I.

If there was any one in the world who had his being more wholly in

literature than I had in 1860, I am sure I should not have known where to

find him, and I doubt if he could have been found nearer the centres of

literary activity than I then was, or among those more purely devoted to

literature than myself. I had been for three years a writer of news

paragraphs, book notices, and political leaders on a daily paper in an

inland city, and I do not know that my life differed outwardly from that

of any other young journalist, who had begun as I had in a country

printing-office, and might be supposed to be looking forward to

advancement in his profession or in public affairs. But inwardly it was

altogether different with me. Inwardly I was a poet, with no wish to be

anything else, unless in a moment of careless affluence I might so far

forget myself as to be a novelist. I was, with my friend J. J. Piatt,

the half-author of a little volume of very unknown verse, and Mr. Lowell

had lately accepted and had begun to print in the Atlantic Monthly five

or six poems of mine. Besides this I had written poems, and sketches,

and criticisms for the Saturday Press of New York, a long-forgotten but

once very lively expression of literary intention in an extinct bohemia

of that city; and I was always writing poems, and sketches, and

criticisms in our own paper. These, as well as my feats in the renowned

periodicals of the East, met with kindness, if not honor, in my own city

which ought to have given me grave doubts whether I was any real prophet.

But it only intensified my literary ambition, already so strong that my

veins might well have run ink rather than blood, and gave me a higher

opinion of my fellow-citizens, if such a thing could be. They were

indeed very charming people, and such of them as I mostly saw were

readers and lovers of books. Society in Columbus at that day had a

pleasant refinement which I think I do not exaggerate in the fond

retrospect. It had the finality which it seems to have had nowhere since

the war; it had certain fixed ideals, which were none the less graceful

and becoming because they were the simple old American ideals, now

vanished, or fast vanishing, before the knowledge of good and evil as

they have it in Europe, and as it has imparted itself to American travel

and sojourn. There was a mixture of many strains in the capital of Ohio,

as there was throughout the State. Virginia, Kentucky, Pennsylvania, New

York, and New England all joined to characterize the manners and customs.

I suppose it was the South which gave the social tone; the intellectual

taste among the elders was the Southern taste for the classic and the

standard in literature; but we who were younger preferred the modern

authors: we read Thackeray, and George Eliot, and Hawthorne, and Charles

Reade, and De Quincey, and Tennyson, and Browning, and Emerson, and

Longfellow, and I--I read Heine, and evermore Heine, when there was not

some new thing from the others. Now and then an immediate French book

penetrated to us: we read Michelet and About, I remember. We looked to

England and the East largely for our literary opinions; we accepted the

Saturday Review as law if we could not quite receive it as gospel. One

of us took the Cornhill Magazine, because Thackeray was the editor; the

Atlantic Monthly counted many readers among us; and a visiting young lady

from New England, who screamed at sight of the periodical in one of our

houses, “Why, have you got the Atlantic Monthly out here?” could be

answered, with cold superiority, “There are several contributors to the

Atlantic in Columbus.” There were in fact two: my room-mate, who wrote

Browning for it, while I wrote Heine and Longfellow. But I suppose two

are as rightfully several as twenty are.

Literary Friends and Acquaintance; a Personal Retrospect of American Authorship · 第 8 / 126 题