CHAPTER XX

A CHAPTER OF ODDS AND ENDS

In 1886 my father took a house at Eastbourne, and I was no longer at

Westward Ho! as constantly as before, although a frequent visitor there

at the house of Claud Carnegie. He and I used to have many matches on

terms that are rather to be commended as a means for bringing together

two players of different handicaps. We used to play level, but I had to

give him five shillings before starting and at the end he paid me back a

shilling for every hole that I was up. It came, of course, to the same

thing as giving five holes up, but it is rather a more amusing way of

stating these odds. The five shillings puts me in mind of a very much

more gambling match that was played about that time, when I was at

Hoylake. There was at that date a very festive company of Edinburgh

golfers going about the various links under the leadership of old Mr.

Robert Clark, who edited the great book on golf. There was Sir Walter

Simpson, who also wrote a great golf book and was the son of the doctor

who discovered the blessed uses of chloroform, Hall Blyth, Valentine

Haggard, Cathcart, Jack Innes, and a few more--all, I fear, except Hall

Blyth, gone over to the majority.[4] Five of these warriors started out

one day at Hoylake to play a five-ball match, for a fiver a hole,

and--this was the prudent stipulation of Mr. Robert Clark, in his

ancient wisdom--they were to settle up at the end of each hole. The man

who happened to fall into bad trouble would thus have to part with four

fivers on the putting green, so it must have needed a well-filled

notebook to make a man sure of living through to the finish without

bankruptcy. I had suggested that a six-ball match would be really more

fun than a five-ball, and that I was willing to make the sixth; but the

well-meant suggestion was not taken in good part. I forget the ultimate

result of the encounter.

Naturally I was at Eastbourne a good deal, as I had no other home than

my father's, and I arrived just at the time of the first laying out of

the original nine-hole course there. Mayhewe was the most active of its

originators, and he and I planned it together. It implies no reflection

on the designers of the later eighteen-hole course to say that the old

nine-holes were better than any of the later developments. It is a very

different problem laying out nine, and laying out eighteen holes on

almost the same circumscribed piece of ground; for the later additions

to the area do not amount to a great deal.

It is amazing to me now to think how ignorant we were in those days of

the proper treatment of inland putting greens. We could plan the rest of

the course well enough. But the great idea was to keep on rolling and

rolling and rolling--the heavier the roller the better--until we had the

surface just round the hole so slick that if there was any gradient at

all the ball would not stay near the hole even if you placed it there by

hand. There was (there still is) a green called "Paradise"--and no

green was ever named more aptly according to the classic principle of

_lucus a non lucendo_. If you were below the hole, and below it on this

green you were sure to be, because the ball would not rest above, you

might putt up to the hole, and if you missed the hole the ball would

come trickling down to you again, and so you might go on putting "till

the cows came home." By which time there might probably be a little dew

which possibly might allow your ball to come to rest in the hole's

vicinity. But long before that you would have come to the conclusion

that golf, on Paradise green, was not a good game. One device used to be

to cut some jagged raw edges to stick out on the ball's surface, before

driving off the tee for this hole. Thus jagged, the ball would not fly

properly, but it was better to lose a shot, owing to this jaggedness,

through the green, than to lose twenty on the putting green. On the

rough edges of its scars the ball would come to rest even in Paradise.

However, this is a picture of that green at its most grievous worst. It

was not always thus, and on the whole the course, with its drives over a

great chalk pit and over the corners of one or two high woods, gave us

great fun and was not a bad test of golf. Peter Paxton was the

professional, a humorous little fellow and a wonderful putter on those

tricky greens. I remember, when he sent us his credentials, he added the

comment "and, Sir, I drink nothing stronger than cold water." I liked

the "cold," as if he feared that water with the chill off might go to

his head. He grew braver later.

This course at Eastbourne, be it understood, was technically of the

"inland" kind, though at the seaside. It was of the chalk-down soil;

and it was among the first of the new supply of inland courses which the

ever spreading vogue of golf demanded. Still we looked on these inland

greens as giving us at best only a poor substitute for the real game. We

had yet to learn of what inland soil, cleverly treated with an eye to

golf, might be capable. The only inland Club which was at this time of

any weight in the general golfing councils was the Royal Wimbledon,

which had seceded from the London Scottish, building itself a club-house

at the opposite end of the common. Some of the golfing leaders of the

day, such as Henry Lamb and Purves and others, made this their

headquarters, and there they were already hatching schemes which were

ultimately to lead to all that great development of golf in the East

Neuk, so to say, of Kent, and at first were to take form in the St.

George's Club and links, at Sandwich. Purves, with characteristic,

energy, was scouring the coast of England in these years, looking for

links as by Nature provided, and it was here, at this point, that he had

his great success. Of course there was much palaver and indecision, as

well as prolonged negotiations with the landowner--or his trustees,

seeing that Lord Guildford was then a minor--before any real move could

be made; but when it was made it meant a very great deal for London

golfers and gave an immense drive forward to the already fast booming

boom of English golf. In 1886 Mr. Du Maurier, the _Punch_ artist, was at

St. Andrews, already, as I remember, in large goggles and having trouble

with his eyes, and he then drew a picture of "the Golf Stream," as he

called it--a succession of pilgrims of all sorts, sexes and sizes,

making their way to St. Andrews. Will it be believed that this was the

first golfing picture in _Punch_; that it was the very first mention, as

I think, of golf in a comic paper? What would _Punch_ do to-day, we may

ask with wonder and dismay, if all the humorous opportunities which golf

gives its artists and its writers were withdrawn from them? They would

feel impoverished indeed. A year or two later, when I was editing the

Badminton Book on Golf, Mr. Harry Furniss showed me a letter he had just

received from Mr. Frank Burnand, then staying at Westward Ho! and then

editing _Punch_. Harry Furniss was, and is, a golfer; Frank Burnand was

not. "I think you would like this place," wrote the author of _Happy

Thoughts_--"there are fine golfing sands (_sic_) here." Therein he

expressed an even happier thought than he knew, for Westward Ho! at that

moment happened to be suffering from a considerable drought, and a heavy

gale had scattered the dry sand far and wide out of the bunkers, so that

"golfing sands" gave rather an apt description.

The Badminton Library of Sport was then coming out, volume by volume,

and delighting all to whom Sports and Pastimes made appeal. I do not

wish to bring too great discredit on a very eminent firm of publishers,

but it is a fact, sad as it is true, that when I first waited on them,

obedient to their summons, in Paternoster Row, and they broached to me

the subject of a golf book in their series, they made the very shocking

suggestion that it should be included in the same volume with other

Scottish sports, such as skating, curling and perhaps tossing the caber.

They did not know, they said, when I met them with some mild

expostulation, whether the game was "of sufficient importance to carry a

volume to itself." I must do them the justice to say that they quickly

saw and repented of their error, and I believe that ultimately the golf

volume did better than any other in all that popular series.

While I was doing some of the writing for this book, Sir Ralph Payne

Galway was writing the Shooting volumes, and we were both staying with

poor John Penn at his house in Carlton House Terrace. One night John

Penn asked Mr. Purdey, the gun-maker, to dinner, to talk guns with Sir

Ralph; and these two sat long over the dessert, after the rest of us had

left the table, talking of loads and bores and so on. The next morning,

while we were at breakfast, a four-wheeler drove up to the door, and Sir

Ralph, looking out, said in dismay, "By Jove, John, I believe that under

the influence of your champagne I must have ordered a whole 'bus load of

guns from Purdey." We looked out, and the four-wheeler was filled, from

roof to floor, with guns. It appeared, however, that they were not all

on order, but had merely been sent round by Mr. Purdey for inspection.

This, however, is not golf; nor was Sir Ralph then, I think, a golfer,

in spite of the good service he has since rendered to the dynamics of

the golf stroke and in spite of the excellence of the "P.G." ball.

FOOTNOTES:

[Footnote 4: Re-reading this, in 1919, even Hall Blyth's name has to be

added to those that have gone.]

Fifty Years of Golf · 第 20 / 36 章