III.

As for Harte’s talk, it was mostly ironical, not to the extreme of

satire, but tempered to an agreeable coolness even for the things he

admired. He did not apparently care to hear himself praised, but he

could very accurately and perfectly mark his discernment of excellence in

others. He was at times a keen observer of nature and again not,

apparently. Something was said before him and Lowell of the beauty of

his description of a rabbit, startled with fear among the ferns, and

lifting its head with the pulsation of its frightened heart visibly

shaking it; then the talk turned on the graphic homeliness of Dante’s

noticing how the dog’s skin moves upon it, and Harte spoke of the

exquisite shudder with which a horse tries to rid itself of a fly.

But once again, when an azalea was shown to him as the sort of bush that

Sandy drunkenly slept under in ‘The Idyl of Iced Gulch’, he asked, “Why,

is that an azalea?” To be sure, this might have been less from his

ignorance or indifference concerning the quality of the bush he had sent

Sandy to sleep under than from his willingness to make a mock of an

azalea in a very small pot, so disproportionate to uses which an azalea

of Californian size could easily lend itself to.

You never could be sure of Harte; he could only by chance be caught in

earnest about anything or anybody. Except for those slight recognitions

of literary, traits in his talk with Lowell, nothing remained from his

conversation but the general criticism he passed upon his brilliant

fellow-Hebrew Heine, as “rather scorbutic.” He preferred to talk about

the little matters of common incident and experience. He amused himself

with such things as the mystification of the postman of whom he asked his

way to Phillips Avenue, where he adventurously supposed his host to be

living. “Why,” the postman said, “there is no Phillips Avenue in

Cambridge. There’s Phillips Place.” “Well,” Harte assented, “Phillips

Place will do; but there is a Phillips Avenue.” He entered eagerly into

the canvass of the distinctions and celebrities asked to meet him at the

reception made for him, but he had even a greater pleasure in

compassionating his host for the vast disparity between the caterer’s

china and plated ware and the simplicities and humilities of the home of

virtuous poverty; and he spluttered with delight at the sight of the

lofty ‘epergnes’ set up and down the supper-table when he was brought in

to note the preparations made in his honor. Those monumental structures

were an inexhaustible joy to him; he walked round and round the room, and

viewed them in different perspectives, so as to get the full effect of

the towering forms that dwarfed it so.

He was a tease, as many a sweet and fine wit is apt to be, but his

teasing was of the quality of a caress, so much kindness went with it. He

lamented as an irreparable loss his having missed seeing that night an

absent-minded brother in literature, who came in rubber shoes, and

forgetfully wore them throughout the evening. That hospitable soul of

Ralph Keeler, who had known him in California, but had trembled for their

acquaintance when he read of all the honors that might well have spoiled

Harte for the friends of his simpler days, rejoiced in the unchanged

cordiality of his nature when they met, and presently gave him one of

those restaurant lunches in Boston, which he was always sumptuously

providing out of his destitution. Harte was the life of a time which was

perhaps less a feast of reason than a flow of soul. The truth is, there

was nothing but careless stories carelessly told, and jokes and laughing,

and a great deal of mere laughing without the jokes, the whole as unlike

the ideal of a literary symposium as well might be; but there was present

one who met with that pleasant Boston company for the first time, and to

whom Harte attributed a superstition of Boston seriousness not realized

then and there. “Look at him,” he said, from time to time. “This is the

dream of his life,” and then shouted and choked with fun at the

difference between the occasion and the expectation he would have

imagined in his commensal’s mind. At a dinner long after in London,

where several of the commensals of that time met again, with other

literary friends of a like age and stature, Harte laid his arms well

along their shoulders as they formed in a half-circle before him, and

screamed out in mocking mirth at the bulbous favor to which the slim

shapes of the earlier date had come. The sight was not less a rapture to

him that he was himself the prey of the same practical joke from the

passing years. The hair which the years had wholly swept from some of

those thoughtful brows, or left spindling autumnal spears, “or few or

none,” to “shake against the cold,” had whitened to a wintry snow on his,

while his mustache had kept its youthful black. “He looks,” one of his

friends said to another as they walked home together, “like a French

marquis of the ancien regime.” “Yes,” the other assented, thoughtfully,

“or like an American actor made up for the part.”

The saying closely fitted the outward fact, but was of a subtle injustice

in its implication of anything histrionic in Harte’s nature. Never was

any man less a ‘poseur’; he made simply and helplessly known what he was

at any and every moment, and he would join the witness very cheerfully in

enjoying whatever was amusing in the disadvantage to himself. In the

course of events, which were in his case so very human, it came about on

a subsequent visit of his to Boston that an impatient creditor decided to

right himself out of the proceeds of the lecture which was to be given,

and had the law corporeally present at the house of the friend where

Harte dined, and in the anteroom at the lecture-hall, and on the

platform, where the lecture was delivered with beautiful aplomb and

untroubled charm. He was indeed the only one privy to the law’s presence

who was not the least affected by it, so that when his host of an earlier

time ventured to suggest, “Well, Harte, this is the old literary

tradition; this is the Fleet business over again,” he joyously smote his

thigh and crowed out, “Yes, the Fleet!” No doubt he tasted all the

delicate humor of the situation, and his pleasure in it was quite

unaffected.

If his temperament was not adapted to the harsh conditions of the elder

American world, it might very well be that his temperament was not

altogether in the wrong. If it disabled him for certain experiences of

life, it was the source of what was most delightful in his personality,

and perhaps most beautiful in his talent. It enabled him to do such

things as he did without being at all anguished for the things he did not

do, and indeed could not. His talent was not a facile gift; he owned

that he often went day after day to his desk, and sat down before that

yellow post-office paper on which he liked to write his literature, in

that exquisitely refined script of his, without being able to inscribe a

line. It may be owned for him that though he came to the East at

thirty-four, which ought to have been the very prime of his powers, he

seemed to have arrived after the age of observation was past for him. He

saw nothing aright, either in Newport, where he went to live, or in New

York, where he sojourned, or on those lecturing tours which took him

about the whole country; or if he saw it aright, he could not report it

aright, or would not. After repeated and almost invariable failures to

deal with the novel characters and circumstances which he encountered he

left off trying, and frankly went back to the semi-mythical California he

had half discovered, half created, and wrote Bret Harte over and over as

long as he lived. This, whether he did it from instinct or from reason,

was the best thing he could do, and it went as nearly as might be to

satisfy the insatiable English fancy for the wild America no longer to be

found on our map.

It is imaginable of Harte that this temperament defended him from any

bitterness in the disappointment he may have shared with that simple

American public which in the early eighteen-seventies expected any and

everything of him in fiction and drama. The long breath was not his; he

could not write a novel, though he produced the like of one or two, and

his plays were too bad for the stage, or else too good for it. At any

rate, they could not keep it, even when they got it, and they denoted the

fatigue or the indifference of their author in being dramatizations of

his longer or shorter fictions, and not originally dramatic efforts. The

direction in which his originality lasted longest, and most strikingly

affirmed his power, was in the direction of his verse.

Whatever minds there may be about Harte’s fiction finally, there can

hardly be more than one mind about his poetry. He was indeed a poet;

whether he wrote what drolly called itself “dialect,” or wrote language,

he was a poet of a fine and fresh touch. It must be allowed him that in

prose as well he had the inventive gift, but he had it in verse far more

importantly. There are lines, phrases, turns in his poems,

characterizations, and pictures which will remain as enduringly as

anything American, if that is not saying altogether too little for them.

In poetry he rose to all the occasions he made for himself, though he

could not rise to the occasions made for him, and so far failed in the

demands he acceded to for a Phi Beta Kappa poem, as to come to that

august Harvard occasion with a jingle so trivial, so out of keeping, so

inadequate that his enemies, if he ever truly had any, must have suffered

from it almost as much as his friends. He himself did not suffer from

his failure, from having read before the most elect assembly of the

country a poem which would hardly have served the careless needs of an

informal dinner after the speaking had begun; he took the whole

disastrous business lightly, gayly, leniently, kindly, as that golden

temperament of his enabled him to take all the good or bad of life.

The first year of his Eastern sojourn was salaried in a sum which took

the souls of all his young contemporaries with wonder, if no baser

passion, in the days when dollars were of so much farther flight than

now, but its net result in a literary return to his publishers was one

story and two or three poems. They had not profited much by his book,

which, it will doubtless amaze a time of fifty thousand editions selling

before their publication, to learn had sold only thirty-five hundred in

the sixth month of its career, as Harte himself,

“With sick and scornful looks averse,”

confided to his Cambridge host after his first interview with the Boston

counting-room. It was the volume which contained “The Luck of Roaring

Camp,” and the other early tales which made him a continental, and then

an all but a world-wide fame. Stories that had been talked over, and

laughed over, and cried over all up and down the land, that had been

received with acclaim by criticism almost as boisterous as their

popularity, and recognized as the promise of greater things than any done

before in their kind, came to no more than this pitiful figure over the

booksellers’ counters. It argued much for the publishers that in spite

of this stupefying result they were willing, they were eager, to pay him

ten thousand dollars for whatever, however much or little, he chose to

write in a year: Their offer was made in Boston, after some offers

mortifyingly mean, and others insultingly vague, had been made in New

York.

It was not his fault that their venture proved of such slight return in

literary material. Harte was in the midst of new and alien

conditions,--[See a corollary in M. Froude who visited the U.S. for a few

months and then published a comprehensive analysis of the nation and its

people. Twain’s rebuttal (Mr. Froude’s Progress) would have been ‘a

propos’ for Harte in Cambridge. D.W.]--and he had always his temperament

against him, as well as the reluctant if not the niggard nature of his

muse. He would no doubt have been only too glad to do more than he did

for the money, but actually if not literally he could not do more. When

it came to literature, all the gay improvidence of life forsook him, and

he became a stern, rigorous, exacting self-master, who spared himself

nothing to achieve the perfection at which he aimed. He was of the order

of literary men like Goldsmith and De Quincey, and Sterne and Steele, in

his relations with the outer world, but in his relations with the inner

world he was one of the most duteous and exemplary citizens. There was

nothing of his easy-going hilarity in that world; there he was of a

Puritanic severity, and of a conscience that forgave him no pang. Other

California writers have testified to the fidelity with which he did his

work as editor. He made himself not merely the arbiter but the

inspiration of his contributors, and in a region where literature had

hardly yet replaced the wild sage-brush of frontier journalism, he made

the sand-lots of San Francisco to blossom as the rose, and created a

literary periodical of the first class on the borders of civilization.

It is useless to wonder now what would have been his future if the

publisher of the Overland Monthly had been of imagination or capital

enough to meet the demand which Harte dimly intimated to his Cambridge

host as the condition of his remaining in California. Publishers, men

with sufficient capital, are of a greatly varying gift in the regions of

prophecy, and he of the Overland Monthly was not to be blamed if he could

not foresee his account in paying Harte ten thousand a year to continue

editing the magazine. He did according to his lights, and Harte came to

the East, and then went to England, where his last twenty-five years were

passed in cultivating the wild plant of his Pacific Slope discovery. It

was always the same plant, leaf and flower and fruit, but it perennially

pleased the constant English world, and thence the European world, though

it presently failed of much delighting these fastidious States. Probably

he would have done something else if he could; he did not keep on doing

the wild mining-camp thing because it was the easiest, but because it was

for him the only possible thing. Very likely he might have preferred not

doing anything.

Literary Friends and Acquaintance; a Personal Retrospect of American Authorship · 第 98 / 126 题