I.

It was in the little office of James T. Fields, over the bookstore of

Ticknor & Fields, at 124 Tremont Street, Boston, that I first met my

friend of now forty-four years, Samuel L. Clemens. Mr. Fields was then

the editor of The Atlantic Monthly, and I was his proud and glad

assistant, with a pretty free hand as to manuscripts, and an unmanacled

command of the book-notices at the end of the magazine. I wrote nearly

all of them myself, and in 1869 I had written rather a long notice of a

book just winning its way to universal favor. In this review I had

intimated my reservations concerning the ‘Innocents Abroad’, but I had

the luck, if not the sense, to recognize that it was such fun as we had

not had before. I forget just what I said in praise of it, and it does

not matter; it is enough that I praised it enough to satisfy the author.

He now signified as much, and he stamped his gratitude into my memory

with a story wonderfully allegorizing the situation, which the mock

modesty of print forbids my repeating here. Throughout my long

acquaintance with him his graphic touch was always allowing itself a

freedom which I cannot bring my fainter pencil to illustrate. He had the

Southwestern, the Lincolnian, the Elizabethan breadth of parlance, which

I suppose one ought not to call coarse without calling one’s self

prudish; and I was often hiding away in discreet holes and corners the

letters in which he had loosed his bold fancy to stoop on rank

suggestion; I could not bear to burn them, and I could not, after the

first reading, quite bear to look at them. I shall best give my feeling

on this point by saying that in it he was Shakespearian, or if his ghost

will not suffer me the word, then he was Baconian.

At the time of our first meeting, which must have been well toward the

winter, Clemens (as I must call him instead of Mark Twain, which seemed

always somehow to mask him from my personal sense) was wearing a sealskin

coat, with the fur out, in the satisfaction of a caprice, or the love of

strong effect which he was apt to indulge through life. I do not know

what droll comment was in Fields’s mind with respect to this garment, but

probably he felt that here was an original who was not to be brought to

any Bostonian book in the judgment of his vivid qualities. With his

crest of dense red hair, and the wide sweep of his flaming mustache,

Clemens was not discordantly clothed in that sealskin coat, which

afterward, in spite of his own warmth in it, sent the cold chills through

me when I once accompanied it down Broadway, and shared the immense

publicity it won him. He had always a relish for personal effect, which

expressed itself in the white suit of complete serge which he wore in his

last years, and in the Oxford gown which he put on for every possible

occasion, and said he would like to wear all the time. That was not

vanity in him, but a keen feeling for costume which the severity of our

modern tailoring forbids men, though it flatters women to every excess in

it; yet he also enjoyed the shock, the offence, the pang which it gave

the sensibilities of others. Then there were times he played these

pranks for pure fun, and for the pleasure of the witness. Once I

remember seeing him come into his drawing-room at Hartford in a pair of

white cowskin slippers, with the hair out, and do a crippled colored

uncle to the joy of all beholders. Or, I must not say all, for I

remember also the dismay of Mrs. Clemens, and her low, despairing cry of,

“Oh, Youth!” That was her name for him among their friends, and it

fitted him as no other would, though I fancied with her it was a

shrinking from his baptismal Samuel, or the vernacular Sam of his earlier

companionships. He was a youth to the end of his days, the heart of a

boy with the head of a sage; the heart of a good boy, or a bad boy, but

always a wilful boy, and wilfulest to show himself out at every time for

just the boy he was.

Literary Friends and Acquaintance; a Personal Retrospect of American Authorship · 第 101 / 126 题