New Jersey passed through many trivial vicissitudes, changes of

ownership, vexed land-titles, and royal encroachments. For several

years the people had no visible government at all. They did not hold

themselves so well in hand as did New York, and were less audacious and

aggressive in resistance; but in one way or another, they fairly held

their own, prospered and multiplied. Pennsylvania enjoyed from the

first more undisturbed independence and self-direction than the others;

at one time it seemed to be their ambition to discover something which

Penn would not grant them, and then to ask for it. But the great Quaker

was equal to the occasion; no selfishness, crankiness, or whimsicality

on their part could wear out his patience and benevolence. In the

intervals of his imprisonments in England he labored for their welfare.

The queen contemplated making Pennsylvania a royal province, but Penn,

though poor, would not let it go except on condition it might retain

its democratic liberties. The people, in short, kept everything in

their own hands, and their difficulties arose chiefly from their

disputes as to what to do with so much freedom. It was a colony where

everybody was equal, without an established church, where any one was

welcome to enter and dwell, which was destitute of arms or defense or

even police, which yet grew in all good things more rapidly than any of

its sister colonies. The people waxed fat and kicked, but they did no

evil in the sight of the Lord, whatever England may have thought of

them; and after the contentious little appendage of Delaware had

finally been cut off from its big foster sister (though they shared the

same governors until the Revolution) there is little more to be said of

either of them.

The Roman Catholic owners of Maryland fared ill after William came into

power; he made the colony a royal province in 1691, and for thirty

years or more there were no more Baltimores in the government. Under

Copley, the first royal governor, the Church of England was declared to

be established; but dissenters were afterward protected; only the

Catholics were treated with intolerance in the garden themselves had

made. The people soon settled down and became contented, and slowly

their numbers augmented. But the Baltimores were persistent, and the

fourth lord, in 1715, took advantage of his infancy to compass a

blameless reconciliation with the Church of England, thereby securing

his installation in the proprietary rights of his forefathers, from

which the family was not evicted until the Revolution of the colonies

in 1775 opened a new chapter in the history of the world.

Virginia recovered rapidly from Berkeley, and suffered little from

Andros, who was governor in 1692, but with his fangs drawn, and an

experience to remember. The people still eschewed towns, and lived each

family in its own solitude, hospitable to all, but content with their

own company. The love of independence grew alike in the descendants of

the cavaliers and in the common people, and the wide application of the

suffrage equalized power, and even enabled the lower sort to keep the

gentry, when the fancy took them, out of the places of authority and

trust. Democracy was in the woods and streams and the blue sky, and all

breathed it in and absorbed it into their blood and bone. They early

petitioned William for home rule in all its purity; he permitted land

grants to be confirmed, but would not let their assembly supplant the

English parliament as a governing power. He sought, unsuccessfully, to

increase the authority of the church; for though the bishop might

license and the governor recommend, the parish would not present. It

was a leisurely, good-natured, careless, but spirited people,

indifferent to commerce, content to harvest their fields and rule their

slaves, and let the world go by. A more enviable existence than theirs

it would be hard to imagine. All their financial transactions were done

in tobacco, even to the clergyman's stipend and the judge's fee. No

enemy menaced them; politics were rather an amusement than a serious

duty; yet in these fertile regions were made the brains and characters

which afterward, for so many years, ruled the councils of the United

States, or led her armies in war. They lay fallow for seventy-five

years, and then gave the best of accounts of themselves. England did

not quite know what to make of the Virginians; to judge by the reports

of the governors, they were changeable as a pretty woman. But they were

simply capricious humorists, full of life and intelligence, who did

what they pleased and did not take themselves too seriously. They

indulged themselves with the novel toy, the post-office; and founded

William and Mary College in 1693. This venerable institution passed its

second centennial with one hundred and sixty students on its roll; but,

soon after, it "ceased upon the midnight, without pain." Anybody may

have a college in these days.

The Carolinas, no longer pestered by Grand Models, became another

rustic paradise. Their suns were warm, their forests vast, their people

delighting in a sort of wild civilization. When James II. went down,

the Carolinians needed no care-taker, and declined to avail themselves

of the martial law suggested by the anxious proprietors. But in 1690

they allowed Seth Sothel to occupy the gubernatorial seat, and sent up

a legislature. The southern section was subjected to some superficial

annoyance by the proprietors, who wished to make an income from the

country, but were unwilling to put their hands in their pockets in the

first place; they insisted upon their authority, and the colonists did

not say them nay, but maintained freedom of action in all their

concerns nevertheless. A series of proprietary governors were sent out

to them--Ludwell first, then Smith; both failed, and retired. Then came

Archdale, the Quaker, who struck a popular note in his remark that

dissenters could cut wood and hoe crops as well as the highest

churchmen; his policy was to concede, to conciliate and to harmonize,

and he was welcome and useful. The Indians, and even the Spaniards,

were brought into friendly relations. Liberty of conscience was

accorded to all but "papists," who were certainly hardly used in these

times. An attempt to base political power on possession of land was

defeated in 1702. The Church of England was accepted in 1704, and

though dissenters were tolerated, it remained the official dispenser of

religion until the Revolution. All these things were on the surface;

the colony, inside, was free, happy and prosperous; it had adopted rice

culture, with a great supply of negro slaves, and it brought furs from

far in the interior. The Huguenots had been enfranchised as soon as it

was known that England had turned her back on Catholicism and James.

None of the colonies had before them a future more peaceful and

profitable than South Carolina. The slaves were her only burden; but at

that period they seemed not a burden, but the assurance of her

prosperity.

North Carolina was as happy and as peaceful as her southern sister, but

the conditions of life there were different. The proprietors attempted

to control the people, but were worsted in almost every encounter. Laws

were passed only to be disregarded. Here, as elsewhere, the Quakers

became conspicuous in inculcating liberal notions, and were paid the

compliment of being hated and feared by the emissaries of England. What

was to be done with a population made up of fugitives of all kinds, not

from Europe only, but from the other colonies, who held all creeds, or

none at all; who lived by hunting and tree-cutting; who were as averse

from towns as Virginia, and many of whom could not be said to have any

fixed abode at all? If restraints were proposed, they ignored them; if

they were pressed, they resisted them, sometimes boisterously, but

never with bloodshed. Robert Daniel, deputy governor in 1704, tried to

establish the Church of England; a building was erected, but in all the

province there was but one clergyman, with an absentee congregation

scattered over hundreds of miles of mountain and forest. In the

following year there were two governors elected by opposite factions,

each with his own legislature; and in 1711 Edward Hyde, going out to

restore order, confounded the confusion. He called in Spotswood from

Virginia to help him; but there were too many Quakers; and the old

soldier, after landing a party of marines to indicate his disapproval

of anarchy, retired. Meantime, fresh emigrants kept arriving, including

many Palatinates from Germany. It was not a profitable country to its

reputed owners, who, in 1714, received a hundred dollars apiece from

it. But it supported its inhabitants all the better; and it was eight

years more before they supplied themselves with a court house, and

forty, before they felt the need of a printing press.

In New England, Connecticut and Rhode Island, which had suffered

comparatively little from the despotism of James, readily recovered

such minor rights as they had been deprived of. There was a dispute

between Fitz-John Winthrop and Fletcher as to the command of the local

militia, the former, with his fellow colonists, demanding that the

control be kept by the colony; Winthrop went to England and got

confirmation of his plea; and from the people, on his return, the

governorship. There were a score and a half of flourishing towns in

Connecticut, each with its meeting house and school. Little Rhode

Island recovered its charter, whether the original or a duplicate. An

act was pending in England to abrogate all colonial charters, and was

backed by the strong mercantile influence; but the French war caused it

to go over. Lord Cornbury, and Joseph Dudley, the Massachusetts-born

traitor, did their best to get a royal governor for these colonies, but

they failed; though Dudley, at the instance of Cotton Mather, was

afterward made governor of Massachusetts.

But no son of Massachusetts has so well deserved the condemnation of

history as Cotton Mather himself. Such political sins as his advocacy

of Dudley, and his opposition to the revival of the old charter, are

trifling; they might have been the result of ordinary blindness or

selfishness merely; but his part in the witchcraft delusion cannot be

so accounted for. In his persecution of the accused persons he was

actuated by a spirit of inflamed vanity and malignity truly diabolic;

and if there can be a crime which Heaven cannot forgive, assuredly

Cotton Mather steeped himself in it. He was a singular being; yet he

represented the evil tendencies of Puritanism; they drained into him,

so to say, until he became their sensible incarnation. In his person,

at last, the Puritans of Massachusetts beheld united every devilish

trait to which the tenets of their belief could incline them; and the

hideousness of the spectacle so impressed them that, from that time

forward, any further Cotton Mathers became impossible. There is no

feature in Mather's case that can be held to palliate his conduct. He

had the best education of the time, coming, as he did, from a line of

scholars, and out-Heroding them in the variety and curiousness of his

accomplishments, and in the number of his published "works"--three

hundred and eighty-three. Nothing that he produced has any original

value; but his erudition was enormous. Of "Magnalia," his chief and

representative work, it has been said that "it is a heterogeneous and

polyglot compilation of information useful and useless, of unbridled

pedantry, of religious adjuration, biographical anecdotes, political

maxims, and theories of education.... Indeed, it contains everything

except order, accuracy, sobriety, proportion, development, and upshot."

This man, born in 1663, was not yet thirty years of age when his

campaign against the witches began; indeed, he had given a hint of his

direction some years earlier. In his multifarious reading he had become

acquainted with all existing traditions and speculations concerning

witchcraft, and his profession as minister in the Calvinist communion

predisposed him to investigate all accessible details concerning the

devil. He was passionately hungry for notoriety and conspicuousness:

Tydides melior patre was the ambition he proposed to himself.

A huge memory, stored with the promiscuous rubbish of libraries, and

with facts which were transformed into rubbish by his treatment of

them, was combined in him with a diseased imagination, and a personal

vanity almost surpassing belief. His mental shallowness and consequent

restlessness rendered anything like original thought impossible to him;

and the faculty of intellectual digestion was not less beyond him. It

is probable that curiosity was the motive which originally drew him to

the study of witchcraft; a vague credence of such things was common at

the time; and in France and England many executions for the supposed

crime had taken place. Mather had no convictions on the subject; he was

incapable of convictions of any kind; and the revelation of his private

diary shows that at the very time he was wallowing in murders, and

shrieking out for ever more victims, he was in secret doubting the

truth of all religion, and coquetting with atheism. But men of no

religious faith are prone to superstitions; the man who denies God is

the first to seek for guidance from the stars. Suppose there should be

a devil?--was Mather's thought. It is not to be wondered at that such a

man should be fascinated by the notion; and we may perhaps concede to

Mather that, if at any time in his career he approached belief in

anything, the devil was the subject of his belief. Had his character

been genuine and vigorous, such a belief would have led him to plunge

into witchcraft, not as a persecutor, but as a performer; he would have

aimed to be chief at the witches' Sabbath, and to have rioted in the

terrible powers with which Satan's children were credited. But he was

far from owning this bold and trenchant fiber: though he could not

believe in God, he dared not defy Him; and still he could not refrain

from dabbling in the forbidden mysteries. Moreover, there was an

obscure and questionable faculty inherent in certain persons,

unaccountable on any recognized natural grounds, which gave support to

the witchcraft theory. We call this faculty hypnotism now; and

physiology seeks to connect it with the nervous affections of hysteria

and epilepsy. At all times, and in all quarters of the earth,

manifestations of it have not been wanting; and in Africa it has for

centuries existed as a so-called religious cult, to which in this

country the name of Hoodooism or Voodooism has been applied. It is a

savage form of devil worship, including snake-charming, and the lore of

fetiches and charms; and its professors are able to produce abnormal

effects, within certain limits, upon the nerves and imaginations of

their clients or victims. Among the negro slaves in Massachusetts in

1692, and the negro-Indian mongrels, there were persons able to

exercise this power. They attracted the attention of Cotton Mather.

Gradually, we may suppose, the idea took form in his mind that if he

could not be a witch himself, he might gain the notoriety he craved by

becoming the denouncer of witchcraft in others. Ministers in that day

still had great influence in New England, and had grasped at temporal

as well as spiritual sway, maintaining that the former should rightly

involve the latter. What a minister said, had weight; what so

well-known a minister as Cotton Mather said, would carry conviction to

many. If Mather could procure the execution of a witch or two, it could

not fail to add greatly to his spiritual glory and ascendency. It is,

of course, not to be imagined that he had any conception, beforehand,

of the extent to which the agitation he was about to begin would be

carried. But when evil is once let loose, it multiplies itself and

gains impetus, and rages like a fire. The only thing for Mather to do

was to keep abreast of the mischief which he had created. If he

faltered or relented, he would be himself destroyed. He was whirled

along with the foul storm by a mingling of terror, malice, vanity,

triumph and fascination: as repulsive and dastardly a figure as has

ever stained the records of our country. He was ready to sacrifice the

population of Massachusetts rather than confess that the deeds for

which he was responsible were based on what, in his secret soul, he

unquestionably felt was a delusion. For though he may have

half-believed in witchcraft while it presented itself to him as a

theory, yet as soon as he had reached the stage of actual examinations

and court testimony, he could not fail to perceive that the theory was

utterly devoid of reasonable foundation; that convictions could not be

had except by aid of open perjury, suppression and intimidation. Yet

Cotton Mather scrupled not to put in operation these and other devices;

to hound on the magistrates, to browbeat and sophisticate the juries,

and to scream threats, warnings and self-glorifications from the

pulpit. Needs must, when the devil drives. Had he paused, had he even

held his peace, that noose, slimy with the death-sweat of a score of

innocent victims, would have settled greedily round his own guilty

neck, and strangled his life. But Cotton Mather was too nimble, too

voluble, too false and too cowardly for the gallows; he lived to a good

age, and died in the odor of sanctity.

Immediately after the news of William's accession was known in New

England, Mather opposed the restoration of the ancient charter, because

it would have interfered with the plans of his personal political

ambition. He caused the presentation of an address to the king,

purporting to represent the desire of the majority of reputable

citizens of Boston, placing themselves at the royal disposal, without

suggesting that the charter rights be revived. Cotton Mather's father,

Increase, was the actual agent to England; but it was the views of

Cotton Mather rather than his own that he submitted to his majesty. The

blatant hypocrite had dominated his father. The king gave Massachusetts

a new charter which was entirely satisfactory to the petitioners, for

it took away the right of the people to elect their own officers and

manage their own affairs, and made the king the fountain of power and

honor. It was identical with all charters of royal colonies, except

that the council was elected jointly by the people and by its own

members. Sir William Phips, at Increase Mather's suggestion, was made

governor, and William Stoughton lieutenant-governor. The members of the

council were "every man of them a friend to the interests of the

churches," and of Cotton Mather. He did not conceal his delight. "The

time for favor is come, yea, the set time is come! Instead of my being

made a sacrifice to wicked rulers, my father-in-law, with several

related to me, and several brethren of my own church, are among the

council. The governor is not my enemy, but one whom I baptized, and one

of my own flock, and one of my dearest friends.--I obtained of the Lord

that He would use me to be a herald of His kingdom now approaching."

Such was the attitude of Cotton Mather regarding the political outlook.

Obviously the field was prepared for him to achieve his crowning

distinction as champion of God against the devil in Massachusetts. In

February of the next year he found his first opportunity.

There was in Salem a certain Reverend Samuel Parris who had a daughter,

a niece, and a negro-Indian servant called Tituba. The children were

about twelve years of age, and much in Tituba's society. Parris was an

Englishman born, and was at this time forty-one years old; he had left

Harvard College without a degree, had been in trade in Boston, and had

entered the ministry and obtained the pastorship of the Congregational

church at Danvers, then a part of Salem, three or four years before. He

had not lived at peace with his people; he had quarreled bitterly with

some of them, and the scandal had been noised abroad. He was a man of

brutal temper, and without moral integrity. These were the dramatis

personae employed by Cotton Mather in the first scene of his hideous

farce.

The children, at the critical age between childhood and puberty, were

in a condition to be readily worked upon; it is the age when the

nervous system is disorganized, the moral sense unformed, and the

imagination ignorant and unbridled. Many children are liars and

deceivers, and self-deceivers, then, who afterward develop into sanity

and goodness. But these unhappy little creatures were under the

fascination of the illiterate and abnormal mongrel, and she secretly

ravished and fascinated them with her inexplicable powers and obscure

devices. Their antics aroused suspicions in the coarse and perhaps

superstitious mind of Parris; he catechised them; the woman's husband

told what he knew; and Parris beat her till she consented to say she

was a witch. Such phenomena could only be due to witchcraft. The

cunning and seeming malignity of the children would tax belief, were it

not so familiar a fact in children; and notable also was their

histrionic ability. They were excited by the sensation they aroused,

and vain of it; they were willing to do what they could to prolong it.

But they hardly needed to invent anything; more than was necessary was

suggested to them by questions and comments. They were quick to take

hints, and improve upon them. Sarah Good, Martha Cory, Rebecca Nourse,

and all the rest, must be their victims; but God will forgive the

children, for they know not what they do. Presently, the contagion

spread; though, upon strict examination of the evidence, not nearly so

far as was supposed. Hundreds were bewildered and terrified, as well

they might be; the magistrates--Stoughton, Sewall, John Hathorne, poor

Octogenarian Bradstreet, Sir William Phips--these and others to whom it

fell to investigate and pronounce sentence--let us hope that some, if

not all of them, truly believed that their sentences were just. "God

will give you blood to drink!" was what Sarah Good said to Noyes, as

she stood on the scaffold. But why may they not have believed they were

in the right? There was Cotton Mather, the holy man, the champion

against the Evil One, the saint who walked with God, and daily lifted

up his voice in prayer and defiance and thanksgiving--he was ever at

hand, to cross-question, to insinuate, to surmise, to bluster, to

interpret, to terrify, to perplex, to vociferate: surely, this paragon

of learning and virtue must know more about the devil than any mere

layman could pretend to know; and they must accept his assurance and

guidance. "I stake my reputation," he shouted, "upon the truth of these

accusations." And he pointedly prayed that the trial might "have a good

issue." When Deliverance Hobbs was under examination, she did but cast

a glance toward the meeting house, "and," cries the Reverend gentleman,

in an ecstasy of indignation, "immediately a demon, invisibly entering

the house, tore down a part of it!" No wonder a man so gifted as he,

was conscious of a certain gratification amid all the horrors of the

diabolic visitation, for how could he regard it otherwise than as--in

his own words--"a particular defiance unto myself!" Such was the pose

which he adopted before his countrymen: that of a semi-divine, or quite

Divine man, standing between his fellow creatures and the assaults of

hell. And then Cotton Mather would go home to his secret chamber, and

write in his diary that God and religion were perhaps, after all, but

an old wives' tale.

The History of the United States from 1492 to 1910, Volume 1 From Discovery of America October 12, 1492 to Battle of Lexington April 19, 1775 · 第 21 / 34 段