CHAPTER XII.

BARNACLES AND ACORN-SHELLS.

Occasionally in strolling along a beach after a storm we shall

encounter some wreckage that came ashore with the last wave of the

incoming tide, and so failed to be washed off again. It may be a spar,

a rudder, a stern-board with a name upon it that tells a tale of a

vessel that has gone down. It may come in clean, with the splintered

wood looking as though just smashed, and we may judge from such

appearances how long it is since the catastrophe happened. On the other

hand, it may bear evidence of having floated in the sea for a long

period before getting into a current running coastwards. Such evidence

will consist in the wood being heavily soaked with water, or in its

surface being covered with hundreds of writhing snake-like creatures

with pale blue heads. We have met under such circumstances, with balks

of timber with scarcely an inch of their surface not covered with this

foreign growth; with casks on which they grew all round the edges of

the heads and the hoops.

A few months ago there drifted into our “porth” a small keg-buoy with

a long thick hawser attached, and the submerged half of the buoy had

a fine crop of the writhing things hanging from it, whilst they hung

from the rope in clusters a few inches apart. The finder very kindly

hauled it upon the rocks, and coiled the hawser round it that I might

photograph the entire lot. As it lay there in the autumn sunshine it

looked a very pretty group, and I regret that the camera would not

reproduce the snaky movements, nor the fine colouring.

Now the creature is no other than the Ship-Barnacle (_Lepas

anatifera_), one of the chief obstacles to speed in the old days of

“the wooden walls of England.” When a ship had made an ocean voyage

it was necessary to dock her and scrape off the enormous quantities

of Barnacles that not merely added to her weight, but offered strong

opposition to her passage through the waters. To-day, what with steel

vessels and patent anti-fouling compositions with which to paint the

ship’s bottom, the poor Barnacles find their world much narrower than

formerly, and with fewer openings for the enterprise of their race.

Should you come across such a barnacle-ridden waif of the sea, consider

it carefully. You shall find in it matter of interest, and, in addition

to its provision of something for your imagination to play round, in

your efforts to get a clue to the vessel of which the wreckage once

formed part, the life-story of the Barnacle itself is a romance.

[Illustration: SHIP-BARNACLE.]

Before we attempt to tell this story briefly, let us look at one of

the specimens before us. The long and evidently muscular neck ends in

a composite shell, which is seen to be composed of four portions, or

valves hinged together, opening in front, and strengthened at the back

by a fifth valve, a long, narrow, and curved piece. At short intervals

the two halves into which this “shell” is obviously divided part in

front, and out comes a mass of coiled up, slender, and hairy processes

which separate and uncoil as though attempting to catch some invisible

body, then coil up again and withdraw as though they had really caught

it and meant to keep it. Now this is the principal, one might almost

say the sole occupation of their adult lives, but writhing is another

to which they pay some attention. Probably it may strike you as a

monotonous, perhaps senseless way of spending one’s days; but it is

quite evident, from the great numbers of Barnacles crowded within a few

square feet, and all looking prosperous, that it is a paying game.

It must be remembered that however clear and crystalline the sea-water

appears, there is really great truth in the remark of the scientific

luminary, who said that the sea was a kind of thin soup or broth,

holding enormous quantities of animal and vegetable matter in solution,

most of it invisible to the unassisted vision. Whoever possesses a

retentive hand like that of the Barnacle, has only to spread the palms

and fingers wide, then close them tightly, to have _something_ enclosed

therein. Such is the Barnacle’s experience; and it is by the mere

opening and shutting of his hand that he gets a good living. Strictly

speaking, this hand is _not_ his hand, but a number of feet and hands

which correspond with the limbs of the crabs, lobsters, and shrimps.

Strange as the assertion may sound, unlike as the creatures appear, the

Barnacles belong to the same great class (Crustacea) as the animals

described in the last two chapters, though they are partly separated

from them and put into an order (Cirripedia) by themselves. No wonder

if you hesitate to accept this statement as a fact; you are in good

company, for no less a naturalist than the great Cuvier failed to see

the relationship.

That this order is an important one will appear when it is stated

that the great Charles Darwin wrote an important work in two volumes,

devoted to the “recent” Cirripedes, and two other volumes on the

“fossil” species of the order.

These Cirripedes are divided into two main groups--the pedunculated or

stalked Cirripedes, represented by the lively Barnacles before us, and

the sessile or stalkless Cirripedes, of which the familiar Acorn-shell

of the littoral rocks are the examples.

Now these two groups may strike you as having little in common, and

yet their early history is practically identical, one group with the

other. Longfellow was quite right when he stated that “things are

not what they seem,” at least, they are not _always_ what they seem;

conversely, they do not always seem what they are. We must not be

content with taking a couple of creatures at one particular stage in

their existence, and say these organisms differ so widely from each

other that we must put them into equally widely separated classes or

groups; we must try to find out and compare all the stages in their

life-histories, before we can talk of separating or bringing together,

except in the most temporary fashion, there to be kept, as it were,

in quarantine until we have found out what we wish to know concerning

their antecedents.

No one, until he had evidence of the successive stages in the life

of a butterfly, would dream of putting such dissimilar things as a

caterpillar and a butterfly into the same order; yet their wonderful

course of development was long ago traced out, and it is within the

power of any person to check off the whole progress from the batch of

elegant eggs laid on a cabbage leaf, through the ravenous worm-like

caterpillar stage, and the apparently inanimate chrysalis to the

beautiful white butterfly that can take no solid food, and which by

depositing another batch of exactly similar eggs, completes the cycle,

and so assures us we have made no mistakes in our observations.

In a like manner we can watch the series of stages, utterly unlike

each other, through which a crab, a lobster, a shrimp or a Barnacle

passes before it attains the adult condition; and when we find the

early forms of the Barnacle agreeing in a very curious way with stages

in the life-history of typical Crustaceans, we are perfectly justified

in grouping them in the same class of animal life. We have, in fact,

pierced through the disguise with which some of the adult forms have

sought to hide their identity, and have found out their true characters.

It must be confessed that the course of development in some of these

creatures partakes of the character of what has been termed “an

Irishman’s rise.” In the case of the caterpillar and the butterfly,

everybody recognises that development is progress, that the butterfly

is a higher being than the caterpillar. But in others development

spells retrogression. Such is undoubtedly the case with the Cirripedes,

and with certain crustaceans which lead the life of parasites. The

course of development in the Barnacles and Acorn-shells has been very

succinctly stated by Darwin.

“The larvæ in the first stage have three pairs of locomotive organs,

a simple single eye, and a probosciformed mouth, with which they

feed largely, for they increase much in size. In the second stage,

answering to the chrysalis stage of butterflies, they have six pairs

of beautifully constructed natatory legs, a pair of magnificent

compound eyes, and extremely complex antennæ; but they have a closed

and imperfect mouth, and cannot feed: their function at this stage is

to search out by their well-developed organs of sense, and to reach

by their active powers of swimming, a proper place on which to become

attached and to undergo their final metamorphosis. When this is

completed they are fixed for life: their legs are now converted into

prehensile organs; they again obtain a well-constructed mouth; but they

have no antennæ, and their two eyes are now re-converted into a minute,

single, simple eye-spot. In this last and complete state, Cirripedes

may be considered as either more highly or more lowly organized than

they were in the larval condition. But in some genera the larvæ become

developed into hermaphrodites, having the ordinary structure, and

into what I have called complemental males; and in the latter the

development has assuredly been retrograde, for the male is a mere sack,

which lives for a short time, and is destitute of mouth, stomach, and

every other organ of importance, excepting those for reproduction.”

In this early condition these Cirripedes much resembled the minute

so-called water-fleas that swarm in our fresh-water ponds and streams,

and when upon the point of their last change they laid their heads down

upon the spot selected for their future station in life. Then a natural

marine glue, that sets under water, exuded from their antennæ, and they

became fixtures, head downwards. The two valves of their old shells

were thrown off, and the new ones, largely composed of carbonate of

lime, grew up from the base.

Some of the Barnacles on our buoy are apparently dead, and one of these

we can take to pieces. Taking off one half of the compound shell, we

find the creature attached to the floor of the chamber, evidently on

its back. From the upper end there arise the twelve limbs, six on each

side, and each one dividing into two branches, each branch a beautiful

feather with a wonderfully jointed, supple, purple-black stem, closely

fringed with purple hairs. It is from this plume-like cluster of

curling limbs that the order obtains its name (Latin, _cirrus_, a

curled lock of hair, and _pes_, a foot = curl-footed).

When the shell opens and the trunk which supports all these limbs is

thrust forward, each branch separates from its fellows and becomes

almost straight, spreading out its hairs as widely as possible. Thus

extended, the entire plume of feathers sweeps through a limited space

of water, and many minute creatures are entangled in its hairs, and so

brought into the currents that flow towards the Barnacle’s mouth.

Huxley has described the Barnacle as standing on its head and kicking

food into its mouth; but we question whether this partakes of his usual

accuracy of description. So far as we have been able to make out the

process, the food particles are strained off from the sea-water by this

exquisite net, and brought, not kicked to the mouth.

It is to this plume of feathers that the Barnacle owes its specific

name, _anatifera_ = goose-bearing. It was formerly thought to be a

vegetable production, whose fruit, when ripe, gaped open, and dropped

out an embryo bird, which fell into the water and developed into a

Bernicle Goose. Gerarde, three centuries ago, wrote a wonderful and

circumstantial account of the whole business, which he declared he

had seen with his own eyes; and every writer of popular works on the

sea since then has seen fit to reproduce his account as one of the

curiosities of natural history. I have no intention of doing so, for it

is time it had a little rest after being so hard worked. For a similar

reason I have in this book utterly ignored Montgomery’s “Pelican

Island;” and the equally hackneyed quotations from Southey, Crabbe, and

Coleridge, that have been a boon to some of my predecessors in filling

their pages, I have also put upon a retired list.

Cirripedes, not being so completely boxed up as the majority of

crustaceans, can enlarge their dwellings by additions to the edges of

the shells, and therefore do not need to throw off the entire envelope

from time to time. But it is difficult to entirely get rid of racial

characteristics, even when there is no special need to retain them; and

so we find the Cirripedes casting the skins of their bodies from time

to time, though the limy shell is made to serve for all their life.

There is a smaller species of Necked Barnacle (_Scalpellum vulgare_),

the shelly portion of which, seen edgeways, looks like a penknife,

whence the Latin name. It is usually found growing among corallines; it

is figured in accompanying group.

[Illustration:

PYRGOMA. SCALPELLUM. PORCATE BARNACLE.

ACORN-SHELL.

]

There is a peculiar little Barnacle called _Pyrgoma anglicum_, which

is parasitical upon the pretty Devonshire Cup-coral (_Caryophyllia

smithii_). It is shown on the coral in the upper left-hand side of our

illustration above, and may be looked for in any of the localities

where this coral occurs. It attaches itself to the outer edge of the

plates of the corallum.

Let us turn now to the more familiar Acorn-shells (_Balanus

balanoides_) that crust the rocks between tide-marks. We might have

used the expression “too-familiar,” for whoever has had to put a

bare foot upon them in bathing or swimming from the rocks, will have

had cause for remembering their sharp edges. It is not easy to keep

the Ship-barnacle in an aquarium; but a flake of rock, or a disused

limpet shell, crusted with _Balanus_, is conveniently kept in a glass

of sea-water, and will long continue at once a thing of beauty and

a wonder to friends who are ignorant of natural history. These are

sessile Cirripedes, that is, they have no stalks upon which to writhe,

but _sit_ directly upon the rock.

If we scrape one of these Acorn-shells off the rock with our useful

putty-knife, we shall find that it has a thin base of shelly matter

upon which it reposes much as the Ship-barnacle does upon the floor

of its shelly chamber. But it will be seen that the sloping outer

walls of the Acorn-shell are firmly cemented together, and allow of no

movement; the top, however, is open, but the animal within is protected

by an interior door of four pieces, that opens in the middle like the

cellar flaps seen in connection with business basements. These doors

“butt” together accurately, and open easily by pressure from inside.

Then out comes a more beautiful and delicate “hand” even than that

of the Barnacle, for this is so fine and transparent that it looks a

thing of spun glass. There is the same movement as in the Barnacle,

the everlasting grasping at something, the opening and shutting of

the cellar flaps. Its earlier history is also similar to that of its

stalked relation. There is a larger species of Acorn-shell known as

the Porcate Barnacle (_Balanus porcatus_), the name having relation to

the form of the conical shell; porcate signifying that it has ridges

between the furrows that mark its outside. Other species, smaller, some

almost flat, will be found on some parts of our coast, but we would

refer our readers to Mr. Darwin’s work[5] for the further study of the

Cirripedes.

[5] A Monograph of the Cirripedia, 2 vols. Ray Society.

By the deep sea · 第 12 / 20 章