, so far as I know. I joked him once as to how I was

going to come out in his autobiography, and he gave me some sort of

joking reassurance. There was one incident, however, that brought us

very frequently and actively together. He came one Sunday afternoon to

have me call with him on Maxim Gorky, who was staying at a hotel a few

streets above mine. We were both interested in Gorky, Clemens rather

more as a revolutionist and I as a realist, though I too wished the

Russian Tsar ill, and the novelist well in his mission to the Russian

sympathizers in this republic. But I had lived through the episode of

Kossuth’s visit to us and his vain endeavor to raise funds for the

Hungarian cause in 1851, when we were a younger and nobler nation than

now, with hearts if not hands, opener to the “oppressed of Europe”; the

oppressed of America, the four or five millions of slaves, we did not

count. I did not believe that Gorky could get the money for the cause of

freedom in Russia which he had come to get; as I told a valued friend of

his and mine, I did not believe he could get twenty-five hundred dollars,

and I think now I set the figure too high. I had already refused to sign

the sort of general appeal his friends were making to our principles and

pockets because I felt it so wholly idle, and when the paper was produced

in Gorky’s presence and Clemens put his name to it I still refused. The

next day Gorky was expelled from his hotel with the woman who was not his

wife, but who, I am bound to say, did not look as if she were not, at

least to me, who am, however, not versed in those aspects of human

nature.

I might have escaped unnoted, but Clemens’s familiar head gave us away to

the reporters waiting at the elevator’s mouth for all who went to see

Gorky. As it was, a hunt of interviewers ensued for us severally and

jointly. I could remain aloof in my hotel apartment, returning answer to

such guardians of the public right to know everything that I had nothing

to say of Gorky’s domestic affairs; for the public interest had now

strayed far from the revolution, and centred entirely upon these. But

with Clemens it was different; he lived in a house with a street door

kept by a single butler, and he was constantly rung for. I forget how

long the siege lasted, but long enough for us to have fun with it. That

was the moment of the great Vesuvian eruption, and we figured ourselves

in easy reach of a volcano which was every now and then “blowing a cone

off,” as the telegraphic phrase was. The roof of the great market in

Naples had just broken in under its load of ashes and cinders, and

crashed hundreds of people; and we asked each other if we were not sorry

we had not been there, where the pressure would have been far less

terrific than it was with us in Fifth Avenue. The forbidden butler came

up with a message that there were some gentlemen below who wanted to see

Clemens.

“How many?” he demanded.

“Five,” the butler faltered.

“Reporters?”

The butler feigned uncertainty.

“What would you do?” he asked me.

“I wouldn’t see them,” I said, and then Clemens went directly down to

them. How or by what means he appeased their voracity I cannot say, but

I fancy it was by the confession of the exact truth, which was harmless

enough. They went away joyfully, and he came back in radiant

satisfaction with having seen them. Of course he was right and I wrong,

and he was right as to the point at issue between Gorky and those who had

helplessly treated him with such cruel ignominy. In America it is not

the convention for men to live openly in hotels with women who are not

their wives. Gorky had violated this convention and he had to pay the

penalty; and concerning the destruction of his efficiency as an emissary

of the revolution, his blunder was worse than a crime.

Literary Friends and Acquaintance; a Personal Retrospect of American Authorship · 第 122 / 126 题