III.

In that elect company I was silent, partly because I was conscious of my

youthful inadequacy, and partly because I preferred to listen. But

Longfellow always behaved as if I were saying a succession of edifying

and delightful things, and from time to time he addressed himself to me,

so that I should not feel left out. He did not talk much himself, and I

recall nothing that he said. But he always spoke both wisely and simply,

without the least touch of pose, and with no intention of effect, but

with something that I must call quality for want of a better word; so

that at a table where Holmes sparkled, and Lowell glowed, and Agassiz

beamed, he cast the light of a gentle gaiety, which seemed to dim all

these vivider luminaries. While he spoke you did not miss Fields’s story

or Tom Appleton’s wit, or even the gracious amity of Mr. Norton, with his

unequalled intuitions.

The supper was very plain: a cold turkey, which the host carved, or a

haunch of venison, or some braces of grouse, or a platter of quails, with

a deep bowl of salad, and the sympathetic companionship of those elect

vintages which Longfellow loved, and which he chose with the inspiration

of affection. We usually began with oysters, and when some one who was

expected did not come promptly, Longfellow invited us to raid his plate,

as a just punishment of his delay. One evening Lowell remarked, with the

cayenne poised above his bluepoints, “It’s astonishing how fond these

fellows are of pepper.”

The old friend of the cavernous arm-chair was perhaps not wide enough

awake to repress an “Ah?” of deep interest in this fact of natural

history, and Lowell was provoked to go on. “Yes, I’ve dropped a red

pepper pod into a barrel of them, before now, and then taken them out in

a solid mass, clinging to it like a swarm of bees to their queen.”

“Is it possible?” cried the old friend; and then Longfellow intervened to

save him from worse, and turned the talk.

I reproach myself that I made no record of the talk, for I find that only

a few fragments of it have caught in my memory, and that the sieve which

should have kept the gold has let it wash away with the gravel. I

remember once Doctor Holmes’s talking of the physician as the true seer,

whose awful gift it was to behold with the fatal second sight of science

the shroud gathering to the throat of many a doomed man apparently in

perfect health, and happy in the promise of unnumbered days. The thought

may have been suggested by some of the toys of superstition which

intellectual people like to play with.

I never could be quite sure at first that Longfellow’s brother-in-law,

Appleton, was seriously a spiritualist, even when he disputed the most

strenuously with the unbelieving Autocrat. But he really was in earnest

about it, though he relished a joke at the expense of his doctrine, like

some clerics when they are in the safe company of other clerics. He told

me once of having recounted to Agassiz the facts of a very remarkable

seance, where the souls of the departed outdid themselves in the

athletics and acrobatics they seem so fond of over there, throwing large

stones across the room, moving pianos, and lifting dinner-tables and

setting them a-twirl under the chandelier. “And now,” he demanded, “what

do you say to that?” “Well, Mr. Appleton,” Agassiz answered, to

Appleton’s infinite delight, “I say that it did not happen.”

One night they began to speak at the Dante supper of the unhappy man

whose crime is a red stain in the Cambridge annals, and one and another

recalled their impressions of Professor Webster. It was possibly with a

retroactive sense that they had all felt something uncanny in him, but,

apropos of the deep salad-bowl in the centre of the table, Longfellow

remembered a supper Webster was at, where he lighted some chemical in

such a dish and held his head over it, with a handkerchief noosed about

his throat and lifted above it with one hand, while his face, in the pale

light, took on the livid ghastliness of that of a man hanged by the neck.

Another night the talk wandered to the visit which an English author (now

with God) paid America at the height of a popularity long since toppled

to the ground, with many another. He was in very good humor with our

whole continent, and at Longfellow’s table he found the champagne even

surprisingly fine. “But,” he said to his host, who now told the story,

“it cawn’t be genuine, you know!”

Many years afterwards this author revisited our shores, and I dined with

him at Longfellow’s, where he was anxious to constitute himself a guest

during his sojourn in our neighborhood. Longfellow was equally anxious

that he should not do so, and he took a harmless pleasure in

out-manoeuvring him. He seized a chance to speak with me alone, and

plotted to deliver him over to me without apparent unkindness, when the

latest horse-car should be going in to Boston, and begged me to walk him

to Harvard Square and put him aboard. “Put him aboard, and don’t leave

him till the car starts, and then watch that he doesn’t get off.”

These instructions he accompanied with a lifting of the eyebrows, and a

pursing of the mouth, in an anxiety not altogether burlesque. He knew

himself the prey of any one who chose to batten on him, and his

hospitality was subject to frightful abuse. Perhaps Mr. Norton has

somewhere told how, when he asked if a certain person who had been

outstaying his time was not a dreadful bore, Longfellow answered, with

angelic patience, “Yes; but then you know I have been bored so often!”

There was one fatal Englishman whom I shared with him during the great

part of a season: a poor soul, not without gifts, but always ready for

more, especially if they took the form of meat and drink. He had brought

letters from one of the best English men alive, who withdrew them too

late to save his American friends from the sad consequences of welcoming

him. So he established himself impregnably in a Boston club, and came

out every day to dine with Longfellow in Cambridge, beginning with his

return from Nahant in October and continuing far into December. That was

the year of the great horse-distemper, when the plague disabled the

transportation in Boston, and cut off all intercourse between the suburb

and the city on the street railways. “I did think,” Longfellow

pathetically lamented, “that when the horse-cars stopped running, I

should have a little respite from L., but he walks out.”

In the midst of his own suffering he was willing to advise with me

concerning some poems L. had offered to the Atlantic Monthly, and after

we had desperately read them together he said, with inspiration, “I think

these things are more adapted to music than the magazine,” and this

seemed so good a notion that when L. came to know their fate from me, I

answered, confidently, “I think they are rather more adapted to music.”

He calmly asked, “Why?” and as this was an exigency which Longfellow had

not forecast for me, I was caught in it without hope of escape. I really

do not know what I said, but I know that I did not take the poems, such

was my literary conscience in those days; I am afraid I should be weaker

now.

Literary Friends and Acquaintance; a Personal Retrospect of American Authorship · 第 63 / 126 题