CHAPTER XX.

[Illustration: 1_265_henry6.jpg HENRY VI.]

HENRY VI.

CONTEMPORARY MONARCHS.

{1422.} During the reigns of the Lancastrian princes, the authority of

parliament seems to have been more confirmed, and the privileges of

the people more regarded, than during any former period; and the two

preceding kings, though men of great spirit and abilities, abstained

from such exertions of prerogative, as even weak princes, whose title

was undisputed, were tempted to think they might venture upon with

impunity. The long minority, of which there was now the prospect,

encouraged still further the lords and commons to extend their

influence; and without paying much regard to the verbal destination

of Henry V., they assumed the power of giving a new arrangement to the

whole administration. They declined altogether the name of “Regent” with

regard to England: they appointed the duke of Bedford “protector” or

“guardian” of that kingdom, a title which they supposed to imply less

authority: they invested the duke of Glocester with the same dignity

during the absence of his elder brother;[*] and in order to limit the

power of both these princes, they appointed a council, without whose

advice and approbation no measure of importance could be determined.[**]

The person and education of the infant prince were committed to Henry

Beaufort, bishop of Winchester, his great uncle, and the legitimated son

of John of Gaunt, duke of Lancaster; a prelate who, as his family could

never have any pretensions to the crown, might safely, they thought, be

intrusted with that important charge.[***]

* Rymer, vol. x. p. 261. Cotton, p. 564.

** Cotton, p. 564.

*** Hall, fol. 83. Monstrelet, vol. ii. p. 27.

The two princes, the dukes of Bedford and Glocester, who seemed injured

by this plan of government, yet, being persons of great integrity and

honor, acquiesced in any appointment which tended to give security

to the public; and as the wars in France appeared to be the object

of greatest moment, they avoided every dispute which might throw an

obstacle in the way of foreign conquests.

When the state of affairs between the English and French kings was

considered with a superficial eye, every advantage seemed to be on the

side of the former; and the total expulsion of Charles appeared to be an

event which might naturally be expected from the superior power of his

competitor. Though Henry was yet in his infancy, the administration was

devolved on the duke of Bedford, the most accomplished prince of his

age; whose experience, prudence, valor, and generosity qualified him

for his high office, and enabled him both to maintain union among his

friends, and to gain the confidence of his enemies. The whole power

of England was at his command; he was at the head of armies inured to

victory; he was seconded by the most renowned generals of the age, the

earls of Somerset, Warwick, Salisbury, Suffolk, and Arundel, Sir

John Talbot, and Sir John Fastolffe: and besides Guienne, the ancient

inheritance of England, he was master of the capital, and of almost

all the northern provinces, which were well enabled to furnish him with

supplies both of men and money, and to assist and support his English

forces.

But Charles, notwithstanding the present inferiority of his power,

possessed some advantages, derived partly from his situation, partly

from his personal character, which promised him success, and served,

first to control, then to overbalance, the superior force and opulence

of his enemies. He was the true and undoubted heir of the monarchy: all

Frenchmen, who knew the interests, or desired the independence, of

their country, turned their eyes towards him as its sole resource; the

exclusion given him by the imbecility of his father, and the forced or

precipitate consent of the states, had plainly no validity: that spirit

of faction which had blinded the people, could not long hold them in

so gross a delusion: their national and inveterate hatred against the

English, the authors of all their calamities, must soon revive, and

inspire them with indignation at bending their necks under the yoke of

that hostile people: great nobles and princes, accustomed to maintain

an independence against their native sovereigns, would never endure a

subjection to strangers; and though most of the princes of the blood

were, since the fatal battle of Azincour detained prisoners in England,

the inhabitants of their de mesnes, their friends their vassals, all

declared a zealous attachment to the king and exerted themselves in

resisting the violence of foreign invaders.

Charles himself, though only in his twentieth year, was of a character

well calculated to become the object of these benevolent sentiments;

and perhaps from the favor which naturally attends youth, was the more

likely, on account of his tender age, to acquire the good-will of

his native subjects. He was a prince of the most friendly and benign

disposition, of easy and familiar manners, and of a just and sound,

though not a very vigorous understanding. Sincere, generous, affable, he

engaged from affection the services of his followers, even while his low

fortunes might make it their interest to desert him; and the lenity of

his temper could pardon in them those sallies of discontent, to which

princes in his situation are so frequently exposed. The love of pleasure

often seduced him into indolence; but amidst all his irregularities, the

goodness of his heart still shone forth; and by exerting at intervals

his courage and activity, he proved that his general remissness

proceeded not from the want either of a just spirit of ambition, or of

personal valor.

Though the virtues of this amiable prince lay some time in obscurity,

the duke of Bedford knew that his title alone made him formidable, and

that every foreign assistance would be requisite, ere an English regent

could hope to complete the conquest of France; an enterprise which,

however it might seem to be much advanced, was still exposed to many

and great difficulties. The chief circumstance which had procured to the

English all their present advantages, was the resentment of the duke

of Burgundy against Charles; and as that prince seemed intent rather on

gratifying his passion than consulting his interests, it was the more

easy for the regent, by demonstrations of respect and confidence, to

retain him in the alliance of England. He bent, therefore, all his

endeavors to that purpose: he gave the duke every proof of friendship

and regard: he even offered him the regency of France, which Philip

declined: and that he might corroborate national connections by private

ties, he concluded his own marriage with the princess of Burgundy, which

had been stipulated by the treaty of Arras.

{1423.} Being sensible that, next to the alliance of Burgundy, the

friendship of the duke of Brittany was of the greatest importance

towards forwarding the English conquests; and that, as the provinces of

France, already subdued, lay between the dominions of these two princes,

he could never hope for any security without preserving his connections

with them; he was very intent on strengthening himself also from that

quarter. The duke of Brittany, having received many just reasons of

displeasure from the ministers of Charles, had already acceded to the

treaty of Troye, and had, with other vassals of the crown, done homage

to Henry V. in quality of heir to the kingdom: but as the regent knew

that the duke was much governed by his brother, the count of Richemont,

he endeavored to fix his friendship, by paying court and doing services

to this haughty and ambitious prince.

Arthur, count of Richemont, had been taken prisoner at the battle of

Azincour, had been treated with great indulgence by the late king, and

had even been permitted on his parole to take a journey into Brittany,

where the state of affairs required his presence. The death of that

victorious monarch happened before Richemont’s return; and this prince

pretended that, as his word was given personally to Henry V., he was not

bound to fulfil it towards his son and successor; a chicane which the

regent, as he could not force him to compliance, deemed it prudent

to overlook. An interview was settled at Amiens between the dukes of

Bedford, Burgundy, and Brittany, at which the count of Richemont was

also present:[*] the alliance was renewed between these princes: and

the regent persuaded Philip to give in marriage to Richemont his eldest

sister, widow of the deceased dauphin, Lewis, the elder brother of

Charles. Thus Arthur was connected both with the regent and the duke of

Burgundy, and seemed engaged by interest to prosecute the same object,

in forwarding the success of the English arms.

* Hall. fol. 84. Monstrelet, vol. i. p 4. Stowe, p. 364.

While the vigilance of the duke of Bedford was employed in gaining or

confirming these allies, whose vicinity rendered them so important, he

did not overlook the state of more remote countries. The duke of Albany,

regent of Scotland, had died: and his power had devolved on Murdac, his

son, a prince of a weak understanding and indolent disposition; who, far

from possessing the talents requisite for the government of that

fierce people, was not even able to maintain authority in his own

family, or restrain the petulance and insolence of his sons. The ardor

of the Scots to serve in France, where Charles treated them with great

honor and distinction, and where the regent’s brother enjoyed the

dignity of constable, broke out afresh under this feeble administration:

new succors daily came over, and filled the armies of the French king:

the earl of Douglas conducted a reënforcement of five thousand men

to his assistance: and it was justly to be dreaded that the Scots, by

commencing open hostilities in the north, would occasion a diversion

still more considerable of the English power, and would ease Charles, in

part, of that load by which he was at present so grievously oppressed.

The duke of Bedford, therefore, persuaded the English council to form an

alliance with James, their prisoner; to free that prince from his long

captivity; and to connect him with England by marrying him to a daughter

of the earl of Somerset, and cousin of the young king.[*] As the

Scottish regent, tired of his present dignity, which he was not able to

support, was now become entirely sincere in his applications for James’s

liberty, the treaty was soon concluded; a ransom of forty thousand

pounds was stipulated;[**] and the king of Scots was restored to the

throne of his ancestors, and proved, in his short reign, one of the

most illustrious princes that had ever governed that kingdom. He was

murdered, in 1437, by his traitorous kinsman the earl of Athole. His

affections inclined to the side of France; but the English had never

reason during his lifetime to complain of any breach of the neutrality

by Scotland.

* Hall, fol. 86. Stowe, p. 364. Grafton, p. 501.

* Rymer, vol. x. p. 299, 300, 326.

But the regent was not so much employed in these political negotiations

as to neglect the operations of war, from which alone he could hope

to succeed in expelling the French monarch. Though the chief seat of

Charles’s power lay in the southern provinces beyond the Loire, his

partisans were possessed of some fortresses in the northern, and even in

the neighborhood of Paris; and it behoved the duke of Bedford first

to clear these countries from the enemy, before he could think of

attempting more distant conquests. The Castle of Dorsoy was taken after

a siege of six weeks: that of Noyelle and the town of Rue, in Picardy,

underwent the same fate: Pont sur Seine, Vertus, Montaigu, were

subjected by the English arms: and a more considerable advantage was

soon after gained by the united forces of England and Burgundy. John

Stuart, constable of Scotland, and the lord of Estissac had formed the

siege of Crevant, in Burgundy: the earls of Salisbury and Suffolk,

with the count of Toulongeon, were sent to its relief: a fierce and

well-disputed action ensued; the Scots and French were defeated: the

constable of Scotland and the count of Ventadour were taken prisoners;

and above a thousand men, among whom was Sir William Hamilton, were left

on the field of battle.[*] The taking of Gaillon upon the Seine, and of

La Charité upon the Loire, was the fruit of this victory: and as

this latter place opened an entrance into the southern provinces, the

acquisition of it appeared on that account of the greater importance

to the duke of Bedford, and seemed to promise a successful issue to the

war.

* Hall, fol. 86. Monstrelet, vol. ii. p. 8. Holingshed, p.

586., Grafton, p. 500.

{1424.} The more Charles was threatened with an invasion in those

provinces which adhered to him, the more necessary it became that he

should retain possession of every fortress which he still held within

the quarters of the enemy. The duke of Bedford had besieged in person,

during the space of three months, the town of Yvri, in Normandy: and

the brave governor, unable to make any longer defence, was obliged to

capitulate; and he agreed to surrender the town, if, before a certain

term, no relief arrived. Charles, informed of these conditions,

determined to make an attempt for saving the place. He collected, with

some difficulty, an army of fourteen thousand men, of whom one half were

Scots; and he sent them thither under the command of the earl of Buchan,

constable of France; who was attended by the earl of Douglas, his

countryman, the duke of Alençon, the mareschal de la Fayette, the count

of Aumale, and the viscount of Narbonne. When the constable arrived

within a few leagues of Yvri, he found that he was come too late, and

that the place was already surrendered. He immediately turned to the

left, and sat down before Verneuil, which the inhabitants, in spite of

the garrison, delivered up to him.[*] Buchan might now have returned in

safety, and with the glory of making an acquisition no less important

than the place which he was sent to relieve: but hearing of Bedford’s

approach, he called a council of war, in order to deliberate concerning

the conduct which he should hold in this emergence.

* Monstrelet, vol. ii. p. 14. Grafton, p. 504.

The wiser part of the council declared for a retreat; and represented,

that all the past misfortunes of the French had proceeded from their

rashness in giving battle when no necessity obliged them; that this

army was the last resource of the king, and the only defence of the few

provinces which remained to him; and that every reason invited him to

embrace cautious measures, which might leave time for his subjects to

return to a sense of their duty, and give leisure for discord to arise

among his enemies, who, being united by no common bond of interest or

motive of alliance, could not long persevere in their animosity against

him. All these prudential considerations were overborne by a vain point

of honor, not to turn their backs to the enemy; and they resolved to

await the arrival of the duke of Bedford.

The numbers were nearly equal in this action; and as the long

continuance of war had introduced discipline, which, however imperfect,

sufficed to maintain some appearance of order in such small armies, the

battle was fierce, and well disputed, and attended with bloodshed

on both sides. The constable drew up his forces under the walls of

Verneuil, and resolved to abide the attack of the enemy: but the

impatience of the viscount of Narbonne, who advanced precipitately, and

obliged the whole line to follow him in some hurry and confusion, was

the cause of the misfortune which ensued. The English archers, fixing

their palisadoes before them, according to their usual custom, sent

a volley of arrows amidst the thickest of the French army; and though

beaten from their ground, and obliged to take shelter among the baggage,

they soon rallied, and continued to do great execution upon the enemy.

The duke of Bedford, meanwhile, at the head of the men at arms, made

impression on the French, broke their ranks, chased them off the field,

and rendered the victory entirely complete and decisive.[*]

* Hall, fol. 83, 89, 90. Monstrelet, vol. ii. p. 15. Stowe,

p 365., Holingshed, p. 588.

The constable himself perished in battle as well as the earl of Douglas

and his son, the counts of Aumale, Tonnerre, and Ventadour, with many

other considerable nobility. The duke of Alençon, the mareschal de la

Fayette, the lords of Gaucour and Mortemar, were taken prisoners. There

fell about four thousand of the French, and sixteen hundred of the

English; a loss esteemed, at that time, so unusual on the side of

the victors, that the duke of Bedford forbade all rejoicings for his

success, Verneuil was surrendered next day by capitulation.[*]

* Monstrelet. vol. ii. p. 15.

The condition of the king of France now appeared very terrible, and

almost desperate. He had lost the flower of his army and the bravest

of his nobles in this fatal action: he had no resource either for

recruiting or subsisting his troops; he wanted money even for his

personal subsistence; and though all parade of a court was banished, it

was with difficulty he could keep a table, supplied with the plainest

necessaries, for himself and his few followers: every day brought

him intelligence of some loss or misfortune: towns which were bravely

defended, were obliged at last to surrender for want of relief or

supply: he saw his partisans entirely chased from all the provinces

which lay north of the Loire: and he expected soon to lose, by the

united efforts of his enemies, all the territories of which he had

hitherto continued master; when an incident happened which saved him

on the brink of ruin, and lost the English such an opportunity for

completing their conquests, as they never afterwards were able to

recall.

Jacqueline, countess of Hainault and Holland, and heir of these

provinces, had espoused John, duke of Brabant cousin-german to the

duke of Burgundy; but having made this choice from the usual motives of

princes, she soon found reason to repent of the unequal alliance. She

was a princess of a masculine spirit and uncommon understanding: the

duke of Brabant was of a sickly complexion and weak mind: she was in the

vigor of her age; he had only reached his fifteenth year: these

causes had inspired her with such contempt for her husband, which soon

proceeded to antipathy that she determined to dissolve a marriage,

where, it is probable, nothing but the ceremony had as yet intervened.

The court of Rome was commonly very open to applications of this nature,

when seconded by power and money; but as the princess foresaw great

opposition from her husband’s relations, and was impatient to effect her

purpose, she made her escape into England, and threw herself under

the protection of the duke of Glocester. That prince, with many noble

qualities had the defect of being governed by an impetuous temper and

vehement passions; and he was rashly induced, as well by the charms

of the countess herself, as by the prospect of possessing her rich

inheritance, to offer himself to her as a husband. Without waiting for

a papal dispensation; without endeavoring to reconcile the duke of

Burgundy to the measure; he entered into a contract of marriage with

Jaqueline, and immediately attempted to put himself in possession of

her dominions. Philip was disgusted with so precipitate a conduct: he

resented the injury done to the duke of Brabant, his near relation:

he dreaded to have the English established on all sides of him: and

he foresaw the consequences which must attend the extensive and

uncontrolled dominion of that nation, if, before the full settlement of

their power, they insulted and injured an ally to whom they had already

been so much indebted, and who was still so necessary for supporting

them in their further progress. He encouraged, therefore, the duke of

Brabant to make resistance: he engaged many of Jaqueline’s subjects to

adhere to that prince: he himself marched troops to his support: and as

the duke of Glocester still persevered in his purpose, a sharp war was

suddenly kindled in the Low Countries. The quarrel soon became personal

as well as political. The English prince wrote to the duke of Burgundy,

complaining of the opposition made to his pretensions; and though, in

the main, he employed amicable terms in his letter, he took notice of

some falsehoods into which, he said, Philip had been betrayed during

the course of these transactions. This unguarded expression was highly

resented: the duke of Burgundy insisted that he should retract it; and

mutual challenges and defiances passed between them on this occasion.[*]

* Monstrelet, vol. ii. p. 19, 20, 21.

The duke of Bedford could easily foresee the bad effects of so ill-timed

and imprudent a quarrel. All the succors which he expected from England,

and which were so necessary in this critical emergence, were intercepted

by his brother, and employed in Holland and Hainault: the forces of the

duke of Burgundy, which he also depended on, were diverted by the

same wars: and besides this double loss, he was in imminent danger of

alienating forever that confederate whose friendship was of the utmost

importance, and whom the late king had enjoined him, with his

dying breath, to gratify by every mark of regard and attachment. He

represented all these topics to the duke of Glocester: he endeavored to

mitigate the resentment of the duke of Burgundy: he interposed with his

good offices between these princes, but was not successful in any of his

endeavors; and he found that the impetuosity of his brother’s temper

was still the chief obstacle to all accommodation.[*] For this reason,

instead of pushing the victory gained at Verneuil, he found himself

obliged to take a journey into England, and to try, by his counsels and

authority, to moderate the measures of the duke of Glocester.

There had likewise broken out some differences among the English

ministry, which had proceeded to great extremities, and which required

the regent’s presence to compose them.[**] The bishop of Winchester, to

whom the care of the king’s person and education had been intrusted,

was a prelate of great capacity and experience, but of an intriguing and

dangerous character; and as he aspired to the government of affairs,

he had continual disputes with his nephew the protector; and he gained

frequent advantages over the vehement and impolitic temper of that

prince.

{1425.} The duke of Bedford employed the authority of parliament to

reconcile them; and these rivals were obliged to promise, before that

assembly, that they would bury all quarrels in oblivion.[***] Time also

seemed to open expedients for composing the difference with the duke of

Burgundy. The credit of that prince had procured a bull from the pope;

by which not only Jaqueline’s contract with the duke of Glocester was

annulled, but it was also declared that, even in case of the duke

of Brabant’s death, it should never be lawful for her to espouse the

English prince. Humphrey, despairing of success, married another lady of

inferior rank, who had lived some time with him as his mistress.[****]

* Monstrelet, vol. ii. p. 18.

** Stowe, p. 368. Holingshed, p. 530.

*** Hall, fol. 98, 99. Hollingshed, p. 593, 594. Polydore

Virgil, p. 466. Grafton, p. 512, 519.

**** Stowe, p 367.

The duke of Brabant died; and his widow, before she could recover

possession of her dominions, was obliged to declare the duke of Burgundy

her heir, in case she should die without issue, and to promise never to

marry without his consent. But though the affair was thus terminated

to the satisfaction of Philip, it left a disagreeable impression on his

mind: it excited an extreme jealousy of the English, and opened his eyes

to his true interests: and as nothing but his animosity against Charles

had engaged him in alliance with them, it counterbalanced that passion

by another of the same kind, which in the end became prevalent, and

brought him back, by degrees, to his natural connections with his family

and his native country.

About the same time, the duke of Brittany began to withdraw himself

from the English alliance. His brother, the count of Richemont, though

connected by marriage with the dukes of Burgundy and Bedford, was

extremely attached by inclination to the French interest; and he

willingly hearkened to all the advances which Charles made him for

obtaining his friendship. The staff of constable, vacant by the earl of

Buchan’s death, was offered him; and as his martial and ambitious temper

aspired to the command of armies, which he had in vain attempted to

obtain from the duke of Bedford, he not only accepted that office, but

brought over his brother to an alliance with the French monarch. The new

constable, having made this one change in his measures, firmly adhered

ever after to his engagements with France. Though his pride and

violence, which would admit of no rival in his master’s confidence,

and even prompted him to assassinate the other favorites, had so much

disgusted Charles, that he once banished him the court, and refused to

admit him to his presence, he still acted with vigor for the service of

that monarch, and obtained at last, by his perseverance, the pardon of

all past offences.

{1426.} In this situation, the duke of Bedford, on his return, found the

affairs of France, after passing eight months in England. The duke

of Burgundy was much disgusted. The duke of Brittany had entered into

engagements with Charles, and had done homage to that prince for his

duchy. The French had been allowed to recover from the astonishment

into which their frequent disasters had thrown them. An incident too

had happened, which served extremely to raise their courage. The earl of

Warwick had besieged Montargis with a small army of three thousand men,

and the place was reduced to extremity, when the bastard of Orleans

undertook to throw relief into it. This general, who was natural son to

the prince assassinated by the duke of Burgundy, and who was afterwards

created count of Dunois, conducted a body of one thousand six hundred

men to Montargis, and made an attack on the enemy’s trenches with so

much valor, prudence, and good fortune, that he not only penetrated into

the place, but gave a severe blow to the English, and obliged Warwick

to raise the siege.[*] This was the first signal action that raised the

fame of Dunois, and opened him the road to those great honors which he

afterwards attained.

But the regent, soon after his arrival, revived the reputation of the

English arms by an important enterprise which he happily achieved. He

secretly brought together, in separate detachments, a considerable

army to the frontiers of Brittany; and fell so unexpectedly upon that

province, that the duke, unable to make resistance, yielded to all the

terms required of him. he renounced the French alliance; he engaged to

maintain the treaty of Troye; he acknowledged the duke of Bedford

for regent of France; and promised to do homage for his duchy to King

Henry.[**] And the English prince, having thus freed himself from a

dangerous enemy who lay behind him, resolved on an undertaking, which,

if successful, would, he hoped, cast the balance between the two

nations, and prepare the way for the final conquest of France.

{1428.} The city of Orleans was so situated between the provinces

commanded by Henry, and those possessed by Charles, that it opened an

easy entrance to either; and as the duke of Bedford intended to make a

great effort for penetrating into the south of France, it behoved him to

begin with this place, which, in the present circumstances, was become

the most important in the kingdom. He committed the conduct of the

enterprise to the earl of Salisbury, who had newly brought him a

reënforcement of six thousand men from England, and who had much

distinguished himself by his abilities during the course of the present

war. Salisbury, passing the Loire, made himself master of several

small places, which surrounded Orleans on that side;[***] and as his

intentions were thereby known, the French king used every expedient

to supply the city with a garrison and provisions, and enable it to

maintain a long and obstinate siege.

* Monstrelet, vol. ii. p. 32, 33. Holingshed, p. 597.

** Monstrelet, vol. ii. p. 35, 36.

*** Monstrelet, vol. ii. p. 38, 39. Polyd. Virg. p. 468.

The lord of Gaucour, a brave and experienced captain, was appointed

governor: many officers of distinction threw themselves into the place:

the troops which they conducted were inured to war, and were determined

to make the most obstinate resistance: and even the inhabitants,

disciplined by the long continuance of hostilities, were well qualified,

in their own defence, to second the efforts of the most veteran forces.

The eyes of all Europe were turned towards this scene; where, it was

reasonably supposed, the French were to make their last stand for

maintaining the independence of their monarchy, and the rights of their

sovereign.

The earl of Salisbury at last approached the place with an army, which

consisted only of ten thousand men; and not being able, with so small

a force, to invest so great a city, that commanded a bridge over the

Loire, he stationed himself on the southern side towards Sologne,

leaving the other, towards the Beausse, still open to the enemy. He

there attacked the fortifications which guarded the entrance to the

bridge; and, after an obstinate resistance, he carried several of them;

but was himself killed by a cannon ball as he was taking a view of the

enemy.[*]

* Hall, fol. 105. Monstrelet, vol. ii. p. 39., Stowe, p.

369. Hoingshed, p. 599. Grafton, p. 531.

The earl of Suffolk succeeded to the command; and being reënforced with

great numbers of English and Burgundians, he passed the river with the

main body of his army, and invested Orleans on the other side. As it

was now the depth of winter, Suffolk, who found it difficult, in that

season, to throw up intrenchments all around, contented himself, for the

present, with erecting redoubts at different distances, where his men

were lodged in safety, and were ready to intercept the supplies which

the enemy might attempt to throw into the place. Though he had several

pieces of artillery in his camp, (and this is among the first sieges

in Europe where cannon were found to be of importance,) the art of

engineering was hitherto so imperfect, that Suffolk trusted more to

famine than to force for subduing the city; and he purposed in

the spring to render the circumvallation more complete, by drawing

intrenchments from one redoubt to another. Numberless feats of valor

were performed both by the besiegers and besieged during the winter:

bold sallies were made, and repulsed with equal boldness: convoys were

sometimes introduced, and often intercepted: the supplies were still

unequal to the consumption of the place: and the English seemed

daily, though slowly, to be advancing towards the completion of their

enterprise.

{1429.} But while Suffolk lay in this situation, the French parties

ravaged all the country around; and the besiegers, who were obliged to

draw their provisions from a distance were themselves exposed to the

danger of want and famine. Sir John Fastolffe was bringing up a large

convoy of even kind of stores, which he escorted with a detachment of

two thousand five hundred men; when he was attacked by a body of four

thousand French, under the command of the counts of Clermont and Dunois.

Fastolffe drew up his troops behind the wagons; but the French generals,

afraid of attacking him in that posture, planted a battery of cannon

against him; which threw every thing into confusion, and would have

insured them the victory, had not the impatience of some Scottish

troops, who broke the line of battle, brought on an engagement, in which

Fastolffe was victorious. The count of Dunois was wounded; and about

five hundred French were left on the field of battle. This action, which

was of great importance in the present conjuncture, was commonly called

the battle of Herrings; because the convoy brought a great quantity of

that kind of provisions, for the use of the English army during the Lent

season.[*]

Charles seemed now to have but one expedient for saving this city, which

had been so long invested. The duke of Orleans, who was still prisoner

in England, prevailed on the protector and the council to consent that

all his demesnes should be allowed to preserve a neutrality during the

war, and should be sequestered, for greater security, into the hands

of the duke of Burgundy. This prince, who was much less cordial in the

English interests than formerly, went to Paris, and made the proposal to

the duke of Bedford; but the regent coldly replied, that he was not of a

humor to beat the bushes while others ran away with the game; an answer

which so disgusted the duke, that he recalled all the troops of Burgundy

that acted in the siege.[**]

* Hall, fol. 100. Monstrelet, vol. ii. p. 41, 42. Stowe, p.

369. Holingshed, p. 600. Polyd. Virg. p. 469. Grafton, p.

532.

** Hall, fol. 106. Monstrelet, vol. ii. p. 42. Stowe, p. 369.

Grafton, p. 533

This place, however, was every day more and more closely invested by

the English: great scarcity began already to be felt by the garrison and

inhabitants: Charles, in despair of collecting an army which should dare

to approach the enemy’s intrenchments, not only gave the city for lost,

but began to entertain a very dismal prospect with regard to the general

state of his affairs. He saw that the country in which he had hitherto

with great difficulty subsisted, would be laid entirely open to the

invasion of a powerful and victorious enemy; and he already entertained

thoughts of retiring with the remains of his forces into Languedoc and

Dauphiny, and defending himself as long as possible in those remote

provinces. But it was fortunate for this good prince that, as he lay

under the dominion of the fair, the women whom he consulted had the

spirit to support his sinking resolution in this desperate extremity.

Mary of Anjou, his queen, a princess of great merit and prudence,

vehemently opposed this measure, which, she foresaw, would discourage

all his partisans, and serve as a general signal for deserting a prince

who seemed himself to despair of success. His mistress too, the fair

Agnes Sorel, who lived in entire amity with the queen, seconded all her

remonstrances, and threatened that, if he thus pusillanimously threw

away the sceptre of France, she would seek in the court of England a

fortune more correspondent to her wishes. Love was able to rouse in the

breast of Charles that courage which ambition had failed to excite: he

resolved to dispute every inch of ground with an imperious enemy, and

rather to perish with honor in the midst of his friends, than yield

ingloriously to his bad fortune; when relief was unexpectedly brought

him by another female of a very different character, who gave rise to

one of the most singular revolutions that is to be met with in history.

In the village of Domremi, near Vaucouleurs, on the borders of Lorraine,

there lived a country girl of twenty-seven years of age, called Joan

d’Arc, who was servant in a small inn, and who in that station had been

accustomed to tend the horses of the guests, to ride them without a

saddle to the watering-place, and to perform other offices which, in

well frequented inns, commonly fall to the share of the men servants.[*]

* Hall, fol. 107. Monstrelet, vol. ii. p. 42. Grafton, p.

534.

This girl was of an irreproachable life, and had not hitherto been

remarked for any singularity; whether that she had met with no occasion

to excite her genius, or that the unskilful eyes of those who conversed

with her had not been able to discern her uncommon merit. It is easy to

imagine, that the present situation of France was an interesting object

even to persons of the lowest rank, and would become the frequent

subject of conversation: a young prince, expelled his throne by the

sedition of native subjects, and by the arms of strangers, could

not fail to move the compassion of all his people whose hearts were

uncorrupted by faction; and the peculiar character of Charles, so

strongly inclined to friendship and the tender passions, naturally

rendered him the hero of that sex whose generous minds know no bounds

in their affections. The siege of Orleans, the progress of the English

before that place, the great distress of the garrison and inhabitants,

the importance of saving this city and its brave defenders, had turned

thither the public eye; and Joan, inflamed by the general sentiment,

was seized with a wild desire of bringing relief to her sovereign in

his present distresses. Her unexperienced mind, working day and night

on this favorite object, mistook the impulses of passion for heavenly

inspirations; and she fancied that she saw visions, and heard voices,

exhorting her to reëstablish the throne of France, and to expel the

foreign invaders. An uncommon intrepidity of temper made her overlook

all the dangers which might attend her in such a path; and thinking

herself destined by Heaven to this office, she threw aside all that

bashfulness and timidity so natural to her sex, her years, and her low

station. She went to Vaucouleurs; procured admission to Baudricourt, the

governor; informed him of her inspirations and intentions; and conjured

him not to neglect the voice of God, who spoke through her, but to

second those heavenly revelations which impelled her to this glorious

enterprise. Baudricourt treated her at first with some neglect; but on

her frequent returns to him, and importunate solicitations, he began

to remark something extraordinary in the maid, and was inclined, at all

hazards, to make so easy an experiment. It is uncertain whether this

gentleman had discernment enough to perceive, that great use might be

made with the vulgar of so uncommon an engine; or, what is more likely

in that credulous age, was himself a convert to this visionary; but he

adopted at last the schemes of Joan; and he gave her some attendants,

who conducted her to the French court, which at that time resided at

Chinon.

It is the business of history to distinguish between the miraculous and

the marvellous; to reject the first in all narrations merely profane

and human; to doubt the second; and when obliged by unquestionable

testimony, as in the present case, to admit of something extraordinary,

to receive as little of it as is consistent with the known facts and

circumstances. It is pretended, that Joan, immediately on her admission,

knew the king, though she had never seen his face before, and though

he purposely kept himself in the crowd of courtiers, and had laid aside

every thing in his dress and apparel which might distinguish him: that

she offered him, in the name of the supreme Creator, to raise the siege

of Orleans, and conduct him to Rheims to be there crowned and anointed;

and on his expressing doubts of her mission, revealed to him, before

some sworn confidants, a secret which was unknown to all the world

beside himself, and which nothing but a heavenly inspiration could

have discovered to her: and that she demanded, as the instrument of her

future victories, a particular sword, which was kept in the church of

St. Catharine of Fierbois, and which, though she had never seen it, she

described by all its marks, and by the place in which it had long lain

neglected.[*] This is certain, that all these miraculous stories were

spread abroad, in order to captivate the vulgar. The more the king

and his ministers were determined to give into the illusion, the more

scruples they pretended. An assembly of grave doctors and theologians

cautiously examined Joan’s mission, and pronounced it undoubted

and supernatural. She was sent to the parliament, then residing at

Poictiers; and was interrogated before that assembly: the presidents,

the counsellors, who came persuaded of her imposture, went away

convinced of her inspiration. A ray of hope began to break through that

despair in which the minds of all men were before enveloped. Heaven

had now declared itself in favor of France, and had laid bare

its outstretched arm to take vengeance on her invaders. Few could

distinguish between the impulse of inclination and the force of

conviction; and none would submit to the trouble of so disagreeable a

scrutiny.

* Hall, fol. 107. Holingshed, p. 600.

After these artificial precautions and preparations had been for some

time employed, Joan’s requests were at last complied with: she was armed

cap-à-pie, mounted on horseback, and shown in that martial habiliment

before the whole people. Her dexterity in managing her steed, though

acquired in her former occupation, was regarded as a fresh proof of

her mission; and she was received with the loudest acclamations by the

spectators. Her former occupation was even denied: she was no longer the

servant of an inn. She was converted into a shepherdess, an employment

much more agreeable to the imagination. To render her still more

interesting, near ten years were subtracted from her age; and all

the sentiments of love and of chivalry were thus united to those of

enthusiasm, in order to inflame the fond fancy of the people with

prepossessions in her favor.

When the engine was thus dressed up in full splendor, it was determined

to essay its force against the enemy. Joan was sent to Blois, where a

large convoy was prepared for the supply of Orleans, and an army of ten

thousand men, under the command of St. Severe, assembled to escort it.

She ordered all the soldiers to confess themselves before they set out

on the enterprise: she banished from the camp all women of bad fame: she

displayed in her hands a consecrated banner, where the Supreme Being was

represented, grasping the globe or earth, and surrounded with flower

de luces. And she insisted, in right of her prophetic mission, that the

convoy should enter Orleans by the direct road from the side of Beausse:

but the count of Dunois, unwilling to submit the rules of the military

art to her inspirations, ordered it to approach by the other side of the

river, where he knew the weakest part of the English army was stationed.

Previous to this attempt, the maid had written to the regent, and to

the English generals before Orleans, commanding them, in the name of the

omnipotent Creator, by whom she was commissioned, immediately to

raise the siege; and to evacuate France; and menacing them with divine

vengeance in case of their disobedience. All the English affected to

speak with derision of the maid, and of her heavenly commission; and

said, that the French king was now indeed reduced to a sorry pass,

when he had recourse to such ridiculous expedients: but they felt their

imagination secretly struck with the vehement persuasion which prevailed

in all around them; and they waited with an anxious expectation, not

unmixed with horror, for the issue of these extraordinary preparations.

As the convoy approached the river, a sally was made by the garrison

on the side of Beausse, to prevent the English general from sending any

detachment to the other side: the provisions were peaceably embarked in

boats, which the inhabitants of Orleans had sent to receive them: the

maid covered with her troops the embarkation: Suffolk did not venture

to attack her: and the French general carried back the army in safety

to Blois; an alteration of affairs which was already visible to all the

world, and which had a proportional effect on the minds of both parties.

The maid entered the city of Orleans, arrayed in her military garb, and

displaying her consecrated standard; and was received as a celestial

deliverer by all the inhabitants. They now believed themselves

invincible under her influence; and Dunois himself, perceiving such a

mighty alteration both in friends and foes, consented, that the next

convoy, which was expected in a few days, should enter by the side of

Beausse. The convoy approached: no sign of resistance appeared in the

besiegers: the wagons and troops passed without interruption between the

redoubts of the English: a dead silence and astonishment reigned among

those troops, formerly so elated with victory, and so fierce for the

combat.

The earl of Suffolk was in a situation very unusual and extraordinary,

and which might well confound the man of the greatest capacity and

firmest temper. He saw his troops overawed, and strongly impressed

with the idea of a divine influence accompanying the maid. Instead of

banishing these vain terrors by hurry, and action, and war, he waited

till the soldiers should recover from the panic; and he thereby gave

leisure for those prepossessions to sink still deeper into their minds.

The military maxims which are prudent in common cases, deceived him in

these unaccountable events. The English felt their courage daunted and

overwhelmed; and thence inferred a divine vengeance hanging over

them. The French drew the same inference from an inactivity so new and

unexpected. Every circumstance was now reversed in the opinions of

men, on which all depends: the spirit resulting from a long course of

uninterrupted success, was on a sudden transferred from the victors to

the vanquished.

The maid called aloud, that the garrison should remain no longer on the

defensive; and she promised her followers the assistance of Heaven in

attacking those redoubts of the enemy which had so long kept them in

awe, and which they had never hitherto dared to insult. The generals

seconded her ardor: an attack was made on one redoubt, and it proved

successful:[*] all the English who defended the intrenchments were put

to the sword or taken prisoners: and Sir John Talbot himself, who had

drawn together, from the other redoubts, some troops to bring them

relief, durst not appear in the open field against so formidable an

enemy.

* Monstrelet, vol. ii. p. 45.

Nothing, after this success, seemed impossible to the maid and her

enthusiastic votaries. She urged the generals to attack the main body

of the English in their intrenchments, but Dunois, still unwilling to

hazard the fate of France by too great temerity, and sensible that the

least reverse of fortune would make all the present visions evaporate,

and restore every thing to its former condition, checked her vehemence

and proposed to her first to expel the enemy from their forts on the

other side of the river, and thus lay the communication with the country

entirely open, before she attempted any more hazardous enterprise. Joan

was persuaded, and these forts were vigorously assailed. In one attack

the French were repulsed; the maid was left almost alone; she was

obliged to retreat, and join the runaways; but, displaying her sacred

standard, and animating them with her countenance, her gestures, her

exhortations, she led them back to the charge, and overpowered the

English in their intrenchments. In the attack of another fort, she was

wounded in the neck with an arrow; she retreated a moment behind the

assailants; she pulled out the arrow with her own hands; she had the

wound quickly dressed; and she hastened back to head the troops, and to

plant her victorious banner on the ramparts of the enemy.

By all these successes, the English were entirely chased from their

fortifications on that side: they had lost above six thousand men in

these different actions; and, what was still more important, their

wonted courage and confidence were wholly gone, and had given place to

amazement and despair. The maid returned triumphant over the bridge, and

was again received as the guardian angel of the city. After performing

such miracles, she convinced the most obdurate incredulity of her divine

mission: men felt themselves animated as by a superior energy, and

thought nothing impossible to that divine hand which so visibly

conducted them. It was in vain even for the English generals to oppose

with their soldiers the prevailing opinion of supernatural influence:

they themselves were probably moved by the same belief: the utmost they

dared to advance was, that Joan was not an instrument of God; she was

only the implement of the devil: but as the English had felt, to their

sad experience, that the devil might be allowed sometimes to prevail,

they derived not much consolation from the enforcing of this opinion.

It might prove extremely dangerous for Suffolk, with such intimidated

troops, to remain any longer in the presence of so courageous and

victorious an enemy; he therefore raised the siege, and retreated

with all the precaution imaginable. The French resolved to push their

conquests, and to allow the English no leisure to recover from their

consternation. Charles formed a body of six thousand men, and sent them

to attack Jergeau, whither Suffolk had retired with a detachment of his

army. The siege lasted ten days; and the place was obstinately defended.

Joan displayed her wonted intrepidity on the occasion. She descended

into the fosse, in leading the attack: and she there received a blow

on the head with a stone, by which she was confounded and beaten to

the ground: but she soon recovered herself, and in the end rendered the

assault successful: Suffolk was obliged to yield himself prisoner to a

Frenchman called Renaud; but before he submitted, he asked his adversary

whether he were a gentleman. On receiving a satisfactory answer, he

demanded whether he were a knight. Renaud replied, that he had not yet

attained that honor. “Then I make you one,” replied Suffolk; upon

which he gave him the blow with his sword which dubbed him into that

fraternity; and he immediately surrendered himself his prisoner.

The remainder of the English army was commanded by Fastolffe, Scales,

and Talbot, who thought of nothing but of making their retreat, as

soon as possible, into a place of safety; while the French esteemed the

overtaking them equivalent to a victory; so much had the events which

passed before Orleans altered every thing between the two nations! The

vanguard of the French under Richemont and Xaintrailles attacked the

rear of the enemy at the village of Patay. The battle lasted not a

moment: the English were discomfited and fled: the brave Fastolffe

himself showed the example of flight to his troops; and the order of

the garter was taken from him, as a punishment for this instance of

cowardice.[*] Two thousand men were killed in this action, and both

Talbot and Scales taken prisoners.

* Monstrelet, vol. ii. p. 46.

In the account of all these successes, the French writers, to magnify

the wonder, represent the maid (who was now known by the appellation of

“the Maid of Orleans”) as not only active in combat, but as performing

the office of general; directing the troops, conducting the military

operations, and swaying the deliberations in all councils of war. It is

certain that the policy of the French court endeavored to maintain this

appearance with the public: but it is much more probable, that Dunois

and the wiser commanders prompted her in all her measures, than that a

country girl, without experience of education, could on a sudden become

expert in a profession which requires more genius and capacity than

any other active scene of life. It is sufficient praise, that she could

distinguish the persons on whose judgment she might rely; that she

could seize their hints and suggestions, and on a sudden, deliver

their opinions as her own; and that she could curb, on occasion, that

visionary and enthusiastic spirit with which she was actuated, and could

temper it with prudence and discretion.

The raising of the siege of Orleans was one part of the maid’s promise

to Charles: the crowning of him at Rheims was the other: and she now

vehemently insisted that he should forthwith set out on that enterprise.

A few weeks before, such a proposal would have appeared the most

extravagant in the world. Rheims lay in a distant quarter of the

kingdom; was then in the hands of a victorious enemy; the whole road

which led to it was occupied by their garrisons; and no man could be so

sanguine as to imagine that such an attempt could so soon come within

the bounds of possibility. But as it was extremely the interest of

Charles to maintain the belief of something extraordinary and divine in

these events, and to avail himself of the present consternation of

the English, he resolved to follow the exhortations of his warlike

prophetess, and to lead his army upon this promising adventure. Hitherto

he had kept remote from the scene of war: as the safety of the state

depended upon his person, he had been persuaded to restrain his military

ardor: but observing this prosperous turn of affairs, he now determined

to appear at the head of his armies, and to set the example of valor

to all his soldiers, And the French nobility saw at once their young

sovereign assuming a new and more brilliant character, seconded by

fortune, and conducted by the hand of Heaven, and they caught fresh zeal

to exert themselves in replacing him on the throne of his ancestors.

Charles set out for Rheims at the head of twelve thousand men: he passed

by Troye, which opened its gates to him; Chalons imitated the example:

Rheims sent him a deputation with its keys, before his approach to it:

and he scarcely perceived, as he passed along, that he was marching

through an enemy’s country. The ceremony of his coronation was here

performed[*] with the holy oil, which a pigeon had brought to King

Clovis from heaven, on the first establishment of the French monarchy:

the maid of Orleans stood by his side in complete armor, and displayed

her sacred banner, which had so often dissipated and confounded his

fiercest enemies: and the people shouted with the most unfeigned joy,

on viewing such a complication of wonders. After the completion of the

ceremony, the maid threw herself at the king’s feet, embraced his knees,

and with a flood of tears, which pleasure and tenderness extorted from

her, she congratulated him on this singular and marvellous event.

* Monstrelet, vol. ii. p. 48.

Charles, thus crowned and anointed, became more respectable in the eyes

of all his subjects, and seemed, in a manner, to receive anew, from a

heavenly commission, his title to their allegiance. The inclinations

of men swaying their belief, no one doubted of the inspirations and

prophetic spirit of the maid: so many incidents which passed all human

comprehension, left little room to question a superior influence: and

the real and undoubted facts brought credit to every exaggeration,

which could scarcely be rendered more wonderful. Laon, Soissons,

Chateau-Thierri, Provins, and many other towns and fortresses in that

neighborhood, immediately after Charles’s coronation, submitted to him

on the first summons; and the whole nation was disposed to give him the

most zealous testimonies of their duty and affection.

Nothing can impress us with a higher idea of the wisdom, address, and

resolution of the duke of Bedford, than his being able to maintain

himself in so perilous a situation, and to preserve some footing in

France, after the defection of so many places, and amidst the universal

inclination of the rest to imitate that contagious example. This prince

seemed present every where by his vigilance and foresight: he employed

every resource which fortune had yet left him: he put all the English

garrisons in a posture of defence: he kept a watchful eye over every

attempt among the French towards an insurrection: he retained the

Parisians in obedience, by alternately employing caresses and severity:

and knowing that the duke of Burgundy was already wavering in his

fidelity, he acted with so much skill and prudence, as to renew, in

this dangerous crisis, his alliance with that prince; an alliance of the

utmost importance to the credit and support of the English government.

The small supplies which he received from England set the talents of

this great man in a still stronger light. The ardor of the English for

foreign conquests was now extremely abated by time and reflection: the

parliament seems even to have become sensible of the danger which might

attend their further progress: no supply of money could be obtained by

the regent during his greatest distresses: and men enlisted slowly under

his standard, or soon deserted, by reason of the wonderful accounts

which had reached England, of the magic and sorcery, and diabolical

power of the maid of Orleans.[*] It happened fortunately, in this

emergency, that the bishop of Winchester, now created a cardinal, landed

at Calais with a body of five thousand men, which he was conducting into

Bohemia, on a crusade against the Hussites. He was persuaded to lend

these troops to his nephew during the present difficulties;[**] and the

regent was thereby enabled to take the field, and to oppose the French

king, who was advancing with his army to the gates of Paris.

The extraordinary capacity of the duke of Bedford appeared also in his

military operations. He attempted to restore the courage of his troops

by boldly advancing to the face of the enemy; but he chose his posts

with so much caution, as always to decline a combat, and to render it

impossible for Charles to attack him. He still attended that prince in

all his movements; covered his own towns and garrisons; and kept himself

in a posture to reap advantage from every imprudence or false step of

the enemy. The French army, which consisted mostly of volunteers, who

served at their own expense, soon after retired and was disbanded:

Charles went to Bourges, the ordinary place of his residence; but not

till he made himself master of Compiegne, Beauvais, Senlis, Sens, Laval,

Lagni, St. Denis, and of many places in the neighborhood of Paris, which

the affections of the people had put into his hands.

{1430.} The regent endeavored to revive the declining state of his

affairs, by bringing over the young king of England, and having him

crowned and anointed at Paris,[***] All the vassals of the crown

who lived within the provinces possessed by the English, swore anew

allegiance, and did homage to him.

* Rymer, vol. x. p. 459, 472.

** Rymer, vol. x. p. 421.

*** Rymer, vol. x. p 432.

But this ceremony was cold and insipid, compared with the lustre which

had attended the coronation of Charles at Rheims; and the duke of

Bedford expected more effect from an accident, which put into his hands

the person that had been the author of all his calamities.

The maid of Orleans, after the coronation of Charles, declared to the

count of Dunois that her wishes were now fully gratified, and that she

had no further desire than to return to her former condition, and to the

occupation and course of life which became her sex: but that nobleman,

sensible of the great advantages which might still be reaped from her

presence in the army, exhorted her to persevere, till, by the final

expulsion of the English, she had brought all her prophecies to their

full completion. In pursuance of this advice, she threw herself into

the town of Compiegne, which was at that time besieged by the duke

of Burgundy, assisted by the earls of Arundel and Suffolk; and the

garrison, on her appearance, believed themselves thenceforth invincible.

But their joy was of short duration. The maid, next day after her

arrival, headed a sally upon the quarters of John of Luxembourg; she

twice drove the enemy from their intrenchments; finding their numbers to

increase every moment, she ordered a retreat; when hard pressed by the

pursuers, she turned upon them, and made them again recoil; but being

here deserted by her friends, and surrounded by the enemy, she was

at last, after exerting the utmost valor, taken prisoner by the

Burgundians.[*] The common opinion was, that the French officers,

finding the merit of every victory ascribed to her, had, in envy to

her renown, by which they were themselves so much eclipsed, willingly

exposed her to this fatal accident.

* Stowe, p. 371.

The envy of her friends, on this occasion, was not a greater proof of

her merit than the triumph of her enemies. A complete victory would not

have given more joy to the English and their partisans. The service

of Te Deum, which has so often been profaned by princes, was publicly

celebrated on this fortunate event at Paris. The duke of Bedford fancied

that, by the captivity of that extraordinary woman, who had blasted all

his successes, he should again recover his former ascendant over France;

and to push farther the present advantage, he purchased the captive from

John of Luxembourg, and formed a prosecution against her, which,

whether it proceeded from vengeance or policy, was equally barbarous and

dishonorable.

{1431.} There was no possible reason why Joan should not be regarded as

a prisoner of war, and be entitled to all the courtesy and good usage

which civilized nations practise towards enemies on these occasions. She

had never, in her military capacity, forfeited, by any act of treachery

or cruelty, her claim to that treatment: she was unstained by any civil

crime: even the virtues and the very decorums of her sex had ever been

rigidly observed by her: and though her appearing in war, and leading

armies to battle, may seem an exception, she had thereby performed such

signal service to her prince, that she had abundantly compensated for

this irregularity; and was, on that very account, the more an object

of praise and admiration. It was necessary, therefore, for the duke of

Bedford to interest religion some way in the prosecution, and to cover

under that cloak his violation of justice and humanity.

[Illustration: 1_272_joan_d’arc.jpg JOAN D’ARC

The bishop of Beauvais, a man wholly devoted to the English interests,

presented a petition against Joan, on pretence that she was taken

within the bounds of his diocese; and he desired to have her tried by

an ecclesiastical court for sorcery, impiety, idolatry, and magic: the

university of Paris was so mean as to join in the same request: several

prelates, among whom the cardinal of Winchester was the only Englishman,

were appointed her judges: they held their court in Rouen, where the

young king of England then resided: and the maid, clothed in her former

military apparel, but loaded with irons, was produced before this

tribunal.

She first desired to be eased of her chains: her judges answered, that

she had once already attempted an escape by throwing herself from a

tower: she confessed the fact, maintained the justice of her intention,

and owned that, if she could, she would still execute that purpose.

All her other speeches showed the same firmness and intrepidity: though

harassed with interrogatories during the course of near four months, she

never betrayed any weakness or womanish submission; and no advantage was

gained over her. The point which her judges pushed most vehemently, was

her visions and revelations, and intercourse with departed saints; and

they asked her, whether she would submit to the church the truth of

these inspirations: she replied, that she would submit them to God,

the fountain of truth. They then exclaimed, that she was a heretic,

and denied the authority of the church. She appealed to the pope: they

rejected her appeal.

They asked her, why she put trust in her standard, which had been

consecrated by magical incantations: she replied that she put trust

in the Supreme Being alone, whose image was impressed upon it. They

demanded, why she carried in her hand that standard at the anointment

and coronation of Charles at Rheims: she answered, that the person who

had shared the danger was entitled to share the glory. When accused

of going to war, contrary to the decorums of her sex, and of assuming

government and command over men, she scrupled not to reply, that her

sole purpose was to defeat the English, and to expel them the kingdom.

In the issue, she was condemned for all the crimes of which she had

been accused, aggravated by heresy; her revelations were declared to be

inventions of the devil to delude the people; and she was sentenced to

be delivered over to the secular arm.

Joan, so long surrounded by inveterate enemies, who treated her with

every mark of contumely; browbeaten and overawed by men of superior

rank, and men invested with the ensigns of a sacred character, which

she had been accustomed to revere, felt her spirit at last subdued; and

those visionary dreams of inspiration, in which she had been buoyed up

by the triumphs of success and the applauses of her own party, gave

way to the terrors of that punishment to which she was sentenced.

She publicly declared herself willing to recant: she acknowledged the

illusion of those revelations which the church had rejected; and she

promised never more to maintain them. Her sentence was then mitigated:

she was condemned to perpetual imprisonment, and to be fed during life

on bread and water.

Enough was now done to fulfil all political views, and to convince both

the French and the English, that the opinion of divine influence, which

had so much encouraged the one and daunted the other, was entirely

without foundation. But the barbarous vengeance of Joan’s enemies was

not satisfied with this victory. Suspecting that the female dress, which

she had now consented to wear, was disagreeable to her, they purposely

placed in her apartment a suit of men’s apparel; and watched for the

effects of that temptation upon her. On the sight of a dress in which

she had acquired so much renown, and which, she once believed, she

wore by the particular appointment of Heaven, all her former ideas and

passions revived; and she ventured in her solitude to clothe herself

again in the forbidden garment. Her insidious enemies caught her in that

situation: her fault was interpreted to be no less than a relapse into

heresy: no recantation would now suffice; and no pardon could be granted

her. She was condemned to be burned in the market-place of Rouen; and

the infamous sentence was accordingly executed. This admirable heroine,

to whom the more generous superstition of the ancients would have

erected altars, was, on pretence of heresy and magic, delivered over

alive to the flames, and expiated, by that dreadful punishment, the

signal services which she had rendered to her prince and to her native

country.

{1432.} The affairs of the English, far from being advanced by this

execution, went every day more and more to decay: the great abilities of

the regent were unable to resist the strong inclination which had seized

the French to return under the obedience of their rightful sovereign,

and which that act of cruelty was ill fitted to remove. Chartres was

surprised, by a stratagem of the count of Dunois: a body of the English,

under Lord Willoughby, was defeated at St. Celerin upon the Sarte:[*]

the fair in the suburbs of Caen, seated in the midst of the English

territories, was pillaged by De Lore, a French officer: the duke of

Bedford himself was obliged by Dunois to raise the siege of Lagni with

some loss of reputation: and all these misfortunes, though light, yet

being continued and uninterrupted, brought discredit on the English,

and menaced them with an approaching revolution. But the chief detriment

which the regent sustained, was by the death of his duchess, who had

hitherto preserved some appearance of friendship between him and her

brother, the duke of Burgundy:[**] and his marriage, soon afterwards,

with Jaqueline of Luxembourg, was the beginning of a breach between

them.[***] Philip complained, that the regent had never had the civility

to inform him of his intentions, and that so sudden a marriage was a

slight on his sister’s memory.

* Monstrelet, vol. ii. p. 100.

** Monstrolet, vol. ii. p. 87.

*** Stowe, p. 373. Grafton, p. 554.

The cardinal of Winchester meditated a reconciliation between these

princes, and brought both of them to St. Omers for that purpose. The

duke of Bedford here expected the first visit, both as he was son,

brother, and uncle to a king, and because he had already made such

advances as to come into the duke of Burgundy’s territories, in order

to have an interview with him: but Philip, proud of his great power and

independent dominions, refused to pay this compliment to the regent; and

the two princes, unable to adjust the ceremonial, parted without seeing

each other.[*] A bad prognostic of their cordial intentions to renew

past amity!

* Monstrelet, vol. ii. p. 90. Grafton, p. 561.

Nothing could be more repugnant to the interests of the house of

Burgundy, than to unite the crowns of France and England on the same

head; an event which, had it taken place, would have reduced the duke

to the rank of a petty prince, and have rendered his situation entirely

dependent and precarious. The title also to the crown of France, which,

after the failure of the elder branches, might accrue to the duke or his

posterity, had been sacrificed by the treaty of Troye; and strangers and

enemies were thereby irrevocably fixed upon the throne. Revenge alone

had carried Philip into these impolitic measures; and a point of honor

had hitherto induced him to maintain them. But as it is the nature of

passion gradually to decay, while the sense of interest maintains

a permanent influence and authority, the duke had, for some years,

appeared sensibly to relent in his animosity against Charles, and to

hearken willingly to the apologies made by that prince for the murder of

the late duke of Burgundy. His extreme youth was pleaded in his favor;

his incapacity to judge for himself; the ascendant gained over him by

his ministers; and his inability to resent a deed which, without his

knowledge, had been perpetrated by those under whose guidance he was

then placed. The more to flatter the pride of Philip, the king of France

had banished from his court and presence Tanegui de Chatel, and all

those who were concerned in that assassination; and had offered to make

every other atonement which could be required of him. The distress which

Charles had already suffered, had tended to gratify the duke’s revenge;

the miseries to which France had been so long exposed, had begun to move

his compassion; and the cries of all Europe admonished him, that his

resentment, which might hitherto be deemed pious, would, if carried

further, be universally condemned as barbarous and unrelenting. While

the duke was in this disposition, every disgust which he received from

England made a double impression upon him; the entreaties of the count

of Richemont and the duke of Bourbon, who had married his two sisters,

had weight; and he finally determined to unite himself to the royal

family of France, from which his own was descended.

{1435.} For this purpose, a congress was appointed at Arras under the

mediation of deputies from the pope and the council of Basle: the duke

of Burgundy came thither in person: the duke of Bourbon, the count of

Richemont, and other persons of high rank, appeared as ambassadors from

France: and the English having also been invited to attend, the cardinal

of Winchester, the bishops of Norwich and St. David’s, the earls of

Huntingdon and Suffolk, with others, received from the protector and

council a commission for that purpose.[*]

The conferences were held in the abbey of St. Vaast, and began with

discussing the proposals of the two crowns which were so wide of each

other as to admit of no hopes of accommodation. France offered to cede

Normandy with Guienne, but both of them loaded with the usual homage

and vassalage to the crown. As the claims of England upon France were

universally unpopular in Europe, the mediators declared the offers of

Charles very reasonable, and the cardinal of Winchester, with the

other English ambassadors, without giving a particular detail of their

demands, immediately left the congress. There remained nothing but to

discuss the mutual pretensions of Charles and Philip. These were easily

adjusted: the vassal was in a situation to give law to his superior; and

he exacted conditions which, had it not been for the present

necessity, would have been deemed, to the last degree, dishonorable

and disadvantageous to the crown of France. Besides making repeated

atonements and acknowledgments for the murder of the duke of Burgundy,

Charles was obliged to cede all the towns of Picardy which lay between

the Somme and the Low Countries; he yielded several other territories;

he agreed that these and all the other dominions of Philip should be

held by him, during his life, without doing any homage, or swearing

fealty to the present king; and he freed his subjects from all

obligations to allegiance, if ever he infringed this treaty.[**] Such

were the conditions upon which France purchased the friendship of the

duke of Burgundy.

* Rymer, vol. x. p. 611, 612.

** Monstrelet, vol ii. p. 112. Grafton, p. 565.

The duke sent a herald to England with a letter, in which he notified the

conclusion of the treaty of Arras, and apologized for his departure from

that of Troye. The council received the herald with great coldness: they

even assigned him his lodgings in a shoemaker’s house, by way of insult;

and the populace were so incensed, that if the duke of Glocester had not

given him guards, his life had been exposed to danger when he appeared

in the streets. The Flemings, and other subjects of Philip, were

insulted, and some of them murdered by the Londoners; and every thing

seemed to tend towards a rupture between the two nations.[*] These

violences were not disagreeable to the duke of Burgundy; as they

afforded him a pretence for the further measures which he intended

to take against the English, whom he now regarded as implacable and

dangerous enemies.

A few days after the duke of Bedford received intelligence of this

treaty, so fatal to the interests of England, he died at Rouen; a prince

of great abilities, and of many virtues; and whose memory, except from

the barbarous execution of the maid of Orleans, was unsullied by any

considerable blemish. Isabella, queen of France, died a little before

him, despised by the English, detested by the French, and reduced, in

her latter years, to regard with an unnatural horror the progress and

success of her own son, in recovering possession of his kingdom. This

period was also signalized by the death of the earl of Arundel,[**] a

great English general, who, though he commanded three thousand men,

was foiled by Xaintrailles at the head of six hundred, and soon after

expired of the wounds which he received in the action.

* Monstrelet, vol. ii. p. 120. Holing. p. 612.

** Monstrelet, vol. ii. p. 105. Holing, p. 610.

{1436} The violent factions which prevailed between the duke of

Glocester and the cardinal of Winchester, prevented the English from

taking the proper measures for repairing these multiplied losses, and

threw all their affairs into confusion. The popularity of the duke,

and his near relation to the crown, gave him advantages in the contest,

which he often lost by his open and unguarded temper, unfit to struggle

with the politic and interested spirit of his rival. The balance,

meanwhile, of these parties, kept every thing in suspense; foreign

affairs were much neglected; and though the duke of York, son to that

earl of Cambridge who was executed in the beginning of the last reign,

was appointed successor to the duke of Bedford, it was seven months

before his commission passed the seals; and the English remained so long

in an enemy’s country, without a proper head or governor.

The new governor, on his arrival, found the capital already lost. The

Parisians had always been more attached to the Burgundian than to the

English interest; and after the conclusion of the treaty of Arras, their

affections, without any further control, universally led them to

return to their allegiance under their native sovereign. The constable,

together with Lile-Adam, the same person who had before put Paris into

the hands of the duke of Burgundy, was introduced in the night-time by

intelligence with the citizens: Lord Willoughby, who commanded only

a small garrison of fifteen hundred men, was expelled: this nobleman

discovered valor and presence of mind on the occasion; but unable to

guard so large a place against such multitudes, he retired into the

Bastile, and being there invested, he delivered up that fortress, and

was contented to stipulate for the safe retreat of his troops into

Normandy.[*]

In the same season, the duke of Burgundy openly took part against

England, and commenced hostilities by the siege of Calais, the only

place which now gave the English any sure hold of France, and still

rendered them dangerous. As he was beloved among his own subjects, and

had acquired the epithet of Good, from his popular qualities, he was

able to interest all the inhabitants of the Low Countries in the success

of this enterprise; and he invested that place with an army formidable

from its numbers, but without experience, discipline, or military

spirit.[**] On the first alarm of this siege, the duke of Glocester

assembled some forces, sent a defiance to Philip, and challenged him to

wait the event of a battle, which he promised to give, as soon as the

wind would permit him to reach Calais. The warlike genius of the English

had at that time rendered them terrible to all the northern parts of

Europe; especially to the Flemings, who were more expert in manufactures

than in arms; and the duke of Burgundy, being already foiled in some

attempts before Calais, and observing the discontent and terror of his

own army, thought proper to raise the siege, and to retreat before the

arrival of the enemy.[***]

* Monstrelet, vol. ii. p. 127. Grafton, p. 568.

** Monstrelet, vol. ii, p. 126, 130, 132. Holing. p. 613.

Grafton, p 571.

*** Monstrelet, vol. ii. p. 136. Holing. p. 614.

The English were still masters of many fine provinces in France; but

retained possession more by the extreme weakness of Charles, than by the

strength of their own garrisons or the force of their armies. Nothing,

indeed, can be more surprising than the feeble efforts made, during the

course of several years, by these two potent nations against each other

while the one struggled for independence, and the other aspired to a

total conquest of its rival. The general want of industry, commerce, and

police in that age, had rendered all the European nations, and France

and England no less than the others, unfit for bearing the burdens of

war, when it was prolonged beyond one season; and the continuance of

hostilities had, long ere this time, exhausted the force and patience of

both kingdoms. Scarcely could the appearance of an army be brought

into the field on either side; and all the operations consisted in

the surprisal of places, in the rencounter of detached parties, and in

incursions upon the open country; which were performed by small bodies,

assembled on a sudden from the neighboring garrisons. In this method

of conducting the war, the French king had much the advantage: the

affections of the people were entirely on his side: intelligence was

early brought him of the state and motions of the enemy: the inhabitants

were ready to join in any attempts against the garrisons: and thus

ground was continually, though slowly, gained upon the English. The

duke of York, who was a prince of abilities, struggled against these

difficulties during the course of five years; and being assisted by

the valor of Lord Talbot, soon after created earl of Shrewsbury, he

performed actions which acquired him honor, but merit not the attention

of posterity. It would have been well, had this feeble war, in sparing

the blood of the people, prevented likewise all other oppressions; and

had the fury of men, which reason and justice cannot restrain, thus

happily received a check from their impotence and inability. But the

French and English, though they exerted such small force, were, however,

stretching beyond their resources, which were still smaller; and the

troops, destitute of pay, were obliged to subsist by plundering and

oppressing the country, both of friends and enemies. The fields in all

the north of France, which was the seat of war, were laid waste and left

uncultivated.[*]

* Grafton, p 562.

{1440.} The cities were gradually depopulated, not by the blood spilt

in battle, but by the more destructive pillage of the garrisons;[*] and

both parties, weary of hostilities which decided nothing, seemed at last

desirous of peace, and they set on foot negotiations for that purpose.

But the proposals of France, and the demands of England, were still so

wide of each other, that all hope of accommodation immediately vanished.

The English ambassadors demanded restitution of all the provinces which

had once been annexed to England, together with the final cession of

Calais and its district; and required the possession of these extensive

territories without the burden of any fealty or homage on the part of

their prince: the French offered only part of Guienne, part of Normandy,

and Calais, loaded with the usual burdens. It appeared in vain

to continue the negotiation while there was so little prospect of

agreement. The English were still too haughty to stoop from the vast

hopes which they had formerly entertained, and to accept of terms more

suitable to the present condition of the two kingdoms.

The duke of York soon after resigned his government to the earl of

Warwick, a nobleman of reputation, whom death prevented from long

enjoying this dignity. The duke, upon the demise of that nobleman,

returned to his charge; and during his administration, a truce was

concluded between the king of England and the duke of Burgundy, which

had become necessary for the commercial interests of their subjects.[**]

The war with France continued in the same languid and feeble state as

before.

The captivity of five princes of the blood, taken prisoners in the

battle of Azincour, was a considerable advantage, which England long

enjoyed over its enemy; but this superiority was now entirely lost.

Some of these princes had died; some had been ransomed; and the duke of

Orleans, the most powerful among them, was the last that remained in

the hands of the English. He offered the sum of fifty-four thousand

nobles[***] for his liberty; and when this proposal was laid before the

council of England, as every question was there an object of faction,

the party of the duke of Glocester, and that of the cardinal of

Winchester, were divided in their sentiments with regard to it.

* Fortescue, who soon after this period visited France, in

the train of Prince Henry, speaks of that kingdom as a

desert, in comparison of England. See his treatise De

Laudibus Legum Angliæ. Though we make allowance for the

partialities of Fortescue, there must have been some

foundation for his account; and these destructive wars are

the most likely reason to be assigned for the difference

remarked by this author.

** Grafton, p. 673.

*** Rymer, vol. x. p. 764, 776, 782, 795, 796. This sum was

equal to thirty-six thousand pounds sterling of our present

money. A subsidy of a tenth and fifteenth was fixed by

Edward III. at twenty-nine thousand pounds, which, in the

reign of Henry VI., made only fifty-eight thousand pounds of

our present money. The parliament granted only one subsidy

during the course of seven years, from 1437 to 1444.

The duke reminded the council of the dying advice of the late king, that

none of these prisoners should on any account be released, till his son

should be of sufficient age to hold himself the reins of government.

The cardinal insisted on the greatness of the sum offered, which,

in reality, was nearly equal to two thirds of all the extraordinary

supplies that the parliament, during the course of seven years, granted

for the support of the war. And he added, that the release of this

prince was more likely to be advantageous than prejudicial to the

English interests; by filling the court of France with faction, and

giving a head to those numerous malecontents whom Charles was at present

able with great difficulty to restrain. The cardinal’s party, as

usual, prevailed: the duke of Orleans was released, after a melancholy

captivity of twenty-five years:[*] and the duke of Burgundy, as a pledge

of his entire reconciliation with the family of Orleans, facilitated to

that prince the payment of his ransom. It must be confessed, that the

princes and nobility, in those ages, went to war on very disadvantageous

terms. If they were taken prisoners, they either remained in captivity

during life, or purchased their liberty at the price which the victors

were pleased to impose, and which often reduced their families to want

and beggary.

* Grafton, p. 578.

{1443.} The sentiments of the cardinal, some time after, prevailed

in another point of still greater moment. That prelate had always

encouraged every proposal of accommodation with France; and had

represented the utter impossibility, in the present circumstances, of

pushing farther the conquests in that kingdom, and the great difficulty

of even maintaining those which were already made. He insisted on the

extreme reluctance of the parliament to grant supplies; the disorders in

which the English affairs in Normandy were involved; the daily progress

made by the French king; and the advantage of stopping his hand by a

temporary accommodation which might leave room for time and accidents

to operate in favor of the English. The duke of Glocester, high-spirited

and haughty, and educated in the lofty pretensions which the first

successes of his two brothers had rendered familiar to him, could not

yet be induced to relinquish all hopes of prevailing over France; much

less could he see with patience his own opinion thwarted and rejected by

the influence of his rival in the English council. But, notwithstanding

his opposition, the earl of Suffolk, a nobleman who adhered to the

cardinal’s party, was despatched to Tours, in order to negotiate with

the French ministers. It was found impossible to adjust the terms of a

lasting peace; but a truce for twenty-two months was concluded, which

left every thing on the present footing between the parties. The

numerous disorders under which the French government labored, and which

time alone could remedy, induced Charles to assent to this truce; and

the same motives engaged him afterwards to prolong it.[*] But Suffolk,

not content with executing this object of his commission, proceeded also

to finish another business, which seems rather to have been implied than

expressed in the powers that had been granted him.[**]

The History of England in Three Volumes, Vol. I., Part B. From Henry III. to Richard III. · 第 12 / 15 章