Early in the year

1780,

meetings of the populace took place in various parts of the kingdom, and

ministers were boldly accused of having prodigally and wastefully spent

the public money; while petitions were presented, praying "for a

correction of abuses in the public expenditure." Riots in many parts of

England were the consequences of unjustly continuing wars and taxation,

and several hundred people were killed and wounded by the military;

while many others forfeited their lives on the scaffold for daring to

raise their arms against tyranny. Lord George Gordon was also committed

to the Tower on a charge of high treason; but no jury of his countrymen

could be found to consider his undaunted attempt to _redress the

people's grievances as treasonable_, and he was, consequently,

_honorably acquitted_! The influence of her majesty, however, kept a

minister in office, though contrary to the sense of the wisest and best

part of the community; and a ruinous war was still permitted to drain

the blood and money of the many.

War might probably be considered by those in power a _legal trade_; but

was it not continued for the untenable purpose of avarice? We think it

was. There did not appear to be any rational hope for reform or

retrenchment, while men versed in corruption were so enriched, and had

an almost unlimited sway over the councils of the reigning authority.

Popular commotion was dreaded; yet the ministers could not be prevailed

upon to dispel the cause of anxiety by conciliatory measures,--by a

timely redress of grievances, by concession of rights, and by

reformation of abuses. If they had done so, they would have given

satisfactory evidence that government had no other object in view than

faithfully to discharge their duty, by adopting such plans as would

really benefit mankind, and furnish means to secure the comfort and

happiness of all men.

In the mean time, much distress was imposed upon the unfortunate king,

by the increasing and uncontroulable prodigality of some of his

children, especially of GEORGE. The queen would not hear of any thing to

his discredit, and thus what little of family enjoyment remained was

ultimately destroyed.

The unrestrained predilection of this youthful prince now became

habitual pursuits, and excesses of the most detestable description were

not unknown to him. Within the circle of his less nominally illustrious

acquaintance, every father dreaded the seduction of his child, if she

possessed any personal charms, while the mother feared to lose sight of

her daughter, even for a moment. It is not in our power to give an

adequate idea of the number of those families whose happiness he ruined;

but we well, too well, know the number was infamously great. The country

gave him credit for being liberal in political principles, and

generously disposed for reform. But little of his _real_ character was

then known; his faults, indeed, were named as virtues, and his vices

considered as _gentlemanly exploits_, so that his dissembled appearance

was received, by those unacquainted with him, as the sure and

incontestable mark of a great and noble soul. But, before our pages are

concluded, we fear we must, in duty, prove him a widely-different

character! It is true, his acquaintance with political characters was

chiefly amongst "the Whigs;" it may also be added that those "Whigs,"

so particularly intimate with this prince, did not gain much by their

connexion with him, but finally became as supine and venal as himself.

They determined that, as the heir-apparent, he should not be allowed to

suffer any deterioration of greatness, and the principles and practices

of so mighty an individual were considered by them to constitute a

sufficient patent for continual imitation.

At this period, Mr. Dunning moved his famous resolution to the House,

with unbending firmness and uncompromising fidelity. He said, "The

influence of the crown has increased, is increasing, and ought to be

diminished." It was carried by a majority of 233 against 215; but a

second resolution, which was to give effect to the first, was lost by a

majority of fifty-one votes.

Secret History of the Court of England, from the Accession of George the Third to the Death of George the Fourth, Volume 1 (of 2) Including, Among Other Important Matters, Full Particulars of the Mysterious Death of the Princess Charlotte · 第 21 / 67 题