The British government, while repealing the law, had yet affirmed its

sovereign authority over the colonies. The colonies, on the other hand,

were inclined to confirm their present advantage and take a step still

further in advance. They would not be taxed without representation; why

should they submit to any legislation whatever without representation?

What right had England to enforce the Navigation Acts? The more the

general situation was contemplated and discussed, the plainer to all

did it appear that union was indispensable. The governors of most of

the colonies were directing a treacherous attack against the charters;

but bold students of the drift of things were foreseeing a time when

charters might be superseded by independence. Patriots everywhere were

keenly on the watch for any symptoms of a design on Parliament's part

to raise a revenue from America. The presence and quartering of English

soldiers in the colonies was regarded as not only a burden, but an

insinuation. It was moreover a constant occasion of disturbance; for

there was no love lost between the people and the soldiers. But, that

there was no disposition on the people's part to pick quarrels or to

borrow trouble, was evident from their voluntarily passing resolutions

for the reimbursement of persons, like Hutchinson, who had suffered

loss from the riots. If England would treat them like reasonable

creatures, they were more than willing to meet her half way. It is

probable that but for the royal governors, England and America might

have arrived at an amicable understanding; yet, in the ultimate

interests of both countries, it was better that the evil counselors of

the day should prevail.

Townshend, an able, eloquent, but entirely untrustworthy man, devoted

to affairs, and of insatiable though unprincipled ambition, proposed in

Parliament to formulate a plan to derive a permanent revenue from

America. This Parliament has been described by historians, and is

convicted by its record, as the most corrupt, profligate and

unscrupulous in English annals. William Pitt, who had accepted the

title of Lord Chatham, and entered the House of Lords, was nominally

the leader, but his health and failing faculties left him no real

power. Shelburne, Secretary of State, was moderate and liberal, but no

match for Townshend's brilliancy. The latter's proposal was to suspend

the legislature of New York, as a punishment for the insubordination of

the colony and a warning to others; to support a resident army, and to

pay salaries to governors, judges and other crown officers, out of the

revenue from America; to establish commissioners of the customs in the

country; to legalize general writs of assistance; to permit no

native-born American to hold office under the crown; and to make the

revenue derivable from specified taxes on imports. The tax on tea was

among those particularly mentioned. This was the scheme which was to be

substituted for the repealed stamp tax; the colonies had objected to

that as internal; this was external, and, though Townshend had refused

to admit any difference between the two, he now employed it as a means

of bringing the colonies to terms. The measure was received with

acclaim by Parliament, though it was contrary to the real sentiment of

the English nation. The king was charmed with it. Townshend died soon

after it was passed, at the age of forty-one; and the king called on

Lord North to take his place; a man of infirm will, but able,

well-informed and clear-minded, with a settled predisposition against

the cause of the people. He was as good an enemy of America as

Grenville himself, though a less ill-natured one.

But, viewing this period broadly, it is manifest that the finest brains

and best hearts, both in England and America, were friends to the cause

of liberty. America, certainly, at this critical epoch in her career,

produced a remarkable band of statesmen and patriots, perfectly fitted

to the parts they had to play. The two Adamses, Gadsden, Franklin,

Otis, Patrick Henry, Livingstone of New York, John Hancock, the wealthy

and splendid Boston merchant, Hawley of Connecticut, and Washington,

meditating upon the liberties of his country in the retirement of Mount

Vernon, and unconsciously preparing himself to lead her armies through

the Revolution--there has never been a company of better men active at

one time in any country. Just at this juncture, too, there arose in

Delaware a prophet by the name of John Dickinson, who wrote under the

title of The Farmer, and who formulated an argument against the new

revenue law which caught the attention of all the colonies. England, he

pointed out, prohibits American manufactures; she now lays duties on

importations, for the purpose of revenue only. Americans were taking

steps to establish a league to abstain from purchasing any articles

brought from England, intending thus to defeat the operation of the act

without breaking the law. This might answer in the case of luxuries, or

of things which could be made at home. But what if England were to meet

this move by laying a duty on some necessary of life, and then forbid

Americans to manufacture it at home? Obviously, they would then be

constrained to buy it, paying the duty, and thus surrendering their

freedom. From this point of view it would not be enough to evade the

tax; it must be repealed, or resisted; and resistance meant war.

Unless, however, some action of an official character were taken,

binding the colonies to co-operation, it was evident that the law would

gradually go into effect. The Massachusetts assembly, early in 1768,

sent to its London agent a letter, composed by Samuel Adams, embodying

their formal protest to the articles of the revenue act and its

corollaries. At the same time, they sent copies of the statement to the

other colonial assemblies in the country, accompanied with the

suggestion that all unite in discontinuing the use of British imported

manufactures and other articles. The crown officers, for their part,

renewed their appeal to England for naval and military forces to compel

obedience and secure order.

The king and the government inclined to think that force was the remedy

in this case. It was in vain that the more magnanimous called attention

to the fact that an army and navy could not compel a man to buy a black

broadcloth coat, if he liked a homespun one better. Inflammatory

reports from America represented it as being practically in a state of

insurrection. A Boston newspaper, which had published a severe

arraignment of Governor Bernard, was tried for libel, and the jury,

though informed by Hutchinson that if they did not convict of high

treason they "might depend on being damned," brought in a verdict of

acquittal. The Adams letter was laid before the English ministry and

pronounced to be "of a most dangerous and factious tendency," and an

injunction was dispatched to the several colonial governors to bid

their assemblies to treat it with contempt, and if they declined, to

dissolve them. Gage was ordered to enforce tranquillity. But the

colonial resistance had thus far been passive only. The assemblies now

declared that they had exclusive right to tax the people; Virginia not

only agreed to the Adams letter, but indited one even more

uncompromising; Pennsylvania and New York fell into line. A Boston

committee presented an address to Bernard asking him to mediate between

the people and England; he promised to do so, but at the same time sent

out secret requests to have regiments sent to Boston. Divining his

duplicity, John Adams, at the next town meeting, formulated the

people's resolve to vindicate their rights "at the utmost hazard of

their lives and fortunes," declaring that whosoever should solicit the

importation of troops was "an enemy to this town and province." The

determination not to rescind the principles stated in the Samuel Adams

letter of January was unanimous. Lord Mansfield thereupon declared that

the Americans must be reduced to entire obedience before their alleged

grievances could be considered. Camden confessed that he did not know

what to do; the law must be executed: but how? "If any province is to

be chastised, it should be Boston." Finally, two regiments and a

squadron were ordered to Boston from Halifax. Samuel Adams felt that

the time was now at hand either for independence or annihilation, and

he affirmed publicly that the colonists would be justified in

"destroying every British soldier whose foot should touch the shore."

In the country round Boston, thirty thousand men were ready to fight. A

meeting was called in Faneuil Hall, and it resolved that "the

inhabitants of the Town of Boston will at the utmost peril of their

lives and fortunes maintain and defend their rights, liberties,

privileges and immunities."--"And," said Otis, pointing to four hundred

muskets which had been collected, "there are your arms; when an attempt

is made against your liberties, they will be delivered." Bernard, who

was pale with alarm, had to announce that the regiments were coming,

and would be quartered, one in Castle William, the other on the town.

The council replied that there was room enough in the Castle for both,

and that, according to the law, any officer attempting to use private

houses would be cashiered. In the midst of the dispute, the regiments

arrived. The convention had, from the first, law on their side; and in

order to preserve this advantage were determined to offer only a

passive resistance to the revenue law, and to abstain from violence

until it was offered to them. No charge of high treason would stand

against any one. The anchoring of the squadron off Castle William, with

guns trained on the State House, had no effect. On the first of

October, in compliance with an order from Gage, and in the absence of

Bernard, who had fled to the country in a panic, the regiments were

landed at Long Wharf. With military music playing, fixed bayonets and

loaded guns, they marched to the Common, which was whitened by their

tents. An artillery train was also brought ashore. An attempt to

browbeat the people into providing quarters failed, and the officers

dared not seize them. At length they were obliged to rent rooms, and

some of the men were lodged in the State House, as the weather became

too cold for outdoor encampment; not a few of them deserted, and

escaped into the country. But Boston was under military rule, though

there was nothing for the soldiers to do. Sentinels were posted about

the town, and citizens were challenged as they walked their streets. On

the Sabbath Day, drums and bugles disturbed the worshipers in the

churches. Officers of the custom house and army officers met at the

British coffee house in King Street. On the south side of the State

House was a court of guard, defended by two brass cannon, and a large

number of soldiers were kept there; in front of the custom house,

further down the street, a sentinel paced his beat. Boston was

indignant, but restricted itself to ceasing all purchases of

importations, trusting thus to wear out their oppressors. Some of the

younger men, however, were becoming restive under the implied or overt

insults of the officers and soldiery, and there were occasional

quarrels which might develop into something more serious. It was at

this time that the French inhabitants of New Orleans rose and drove out

the Spanish governor, Ulloa; and Du Chatelet remarked that it was "a

good example for the English colonies." But Boston needed no example;

she afforded one in herself. All the other colonies had indorsed her

attitude; but the animosity of England was concentrated against her.

The whole kingdom was embattled against the one small town; two more

regiments had been sent there, but no rebellion could be found. Was it

the purpose to provoke one? Soldiers, from time to time, were arrested

for misdemeanors, and brought before the civil magistrates, but were

pardoned, when convicted, by the higher courts. Samuel Adams and

others, on the other hand, continued to be threatened with prosecution

for treason, but did not recede from their position. Bernard,

Hutchinson, Oliver, and the attorney-general acted as secret informers

and purveyors of evidence against the patriots. All petitions from the

colonies addressed to the English government were refused so much as a

hearing. And yet there was a strong division of opinion in Parliament

as to the course England was taking; and there were many who wished

that the question of taxation had never been raised. In 1769, it was

conceded that the duties on most specified articles should be

abolished; nevertheless, Hillsborough, Secretary for the Colonies, said

that he would "grant nothing to Americans except what they might ask

with a halter round their necks"; and the great Samuel Johnson did not

scruple to add that "they are a race of convicts, and ought to be

thankful for anything we allow them short of hanging." Against such

intemperate vaporings are to be set the noble resolutions of the

Virginia assembly, of which Jefferson, Patrick Henry and Washington

were members, extending its sympathy and support to Massachusetts,

warning King George against carrying Americans beyond seas for trial,

and advocating colonial union. This was the more admirable, because

England had treated Virginia with especial tenderness and

consideration. Similar resolutions in other colonies followed, and a

regular correspondence between the assemblies was agreed to. The folly

of English oppression had already created a united America.

At length the English government, weakened by the opposition, and by

the badness of their cause, agreed to abolish all duties except that on

tea, which was now bought cheaper in Boston than in London; and to

withdraw two at least of the regiments. But Boston was contending for a

principle, not for a few hundred pounds, and refused to accept the tea

as a compromise. Much more conducive to good feeling was the recall of

Governor Bernard, just as he was making himself comfortable for a long

tenure of office under the protection of British soldiers. This man's

character is as contemptible as any in colonial history. It was not

merely or chiefly that he was an abject miser and a foe to liberty. He

was a convicted liar, a spy, and a double-dealer; and his cowardice

made him despised even by the British. He scrupled not to swindle the

British government, by conniving at smuggling, while assuring them of

his zeal in putting it down. While smiling in men's faces, he was

covertly laying plots for their destruction. His last thought, after

receiving the crushing news of his recall, was to try to beguile the

assembly into voting him his salary for the coming year. The attempt

failed, and he retreated in disgrace, with joy-bells ringing in his

ears. His only consolation was that he left Hutchinson in his place, as

ill-disposed toward liberty and honor as himself, and his superior in

intelligence. His recall had been due to the desire of London

merchants, who believed that his presence was destructive of their

commercial interests. The ministers for whom he had incurred so much

ignominy would do nothing for him; for the dishonorable are always

ready to sacrifice their instruments.

Hutchinson immediately began the system of secret conspiracy against

the lives and liberties of the chief citizens of Boston which marked

his administration; flattering them in their presence, while writing

letters of false accusations to the English ministry, which he begged

them never to disclose. But his cowardice was equal to Bernard's; so

that when the people detected an informer, and tarred and feathered

him, he dared not order the English regiments to interfere, and no one

else was qualified to give the word. But the hatred between the

soldiers and the citizens was inflamed. A British officer told his men,

if they were "touched" by a citizen, to "run him through the body."

Many young men went armed with oaken cudgels.

Two sons of Hutchinson, worthy of their sire, were guilty of felony in

breaking a lock to get at a consignment of tea, which had been locked

up by the committee of merchants. The merchants called Hutchinson to

account; he promised to deposit the price of what tea had been sold and

to return the rest. Dalrymple, the commander, issued twelve rounds of

ammunition, with which the soldiers ostentatiously paraded the streets.

But inasmuch as no one but the governor was authorized to bid them

fire, and the citizens knew Hutchinson's timidity too well to imagine

that he would do such a thing, this only led to taunts and revilings;

and such epithets as "lobster-backs" and "damned rebels" were freely

bandied between the military and the young men. The officers made

common cause with their men, and the custom house people fomented the

bitterness. A vague plan seems to have been formed to provoke the

citizens into attacking the military, who were then to fire, and plead

self-defense.

On Friday, March 2, 1770, some soldiers came to blows with men employed

on a rope-walk. The affair was talked over in the barracks, and nothing

was done to restrain the desire of the soldiers for revenge, or to keep

them off the streets at night. On the 5th, squads of them were forging

about, armed with bludgeons, bayonets and cutlasses, boasting of their

"valor," challenging the people they met, and even striking them. Their

officers openly encouraged them. Their regiments were the Fourteenth

and the Twenty-ninth, notorious for their dissoluteness and

disorderliness. The night was cold, and a few inches of snow fell.

Other groups of soldiers came out, with their flintlocks in their

hands: a boy was struck on the head; several times the guns were

leveled, and the threat was made to fire. One youth was knocked down

with a cutlass. Knots of angry young men began to range hither and

thither with staves:--"Where are they?--Cowards!--Fire if you

dare!--Lobster-scoundrels!" The soldiers, on the other hand, were

giving way to fury, striking persons in the doors of their houses,

calling out that they would kill everybody, and shouting "Fire--fire!"

as if it were a watchword. But as yet no irrevocable act had been done.

Soon after nine o'clock, however, the alarm bell at the top of King

Street was rung hurriedly. Many persons thought it was for fire; and as

Boston had been nearly destroyed by a great fire ten years before, a

large crowd rapidly poured out into the streets. But the frosty air

carried no scent of smoke, and as the bell soon stopped its clangor, a

number returned to their homes; but the younger and more hot-headed

smelled mischief, if not smoke, and drew from various directions toward

the barracks. A party of them came down King Street toward the custom

house. They were halted by the gruff "Who goes there?" of the sentry,

and his bayonet at their breasts.

There were words of defiance: a sudden scuffle: and out of the barrack

gate came pouring the guard, with guns in their hands. Almost in the

same moment a great multitude of citizens came surging in from all

sides, and thronged in front of the custom house, where the fight

seemed to be going on. Those behind pushed against those in front, and

all became wedged in a mass, trying to see what was going forward,

swaying this way and that, uttering broken shouts, threatening,

warning, asking, replying; and hot at heart with that fierce craving to

measure strength against strength which is the characteristic of the

Anglo-Saxon when his blood is up. The soldiers were wholly in the

wrong: they had no right to be where they were; they had no right to

wantonly annoy and provoke citizens in their own town; their presence

in the colony, for the purpose of constraining a peaceful population,

was a crime; but consciousness of this fact did not lessen their

animosity. As for the Boston people, they felt, as they faced the

emissaries of their oppressors on that wintry night, the accumulated

exasperation of generations of injustice, and perhaps a stern thrill of

joy that now, at last, the final, unforgivable outrage was to be

perpetrated.

The great majority of citizens had not even sticks in their hands; none

of them carried guns or cutlasses. Some snowballs were thrown at the

soldiers, who faced the crowd with savage faces, and leveled bayonets.

Then there was a fresh crowding and uproar, for Captain Preston and a

squad of eight men had issued from the guard house and were forcing

their way to their comrades with the point of the cold steel. Their red

coats and black shakos and the glint of the moonlight on their weapons

made them conspicuous in the struggling mass, and the sinister intent

which was manifest in their look and bearing sent a strange thrill

through the multitude.

A tall man in a black cloak, who five years later was a general of

artillery in the American army, laid his hand on Preston's shoulder

forcibly. "For God's sake, sir, get back to your barracks; if you fire,

you must die for it!" exclaimed he, in a deep voice. Preston stared at

him, hardly seeming to see him, and quivering with agitation. "Stand

aside--I know what I'm about," he replied huskily. As the soldiers

reached the sentinel's post and faced about in a semicircle, the crowd

fell back, and there were voices calling "Home--home!" The soldiers

began to load, pouring the powder and ball into the muzzles of their

guns, and ramming the charge home sharply with their ramrods. At this,

a dozen men, with cudgels, advanced upon the soldiers, cheering, and

passed in front of them, striking the barrels of their muskets with

their sticks. "Cowardly rascals!--drop your guns, and we're ready for

you," said some between their gritted teeth. "Fire, lobsters!--you

daren't fire!" cried others. "Down with 'em! drive the cowards to their

barracks!" shouted some. "Are your men loaded?" demanded a citizen,

stepping up to Preston; and when the latter nodded--"Will they fire

upon the inhabitants?"--"Not without my orders," the captain seemed to

say. "Come on, you rascals--fire if you dare--you daren't fire!" yelled

the fiercer spirits, now beside themselves with passion; and one struck

a soldier's piece. He leveled it and fired, at the same moment that

Preston waved his sword and gave the word. A man fell at the shot: the

people gave back; the other soldiers fired deliberately and viciously,

not in a volley, but one after another, taking aim. Some of them

started forward to use the bayonet. It is said that a figure was seen

to come out on the balcony of the custom house, his face concealed by a

veil hanging down over it, and fire into the retreating throng. The

open space in front of the soldiers was overhung with smoke, which

slowly dissolved away, and revealed eleven New Englanders stretched

along the trodden snow of their native town. Some tried to rise; others

lay still. Blood flowed from their wounds, smoking in the icy air, and

tinging the white snow red. The deed had been done.

A sullen muttering of horror, swelling by degrees into a roar of rage,

burst from hundreds of throats as that spectacle was seen; and in a

moment, as it seemed, the town drums had beat to arms, the bells were

clanging, and all Boston was pressing tumultuously into King Street.

The Twenty-ninth regiment was hurriedly marshaled under arms; it

appeared at first as if the populace, thousands strong, and not without

weapons, would rush upon them and tear them in pieces. But by this time

the saner and stronger men had reached the scene, and set themselves

resolutely to withhold the people. "You shall have justice," they told

them, "but let it be by due course of law." And there was Hutchinson,

promising everything in his dismay, hurrying between the soldiers and

the crowd, his feet making blood-stained marks in the snow as he went.

To no man more than to him was due the guilt of that night's work.

The History of the United States from 1492 to 1910, Volume 1 From Discovery of America October 12, 1492 to Battle of Lexington April 19, 1775 · 第 30 / 34 段