CHAPTER III

THE FEUDS OF THE HOUSE OF RURIK

The history of Russia during the next two hundred years is little

more than a long chronicle of aimless and inconsequent feuds between

the multiple Princes of the Blood--“the much-too-many” of their

crowded little world--overlaid and beclouded with strange-sounding

names recurring and clashing in a luxuriant tangle of pedigree, and

further embarrassed by a perpetual shifting and reshifting of the

family appanages. Here and there the figure of some particular kniaz

stands out for a space from the ravelled skein that the old historians

painstakingly wove upon the loom of their chronicles, but for the most

part the student searches in vain for glimpses of the real life-story

of Russia during this barren and over-trampled period.

The city of Kiev, carrying with it the dignity of the Grand-princedom

and the nominal authority over the whole realm, was the key-stone of

the body politic as Yaroslav left it, but the loosely-ordered theory

of succession which obtained in the Slavonic world led to a perpetual

dislocation of this local and ill-defined supremacy, and robbed the

arch-throne of any chance of making good its claimed dominion over

the other units of the State. Under Isiaslav I. and the brothers,

son, and nephew who succeeded him in promiscuous order,[22] Kiev

became merely a focussing point for the profusion of quarrels and

petty revolutions which were set in perpetual motion by the restless

ambition of the neighbouring Princes of Polotzk, Smolensk, and

Tchernigov. The last-named province passed into the possession of Oleg

Sviatoslavitch[23] (nephew of Isiaslav), and from him sprang the house

of Olgovitch, which held the fief of Tchernigov for many generations

and convulsed South Russia again and again in its attempts to grasp the

throne of Kiev, this hereditary feud of the Olgovitchie with the branch

of Vsevolod being the most understandable feature of the prevailing

strife-storms of the period. A factor which might have been supposed

to make for unity and self-help among the detached Russian rulers, but

which instead frequently served to complicate the distresses of the

country, was the appearance in the south-east, shortly after the death

of Yaroslav, of a new enemy, rising phœnix-like on the ruin of the

Petchenigs. The Polovtzi, or Kumans, a nomad race of Turko origin, were

even fiercer and more cruel than the tribe they had replaced, and their

fighting value was such that the princes, though frequently banding in

short-lived leagues against them, were often tempted to invoke their

aid in pressing family quarrels, and even stooped to mate with their

chieftain women--a woful falling away from the bridal splendours of the

Court of Yaroslav.

During the reigns of Isiaslav’s three immediate successors two figures

stand out prominently amid the bewildering plurality of princes,

respectively playing the part of good and evil geniuses of the country.

Vladimir Monomachus, son of Vsevolod, sometime Prince of Kiev, fulfils

the former function with commendable assiduity, righting wrongs

and averting national disasters after the most approved chivalric

pattern, and ever ready to improve the occasion by the delivery of

irreproachable sentiments--if these were not fathered upon him by the

chroniclers of the time. Throughout the turmoil which distinguishes the

close of the eleventh century he hovers in the background, like the

falcon of Ser Federigo, with his air of “if anything is wanting I am

here.” The other side of the picture--and picture it doubtless is, in a

large measure, painted by the prejudice and ornamented by the fancies

of the old-time annalists--is the wayward Prince of Polotzk,[24] ever

ready to devise new troubles for his groaning country, always managing

to elude the consequences of his transgressions against the peace.

Naturally he achieves the reputation of having more than human powers;

rumour has it that he traversed the road from Kiev to Tmoutorakan in

a single night, and the unholy wight could in Kiev hear the clock of

the Sofia church at Polotzk striking the hours. The suddenness with

which he would appear before the gates of some distant town gave rise,

no doubt, to the belief that he assumed the form of a wolf on these

occasions: “He sped, in blue obscurity hidden, as a wild beast, at

midnight to Bielgrad, at morning ... opened the gate of Novgorod,

destroyed the glory of Yaroslav, and hunted as a wolf from Dudutki to

Nemiga.”[25] Wonders of an evil nature were reported from his capital,

where malevolent spirits rode on horseback through the streets day and

night, wounding the inhabitants. What with the intermittent attacks

of the princes of the house of Yaroslav and the eerie enemies within

the town, it must have required exceptional nerve to be a citizen of

Polotzk. In 1101 closes the eventful life of the wehr-wolf prince, who

makes his last lone journey into the “blue obscurity,” where perhaps

his “white soul” yet hies in wolf’s gallop over the eternal plains.

Four years earlier (1097) an interesting gathering had taken place

of the numerous princes of the line of Yaroslav, who were assembled

together in the town of Lubetch, “on the same carpet,” and swore on

the Holy Cross to live in peace and friendship with each other. With a

limited number of fiefs and a superabundant supply of Princes of the

Blood, many of whom were necessarily in the position of have-nots, it

was scarcely likely that the public pact would be very long-lived, but

a decent lull might have been looked for before the outbreak of new

dissensions. David Igorovitch, cousin of the Grand Prince Sviatopalk,

went straight from the council of peace, from the carpet-in-common

and the bekissed cross, to stir up fresh strife in the West Russian

country, and the series of wars which ensued was remarkable for the

armed participation of Kalman, King of Hungary. The reason for this

foreign intermeddling, which ended in signal discomfiture and a

hurried retreat across the Karpathians, is not obvious. “What were the

causes of this war,” wrote a Hungarian annalist,[26] “are not to be

ascertained.” It was, however, the opening of a long chapter of western

encroachments in the affairs of the Red Russian provinces, while in the

steppe-lands of the south, Tmoutorakan and other territory slipped into

the hands of the Kuman tribesmen.

[Sidenote: 1113]

The accession of Vladimir Monomachus to the dignity of Velikie Kniaz

gave Kiev for the time being greater importance as the sovereign State,

since the lands of Péréyaslavl, Novgorod, and Souzdal were also held in

the monarch’s family. Under his son Mstislav the Novgorodskie pushed

their arms into Livland and took the town of Odenpay (bear’s head),

and later these hardy and enterprising folk swept the desolate Finnish

northlands into their wide dominion. The character of Vladimir (who

died in 1125, and was succeeded by Mstislav) exercised a lively hold on

the imaginations of his countrymen, and he is yet reckoned among those

sovereigns “whose earthly diadems beamed in anticipation of the crowns

they were to receive in Paradise.” This much may fairly be said of

him, that during his career, and particularly during his reign, Russia

enjoyed a greater measure of cohesion than she experienced under his

immediate successors, and that this was in no small measure the outcome

of a carefully thought-out and scrupulously applied policy. But the

greatest monument to Vladimir’s memory is the parchment document which

he left for the guidance of his sons, and which is preserved in the

archives of his country as a precious historical relic.

“Bear in mind that a man ought always to be employed” is one of the

admonitions of this remarkable homily, though if the persons addressed

imitated the example therein displayed it was scarcely needed. “For my

part I accustomed myself to do everything that I might have ordered

my servants to do. Night and day, summer and winter, I was perpetually

moving about. I wished to see everything with my own eyes.... I made it

my duty to inspect the churches and the sacred ceremonies of religion,

as well as the management of my property, my stables, and the eagles

and hawks of my hunting establishment. I have made eighty-three

campaigns and many expeditions. I concluded nineteen treaties with

the Polovtzi. I took captive one hundred of their princes, whom I set

free again; and I put two hundred of them to death by throwing them

into rivers. No one has ever travelled more rapidly than I have done.

Setting out in the morning from Tchernigov, I have arrived at Kiev

before the hour of vespers.” (A feat surpassed by the goblin-post of

the Prince of Polotzk.) “In hunting amidst the thickest forests, how

many times have I myself caught wild horses and bound them together?

How many times have I been thrown down by buffaloes, wounded by the

antlers of stags, and trodden under the feet of elks? A furious boar

rent my sword from my baldrick; my saddle was torn to pieces by a bear;

this terrible beast rushed upon my steed, whom he threw down upon me.

But the Lord protected me.”

There is a suspicion of exaggeration in the number of campaigns

enumerated, besides “many expeditions,” and the hunting reminiscences

are almost too full of incident; neither do wild horses, as a rule,

inhabit the thickest forests. Allowing for these enlargements of old

age, however, the outlines are probably true.

“Oh, my children,” the testator continues, “fear neither death nor wild

beasts. Trust in Providence; it far surpasses all human precautions.”

In order, presumably, not to risk all his eggs in one basket, he

qualifies this pious aphorism with the following excellent advice:

“Never retire to rest till you have posted your guards. Never lay aside

your arms while you are within reach of the enemy. And, to avoid being

surprised, always be early on horseback.”

With the disappearance of Vladimir Russian political life lapsed into

the distracting turmoil of family feuds, embittered now afresh by the

jealousies of the elder and younger branches of his descendants, in

addition to the existing elements of discord furnished by the houses

of Tchernigov and Galitz and the sporadic turbulence of the people of

Novgorod.

It is interesting to compare and contrast the condition of the Russian

State at this period with that of the neighbouring Germanic Empire,

whose constitution and scheme of government was not widely different,

and to examine the possible causes of the decay of the Grand-princely

power in the one, and the survival of the Imperial ascendency in the

other. The Western Empire had, like Russia, her periods of internal

confusion, but however weak or unfortunate an individual Kaiser might

be, his title and office always carried a certain weight of authority,

a certain glamour of reverence with it, while in the Eastern State

it is sometimes difficult to remember who was at any given time in

possession of the arch-throne of Kiev. Probably the greater stability

of German institutions was due to their greater complexity; side

by side with the oligarchy of sovereign Dukes and Margraves there

had grown up, fostered by the sagacious foresight of successive

Emperors, a crop of free cities and burghs, enjoying a large measure

of independence, while another element was introduced by the extensive

temporal possessions and powers of many of the German prelates. These

interwoven and antagonistic interests were naturally fertile of

disputes and petty conflicts, in which events appeal was sure to be

made, sooner or later, to the Emperor, whose intervention was seldom

fruitless; for where a man, or a community, had many possible enemies,

it was less easy to defy the sovereign power. If, therefore, each

little fragment of the State was a law unto itself, the final supremacy

of the Emperor was always in evidence, and in the same way some

overweening vassal preparing to wage war on his sovereign liege might

have his hand stayed by the irritating incursion of the Herrschaft

of a mitred abbot or an aggrieved Burg upon his own dominions. In

the Russian Weal, on the contrary, no such delicately adjusted

conditions existed. With the exception of Velikie Novgorod, nothing was

independent besides the princes of the house of Rurik; towns, clergy,

and boyarins “went with” the various appanages to which they belonged,

and shared the fortunes of the prince who for the time being ruled over

them. Hence there was nothing beyond an empty title and the control of

an uncertain quantity of treasure to advance the Grand Prince above the

standing of his brothers and cousins. In consequence of this weakness

of the central authority it follows that there was little to bind the

mass together in a cohesive whole. Besides the kinship of the princes

there were, perhaps, only two elements which prevented a splitting

asunder of the federation: one was the physical aspect of the country,

which presented no natural divisions which might have been resolved

into political ones. As certainly as Denmark was destined to break

away, in spite of artificial acts of union, such as that of Kalmar,

from the other Skandinavian lands, so certainly was Russia likely to

remain united. The wide plains, intersected by far-winding rivers,

offered no obvious barriers which might have marked off a separate

kingdom of Tchernigov or Polotzk, and each district was too dependent

on the others to become permanently estranged. The other factor which

made for unity was the bond of a common, and as regards their western

neighbours, a distinct religion. The Greek-Christian faith, with all

its attendant ceremonials and mysteries, had taken deep root among the

Slavs of Russia, and had assimilated itself with the national life of

the people. The beauties of the old cathedrals of S. Sofia at Kiev, S.

John Theologus at Rostov, and S. Dimitri at Vladimir, bore evidence

of the care that was lavished on the decoration of these temples of

Christian worship. The Metropolitan of Kiev, as Primate over all the

Russian churches, served as a link with the capital city which the

Grand Prince did not always supply.

Novgorod, which has been mentioned as an exception to the state of

subserviency prevalent among the other Russian towns, derived her

strength and importance from her situation, which commanded both the

Baltic and the Russian overland trade. Although the Hansa League had

not yet taken definite shape, the elements of the later organisation

were already in existence. The commercial life of the Baltic centred

in Wisby, capital of the island of Gothland, and to this convenient

meeting-place came, twice a year, German, Swedish, Russian, Danish, and

Wendish merchants to exchange their various wares and supply the needs

of their respective trade-circles. After the Wisby markets were over

many of the traders from Lubeck, Hamburg, Bremen, etc., made their way

to Novgorod, where they early possessed a factory and a separate place

of worship, even as the Novgorodskie, since the middle of the twelfth

century, had their church and quarter at Wisby. The intercourse with

enterprising merchant folk from other lands--and merchants needed to be

adventurous in those days--infused a spirit of energy and independence

into the inhabitants of Novgorod, while the wealth at their disposal

enabled them to extend their domination far over the bleak, but by no

means barren, northlands of Russia, even to the further side of the

Ourals. This extensive over-lordship, again, gave them control of many

sources of commerce, and the produce of Arctic seas and sub-Arctic

forests filtered through their hands into the channels of Baltic trade.

Walrus teeth, the blubber oil from seals, and the down of sea-haunting

birds formed the harvest of the frozen ocean; forest and lake furnished

their markets with furs, raw leather, tallow, fish, and tar; cultivated

lands yielded flax and hemp, honey and wax--the latter an important

commodity in the times when the Church kept tapers burning day and

night in thousands of shrines throughout the greater part of Europe. In

exchange for these products the merchants of Wisby and of the German

“Hof” at Novgorod bartered metal wares and manufactured goods. Of raw

metals came tin from the celebrated mines of Cornwall, copper from the

Swedish uplands, and iron from Bohemia and the Netherlands. Spanish

lead found its way through Bruges and Antwerp.[27] Thus Novgorod

was the staple of a flourishing and far-reaching trade, even though

the rise of the Italian maritime republics had in a large measure

diverted the commerce of the East from its old Russian waterway,

and the wealth and importance of this world-faring traffic took the

city out of the limitations of the Russian realm, even as Lubeck and

her sister towns stood beyond the bonds of the Empire. To the other

Russian cities their respective rulers were the mainspring of their

being, and each prince might have locally adapted the boast of the

great Louis; to the Novgorodskie their prince was only an incident in

a busy existence. This spirit of liberty and impatience found vigorous

expression in the year 1138 when the citizens of Novgorod, with those

of the subject towns of Pskov and Ladoga, in Vetché assembled, solemnly

deposed their prince on the following grounds: that he had no care for

the poorer people; that he only loved pleasures, falcons, and dogs;

that he had coveted the government of Péréyaslavl; that in a battle

with the Souzdalians he had been the first to leave the field; that

he had no fixed policy, but was at times on the side of the house of

Tchernigov, at times on the side of its enemies. The citizens had a

quaint and effective way of dealing with a troublesome minority in

carrying through their frequent prince-purgings. According to an old

Slavonic custom (retained in Poland till her downfall), the decisions

of the Vetché or the Diet had to be of one voice; however, “the

majority had the resource of drowning the minority in the Volkof,”[28]

and the bridge over that river was not unseldom the scene of violent

party strife. The great bell of Yaroslav would clang out the curfew of

the dethroned kniaz, who was thenceforth “shown the way” out of his

erstwhile principality. On an occasion when the Grand Prince Sviatopalk

II. wished to foist his son on the people of Novgorod, the elders of

the city grimly sent him word to keep the young prince at home, “unless

he has a head to spare.”

With the onward march of days and deeds in the stormy times of the

twelfth century two facts, indeed, begin to stand forth. One is the

waning power and import of Kiev, consequent on the many changes of

masters to which she was subject; “the Mother of Russian cities” passed

into the keeping of one prince after another, like a dainty piece of

carrion dropped and snatched and fought over by a parcel of kites or

crows. Side by side with this decline of the southern city is to be

marked the silent growth of a new principality in the lands of the

north-east, where Urii “Dolgoroukie” (the Long-armed), son of Vladimir

Monomachus, had nursed the savage, forest-choked marchland of Souzdal

into a well-ordered province, enjoying from its very remoteness and

seclusion a domestic calm which was to be found nowhere else in the

wide Russian realm. Among the towns which he founded, or advanced from

the position of tribal villages, was one on the banks of the Moskva,

to which was given the name of the river that watered it, a name to be

one day of first importance in Russian history. On the death of Urii

(1157) his son Andrei, albeit one of a numerous family, succeeded him

in the undivided sovereignty of Souzdal. Turning his back on glittering

but unprofitable Kiev, with its thousand shrines and general odour of

sanctity and its unhealthy political atmosphere, he established himself

at Vladimir-on-the-Kliasma, strong in the possession of a bejewelled

ikon of the Virgin, of Greek manufacture--if it were not, as was

asserted, the handiwork of the Apostle Luke. From this vantage-ground

of possession and authority the wary kniaz proceeded to sweep away with

unsparing hand the gaping brood of his brothers and nephews, who were

exiled wholesale, together with such boyarins as were suspected of

favouring a splitting-up of Andrei’s dominion. The banished Urievitch

princes retired to Constantinople, where they were honourably received

by the Greek Emperor Manuel, who, amid the vigorous wars which he

carried on with most of his neighbours, maintained terms of friendship

with the princes of Russia. Shortly after this state-stroke the

Prince of Souzdal became embroiled with the turbulent Novgorodskie,

whose newly-elected Prince Roman was son of the then Velikie Kniaz of

Kiev. Andrei was minded to show who really was master in the Northern

Russian world, and turned his arms, not upon Novgorod, but upon Kiev.

[Sidenote: 1169] Against the devoted city gathered, in obedience to

the behest of Andrei, a mighty host of princes, with their boyarins

and followers; Mstislav of Souzdal, Roman of Smolensk, Vseslav of

Polotzk, Oleg of Sieversk, the Rostislavitches, and many another,

banded themselves together, under the leadership of the first-named, to

assist at the death of a fiction. The Grand Prince entrenched himself

in his capital and defended the walls for two days against the assaults

of his enemies. On the 8th March the walls were stormed and the “Mother

of Russian cities” was given over to sack and pillage. In one wild

moment all the reverence and religious piety of the Slavonic nature was

scattered to the winds, and churches, monasteries, and the cathedrals

of S. Sofia and the Dime shared the general disaster. Sacrilegious

hands bore gleefully through the roaring streets a spoil of holy ikons,

illuminated missals, crosses, priestly robes, and all the trappings

of an outraged religion; even the bells were torn down from their

campaniles to serve as plunder for the victorious invaders.

Kiev still existed as a city, but on her Golden Gate the conquerors

might fitly have hewed the epitaph, “Ichabod. Thy glory is departed

from thee.”

The Grand Prince made his escape from the toils of his enemies, and

one of the sons of Urii succeeded to what was left of the submerged

dignity; but the real centre of authority had shifted. Souzdal

extended its influence over nearly the whole of the Russian land; the

Princes of Galitz and Tchernigov and the republic of Novgorod alone

maintained their independence. The latter government, indeed, despite

the internal disorders with which it was from time to time afflicted,

had risen to a power which might well cry halt to the most ambitious

potentate. Not only had it held its own against the leagued princes

of Northern Russia, but it had valiantly repelled the onslaught of a

foreign enemy. The union of the crowns of Sweden and Gothland, the pact

between the houses of Swerker and Jeswar, and the gradual dying out

of the pagan minority had given the Swedes comparative domestic quiet,

and at the same time leisure to turn their attention to attacks on

their neighbours. Hence it was that Karl VII., in the year 1164 (while

Sviatoslav yet reigned at Novgorod), invaded the Russian northlands

and besieged Ladoga, which was defended by the citizens with great

spirit. The arrival of Sviatoslav with the Posadnik Zakharie and the

Novgorodskie forces was followed by the complete defeat of the Swedish

host, only a remnant of which, according to the city Chronicles,

succeeded in making good its escape. This exploit gives some idea

of the power and position of Velikie Novgorod, which at this period

matches the standing of Lubeck in the days of the Kaiser Karl IV.

Against so dangerous a rival it was inevitable that Andrei, dreaming

of autocracy 300 years before its time, should bend the whole crushing

weight of his resources and influence, and seek to whelm Novgorod

in the same humiliation that had befallen Kiev. The inhabitants of

the threatened city saw an ominous league of their enemies gathering

together; the Princes of Smolensk, Polotzk, Mourom, and Riazan joined

their forces to those of Mstislav Andreivitch, the conqueror of Kiev,

under whose banner marched the men of Souzdal, Rostov, Vladimir, and

Bielozersk. At the head of the citizens stood their Kniaz, Roman, the

Posadnik Yakun, and the Archbishop Ivan. These prepared by every means

in their power to resist the formidable army whose skirmishers were

ravaging the country for miles around and lighting the winter sky with

the fires of hundreds of blazing villages. The doubt voiced by a poet

of a later century--

Though kneeling nations watch and yearn,

Does the Primordial Purpose turn?

found no expression in the minds of these early Russians, in whose

civil discords the members of the Holy Family of heaven were supposed

to take as keen an interest as the gods of Olympus in the skirmishes

round Troy. [Sidenote: 1170] When the attack closed in upon the city

the Archbishop, attended by his clergy, carried round the ramparts,

during the thick of the fight, a standard with a representation of the

Virgin. An impious arrow struck the sainted ikon, which thereupon

turned its face towards Novgorod and let fall a shower of tears upon

the Archbishop; this was too much for the nerves of the Souzdalians,

who seemingly were near enough to witness the miracle, and a headlong

flight ensued, in which many were slain and many taken prisoners.

In the words of the Novgorodskie Chronicle, “You could get ten

Souzdalians for a grivna.” It is difficult to discern, under the mass

of legend, what was the real cause of this panic. The warriors who

had laid ruthless hands on the hallowed sanctuaries of the Russian

capital were not likely to be cowed by a provincial representation

of the Virgin; had they not their own apostle-wrought ikon of the

Mother of God at Vladimir? Whatever the cause of defeat, it gave a

serious check to Andrei’s projects of undisputed supremacy. Novgorod,

however, was not secure from the enmity of the Prince of Souzdal, from

whose province she drew her supplies of grain, and the Posadnik and

Archbishop followed up their victory by timely overtures for peace,

which was effected by the dismissal of Roman and the subsequent “free

election” of a prince from the Souzdal family. Four years later the

dreaded northern Kniaz suffered the penalty of being in advance of

his times. The high hand with which he had ruled in his own province

had inspired among his boyarins and courtiers a fear which might on

occasion become dangerous. [Sidenote: 1177] And the occasion arrived,

when one summer’s evening a band of twenty conspirators, including the

chamberlain of his household, burst into the old man’s sleeping-chamber

in his palace at Bogolubov (a suburb of Vladimir) and stabbed wildly

at him in the uncertain twilight. Favoured by the dusk and confusion,

Andrei managed to crawl away into hiding; a light was procured, and by

the track of his streaming wounds he was hunted down and the assassins

finished their task. Vladimir, which he had raised to the position

of his capital over the older towns of Souzdal and Rostov, mourned

the grim fate of her patron, but throughout the rest of the province

the long-repressed feelings of the inhabitants ran riot in bloodshed

and pillage. The affrighted clergy, clad in their priestly vestments

and bearing the sacred ensigns of their religion, went in solemn

processions through the towns, invoking the assistance of the Most High

God to quell a revolt which threatened the submersion of their world.

Andrei had tried to weld into a disciplined kingdom materials that were

as yet only fitted for a modified anarchy, tempered by attachment to a

loosely-ordered succession of princes; dreaming of despotism, he had at

least died the death of a despot.

And while they do to death the only prince who had shown them the way

to the safety which lay in union and centralisation, far away on the

banks of the Okon, in the desert region which borders Northern China

and Manchuria, is growing from insignificance to an overmastering

weight of supremacy the tribe, horde, locust-swarm of the swarthy

Mongols.

The disorders which marked the disappearance of Andrei’s overshadowing

personality from the throne of Souzdal were soothed, after a long

struggle between his reflucted kinsfolk, by the final establishment

of Vsevolod, brother of the murdered prince, surnamed “Big-nest” in

allusion to his large family.[29] Applying himself to the ordering of

his own province, he meddled but languidly in the seething troubles of

the Dniepr-watered principalities, where the house of Olgovitch was

enjoying a fitful revival of importance. A scion of that strenuous

family at this time embarked on an enterprise which, though fruitless

from a military point of view, was crowned with a halo of glory

and immortalised in an epic poem of great beauty. “The Song of the

Expedition of Igor, Prince of Sieverski,” or, more shortly, the Song of

Igor, one of the earliest Slavonic folk-songs that has been handed down

from the dead past, has been translated into many languages, but never

before into English, so that it is well worth reproducing in part in

a history of Russian development. It deals with a campaign undertaken

by Igor Sviatoslavitch, Prince of Severski, and his brother Vsevolod,

against the Polovtzi in their own country, of its disastrous result,

and the ultimate return of Igor.

Brothers, were it not well that we, after the old custom, began the

song of the unlucky campaign of Igor, the seed of Sviatoslav? That

we celebrate him in the heroic songs of our time, and not in the

manner of Bōyan? If the sage Bōyan wished to tune to one a song, it

was as if a squirrel sprang up the tree, or a gray wolf hied along

the plain, or a blue eagle soared to the clouds....

Igor looked forth and saw that the sun had hidden his face, and

a mist had enveloped his warriors. Then spoke Igor to his army:

“Brothers and soldiers, it is better to fall in battle than to

yield one’s life; so will we mount our mettlesome horses and gain

the Blue Don by daylight.” Yearning filled the soul of the Prince,

and the wish to see the noble Don led him to forget many evil

tokens. “I will break a lance,” cried he, “on the farthest verge

of the Polovtzi land, or bow my head with you, Russians, and with

my helmet draw water from the Don.” O Bōyan, thou nightingale

of the olden days, if thou hadst inspired these warrior-bands,

alighting on the Tree of Thought and hovering in the spirit of the

clouds, thou hadst, O nightingale, united this severed time (that

which is Past with that which Is).... Not a storm-wind drove the

falcons over the wide plain, nor hurried the flocks of daws to the

glorious Don. Or thou mightest, sage Bōyan, thus have sung: The

steeds are neighing this side the Sula, the war-song resounds in

Kiev, the trumpets are crashing in Novgorod. The standards wave in

Poutivl, where awaits Igor his loved brother Vsevolod. And to him

saith the bold, war-lusting Vsevolod, “O Igor, my only brother, my

bright Sun, truly are we twain the seed of Sviatoslav. Brother,

let thy spirited war-horses be saddled; already are mine saddled

and waiting at Koursk, and my Kourskies are right warriors, born

’neath the blare of the trumpets, and nurtured at the point of the

lance. The roads are familiar to them; they know the passes, their

bows are strung, the quiver is open, the sabres are burnished, and

they themselves press forward, like gray wolves on the bleak wold,

in pursuit of honour and princely renown.” Then set Prince Igor

his foot in the golden stirrup and rode forth into the wide plain.

The sun blurs the way through the gloom, the night groans in storm

and wakes the birds, swells in chorus the howling of beasts, the

evil Div shrieks down from the tree-tops and summons the strange

lands to listen, from the Volga, and the sea-coast, and along the

Sula and to the Suroz and Khorsun, to the idol at Tmoutorakan. The

Polovtzi hastened by pathless ways to the glorious Don; at midnight

shrieked the wheels of their carts, as though flight-circling

swans screamed loud. Igor pressed with his war-men to the Don. But

already the bird on the oak warned him of misfortune, the wolves

set the ravines in alarm, the eagles with loud screams called

hither the beasts to the banquet, the foxes barked at the purple

shields.

O Russian band, already art thou this side the hill!

Long lasts the night, the twilight dawn not yet foretells the

coming of the Sun, darkness clothes the fields, the flute of the

nightingale is hushed, while the croaking of the daws resounds, but

the Russians have bedecked the stretching plain with their purple

shields, and strive after honour and the glory of princes.

On Friday early have our warriors defeated the war-hordes of the

Polovtzi, and they thenafter scattered with arrow-swiftness in

the plain, bearing away the lovely Polovtzi maidens, and with

them also gold and precious silken stuffs; with costly rugs, with

cloaks and vestments the Polovtzi strewed the streams, marshes,

and swamps. The golden standards with the white pennons, the

purple horse-housings and the silver staff fell to the brave

Sviatoslavitch. Oleg’s brave nest-brood slept on the field,

thenafter they are flown afar; they were not born to suffer

ill, neither from falcon, nor sparhawk, nor from these, heathen

Polovtzi, the black ravens. Gsak sped like a gray wolf, and

Kontchak followed him on the road to the glorious Don.

Right early the other morning rose a blood-red promise of the sun,

black clouds drew in from the sea, that would have darkened four

suns, and torn were they by blue flashes; there was brewing a

mighty storm of thunder, and bolts rained over the majestic Don;

then at the stream Kayala, by the mighty Don, lances were broken

and sabres blunted on Polovtzi helmets.

O Russian band, still art thou this side the hill!

There blew the Wind (Stribog’s grandchild)[30] bolts from the sea

against Igor’s brave fighters; the Earth shuddered, mournfully

flowed the rivers, dew-drops spangled the fields, the banners

rustled.

Forth from the Don, from the sea, and from all sides around came

the Polovtzi; they surrounded the Russian troop, with yells the

children of the devils filled the plain, but the brave Russians

guarded themselves behind the purple shields. Thou Wild-Bull

Vsevolod, thou art in the rank that is foremost, slinging thy

arrows at the fighters, and with thy sword of steel batterest the

helmets, and where thou chargest, there where thy golden helmet

glitters, there lie the heads of the Heathen and the Avaric

helmets, smashed by thy hardened sabre, thou Wild-Bull Vsevolod,

and there was thy grief so great at the wound of thy brother, thou

hadst both honour and life forgotten, and the town of Tchernigov,

and the throne of thy fathers, even as the caresses of thy sweet

and beauteous wife Glebovna.... So is it ever in the time of

fighting and war, but never yet has been heard of such a battle as

this; from early morn till the even, from eve to red dawn, nought

but flying arrows, and the clashing of sabres on helmets, and steel

lances splintering in the far plain of the Polovtzi-land. The black

earth under the hoofs of the horses is with bones emplanted, which

spring up from the Russian soil watered with blood amid stress of

grievous sorrow. What is the stamping I hear? What is it I hear

ringing in the morning early before the red Dawn?...

So for a day they fought, and for two days, but on the third,

towards mid-day, sank the banner of Igor.

There on the banks of the rapid Kayala the brothers were

sundered....

The grass drooped its head in mourning and the tree bowed

sorrowfully earthward....

The war of the princes against the Heathen had ceased, for one

brother saith to another, “That belongeth to me, and this belongeth

also to me.” And of each little thing the princes say, “A great

matter,” and stir up strife with one another, while on all sides of

the Russian land the warlike heathen press forward.

But Igor’s brave war-men shall never wake again.... Loudly weep the

Russian women, “Alas! that never more can our thoughts to our dear

husbands be wafted, that our eyes shall never, never again behold

them, and gold and silver never more be stored.” And therefore,

brothers, Kiev groaneth aloud in sorrow and Tchernigov in grief;

woe streameth through the land, and pain, in full flood, through

Russia, but ever more and more were the princes growing in hatred,

while the warlike Heathen raged through the land, and from every

holding had as tribute a squirrel pelt....

[The despairing lamentations of the saga are changed to rejoicing

over the unexpected return of Igor, who had made his escape from

the Polovtzi land.]

The Sun shines in the heaven since Prince Igor is on Russian land.

The maidens sing on the Danube, and their voices reach over the sea

to Kiev. Prince Igor rides through the Boritchev-ford to the Holy

Mother-of-God of Pirogosha. The country is gladsome and the towns

rejoice.[31]

This folk-song, apart from its intrinsic beauty, is valuable as a relic

of Russian thought and feeling at a time when the old pre-Christian

ideas were still blended with the sentiments of the newer traditions,

and it is interesting to mark how the ghosts and gods of old Slavonic

myth are mixed up with the saints and virgins of the Orthodox faith.

Not unworthy of notice, too, are the sage strictures on the political

evils of the day, the perpetual quarrelling among the Princes of the

Blood, which, however, continued with unabated vehemence despite

the common bond which existed in a common enemy. On the north and

north-east the armies of Novgorod and Souzdal extended the Russian

influence in the lands of the Finns and Bulgars, but on the south-east,

south, and west occurred encroachments which the princes were too

enfeebled by internal feuds to resist. The Kuman (Polovtzi) hordes held

the banks of the Dniepr almost up to the walls of Kiev and Biel-gorod,

as the Petchenigs had done before them; amid the dense forests of

Lit’uania, on the border of Polotzk, was rising into importance the

Lettish State which was to become a formidable factor in Russian

and Polish annals; and the kings of Hungary cast greedy eyes on the

fair province of Galitz, held in the feeble and precarious grasp of

Vladimir, unworthy successor of a line of valiant Red Russian princes.

The occupant of the throne of S. Stefan was not the only interested

onlooker at the spectacle of misgovernment provided by the Prince

of Galitz; his nearest neighbour on the Russian side was Roman of

Volhynia, the same Roman who had held Novgorod against the might

of Andrei, and who had been thrown over to procure for the city a

substantial peace. This prince, whose forefathers in the direct line

back to the first Igor had all been sovereigns of Kiev, was possessed

of exceptional qualities of energy and enterprise, and saw himself

fitted to replace the effete and impolitic Vladimir in the important

and Magyar-threatened principality of Galitz. Between the warlike and

strenuous efforts of this battle-loving kniaz, who was renowned for the

eagle-swoop rapidity with which he was wont to hurl himself upon his

enemies, the assiduous intrigues and invasions of Bela III. of Hungary,

and the occasional intervention of the princes of Poland, the West

Russian lands were kept in a continual ferment; in the words of the

saga, “Men’s lives were shortened by the wars of the brother princes.

Then seldom in the Russian land was heard the call of the husbandman,

but often indeed the ravens croaking as they divided the corpse among

them, and the cry of the corbies as they called to each other to come

to the banquet.” Long time the clashing factions warred and schemed,

but Roman at last broke down all opposition without and within. In

dismal plight were then those notables of Galitz who had resisted his

incoming; according to Polish accounts he treated the disaffected

boyarins with a savagery unworthy of a brave prince. The unfortunate

objects of his ill-will were dismembered, flayed, riddled with arrows,

buried alive, and done to death in various other barbarous ways.[32]

“To eat a drop of honey in peace, one must first kill the bees,” was

his explanation of this severity. This prince, who, in the words of

the Russian Chronicles, “walked in the ways of God,” was soon called

upon to defend his “drop of honey” against the Princes of Tchernigov

and Kiev--a coalition brought together by jealousy and dislike of

the vigorous Roman, for whom, however, it was no match. Gathering

together his Galician and Volhynian retainers, and calling to his aid

the Tchernie-Kloboukie (“Black-caps,” a name given to the nomads of

the western steppes other than the Polovtzi), he threw himself with

the famous eagle-swoop upon Kiev, the centre-point of his enemies.

In vain did its Grand Prince Rurik and the Kniaz of Tchernigov apply

themselves to repel his attack; the Kievians, who had a trained eye for

the strongest side, threw open the Podolian Gate, and the redoubtable

Roman swirled with his warriors into the lower city. His opponents did

not stay to dispute the upper quarter with him, and the victorious

Prince of Galitz was able, with the assent of Vsevolod of Souzdal, to

bestow the time-worn capital on one of his own kinsfolk. [Sidenote:

1202] At the request of the Metropolitan, Alexis Comnenus, and on

behalf of the Greek Imperial family, the indefatigable Roman made a

diversion against the Polovtzi, who were ravaging the Thracian border.

Having successfully drawn off their attack and destroyed their camps,

he returned in triumph to Galitz. During his absence Kiev, which had

betrayed the cause of Rurik, experienced in full measure the resentment

of that prince; calling to his assistance the Polovtzi--“children of

the devils,” but useful on occasion--he let them loose on the miserable

inhabitants. The Kuman warfolk passed over the city like a swarm of

locusts over a barley field; nothing escaped their devouring fury

except the foreign merchants who defended themselves behind the stone

walls of the churches, which became veritable sanctuaries in the midst

of a blazing, blood-streaming Kiev. The cathedrals and monasteries

suffered as severely from the heathen pillagers as they had done at

the hands of the Christians at the previous sacking of the city: “They

stripped the Cathedral of S. Sofia, the Church of the Dime, and all the

monasteries, monks and nuns, priests and their wives, old and cripple,

they killed, but the young and strong they drove into captivity.”[33]

The death of Roman in battle with the Poles near Zawichwost (1205) left

Red Russia once more a prey to domestic strife and foreign inroad.

On the 14th April 1212 came to an end the thirty-seven years’ reign

of Vsevolod, the last days of which were clouded by a quarrel with

his eldest son and natural heir, Konstantin. The latter, whether from

statesmanlike motives or mere grasping ambition, refused to cede

to his brother Urii the patrimony of Rostov designed for him, in

consequence of which Vsevolod bequeathed to the injured younger son the

succession to the grand principality of Vladimir-Souzdal, which would

otherwise have been the share of Konstantin. Vsevolod, overweighted

by the Russian chroniclers with the title of “Great,” shared in his

youth the exile of his brothers on the accession of Andrei, and

received his education amid Byzantine influences. In this connection

it is interesting to note that the scheme of policy unfolded during

his long reign bears some resemblance to that favoured by the Greek

Emperors. Avoiding for the most part the employment of open force

against Novgorod, he contrived, nevertheless, to be always to the fore

in the affairs of the republic, in the aspect either of a bogey or

a patron, in any case a factor to be reckoned with. Kiev he allowed

to pass backwards and forwards from one hand to another, and in this

way contributed to the decline of her importance and the consequent

advancement of his own capital as the head-town of Russia. This pacific

policy gave his Souzdalian subjects a measure of peace and tranquillity

unknown to their brothers in the other provinces, but it permitted the

dangerous aggrandisement of princes of lesser strength and more limited

resources.

The Grand Prince’s Greek upbringing and possible Greek sympathies may

have influenced the Russian hierarchy in the decision they were called

upon to make during his reign between adherence to or desertion of the

distressed Church of Constantinople. For evil times had fallen upon

the Orthodox communion; since the eastern and western Christians had

solemnly and bitterly quarrelled over the merits of the respective

formulas “proceeding from the Father by the Son,” and “proceeding

from the Father and the Son,”--the celebrated controversy of the

_Filioque_,--the two Churches had drifted wider and wider apart, and

the hatred existing between them found expression in the massacre

of the Latin or Roman Catholic inhabitants of Constantinople in the

year 1183, when young and old, sick and infirm of both sexes were

indiscriminately slaughtered; when the head of the Pope’s Legate,

severed from its legitimate body and tied to the tail of a dog, went

bumping and thudding along the public streets to the accompaniment

of hymns of praise and thanksgiving. Now (in the year 1204) it was

the turn of the Latins to revenge themselves on the stronghold and

headquarters of the rival religion; the French and Venetian Crusaders,

turning aside from the pious object of their expedition, the rescue

of the “Holy Land” from the infidels, had carried Constantinople by

assault, replaced the fugitive Greek Emperor by a Latin prince, and

sacked the Tzargrad with systematic thoroughness. The furniture and

adornments of S. Sophia and other sacred buildings became spoil for

the western soldiery, and the Lion of S. Mark waved triumphantly over

the scene of pillage and desecration. Then did the head of the Roman

Church, the splendid Lotario Conti (Innocent III.), beneath whose

despotic sway chafed and trembled most of the princes of Christendom,

follow up the triumph of the Latin arms by an attempt to draw the

heretic Church of Russia into the Catholic fold. In a pastoral letter

to the prelates and clergy of the Orthodox faith he pointed out the

temporal ruin which had overtaken the heads of the schismatic religion,

and invited the Russian Christians to attach themselves to the glories

and benefits of Rome. The appeal fell on hostile ears, and the next

Metropolitan was consecrated at Nicæa, where the dispossessed Emperor

had established his court.

In other quarters the zeal and activity of the Roman Church brought her

into contact with Russian “spheres of influence,” to use a modern term.

[Sidenote: 1201] Albrecht, Bishop of the new Livlandish see of Riga,

had instituted in that district the Order of the Warriors of Christ, or

Sword Brethren, whose mission was to convert the pagan Livlanders by

fire, and steel, and thong to the worship of Jesus, and teach them the

lesson of peace on earth and goodwill towards men with which His name

was associated. As the scope of their endeavours included a temporal

as well as a spiritual ascendancy over the lands they were able to

conquer, their arms soon clashed with those of Vladimir, Prince of

Polotzk, who claimed the over-lordship of Livland. Reinforced by Danish

warmen, sent to their assistance by King Waldemar at the instance of

the Pope, the knights of the Order were able to hold their own against

the Russian kniaz, and the Catholic Church scored another triumph in

Europe to make up for her disappointments in Asia Minor.

Vsevolod left to his successors the heritage of a ready-made feud, in

which the members of his family took different sides, some supporting

Urii, who held Souzdal and Vladimir, others ranging themselves with

Konstantin, who kept his grasp on Rostov. After a campaign in which

neither side could obtain a decided advantage, the brothers agreed

to divide the principality between them, Urii retaining the largest

share, which included Vladimir, Souzdal, and Moskva. Another brother,

Yaroslav, became in an unlucky hour the choice of the people of

Novgorod. In course of time they quarrelled with him, as was their

wont. Yaroslav shook the dust of the ungovernable city off his feet,

and settled himself down at Torjhok to starve it into submission. Its

imports of grain were systematically cut off, supplies of every kind

were intercepted, and famine stalked through the streets of Novgorod.

Want, in its most fearful form, the starvation of an entire populace,

tamed the spirit of the proud citizens. Pine-bark and moss were chewed

in place of the bread that could not be bought for money; the bodies

of those who died of hunger lined the streets--the dogs at least were

fed. What manner of man was this who sat gloating, vampire-like, over

the misery of a province which he would neither govern nor renounce?

Vainly embassies and petitions were sent by the stricken citizens, who

tendered their submission and besought him to take up his rule over

them; the spokesmen were cast into prison and the dearth continued.

Then like a god from the blue appeared to the famishing and despairing

Novgorodskie their erstwhile prince, Mstislav of Toropetz. The bitter

cry of their extremity had reached him in Southern Russia and drawn

him to their succour. After vainly attempting to bring Yaroslav to

reason, Mstislav took up arms against him. The first-named prince

could count on the support of Urii, but on the other hand Mstislav

had engaged Konstantin on his side, so that the province of Souzdal

was drawn, town against town, into this local quarrel. The armies of

the two leagues, burning with resentment against each other, met on

the plain of Lipetsk. [Sidenote: 1216] After a desperate battle the

troops of Rostov, Smolensk, and Novgorod scored a decisive victory

and hewed down their scattering foes during an April afternoon with

the fierce joy that a triumph in civil warfare inspires. Over 9000 of

the vanquished are stated to have fallen in the fight and subsequent

slaughter. Four days later the inhabitants of Vladimir, consisting for

the most part of women, children, monks, and priests, and men too old

to have marched to the war, saw in the gray distance a single horseman

making with weary speed for the city--a courier, they fondly imagined,

sent to announce their Prince’s victory. The Prince (Urii) himself

rode in through the startled crowd, the forlorn herald of the disaster

which had overwhelmed his army. The depleted province was in no plight

to withstand the victors, and the Grand Principality was practically

at the disposal of the upstart Kniaz of Toropetz. Konstantin, by his

decree, became Prince of Vladimir-Souzdal, naming Urii, however, to

succeed him at his death. Mstislav returned in triumph to Novgorod,

where he was hailed with acclamations by the citizens, to whom he had

been a friend in need. It was a bitter irony of circumstance that

almost the only prince for whom they had had a lasting affection

could not find it well to stay with them. Perhaps he was fearful of

outstaying his welcome, or wished to secure for himself a more assured

possession than the government of the fickle republic, and the foreign

encroachments which disturbed Russia on her western marches attracted

his adventure-loving spirit to play the rescuer in that direction. In

Livland, Volquin von Winterstadt, Grand Master of the Sword Order, was

ever seeking to push forward his military outposts; the Lit’uanians,

harassed by Catholics on one side and Orthodox neighbours on the

other, were drawing closer together in self-defence, and becoming

more formidable to Polotzk and Pskov, while Red Russia was a prey to

Hungarian domination and Polish interference. It was by invitation of

the latter power, in the person of Duke Lesko, that Mstislav undertook

to drive the Hungarians out of Galicia, and in consequence bade an

affectionate farewell to the people of Novgorod, the tomb of his

father, and the Cathedral of S. Sofia.

While foreign war flamed lurid in the west, a peaceable restoration

had been witnessed in the north-east, where Urii, on the death of

his brother Konstantin (1219), had come into possession of the Grand

Principality. In the north-west, again, important happenings were

forcing themselves disagreeably on the notice of the border princes.

Many causes contributed to complicate the struggle for mastery which

was beginning to be waged in the pagan-inhabited lands at the mouth

of the western Dvina and along the “Baltic gull-sought strand.” The

institution of the Crusades and the erection of the Latin kingdom of

Jerusalem had aroused a spirit of religious and temporal colonisation

and conquest, of which the seizure of Constantinople was a symptom,

while on the other hand the comparative failure of the Asiatic

expeditions and the recapture of Jerusalem by the Moslems had modified

the crusading fervour and disinclined the champions of the Cross to

seek adventures so far afield. Hence many Catholic princes and knights

were glad to avail themselves of the Papal permission to divert their

pious raids from the valley of the Jordan to the shores of the Baltic,

a more convenient locality, where they might gain, in addition to

their eternal salvation, welcome pieces of earthly territory. Danes,

Swedes, the Sword Brothers, and later (in 1230) the Teutonic Order,

fought indiscriminately with the native pagans, with the Russians,

and with themselves for the advancement of the Catholic religion and

of their own interests. Estland, Kourland, Livland, Lit’uania, and

Prussia became happy hunting-grounds for these various adventurers and

military companies, and the unfortunate inhabitants, confronted with

an _embarras du richesse_ in the way of spiritual guides, knew not

which way to turn for safety. A Tchoud notable was hanged by the Danes

for having received baptism from the Sword Order, and the Latin and

Orthodox Christians systematically destroyed each other’s churches and

settlements whenever they had the opportunity. Of the knights of the

two Orders, however, it may be said that the cruelties and oppressions

with which they sought to harry the heathen into their particular

fold were in some measure condoned by the splendid bravery and

devotion which they displayed in carrying out their self-imposed task.

Moreover, it was to these northern crusaders that the Baltic provinces

owed many of their most important towns: Riga was the creation of

the Knights of Jesus; Thorn, Kulm, and Elbing marked the rise of the

Teutonic Order; Revel sprang into existence under Danish auspices. It

was during a combat in the neighbourhood of the latter town that the

Danes received “from the clouds” the red flag blazoned with a white

cross which has since remained their national standard--a mark of

Divine favour which did not, however, cause the immediate withdrawal

of their Christian competitors. The cruelties and dissensions of the

invaders moved the inhabitants of Northern Livland to throw off the

Catholic yoke and call the citizens of Novgorod to their assistance,

propitiating them with a portion of the spoil they had wrested from the

Germans and Skandinavians. Novgorod, by a curious revulsion of feeling,

had, after a succession of princes of the house of Souzdal, elected

the same Yaroslav who had treated her people with such heartless

cruelty. Possibly, in the turn affairs were taking on their west, the

Novgorodskie saw an opportunity for employing his malignant genius

against their obnoxious enemies. But the warlike efforts of the men of

Lake Ilmen and their Souzdalian prince were neutralised by the fact

that the Germans, fighting behind the walls of their towns, were more

skilled in the handling of the slings and stone-hurling engines, the

rude artillery of the day; the old Russian proverb, “Who can resist God

and Velikie Novgorod?” had to be modified in the face of such weapons

of precision, and the Westerners remained masters of the greater part

of the disputed territories.

Two hundred years of unending domestic strife, carving and shredding

off into a crowd of incoherent provinces--Kiev, Tchernigov, Riazan,

Souzdal, Smolensk, Polotzk, Novgorod, Pskov, Volhynia, Galitz, and

others of less importance--had not fitted Russia to contend with the

expanding powers of Catholic Christendom, or to show a solid front

against the incursion of teeming Asiatic hordes on her east.

The Chronicles of Russian history at this period were wholly in the

hands of the monks who wrote them around the deeds of the princes or

of the luminaries of the Church; hence little can be gleaned from them

of the social life and condition of the people, who existed therein

solely for the purposes of supplying raw material for a massacre

or a pestilence. The history of Novgorod is valuable as yielding

occasional glimpses of the life-pulse that beat beneath the over-crust

of court or cathedral annals, but this city was too impregnated with

outside influences to furnish a faithful picture of the inward state

of old-time Russia. Of the towns it may be broadly stated that they

were yet little more in scope than walled villages; universities or

seats of learning other than the monkish cloister there were none, and

much of the trade was in the hands of foreign merchants. The wealthy

boyarins had their houses and palaces clustered within the walls, and

often possessed in addition other houses in the _sloboda_, or detached

village, without, where there was more space available for gardens,

etc. Freemen as well as slaves (the latter captured in war or bought)

were in their service, but the abject poverty of the lower classes of

freemen bound them in almost servile dependence on their masters. Even

more grinding was the normal state of poverty in which the peasants

eked out their livelihood, and the name _smerd_ applied to them was

one of contempt, something akin to our “rascallion.” For the most part

the peasants tilled the soil for the landowners under a system which

allowed them a half, or other fixed share, of the harvest produced,

the freeman having this distinction from the _kholop_ or bondman that

he was able to move from one estate to another at will. Under these

conditions of hand-to-mouth existence farm-craft remained at a very low

ebb; with axe, scythe, and plough the peasant won precarious roothold

for his crops, which might be blighted by an untimely frost-coming or

damaged by a too-late thaw, leaving him to propitiate his appeal-court

of saints by an involuntary emptiness of stomach. With cattle-stock,

horses, and horned beasts, the Russian lands, of the north especially,

were ill-provided, and possibly this was partly the outcome of the

unsettled state of the country, which discouraged the multiplication of

movable property, even the heaviest church bells being now and again

swept off in the wake of some pilfering kniaz-raid.[34]

FOOTNOTES:

[22] See Table I. for Grand Princes of Kiev.

[23] The affix _vitch_ signifies _son of_: Sviatoslavitch--son of

Sviatoslav.

[24] Vseslav Briatcheslavitch.

[25] “The Song of the Expedition of Igor.”

[26] Georg Pray.

[27] N. G. Riesenkampff, _Der Deutsche Hof zu Nowgorod_.

[28] Rambaud, _History of Russia_.

[29] See Table III. for house of Souzdal.

[30] Stribog was the Slavonic wind-god.

[31] Rendered into English partly from H. von Paucker’s German

translation, _Das Lied von der Heerfahrt Igor’s Fürsten von Seversk_,

and partly from a modernised Russian reproduction of the Slavonic text.

[32] Kadlubek, _Origine et rebus gestis Polonorum_.

[33] S. Solov’ev.

[34] Karamzin; S. Solov’ev; Schiemann; Kostomarov, _Sieverno Rousskiya

Narodopravstva_, _Chronique de Nestor_.

The Rise of the Russian Empire · 第 3 / 12 章