DEAREST ELSIE,

I am just back from the country. But first I must tell you about my

dinner. I had asked the Housmans, George, Eileen Hope, and Madame de

Saint Luce who is staying in London for three weeks. Just before dinner

I got a telegram saying that Mrs Housman was laid up and couldn't

possibly come. Housman arrived by himself. George was evidently

frightfully annoyed and hardly spoke. Madame de Saint Luce was amazed

and rather amused by Housman, and after dinner Eileen sang beautifully,

so it went off fairly well except for George.

Saturday I went down to Staines. Housman had got an elegant villa on the

river. Very ugly, with red tiles, photogravures, and green wooden chairs

and a conservatory, full of calceolaria. But I must say his food is

delicious. George was there, Lady Jarvis, and Miss Sarah.

After dinner on Saturday there was a slight fracas. George asked Mrs

Housman to sing. She didn't much want to, but finally said she would.

Miss Sarah, who is a brilliant pianist, said she would accompany her

(she evidently hates being accompanied). She sang a song of Schubert's,

_Gute Nacht_. Miss Sarah played it rather fast. Mrs Housman said it

ought to be slower. Miss Sarah said it was meant to be fast, and that

was her conception of the song in any case.

Mrs Housman said she couldn't sing it like that, and didn't, and then

she said she couldn't sing at all. Afterwards she did sing some English

ballads and accompanied herself.

She sings most beautifully, her voice is perfectly produced and you hear

every word. There is nothing throaty or operatic about it but her voice

goes straight through one. George was entranced. Sunday afternoon George

and Mrs H. went out on the river and stayed out all the afternoon. I

spent the afternoon with Lady Jarvis, who is most clever and amusing.

She told me all about the Housmans. Mrs H. is not Canadian but Irish.

She was brought up in a convent in French Canada. Directly she came out

of it her marriage with H., who was then in a Canadian firm, was

arranged by her aunt (her aunt was an imbecile and quite penniless).

They lived several years in Canada, California and other parts of

America, and came to England about three years ago. Housman was

unfaithful from the first. Lady Jarvis knew about Celia Russell. I asked

her if Mrs Housman knew. She said she--Lady Jarvis--didn't know, but it

wouldn't make any difference if Mrs H. did or not. She said: "There is

nothing about Albert Housman that Clare doesn't know." Then she said

that unless I was blind I must of course have seen George was madly in

love with her.

I said I agreed. She said she thought Mrs Housman was madly in love with

him. I said I wasn't sure. Lady Jarvis said she was quite sure.

They came back very late from the river and Mrs Housman didn't come

down to dinner. She said she had a headache. We had rather a gloomy

dinner although Miss Sarah and Lady Jarvis never stopped talking for a

moment, but George was silent.

You know he sees nobody now except the Housmans.

Yours,

G.

_From the Diary of Godfrey Mellor_

_Monday, May_ 3_rd. Gray's Inn_.

A. returned to London a day sooner than he was expected. His Secretary,

Tuke, had not returned. He had left his address with me. He spent his

holiday in the Guest House, Fort Augustus Abbey, a Benedictine

monastery. He returned this morning. A. asked me on Saturday where he

was. When I told him, A. showed great surprise. He said: "He has been

with me six years and I never knew he was an R.C. It's extraordinary

when a thing once turns up, you then meet with it every day. I seem

always to be coming across Catholics now."

_Tuesday, May_ 4_th._

Alfred Riley telegraphed to me to know whether I could put him up

to-night. I have answered in the affirmative, but he will be, I fear,

most uncomfortable.

_Wednesday, May_ 5_th._

Riley arrived last night. He has been in Paris for the last three months

working at the _Bibliothèque Nationale_. He told me he had something of

importance to tell me: that he was seriously thinking of becoming a

Roman Catholic. I was greatly surprised. He was the last person I would

expect to do such a thing. I told him I had no prejudice against Roman

Catholics, but it was very difficult for me to believe that a man of his

intellectual attainments could honestly believe the things he would be

expected to believe. Also, if he needed a Church I did not understand

why he could not be satisfied with the Church of England, which was a

historic Church. He said: "Do you remember when we were at Oxford that

we used to say it would be a great sell if we found out when we were

dead that Christianity was true after all? Well, I believe it is true. I

believe, not in spite of my reason, nor against my reason, nor apart

from my reason, but with my reason. Well, if one believes with one's

reason in the Christian revelation, that is to say, if one believes that

God has uttered Himself fully and uniquely through Christ, such a belief

has certain logical consequences." I said nothing, for indeed I did not

know what to say. Riley laughed and said: "Don't be alarmed; don't think

I am going to hand you a tract. For Heaven's sake let me be able to

speak out at least to one person about this." I begged him to go on, and

he said he thought Catholicism was the only logical consequence of a

belief in the Christian revelation. Anglicanism and all forms of

Protestantism seemed to him like the lopped off branches of a living

tree.

I asked him what there was to prevent him worshipping in Roman Catholic

churches if he felt inclined that way without sacrificing his

intellectual freedom to their tenets.

He said: "You talk as if it was ritual I cared for and wanted. One can

be glutted with ritual in the Anglican Church if one wants that."

As for giving up one's freedom, he said I must agree that law, order and

discipline were the indispensable conditions of freedom. He had never

heard Catholics complain of any loss of freedom, indeed Catholic

philosophy, manners, customs, and even speech, seemed to him much freer

than Protestant or Agnostic philosophy, and what it stood for. He asked

me which I thought was freest, a Sunday in Paris or Rome or a Sunday in

Glasgow or London.

Passing By · 第 20 / 78 题