SECTION XIII

THE MIRACLES

802

_The beginning._--Miracles enable us to judge of doctrine, and doctrine

enables us to judge of miracles.

There are false miracles and true. There must be a distinction, in order

to know them; otherwise they would be useless. Now they are not useless;

on the contrary, they are fundamental. Now the rule which is given to us

must be such, that it does not destroy the proof which the true miracles

give of the truth, which is the chief end of the miracles.

Moses has given two rules: that the prediction does not come to pass

(Deut. xviii), and that they do not lead to idolatry (Deut. xiii); and

Jesus Christ[318] one.

If doctrine regulates miracles, miracles are useless for doctrine.

If miracles regulate....

_Objection to the rule._--The distinction of the times. One rule during

the time of Moses, another at present.

803

_Miracle._--It is an effect, which exceeds the natural power of the

means which are employed for it; and what is not a miracle is an effect,

which does not exceed the natural power of the means which are employed

for it. Thus, those who heal by invocation of the devil do not work a

miracle; for that does not exceed the natural power of the devil.

But ...

804

The two fundamentals; one inward, the other outward; grace and miracles;

both supernatural.

805

Miracles and truth are necessary, because it is necessary to convince

the entire man, in body and soul.

806

In all times, either men have spoken of the true God, or the true God

has spoken to men.

807

Jesus Christ has verified that He was the Messiah, never in verifying

His doctrine by Scripture and the prophecies, but always by His

miracles.

He proves by a miracle that He remits sins.

Rejoice not in your miracles, said Jesus Christ, but because your names

are written in heaven.[319]

If they believe not Moses, neither will they believe one risen from the

dead.

Nicodemus recognises by His miracles that His teaching is of God.

_Scimus quia venisti a Deo magister; nemo enim potest haec signa facere

quae tu facis nisi Deus fuerit cum eo._[320] He does not judge of the

miracles by the teaching, but of the teaching by the miracles.

The Jews had a doctrine of God as we have one of Jesus Christ, and

confirmed by miracles. They were forbidden to believe every worker of

miracles; and they were further commanded to have recourse to the chief

priests, and to rely on them.

And thus, in regard to their prophets, they had all those reasons which

we have for refusing to believe the workers of miracles.

And yet they were very sinful in rejecting the prophets, and Jesus

Christ, because of their miracles; and they would not have been

culpable, if they had not seen the miracles. _Nisi fecissem ... peccatum

non haberent._[321] Therefore all belief rests upon miracles.

Prophecy is not called miracle; as Saint John speaks of the first

miracle in Cana, and then of what Jesus Christ says to the woman of

Samaria, when He reveals to her all her hidden life. Then He heals the

centurion's son; and Saint John calls this "the second miracle."[322]

808

The combinations of miracles.

809

The second miracle can suppose the first, but the first cannot suppose

the second.

810

Had it not been for the miracles, there would have been no sin in not

believing in Jesus Christ.

811

I should not be a Christian, but for the miracles, said Saint Augustine.

812

_Miracles._--How I hate those who make men doubt of miracles!

Montaigne[323] speaks of them as he should in two places. In one, we see

how careful he is; and yet, in the other, he believes, and makes sport

of unbelievers.

However it may be, the Church is without proofs if they are right.

813

Montaigne against miracles.

Montaigne for miracles.

814

It is not possible to have a reasonable belief against miracles.

815

Unbelievers the most credulous. They believe the miracles of Vespasian,

in order not to believe those of Moses.

816

_Title: How it happens that men believe so many liars, who say that they

have seen miracles, and do not believe any of those who say that they

have secrets to make men immortal, or restore youth to them._--Having

considered how it happens that so great credence is given to so many

impostors, who say they have remedies, often to the length of men

putting their lives into their hands, it has appeared to me that the

true cause is that there are true remedies. For it would not be possible

that there should be so many false remedies, and that so much faith

should be placed in them, if there were none true. If there had never

been any remedy for any ill, and all ills had been incurable, it is

impossible that men should have imagined that they could give remedies,

and still more impossible that so many others should have believed those

who boasted of having remedies; in the same way as did a man boast of

preventing death, no one would believe him, because there is no example

of this. But as there were a number of remedies found to be true by the

very knowledge of the greatest men, the belief of men is thereby

induced; and, this being known to be possible, it has been therefore

concluded that it was. For people commonly reason thus: "A thing is

possible, therefore it is"; because the thing cannot be denied

generally, since there are particular effects which are true, the

people, who cannot distinguish which among these particular effects are

true, believe them all. In the same way, the reason why so many false

effects are credited to the moon, is that there are some true, as the

tide.

It is the same with prophecies, miracles, divination by dreams,

sorceries, etc. For if there had been nothing true in all this, men

would have believed nothing of them; and thus, instead of concluding

that there are no true miracles because there are so many false, we

must, on the contrary, say that there certainly are true miracles, since

there are false, and that there are false miracles only because some are

true. We must reason in the same way about religion; for it would not be

possible that men should have imagined so many false religions, if there

had not been a true one. The objection to this is that savages have a

religion; but the answer is that they have heard the true spoken of, as

appears by the deluge, circumcision, the cross of Saint Andrew, etc.

817

Having considered how it comes that there are so many false miracles,

false revelations, sorceries, etc., it has seemed to me that the true

cause is that there are some true; for it would not be possible that

there should be so many false miracles, if there were none true, nor so

many false revelations, if there were none true, nor so many false

religions, if there were not one true. For if there had never been all

this, it is almost impossible that men should have imagined it, and

still more impossible that so many others should have believed it. But

as there have been very great things true, and as they have been

believed by great men, this impression has been the cause that nearly

everybody is rendered capable of believing also the false. And thus,

instead of concluding that there are no true miracles, since there are

so many false, it must be said, on the contrary, that there are true

miracles, since there are so many false; and that there are false ones

only because there are true; and that in the same way there are false

religions because there is one true.--Objection to this: savages have a

religion. But this is because they have heard the true spoken of, as

appears by the cross of Saint Andrew, the deluge, circumcision,

etc.--This arises from the fact that the human mind, finding itself

inclined to that side by the truth, becomes thereby susceptible of all

the falsehoods of this ...

818

Jeremiah xxiii, 32. The _miracles_ of the false prophets. In the Hebrew

and Vatable[324] they are the _tricks_.

_Miracle_ does not always signify miracle. I Sam. xiv, 15; _miracle_

signifies _fear_, and is so in the Hebrew. The same evidently in Job

xxxiii, 7; and also Isaiah xxi, 4; Jeremiah xliv, 12. _Portentum_

signifies _simulacrum_, Jeremiah l, 38; and it is so in the Hebrew and

Vatable. Isaiah viii, 18. Jesus Christ says that He and His will be in

_miracles_.

819

If the devil favoured the doctrine which destroys him, he would be

divided against himself, as Jesus Christ said. If God favoured the

doctrine which destroys the Church, He would be divided against Himself.

_Omne regnum divisum._[325] For Jesus Christ wrought against the devil,

and destroyed his power over the heart, of which exorcism is the

symbolisation, in order to establish the kingdom of God. And thus He

adds, _Si in digito Dei ... regnum Dei ad vos_.[326]

820

There is a great difference between tempting and leading into error. God

tempts, but He does not lead into error. To tempt is to afford

opportunities, which impose no necessity; if men do not love God, they

will do a certain thing. To lead into error is to place a man under the

necessity of inferring and following out what is untrue.

821

Abraham and Gideon are above revelation. The Jews blinded themselves in

judging of miracles by the Scripture. God has never abandoned His true

worshippers.

I prefer to follow Jesus Christ than any other, because He has miracle,

prophecy, doctrine, perpetuity, etc.

The Donatists. No miracle which obliges them to say it is the devil.

The more we particularise God, Jesus Christ, the Church ...

822

If there were no false miracles, there would be certainty. If there were

no rule to judge of them, miracles would be useless, and there would be

no reason for believing.

Now there is, humanly speaking, no human certainty, but we have reason.

823

Either God has confounded the false miracles, or He has foretold them;

and in both ways He has raised Himself above what is supernatural with

respect to us, and has raised us to it.

824

Miracles serve not to convert, but to condemn. (Q. 113, A. 10, _Ad._

2.)[327]

825

_Reasons why we do not believe._

John xii, 37. _Cum autem tanta signa fecisset, non credebant in eum, ut

sermo Isayae impleretur. Excaecavit_, etc.

_Haec dixit Isaias, quando vidit gloriam ejus et locutus est de eo._

_Judaei signa petunt et Graeci sapientiam quaerunt, nos autem Jesum

crucifixum. Sed plenum signis, sed plenum sapientia; vos autem Christum

non crucifixum et religionem sine miraculis et sine sapientia._[328]

What makes us not believe in the true miracles, is want of love. John:

_Sed vos non creditis, quia non estis ex ovibus._[329] What makes us

believe the false is want of love. II Thess. ii.

The foundation of religion. It is the miracles. What then? Does God

speak against miracles, against the foundations of the faith which we

have in Him?

If there is a God, faith in God must exist on earth. Now the miracles of

Jesus Christ are not foretold by Antichrist, but the miracles of

Antichrist are foretold by Jesus Christ. And so if Jesus Christ were not

the Messiah, He would have indeed led into error. When Jesus Christ

foretold the miracles of Antichrist, did He think of destroying faith in

His own miracles?

Moses foretold Jesus Christ, and bade to follow Him. Jesus Christ

foretold Antichrist, and forbade to follow him.

It was impossible that in the time of Moses men should keep their faith

for Antichrist, who was unknown to them. But it is quite easy, in the

time of Antichrist, to believe in Jesus Christ, already known.

There is no reason for believing in Antichrist, which there is not for

believing in Jesus Christ. But there are reasons for believing in Jesus

Christ, which there are not for believing in the other.

826

Judges xiii, 23: "If the Lord were pleased to kill us, He would not have

shewed us all these things."

Hezekiah, Sennacherib.

Jeremiah. Hananiah, the false prophet, dies in seven months.

2 Macc. iii. The temple, ready for pillage, miraculously succoured.--2

Macc. xv.

1 Kings xvii. The widow to Elijah, who had restored her son, "By this I

know that thy words are true."

1 Kings xviii. Elijah with the prophets of Baal.

In the dispute concerning the true God and the truth of religion, there

has never happened any miracle on the side of error, and not of truth.

827

_Opposition._--Abel, Cain; Moses, the Magicians; Elijah, the false

prophets: Jeremiah, Hananiah; Micaiah, the false prophets; Jesus Christ,

the Pharisees; St. Paul, Bar-jesus; the Apostles, the Exorcists;

Christians, unbelievers; Catholics, heretics; Elijah, Enoch, Antichrist.

828

Jesus Christ says that the Scriptures testify of Him. But He does not

point out in what respect.

Even the prophecies could not prove Jesus Christ during His life; and

so, men would not have been culpable for not believing in Him before His

death, had the miracles not sufficed without doctrine. Now those who did

not believe in Him, when He was still alive, were sinners, as He said

Himself, and without excuse. Therefore they must have had proof beyond

doubt, which they resisted. Now, they had not the prophecies, but only

the miracles. Therefore the latter suffice, when the doctrine is not

inconsistent with them; and they ought to be believed.

John vii, 40. _Dispute among the Jews as among the Christians of

to-day._ Some believed in Jesus Christ; others believed Him not, because

of the prophecies which said that He should be born in Bethlehem. They

should have considered more carefully whether He was not. For His

miracles being convincing, they should have been quite sure of these

supposed contradictions of His teaching to Scripture; and this obscurity

did not excuse, but blinded them. Thus those who refuse to believe in

the miracles in the present day on account of a supposed contradiction,

which is unreal, are not excused.

The Pharisees said to the people, who believed in Him, because of His

miracles: "This people who knoweth not the law are cursed. But have any

of the rulers or of the Pharisees believed on him? For we know that out

of Galilee ariseth no prophet." Nicodemus answered: "Doth our law judge

any man before it hear him, [and specially, such a man who works such

miracles]?"

829

The prophecies were ambiguous; they are no longer so.

830

The five propositions were ambiguous; they are no longer so.

831

Miracles are no longer necessary, because we have had them already. But

when tradition is no longer minded; when the Pope alone is offered to

us; when he has been imposed upon; and when the true source of truth,

which is tradition, is thus excluded; and the Pope, who is its guardian,

is biased; the truth is no longer free to appear. Then, as men speak no

longer of truth, truth itself must speak to men. This is what happened

in the time of Arius. (Miracles under Diocletian and under Arius.)

832

_Miracle._--The people concluded this of themselves; but if the reason

of it must be given to you ...

It is unfortunate to be in exception to the rule. The same must be

strict, and opposed to exception. But yet, as it is certain that there

are exceptions to a rule, our judgment must though strict, be just.

833

John vi, 26: _Non quia vidisti signum, sed quia saturati estis._

Those who follow Jesus Christ because of His miracles honour His power

in all the miracles which it produces. But those who, making profession

to follow Him because of His miracles, follow Him in fact only because

He comforts them and satisfies them with worldly blessings, discredit

His miracles, when they are opposed to their own comforts.

John ix: _Non est hic homo a Deo, quia sabbatum non custodit. Alii:

Quomodo potest homo peccator haec signa facere?_

Which is the most clear?

This house is not of God; for they do not there believe that the five

propositions are in Jansenius. Others: This house is of God; for in it

there are wrought strange miracles.

Which is the most clear?

_Tu quid dicis? Dico quia propheta est. Nisi esset hic a Deo, non

poterat facere quidquam._[330]

834

In the Old Testament, when they will turn you from God. In the New, when

they will turn you from Jesus Christ. These are the occasions for

excluding particular miracles from belief. No others need be excluded.

Does it therefore follow that they would have the right to exclude all

the prophets who came to them? No; they would have sinned in not

excluding those who denied God, and would have sinned in excluding those

who did not deny God.

So soon, then, as we see a miracle, we must either assent to it, or have

striking proofs to the contrary. We must see if it denies a God, or

Jesus Christ, or the Church.

835

There is a great difference between not being for Jesus Christ and

saying so, and not being for Jesus Christ and pretending to be so. The

one party can do miracles, not the others. For it is clear of the one

party, that they are opposed to the truth, but not of the others; and

thus miracles are clearer.

836

That we must love one God only is a thing so evident, that it does not

require miracles to prove it.

837

Jesus Christ performed miracles, then the apostles, and the first saints

in great number; because the prophecies not being yet accomplished, but

in the process of being accomplished by them, the miracles alone bore

witness to them. It was foretold that the Messiah should convert the

nations. How could this prophecy be fulfilled without the conversion of

the nations? And how could the nations be converted to the Messiah, if

they did not see this final effect of the prophecies which prove Him?

Therefore, till He had died, risen again, and converted the nations, all

was not accomplished; and so miracles were needed during all this time.

Now they are no longer needed against the Jews; for the accomplished

prophecies constitute a lasting miracle.

838

"Though ye believe not Me, believe at least the works."[331] He refers

them, as it were, to the strongest proof.

It had been told to the Jews, as well as to Christians, that they should

not always believe the prophets; but yet the Pharisees and Scribes are

greatly concerned about His miracles, and try to show that they are

false, or wrought by the devil. For they must needs be convinced, if

they acknowledge that they are of God.

At the present day we are not troubled to make this distinction. Still

it is very easy to do: those who deny neither God nor Jesus Christ do no

miracles which are not certain. _Nemo facit virtutem in nomine meo, et

cito possit de me male loqui._[332]

But we have not to draw this distinction. Here is a sacred relic.[333]

Here is a thorn from the crown of the Saviour of the world, over whom

the prince of this world has no power, which works miracles by the

peculiar power of the blood shed for us. Now God Himself chooses this

house in order to display conspiciously therein His power.

These are not men who do miracles by an unknown and doubtful virtue,

which makes a decision difficult for us. It is God Himself. It is the

instrument of the Passion of His only Son, who, being in many places,

chooses this, and makes men come from all quarters there to receive

these miraculous alleviations in their weaknesses.

839

The Church has three kinds of enemies: the Jews, who have never been of

her body; the heretics, who have withdrawn from it; and the evil

Christians, who rend her from within.

These three kinds of different adversaries usually attack her in

different ways. But here they attack her in one and the same way. As

they are all without miracles, and as the Church has always had miracles

against them, they have all had the same interest in evading them; and

they all make use of this excuse, that doctrine must not be judged by

miracles, but miracles by doctrine. There were two parties among those

who heard Jesus Christ: those who followed His teaching on account of

His miracles; others who said.... There were two parties in the time of

Calvin.... There are now the Jesuits, etc.

840

Miracles furnish the test in matters of doubt, between Jews and

heathens, Jews and Christians, Catholics and heretics, the slandered and

slanderers, between the two crosses.

But miracles would be useless to heretics; for the Church, authorised by

miracles which have already obtained belief, tells us that they have not

the true faith. There is no doubt that they are not in it, since the

first miracles of the Church exclude belief of theirs. Thus there is

miracle against miracle, both the first and greatest being on the side

of the Church.

These nuns,[334] astonished at what is said, that they are in the way of

perdition; that their confessors are leading them to Geneva; that they

suggest to them that Jesus Christ is not in the Eucharist, nor on the

right hand of the Father; know that all this is false, and therefore

offer themselves to God in this state. _Vide si via iniquitatis in me

est._[335] What happens thereupon? This place, which is said to be the

temple of the devil, God makes His own temple. It is said that the

children must be taken away from it. God heals them there. It is said

that it is the arsenal of hell. God makes of it the sanctuary of His

grace. Lastly, they are threatened with all the fury and vengeance of

heaven; and God overwhelms them with favours. A man would need to have

lost his senses to conclude from this that they are therefore in the way

of perdition.

(We have without doubt the same signs as Saint Athanasius.)

841

_Si tu es Christus, dic nobis.[336]

Opera quae ego facio in nomine patris mei, haec testimonium perhibent de

me. Sed vos non creditis quia non estis ex ovibus meis. Oves meoe vocem

meam audiunt._[337]

John vi, 30. _Quod ergo tu facis signum ut videamus et credamus

tibi?--Non dicunt: Quam doctrinam praedicas?

Nemo potest facere signa quae tu facis nisi Deus._[338]

2 Macc. xiv, 15. _Deus qui signis evidentibus suam portionem protegit.

Volumus signum videre de coelo, tentantes eum._ Luke xi, 16.

_Generatio prava signum quaerit; et non dabitur.[339]

Et ingemiscens ait: Quid generatio ista signum quaerit?_ (Mark viii, 12.)

They asked a sign with an evil intention.

_Et non poterat facere._[340] And yet he promises them the sign of

Jonah, the great and wonderful miracle of his resurrection.

_Nisi videritis, non creditis._[341] He does not blame them for not

believing unless there are miracles, but for not believing unless they

are themselves spectators of them.

Antichrist _in signis mendacibus_, says Saint Paul, 2 Thess. ii.

_Secundum operationem Satanae, in seductione iis qui pereunt eo quod

charitatem veritatis non receperunt ut salvi fierent, ideo mittet illis

Deus optationes erroris ut credant mendacio._

As in the passage of Moses: _Tentat enim vos Deus, utrum diligatis

eum.[342]

Ecce praedixi vobis: vos ergo videte._[343]

842

Here is not the country of truth. She wanders unknown amongst men. God

has covered her with a veil, which leaves her unrecognised by those who

do not hear her voice. Room is opened for blasphemy, even against the

truths that are at least very likely. If the truths of the Gospel are

published, the contrary is published too, and the questions are

obscured, so that the people cannot distinguish. And they ask, "What

have you to make you believed rather than others? What sign do you give?

You have only words, and so have we. If you had miracles, good and

well." That doctrine ought to be supported by miracles is a truth, which

they misuse in order to revile doctrine. And if miracles happen, it is

said that miracles are not enough without doctrine; and this is another

truth, which they misuse in order to revile miracles.

Jesus Christ cured the man born blind, and performed a number of

miracles on the Sabbath day. In this way He blinded the Pharisees, who

said that miracles must be judged by doctrine.

"We have Moses: but, as for this fellow, we know not from whence he

is."[344] It is wonderful that you know not whence He is, and yet He

does such miracles.

Jesus Christ spoke neither against God, nor against Moses.

Antichrist and the false prophets, foretold by both Testaments, will

speak openly against God and against Jesus Christ. Who is not hidden ...

God would not allow him, who would be a secret enemy, to do miracles

openly.

In a public dispute where the two parties profess to be for God, for

Jesus Christ, for the Church, miracles have never been on the side of

the false Christians, and the other side has never been without a

miracle.

"He hath a devil." John x, 21. And others said, "Can a devil open the

eyes of the blind?"

The proofs which Jesus Christ and the apostles draw from Scripture are

not conclusive; for they say only that Moses foretold that a prophet

should come. But they do not thereby prove that this is He; and that is

the whole question. These passages therefore serve only to show that

they are not contrary to Scripture, and that there appears no

inconsistency, but not that there is agreement. Now this is enough,

namely, exclusion of inconsistency, along with miracles.

There is a mutual duty between God and men. We must pardon Him this

saying: Quid debui?[345] "Accuse me," said God in Isaiah.

"God must fulfil His promises," etc.

Men owe it to God to accept the religion which He sends. God owes it to

men not to lead them into error. Now, they would be led into error, if

the workers of miracles announced a doctrine which should not appear

evidently false to the light of common sense, and if a greater worker of

miracles had not already warned men not to believe them.

Thus, if there were divisions in the Church, and the Arians, for

example, who declared themselves founded on Scripture just as the

Catholics, had done miracles, and not the Catholics, men should have

been led into error.

For, as a man, who announces to us the secrets of God, is not worthy to

be believed on his private authority, and that is why the ungodly doubt

him; so when a man, as a token of the communion which he has with God,

raises the dead, foretells the future, removes the seas, heals the sick,

there is none so wicked as not to bow to him, and the incredulity of

Pharaoh and the Pharisees is the effect of a supernatural obduracy.

When, therefore, we see miracles and a doctrine not suspicious, both on

one side, there is no difficulty. But when we see miracles and

suspicious doctrine on the same side, we must then see which is the

clearest. Jesus Christ was suspected.

Bar-jesus blinded.[346] The power of God surpasses that of His enemies.

The Jewish exorcists[347] beaten by the devils, saying, "Jesus I know,

and Paul I know; but who are ye?"

Miracles are for doctrine, and not doctrine for miracles.

If the miracles are true, shall we be able to persuade men of all

doctrine? No; for this will not come to pass. _Si angelus_[348]....

Rule: we must judge of doctrine by miracles; we must judge of miracles

by doctrine. All this is true, but contains no contradiction.

For we must distinguish the times.

How glad you are to know the general rules, thinking thereby to set up

dissension, and render all useless! We shall prevent you, my father;

truth is one and constant.

It is impossible, from the duty of God to men, that a man, hiding his

evil teaching, and only showing the good, saying that he conforms to God

and the Church, should do miracles so as to instil insensibly a false

and subtle doctrine. This cannot happen.

And still less, that God, who knows the heart, should perform miracles

in favour of such a one.

843

The three marks of religion: perpetuity, a good life, miracles. They

destroy perpetuity by their doctrine of probability; a good life by

their morals; miracles by destroying either their truth or the

conclusions to be drawn from them.

If we believe them, the Church will have nothing to do with perpetuity,

holiness, and miracles. The heretics deny them, or deny the conclusions

to be drawn from them; they do the same. But one would need to have no

sincerity in order to deny them, or again to lose one's senses in order

to deny the conclusions to be drawn from them.

Nobody has ever suffered martyrdom for the miracles which he says he has

seen; for the folly of men goes perhaps to the length of martyrdom, for

those which the Turks believe by tradition, but not for those which they

have seen.

844

The heretics have always attacked these three marks, which they have

not.

845

_First objection_: "An angel from heaven.[349] We must not judge of

truth by miracles, but of miracles by truth. Therefore the miracles are

useless."

Now they are of use, and they must not be in opposition to the truth.

Therefore what Father Lingende[350] has said, that "God will not permit

that a miracle may lead into error...."

When there shall be a controversy in the same Church, miracle will

decide.

_Second objection_: "But Antichrist will do miracles."

The magicians of Pharaoh did not entice to error. Thus we cannot say to

Jesus respecting Antichrist, "You have led me into error." For

Antichrist will do them against Jesus Christ, and so they cannot lead

into error. Either God will not permit false miracles, or He will

procure greater.

[Jesus Christ has existed since the beginning of the world: this is more

impressive than all the miracles of Antichrist.]

If in the same Church there should happen a miracle on the side of those

in error, men would be led into error. Schism is visible; a miracle is

visible. But schism is more a sign of error than a miracle is a sign of

truth. Therefore a miracle cannot lead into error.

But apart from schism, error is not so obvious as a miracle is obvious.

Therefore a miracle could lead into error.

_Ubi est Deus tuus?_[351] Miracles show Him, and are a light.

846

One of the anthems for Vespers at Christmas: _Exortum est in tenebris

lumen rectis corde._[352]

847

If the compassion of God is so great that He instructs us to our

benefit, even when He hides Himself, what light ought we not to expect

from Him when He reveals Himself?

848

Will _Est et non est_ be received in faith itself as well as in

miracles? And if it is inseparable in the others ...

When Saint Xavier[353] works miracles.--[Saint Hilary. "Ye wretches, who

oblige us to speak of miracles."]

Unjust judges, make not your own laws on the moment; judge by those

which are established, and by yourselves. _Vae qui conditis leges

iniquas._[354]

Miracles endless, false.

In order to weaken your adversaries, you disarm the whole Church.

If they say that our salvation depends upon God, they are "heretics." If

they say that they are obedient to the Pope, that is "hypocrisy." If

they are ready to subscribe to all the articles, that is not enough. If

they say that a man must not be killed for an apple, "they attack the

morality of Catholics." If miracles are done among them, it is not a

sign of holiness, and is, on the contrary, a symptom of heresy.

This way in which the Church has existed is that truth has been without

dispute, or, if it has been contested, there has been the Pope, or,

failing him, there has been the Church.

849

The five propositions[355] condemned, but no miracle; for the truth was

not attacked. But the Sorbonne ... but the bull....

It is impossible that those who love God with all their heart should

fail to recognise the Church; so evident is she.--It is impossible that

those who do not love God should be convinced of the Church.

Miracles have such influence that it was necessary that God should warn

men not to believe in them in opposition to Him, all clear as it is that

there is a God. Without this they would have been able to disturb men.

And thus so far from these passages, Deut. xiii, making against the

authority of the miracles, nothing more indicates their influence. And

the same in respect of Antichrist. "To seduce, if it were possible, even

the elect."[356]

850

The history of the man born blind.

What says Saint Paul? Does he continually speak of the evidence of the

prophecies? No, but of his own miracle. What says Jesus Christ? Does He

speak of the evidence of the prophecies? No; His death had not fulfilled

them. But He says, _Si non fecissem_.[357] Believe the works.

Two supernatural foundations of our wholly supernatural religion; one

visible, the other invisible; miracles with grace, miracles without

grace.

The synagogue, which had been treated with love as a type of the Church,

and with hatred, because it was only the type, has been restored, being

on the point of falling when it was well with God, and thus a type.

Miracles prove the power which God has over hearts, by that which He

exercises over bodies.

The Church has never approved a miracle among heretics.

Miracles a support of religion: they have been the test of Jews; they

have been the test of Christians, saints, innocents, and true believers.

A miracle among schismatics is not so much to be feared; for schism,

which is more obvious than a miracle, visibly indicates their error. But

when there is no schism, and error is in question, miracle decides.

_Si non fecissem quae alius non fecit._ The wretches who have obliged us

to speak of miracles.

Abraham and Gideon confirm faith by miracles.

Judith. God speaks at last in their greatest oppression.

If the cooling of love leaves the Church almost without believers,

miracles will rouse them. This is one of the last effects of grace.

If one miracle were wrought among the Jesuits!

When a miracle disappoints the expectation of those in whose presence it

happens, and there is a disproportion between the state of their faith

and the instrument of the miracle, it ought then to induce them to

change. But with you it is otherwise. There would be as much reason in

saying that, if the Eucharist raised a dead man, it would be necessary

for one to turn a Calvinist rather than remain a Catholic. But when it

crowns the expectation, and those, who hoped that God would bless the

remedies, see themselves healed without remedies ...

_The ungodly._--No sign has ever happened on the part of the devil

without a stronger sign on the part of God, or even without it having

been foretold that such would happen.

851

Unjust persecutors of those whom God visibly protects. If they reproach

you with your excesses, "they speak as the heretics." If they say that

the grace of Jesus Christ distinguishes us, "they are heretics." If they

do miracles, "it is the mark of their heresy."

Ezekiel.--They say: These are the people of God who speak thus.

It is said, "Believe in the Church";[358] but it is not said, "Believe

in miracles"; because the last is natural, and not the first. The one

had need of a precept, not the other. Hezekiah.

The synagogue was only a type, and thus it did not perish; and it was

only a type, and so it is decayed. It was a type which contained the

truth, and thus it has lasted until it no longer contained the truth.

My reverend father, all this happened in types. Other religions perish;

this one perishes not.

Miracles are more important than you think. They have served for the

foundation, and will serve for the continuation of the Church till

Antichrist, till the end.

The two witnesses.

In the Old Testament and the New, miracles are performed in connection

with types. Salvation, or a useless thing, if not to show that we must

submit to the Scriptures: type of the sacrament.

852

[We must judge soberly of divine ordinances, my father.

Saint Paul in the isle of Malta.]

853

The hardness of the Jesuits, then, surpasses that of the Jews, since

those refused to believe Jesus Christ innocent only because they doubted

if His miracles were of God. Whereas the Jesuits, though unable to doubt

that the miracles of Port-Royal are of God, do not cease to doubt still

the innocence of that house.

854

I suppose that men believe miracles. You corrupt religion either in

favour of your friends, or against your enemies. You arrange it at your

will.

855

_On the miracle._--As God has made no family more happy, let it also be

the case that He find none more thankful.

Pascal's Pensées · 第 13 / 14 章