SECTION VI

THE PHILOSOPHERS

339

I can well conceive a man without hands, feet, head (for it is only

experience which teaches us that the head is more necessary than feet).

But I cannot conceive man without thought; he would be a stone or a

brute.

340

The arithmetical machine produces effects which approach nearer to

thought than all the actions of animals. But it does nothing which would

enable us to attribute will to it, as to the animals.

341

The account of the pike and frog of Liancourt.[128] They do it always,

and never otherwise, nor any other thing showing mind.

342

If an animal did by mind what it does by instinct, and if it spoke by

mind what it speaks by instinct, in hunting, and in warning its mates

that the prey is found or lost; it would indeed also speak in regard to

those things which affect it closer, as example, "Gnaw me this cord

which is wounding me, and which I cannot reach."

343

The beak of the parrot, which it wipes, although it is clean.

344

Instinct and reason, marks of two natures.

345

Reason commands us far more imperiously than a master; for in disobeying

the one we are unfortunate, and in disobeying the other we are fools.

346

Thought constitutes the greatness of man.

347

Man is but a reed, the most feeble thing in nature; but he is a thinking

reed. The entire universe need not arm itself to crush him. A vapour, a

drop of water suffices to kill him. But, if the universe were to crush

him, man would still be more noble than that which killed him, because

he knows that he dies and the advantage which the universe has over him;

the universe knows nothing of this.

All our dignity consists, then, in thought. By it we must elevate

ourselves, and not by space and time which we cannot fill. Let us

endeavour, then, to think well; this is the principle of morality.

348

_A thinking reed._--It is not from space that I must seek my dignity,

but from the government of my thought. I shall have no more if I possess

worlds. By space the universe encompasses and swallows me up like an

atom; by thought I comprehend the world.

349

_Immateriality of the soul._--Philosophers[129] who have mastered their

passions. What matter could do that?

350

_The Stoics._--They conclude that what has been done once can be done

always, and that since the desire of glory imparts some power to those

whom it possesses, others can do likewise. There are feverish movements

which health cannot imitate.

Epictetus[130] concludes that since there are consistent Christians,

every man can easily be so.

351

Those great spiritual efforts, which the soul sometimes assays, are

things on which it does not lay hold.[131] It only leaps to them, not as

upon a throne, for ever, but merely for an instant.

352

The strength of a man's virtue must not be measured by his efforts, but

by his ordinary life.

353

I do not admire the excess of a virtue as of valour, except I see at the

same time the excess of the opposite virtue, as in Epaminondas,[132] who

had the greatest valour and the greatest kindness. For otherwise it is

not to rise, it is to fall. We do not display greatness by going to one

extreme, but in touching both at once, and filling all the intervening

space. But perhaps this is only a sudden movement of the soul from one

to the other extreme, and in fact it is ever at one point only, as in

the case of a firebrand. Be it so, but at least this indicates agility

if not expanse of soul.

354

Man's nature is not always to advance; it has its advances and retreats.

Fever has its cold and hot fits; and the cold proves as well as the hot

the greatness of the fire of fever.

The discoveries of men from age to age turn out the same. The kindness

and the malice of the world in general are the same. _Plerumque gratae

principibus vices._[133]

355

Continuous eloquence wearies.

Princes and kings sometimes play. They are not always on their thrones.

They weary there. Grandeur must be abandoned to be appreciated.

Continuity in everything is unpleasant. Cold is agreeable, that we may

get warm.

Nature acts by progress, _itus et reditus_. It goes and returns, then

advances further, then twice as much backwards, then more forward than

ever, etc.

The tide of the sea behaves in the same manner; and so apparently does

the sun in its course.

356

The nourishment of the body is little by little. Fullness of nourishment

and smallness of substance.

357

When we would pursue virtues to their extremes on either side, vices

present themselves, which insinuate themselves insensibly there, in

their insensible journey towards the infinitely little: and vices

present themselves in a crowd towards the infinitely great, so that we

lose ourselves in them, and no longer see virtues. We find fault with

perfection itself.

358

Man is neither angel nor brute, and the unfortunate thing is that he who

would act the angel acts the brute.[134]

359

We do not sustain ourselves in virtue by our own strength, but by the

balancing of two opposed vices, just as we remain upright amidst two

contrary gales. Remove one of the vices, and we fall into the other.

360

What the Stoics propose is so difficult and foolish!

The Stoics lay down that all those who are not at the high degree of

wisdom are equally foolish and vicious, as those who are two inches

under water.

361

_The sovereign good. Dispute about the sovereign good._--_Ut sis

contentus temetipso et ex te nascentibus bonis._[135] There is a

contradiction, for in the end they advise suicide. Oh! What a happy

life, from which we are to free ourselves as from the plague!

362

_Ex senatus-consultis et plebiscitis_ ...

To ask like passages.

363

_Ex senatus-consultis et plebiscitis scelera exercentur._ Sen. 588.[136]

_Nihil tam absurde dici potest quod non dicatur ab aliquo

philosophorum._ Divin.[137]

_Quibusdam destinatis sententiis consecrati quae non probant coguntur

defendere._ Cic.[138]

_Ut omnium rerum sic litterarum quoque intemperantia laboramus._

Senec.[139]

_Id maxime quemque decet, quod est cujusque suum maxime._[140]

_Hos natura modos primum dedit._[141] Georg.

_Paucis opus est litteris ad bonam mentem._[142]

_Si quando turpe non sit, tamen non est non turpe quum id a multitudine

laudetur._

_Mihi sic usus est, tibi ut opus est facto, fac._[143] Ter.

364

_Rarum est enim ut satis se quisque vereatur._[144]

_Tot circa unum caput tumultuantes deos._[145]

_Nihil turpius quam cognitioni assertionem praecurrere._ Cic.[146]

_Nec me pudet, ut istos, fateri nescire quid nesciam._[147]

_Melius non incipient._[148]

365

_Thought._--All the dignity of man consists in thought. Thought is

therefore by its nature a wonderful and incomparable thing. It must have

strange defects to be contemptible. But it has such, so that nothing is

more ridiculous. How great it is in its nature! How vile it is in its

defects!

But what is this thought? How foolish it is!

366

The mind of this sovereign judge of the world is not so independent that

it is not liable to be disturbed by the first din about it. The noise of

a cannon is not necessary to hinder its thoughts; it needs only the

creaking of a weathercock or a pulley. Do not wonder if at present it

does not reason well; a fly is buzzing in its ears; that is enough to

render it incapable of good judgment. If you wish it to be able to reach

the truth, chase away that animal which holds its reason in check and

disturbs that powerful intellect which rules towns and kingdoms. Here is

a comical god! _O ridicolosissimo eroe!_

367

The power of flies; they win battles,[149] hinder our soul from acting,

eat our body.

368

When it is said that heat is only the motions of certain molecules, and

light the _conatus recedendi_ which we feel,[150] it astonishes us.

What! Is pleasure only the ballet of our spirits? We have conceived so

different an idea of it! And these sensations seem so removed from those

others which we say are the same as those with which we compare them!

The sensation from the fire, that warmth which affects us in a manner

wholly different from touch, the reception of sound and light, all this

appears to us mysterious, and yet it is material like the blow of a

stone. It is true that the smallness of the spirits which enter into the

pores touches other nerves, but there are always some nerves touched.

369

Memory is necessary for all the operations of reason.

370

[Chance gives rise to thoughts, and chance removes them; no art can keep

or acquire them.

A thought has escaped me. I wanted to write it down. I write instead,

that it has escaped me.]

371

[When I was small, I hugged my book; and because it sometimes happened

to me to ... in believing I hugged it, I doubted....]

372

In writing down my thought, it sometimes escapes me; but this makes me

remember my weakness, that I constantly forget. This is as instructive

to me as my forgotten thought; for I strive only to know my nothingness.

373

_Scepticism._--I shall here write my thoughts without order, and not

perhaps in unintentional confusion; that is true order, which will

always indicate my object by its very disorder. I should do too much

honour to my subject, if I treated it with order, since I want to show

that it is incapable of it.

374

What astonishes me most is to see that all the world is not astonished

at its own weakness. Men act seriously, and each follows his own mode of

life, not because it is in fact good to follow since it is the custom,

but as if each man knew certainly where reason and justice are. They

find themselves continually deceived, and by a comical humility think it

is their own fault, and not that of the art which they claim always to

possess. But it is well there are so many such people in the world, who

are not sceptics for the glory of scepticism, in order to show that man

is quite capable of the most extravagant opinions, since he is capable

of believing that he is not in a state of natural and inevitable

weakness, but, on the contrary, of natural wisdom. Nothing fortifies

scepticism more than that there are some who are not sceptics; if all

were so, they would be wrong.

375

[I have passed a great part of my life believing that there was justice,

and in this I was not mistaken; for there is justice according as God

has willed to reveal it to us. But I did not take it so, and this is

where I made a mistake; for I believed that our justice was essentially

just, and that I had that whereby to know and judge of it. But I have so

often found my right judgment at fault, that at last I have come to

distrust myself, and then others. I have seen changes in all nations and

men, and thus after many changes of judgment regarding true justice, I

have recognised that our nature was but in continual change, and I have

not changed since; and if I changed, I would confirm my opinion.

The sceptic Arcesilaus,[151] who became a dogmatist.]

376

This sect derives more strength from its enemies than from its friends;

for the weakness of man is far more evident in those who know it not

than in those who know it.

377

Discourses on humility are a source of pride in the vain, and of

humility in the humble. So those on scepticism cause believers to

affirm. Few men speak humbly of humility, chastely of chastity, few

doubtingly of scepticism. We are only falsehood, duplicity,

contradiction; we both conceal and disguise ourselves from ourselves.

378

_Scepticism._--Excess, like defect of intellect, is accused of madness.

Nothing is good but mediocrity. The majority has settled that, and finds

fault with him who escapes it at whichever end. I will not oppose it. I

quite consent to put myself there, and refuse to be at the lower end,

not because it is low, but because it is an end; for I would likewise

refuse to be placed at the top. To leave the mean is to abandon

humanity. The greatness of the human soul consists in knowing how to

preserve the mean. So far from greatness consisting in leaving it, it

consists in not leaving it.

379

It is not good to have too much liberty. It is not good to have all one

wants.

380

All good maxims are in the world. We only need to apply them. For

instance, we do not doubt that we ought to risk our lives in defence of

the public good; but for religion, no.

It is true there must be inequality among men; but if this be conceded,

the door is opened not only to the highest power, but to the highest

tyranny.

We must relax our minds a little; but this opens the door to the

greatest debauchery. Let us mark the limits. There are no limits in

things. Laws would put them there, and the mind cannot suffer it.

381

When we are too young, we do not judge well; so, also, when we are too

old. If we do not think enough, or if we think too much on any matter,

we get obstinate and infatuated about it. If one considers one's work

immediately after having done it, one is entirely prepossessed in its

favour; by delaying too long, one can no longer enter into the spirit of

it. So with pictures seen from too far or too near; there is but one

exact point which is the true place wherefrom to look at them: the rest

are too near, too far, too high, or too low. Perspective determines that

point in the art of painting. But who shall determine it in truth and

morality?

382

When all is equally agitated, nothing appears to be agitated, as in a

ship. When all tend to debauchery, none appears to do so. He who stops

draws attention to the excess of others, like a fixed point.

383

The licentious tell men of orderly lives that they stray from nature's

path, while they themselves follow it; as people in a ship think those

move who are on the shore. On all sides the language is similar. We must

have a fixed point in order to judge. The harbour decides for those who

are in a ship; but where shall we find a harbour in morality?

384

Contradiction is a bad sign of truth; several things which are certain

are contradicted; several things which are false pass without

contradiction. Contradiction is not a sign of falsity, nor the want of

contradiction a sign of truth.

385

_Scepticism._--Each thing here is partly true and partly false.

Essential truth is not so; it is altogether pure and altogether true.

This mixture dishonours and annihilates it. Nothing is purely true, and

thus nothing is true, meaning by that pure truth. You will say it is

true that homicide is wrong. Yes; for we know well the wrong and the

false. But what will you say is good? Chastity? I say no; for the world

would come to an end. Marriage? No; continence is better. Not to kill?

No; for lawlessness would be horrible, and the wicked would kill all the

good. To kill? No; for that destroys nature. We possess truth and

goodness only in part, and mingled with falsehood and evil.

386

If we dreamt the same thing every night, it would affect us as much as

the objects we see every day. And if an artisan were sure to dream every

night for twelve hours' duration that he was a king, I believe he would

be almost as happy as a king, who should dream every night for twelve

hours on end that he was an artisan.

If we were to dream every night that we were pursued by enemies, and

harassed by these painful phantoms, or that we passed every day in

different occupations, as in making a voyage, we should suffer almost as

much as if it were real, and should fear to sleep, as we fear to wake

when we dread in fact to enter on such mishaps. And, indeed, it would

cause pretty nearly the same discomforts as the reality.

But since dreams are all different, and each single one is diversified,

what is seen in them affects us much less than what we see when awake,

because of its continuity, which is not, however, so continuous and

level as not to change too; but it changes less abruptly, except rarely,

as when we travel, and then we say, "It seems to me I am dreaming." For

life is a dream a little less inconstant.

387

[It may be that there are true demonstrations; but this is not certain.

Thus, this proves nothing else but that it is not certain that all is

uncertain, to the glory of scepticism.]

388

_Good sense._--They are compelled to say, "You are not acting in good

faith; we are not asleep," etc. How I love to see this proud reason

humiliated and suppliant! For this is not the language of a man whose

right is disputed, and who defends it with the power of armed hands. He

is not foolish enough to declare that men are not acting in good faith,

but he punishes this bad faith with force.

389

Ecclesiastes[152] shows that man without God is in total ignorance and

inevitable misery. For it is wretched to have the wish, but not the

power. Now he would be happy and assured of some truth, and yet he can

neither know, nor desire not to know. He cannot even doubt.

390

My God! How foolish this talk is! "Would God have made the world to damn

it? Would He ask so much from persons so weak?" etc. Scepticism is the

cure for this evil, and will take down this vanity.

391

_Conversation._--Great words: Religion, I deny it.

_Conversation._--Scepticism helps religion.

392

_Against Scepticism._--[... It is, then, a strange fact that we cannot

define these things without obscuring them, while we speak of them with

all assurance.] We assume that all conceive of them in the same way; but

we assume it quite gratuitously, for we have no proof of it. I see, in

truth, that the same words are applied on the same occasions, and that

every time two men see a body change its place, they both express their

view of this same fact by the same word, both saying that it has moved;

and from this conformity of application we derive a strong conviction of

a conformity of ideas. But this is not absolutely or finally convincing,

though there is enough to support a bet on the affirmative, since we

know that we often draw the same conclusions from different premisses.

This is enough, at least, to obscure the matter; not that it completely

extinguishes the natural light which assures us of these things. The

academicians[153] would have won. But this dulls it, and troubles the

dogmatists to the glory of the sceptical crowd, which consists in this

doubtful ambiguity, and in a certain doubtful dimness from which our

doubts cannot take away all the clearness, nor our own natural lights

chase away all the darkness.

393

It is a singular thing to consider that there are people in the world

who, having renounced all the laws of God and nature, have made laws for

themselves which they strictly obey, as, for instance, the soldiers of

Mahomet, robbers, heretics, etc. It is the same with logicians. It seems

that their licence must be without any limits or barriers, since they

have broken through so many that are so just and sacred.

394

All the principles of sceptics, stoics, atheists, etc., are true. But

their conclusions are false, because the opposite principles are also

true.

395

_Instinct, reason._--We have an incapacity of proof, insurmountable by

all dogmatism. We have an idea of truth, invincible to all scepticism.

396

Two things instruct man about his whole nature; instinct and experience.

397

The greatness of man is great in that he knows himself to be miserable.

A tree does not know itself to be miserable. It is then being miserable

to know oneself to be miserable; but it is also being great to know that

one is miserable.

398

All these same miseries prove man's greatness. They are the miseries of

a great lord, of a deposed king.

399

We are not miserable without feeling it. A ruined house is not

miserable. Man only is miserable. _Ego vir videns._[154]

400

_The greatness of man._--We have so great an idea of the soul of man

that we cannot endure being despised, or not being esteemed by any soul;

and all the happiness of men consists in this esteem.

401

_Glory._--The brutes do not admire each other. A horse does not admire

his companion. Not that there is no rivalry between them in a race, but

that is of no consequence; for, when in the stable, the heaviest and

most ill-formed does not give up his oats to another, as men would have

others do to them. Their virtue is satisfied with itself.

402

The greatness of man even in his lust, to have known how to extract from

it a wonderful code, and to have drawn from it a picture of benevolence.

403

_Greatness._--The reasons of effects indicate the greatness of man, in

having extracted so fair an order from lust.

404

The greatest baseness of man is the pursuit of glory. But it is also the

greatest mark of his excellence; for whatever possessions he may have on

earth, whatever health and essential comfort, he is not satisfied if he

has not the esteem of men. He values human reason so highly that,

whatever advantages he may have on earth, he is not content if he is not

also ranked highly in the judgment of man. This is the finest position

in the world. Nothing can turn him from that desire, which is the most

indelible quality of man's heart.

And those who most despise men, and put them on a level with the brutes,

yet wish to be admired and believed by men, and contradict themselves by

their own feelings; their nature, which is stronger than all, convincing

them of the greatness of man more forcibly than reason convinces them of

their baseness.

405

_Contradiction._--Pride counterbalancing all miseries. Man either hides

his miseries, or, if he disclose them, glories in knowing them.

406

Pride counterbalances and takes away all miseries. Here is a strange

monster, and a very plain aberration. He is fallen from his place, and

is anxiously seeking it. This is what all men do. Let us see who will

have found it.

407

When malice has reason on its side, it becomes proud, and parades reason

in all its splendour. When austerity or stern choice has not arrived at

the true good, and must needs return to follow nature, it becomes proud

by reason of this return.

408

Evil is easy, and has infinite forms; good is almost unique.[155] But a

certain kind of evil is as difficult to find as what we call good; and

often on this account such particular evil gets passed off as good. An

extraordinary greatness of soul is needed in order to attain to it as

well as to good.

409

_The greatness of man._--The greatness of man is so evident, that it is

even proved by his wretchedness. For what in animals is nature we call

in man wretchedness; by which we recognise that, his nature being now

like that of animals, he has fallen from a better nature which once was

his.

For who is unhappy at not being a king, except a deposed king? Was

Paulus AEmilius[156] unhappy at being no longer consul? On the contrary,

everybody thought him happy in having been consul, because the office

could only be held for a time. But men thought Perseus so unhappy in

being no longer king, because the condition of kingship implied his

being always king, that they thought it strange that he endured life.

Who is unhappy at having only one mouth? And who is not unhappy at

having only one eye? Probably no man ever ventured to mourn at not

having three eyes. But any one is inconsolable at having none.

410

_Perseus, King of Macedon._--Paulus AEmilius reproached Perseus for not

killing himself.

411

Notwithstanding the sight of all our miseries, which press upon us and

take us by the throat, we have an instinct which we cannot repress, and

which lifts us up.

412

There is internal war in man between reason and the passions.

If he had only reason without passions ...

If he had only passions without reason ...

But having both, he cannot be without strife, being unable to be at

peace with the one without being at war with the other. Thus he is

always divided against, and opposed to himself.

413

This internal war of reason against the passions has made a division of

those who would have peace into two sects. The first would renounce

their passions, and become gods; the others would renounce reason, and

become brute beasts. (Des Barreaux.)[157] But neither can do so, and

reason still remains, to condemn the vileness and injustice of the

passions, and to trouble the repose of those who abandon themselves to

them; and the passions keep always alive in those who would renounce

them.

414

Men are so necessarily mad, that not to be mad would amount to another

form of madness.

415

The nature of man may be viewed in two ways: the one according to its

end, and then he is great and incomparable; the other according to the

multitude, just as we judge of the nature of the horse and the dog,

popularly, by seeing its fleetness, _et animum arcendi_; and then man is

abject and vile. These are the two ways which make us judge of him

differently, and which occasion such disputes among philosophers.

For one denies the assumption of the other. One says, "He is not born

for this end, for all his actions are repugnant to it." The other says,

"He forsakes his end, when he does these base actions."

416

_For Port-Royal.[158] Greatness and wretchedness._--Wretchedness being

deduced from greatness, and greatness from wretchedness, some have

inferred man's wretchedness all the more because they have taken his

greatness as a proof of it, and others have inferred his greatness with

all the more force, because they have inferred it from his very

wretchedness. All that the one party has been able to say in proof of

his greatness has only served as an argument of his wretchedness to the

others, because the greater our fall, the more wretched we are, and

_vice versa._ The one party is brought back to the other in an endless

circle, it being certain that in proportion as men possess light they

discover both the greatness and the wretchedness of man. In a word, man

knows that he is wretched. He is therefore wretched, because he is so;

but he is really great because he knows it.

417

This twofold nature of man is so evident that some have thought that we

had two souls. A single subject seemed to them incapable of such sudden

variations from unmeasured presumption to a dreadful dejection of

heart.

418

It is dangerous to make man see too clearly his equality with the brutes

without showing him his greatness. It is also dangerous to make him see

his greatness too clearly, apart from his vileness. It is still more

dangerous to leave him in ignorance of both. But it is very advantageous

to show him both. Man must not think that he is on a level either with

the brutes or with the angels, nor must he be ignorant of both sides of

his nature; but he must know both.

419

I will not allow man to depend upon himself, or upon another, to the end

that being without a resting-place and without repose ...

420

If he exalt himself, I humble him; if he humble himself, I exalt him;

and I always contradict him, till he understands that he is an

incomprehensible monster.

421

I blame equally those who choose to praise man, those who choose to

blame him, and those who choose to amuse themselves; and I can only

approve of those who seek with lamentation.

422

It is good to be tired and wearied by the vain search after the true

good, that we may stretch out our arms to the Redeemer.

423

_Contraries. After having shown the vileness and the greatness of

man._--Let man now know his value. Let him love himself, for there is in

him a nature capable of good; but let him not for this reason love the

vileness which is in him. Let him despise himself, for this capacity is

barren; but let him not therefore despise this natural capacity. Let him

hate himself, let him love himself; he has within him the capacity of

knowing the truth and of being happy, but he possesses no truth, either

constant or satisfactory.

I would then lead man to the desire of finding truth; to be free from

passions, and ready to follow it where he may find it, knowing how much

his knowledge is obscured by the passions. I would indeed that he should

hate in himself the lust which determined his will by itself, so that it

may not blind him in making his choice, and may not hinder him when he

has chosen.

424

All these contradictions, which seem most to keep me from the knowledge

of religion, have led me most quickly to the true one.

Pascal's Pensées · 第 6 / 14 章