VIII.

We walked across what must have been Jarvis Field to what must have been

North Avenue, and there he left me. But before he let me go he held my

hand while he could say that he wished me to dine with him; only, he was

not in his own house, and he would ask me to dine with him at the Parker

House in Boston, and would send me word of the time later.

I suppose I may have spent part of the intervening time in viewing the

wonders of Boston, and visiting the historic scenes and places in it and

about it. I certainly went over to Charleston, and ascended Bunker Hill

monument, and explored the navy-yard, where the immemorial man-of-war

begun in Jackson’s time was then silently stretching itself under its

long shed in a poetic arrest, as if the failure of the appropriation for

its completion had been some kind of enchantment. In Boston, I early

presented my letter of credit to the publisher it was drawn upon, not

that I needed money at the moment, but from a young eagerness to see if

it would be honored; and a literary attache of the house kindly went

about with me, and showed me the life of the city. A great city it

seemed to me then, and a seething vortex of business as well as a whirl

of gaiety, as I saw it in Washington Street, and in a promenade concert

at Copeland’s restaurant in Tremont Row. Probably I brought some

idealizing force to bear upon it, for I was not all so strange to the

world as I must seem; perhaps I accounted for quality as well as quantity

in my impressions of the New England metropolis, and aggrandized it in

the ratio of its literary importance. It seemed to me old, even after

Quebec, and very likely I credited the actual town with all the dead and

gone Bostonians in my sentimental census. If I did not, it was no fault

of my cicerone, who thought even more of the city he showed me than I

did. I do not know now who he was, and I never saw him after I came to

live there, with any certainty that it was he, though I was often

tormented with the vision of a spectacled face like his, but not like

enough to warrant me in addressing him.

He became part of that ghostly Boston of my first visit, which would

sometimes return and possess again the city I came to know so familiarly

in later years, and to be so passionately interested in. Some color of

my prime impressions has tinged the fictitious experiences of people in

my books, but I find very little of it in my memory. This is like a web

of frayed old lace, which I have to take carefully into my hold for fear

of its fragility, and make out as best I can the figure once so distinct

in it. There are the narrow streets, stretching saltworks to the docks,

which I haunted for their quaintness, and there is Faunal Hall, which I

cared to see so much more because Wendell Phillips had spoken in it than

because Otis and Adams had. There is the old Colonial House, and there

is the State House, which I dare say I explored, with the Common sloping

before it. There is Beacon Street, with the Hancock House where it is

incredibly no more, and there are the beginnings of Commonwealth Avenue,

and the other streets of the Back Bay, laid out with their basements left

hollowed in the made land, which the gravel trains were yet making out of

the westward hills. There is the Public Garden, newly planned and

planted, but without the massive bridge destined to make so ungratefully

little of the lake that occasioned it. But it is all very vague, and I

could easily believe now that it was some one else who saw it then in my

place.

I think that I did not try to see Cambridge the same day that I saw

Lowell, but wisely came back to my hotel in Boston, and tried to realize

the fact. I went out another day, with an acquaintance from Ohio; whom I

ran upon in the street. We went to Mount Auburn together, and I viewed

its monuments with a reverence which I dare say their artistic quality

did not merit. But I am, not sorry for this, for perhaps they are not

quite so bad as some people pretend. The Gothic chapel of the cemetery,

unsorted as it was, gave me, with its half-dozen statues standing or

sitting about, an emotion such as I am afraid I could not receive now

from the Acropolis, Westminster Abbey, and Santa Crocea in one. I tried

hard for some aesthetic sense of it, and I made believe that I thought

this thing and that thing in the place moved me with its fitness or

beauty; but the truth is that I had no taste in anything but literature,

and did not feel the effect I would so willingly have experienced.

I did genuinely love the elmy quiet of the dear old Cambridge streets,

though, and I had a real and instant pleasure in the yellow colonial

houses, with their white corners and casements and their green blinds,

that lurked behind the shrubbery of the avenue I passed through to Mount

Auburn. The most beautiful among them was the most interesting for me,

for it was the house of Longfellow; my companion, who had seen it before,

pointed it out to me with an air of custom, and I would not let him see

that I valued the first sight of it as I did. I had hoped that somehow I

might be so favored as to see Longfellow himself, but when I asked about

him of those who knew, they said, “Oh, he is at Nahant,” and I thought

that Nahant must be a great way off, and at any rate I did not feel

authorized to go to him there. Neither did I go to see the author of

‘The Amber Gods’ who lived at Newburyport, I was told, as if I should

know where Newburyport was; I did not know, and I hated to ask. Besides,

it did not seem so simple as it had seemed in Ohio, to go and see a young

lady simply because I was infatuated with her literature; even as the

envoy of all the infatuated young people of Columbus, I could not quite

do this; and when I got home, I had to account for my failure as best I

could. Another failure of mine was the sight of Whittier, which I then

very much longed to have. They said, “Oh, Whittier lives at Amesbury,”

but that put him at an indefinite distance, and without the introduction

I never would ask for, I found it impossible to set out in quest of him.

In the end, I saw no one in New England whom I was not presented to in

the regular way, except Lowell, whom I thought I had a right to call upon

in my quality of contributor, and from the acquaintance I had with him by

letter. I neither praise nor blame myself for this; it was my shyness

that with held me rather than my merit. There is really no harm in

seeking the presence of a famous man, and I doubt if the famous man

resents the wish of people to look upon him without some measure, great

or little, of affectation. There are bores everywhere, but he is

likelier to find them in the wonted figures of society than in those

young people, or old people, who come to him in the love of what he has

done. I am well aware how furiously Tennyson sometimes met his

worshippers, and how insolently Carlyle, but I think these facts are

little specks in their sincerity. Our own gentler and honester

celebrities did not forbid approach, and I have known some of them caress

adorers who seemed hardly worthy of their kindness; but that was better

than to have hurt any sensitive spirit who had ventured too far, by the

rules that govern us with common men.

Literary Friends and Acquaintance; a Personal Retrospect of American Authorship · 第 15 / 126 题